Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Martha Stewart CC010827-001 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£120Motor power:660 WBowl capacity:5 LNumber of speed levels:12Number of included attachments:3Weight:4.08 kg

Martha Stewart CC010827-001 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications and 1 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Martha Stewart CC010827-001
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

6.4

Technical score

15%

8.5

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

6.4

Reviews score

â–¼Worse than 57% of stand mixers
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–²Better than 66%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

7.0

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

7.1

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

8.5

Design

10%

9.3

Safety

â–¼Worse than 60%
6.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

6.4

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.4

Average grade

20%

5.0

Popularity

Grades by review (1)
1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
â–¼Worse than 78%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

8.2

Popularity

â–²Better than 50%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
  • martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
martha-stewart-cc010827-001
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Martha Stewart CC010827-001

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

7.0

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

7.1

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

8.5

Design

10%

9.3

Safety

6.4
Reviews score
6.4
User score
8.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

7.7
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
660 W
This stand mixer delivers 660 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 77.2% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.5% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
12
This stand mixer offers 12 speed levels, which is more speed settings than on 92.7% of stand mixers and equal to that on 5.3% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
5 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 5 L, which is larger than the mixing bowl of 34.8% of stand mixers and equal to that of 18.3% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
43 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 43 cm, which is taller than 91.4% of stand mixers and equal in height to 0.9% of stand mixers.
Width
26.5 cm
This stand mixer measures 26.5 cm in width, which is narrower than 58.5% of stand mixers.
Depth
16.93 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 16.93 cm, which is shallower than 98.6% of stand mixers.
Weight
4.08 kg
This stand mixer weighs 4.08 kg, which is lighter than 89.3% of stand mixers.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Overload protection
?
Safety locking system
?
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Martha Stewart CC010827-001 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 5 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (12 vs 7).
    12 vs 7
  • 14.4 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (16.9 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    16.93 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 45.6% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (4.1 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    4.08 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 10.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    8.2

    Popularity

    8.5 vs 7.7
  • 1.5 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (26.5 cm vs 28 cm).
    26.5 cm vs 28 cm
  • 75% cheaper
    Martha Stewart CC010827-001 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£120 vs £210).
    £120 vs £210
  • 3.5% better value for money
    Martha Stewart CC010827-001 has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.66 vs 7.4).
    7.66 vs 7.4
  • 10.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    8.2

    Popularity

    8.5 vs 7.7
  • 75% cheaper
    Martha Stewart CC010827-001 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£120 vs £210).
    £120 vs £210
  • 3.5% better value for money
    Martha Stewart CC010827-001 has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.66 vs 7.4).
    7.66 vs 7.4
  • 5 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (12 vs 7).
    12 vs 7
  • 14.4 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (16.9 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    16.93 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 45.6% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (4.1 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    4.08 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 1.5 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (26.5 cm vs 28 cm).
    26.5 cm vs 28 cm
  • 340 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (660 W vs 1,000 W).
    660 W vs 1,000 W
  • 8 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (43 cm vs 35 cm).
    43 cm vs 35 cm
  • 14.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    6.4

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.4

    Average grade

    20%

    5.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (1)
    1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    6.4 vs 7.5
  • 14.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    6.4

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.4

    Average grade

    20%

    5.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (1)
    1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    6.4 vs 7.5
  • 340 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (660 W vs 1,000 W).
    660 W vs 1,000 W
  • 8 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (43 cm vs 35 cm).
    43 cm vs 35 cm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Searching For Treasures (Laura)
≈ estimated
18/04/2026
Comparison · side-by-side with KitchenAid
Verdict
Martha Stewart CC010827-001 earns praise so far for its lighter build and splash guard, though it lacks the KitchenAid's attachment hub.
Overview video

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Martha Stewart CC010827-001

  • Affordable price compared to traditional all-metal models
  • Lightweight build making it easy to maneuver and lift from storage
  • Suction cups on the base provide solid counter stability
  • Dishwasher-safe mixing bowl and attachments allow fast cleanup
  • Generous 5.3-quart capacity with a convenient easy-grip bowl handle
  • Powerful 660-watt motor that excels at kneading thick doughs like bread
  • Intuitively located tilt-head release button and front-facing speed dial
  • Quiet motor operation during lighter mixing tasks
  • Effective removable splash guard with an integrated pour chute

What customers don't like about Martha Stewart CC010827-001

  • Plastic base construction feels less durable and more scratch-prone than steel models
  • The lightweight mixer head tends to bob or rattle when mixing chunky ingredients or creaming cold butter
  • Silicone-edge beater blade sometimes fails to scrape the sides cleanly, requiring manual intervention
  • Lacks a front hub expansion port for extra attachments (like a cheese grater or pasta roller)

Verdict

The Martha Stewart CC010827-001 is a 660-watt electric tilt-head stand mixer in a linen colorway, featuring a 120-volt motor and a spacious 5.3-quart stainless steel mixing bowl. Main characteristics and pros include its versatile 12 optimized speed settings, automated auto-shutoff functionality, and a lightweight 9-pound build that is highly maneuverable. It comes well-equipped with a splash guard with a pouring chute alongside dishwasher-safe accessories including a whisk, dough hook, and a flat silicone-edged beater that automatically scrapes the bowl. However, minor cons include a lightweight plastic body construction that lacks the premium feel of solid metal alternatives, a motor head that can rattle or experience jumpy starts on its lowest speed setting, and noticeable noise and vibrations when kneading heavy bread doughs.

Compare Martha Stewart CC010827-001 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Martha Stewart CC010827-001 and other stand mixers

No results found