OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Fitbit Versa Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180Screen size:1.34 inchBattery life:4 daysDisplay type:LCD

Fitbit Versa Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 21 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Technical score

30%

7.9

Review score ( 9 · 12)

Review score 30% · 7.9 · based on 21 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 21 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 55% of smartwatches
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components

24%

7.3

Health

21%

9.2

Fitness

16%

3.7

Battery

14%

6.0

Smart features

12%

3.1

Connectivity

9%

6.5

Display & Design

4%

3.6

Hardware

â–²Better than 51% of smartwatches
7.9

Review score

Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Grades by review (21)
9 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 6
✓ explicit
4

7.7%

8.4

techgearlab.com

7.7%

8.0

cnet.com

7.7%

8.0

techradar.com

7.7%

8.0

techadvisor.com

≈ estimated
2

7.7%

8.0

expertreviews.co.uk

6.2%

9.0

androidauthority.com

Video reviews 3

3.1%

9.0

Techy Agent

3.1%

8.0

MobileTechReview

3.1%

8.0

Engadget

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 61% of smartwatches
  • fitbit-versa
  • fitbit-versa
  • fitbit-versa
  • fitbit-versa
  • fitbit-versa
  • fitbit-versa
  • fitbit-versa
fitbit-versa
fitbit-versa
fitbit-versa
fitbit-versa
fitbit-versa
fitbit-versa
fitbit-versa

Best prices

    N/A~ £180

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fitbit Versa

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components:

24%

7.3

Health

21%

9.2

Fitness

16%

3.7

Battery

14%

6.0

Smart features

12%

3.1

Connectivity

9%

6.5

Display & Design

4%

3.6

Hardware

6.2
Review score
Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Grades by review (21)
9 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 6
✓ explicit
4

7.7%

8.4

techgearlab.com

7.7%

8.0

cnet.com

7.7%

8.0

techradar.com

7.7%

8.0

techadvisor.com

≈ estimated
2

7.7%

8.0

expertreviews.co.uk

6.2%

9.0

androidauthority.com

Video reviews 3

3.1%

9.0

Techy Agent

3.1%

8.0

MobileTechReview

3.1%

8.0

Engadget

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Fitbit Versa has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 70.7% of smartwatches.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

7.6
Brand name
Fitbit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Distance tracking may depend on phone GPS/app on some models.
Show more
Battery life
4 days
Battery life
4 days
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 4 days which is shorter than that of 70.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.9% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
12 h
Battery life in training mode
12 h
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 12 h in training mode which is shorter than 62.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
170 mAh
Battery power
170 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 170 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 93.2% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.2% of smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Fitbit OS
Operating system
Fitbit OS
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch runs Fitbit OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 57.6% of smartwatches and the same as that in 1% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.34 inch
Screen size
1.34 inch
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.34 inch which is smaller than the screens of 62.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1.3% of smartwatches.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This smartwatch uses a LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 90.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 7.4% of smartwatches.
Resolution
300x 300
Resolution
300x 300
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 300x300 which is lower than that of 61.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
317 ppi
Pixel density
317 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 317 ppi which is lower than that of 58.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.3% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nits
Display brightness
1,000 nits
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 1,000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 59.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
0.096 GHz
CPU speed
0.096 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.096 GHz which is slower than that in 90% of smartwatches and equal to that in 2% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Toshiba TZ1201XBG
Processor model
Toshiba TZ1201XBG
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
This smartwatch uses the Toshiba TZ1201XBG processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
4 GB
Internal storage
4 GB
â–² Better than 40% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 4 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 40.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 27% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Fitbit Versa vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
    Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Fitbit OS
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Fitbit OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Fitbit OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    1,000 nits
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (1000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • 15 °C higher max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    60.0 °C
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a higher maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (60 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    60.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • 5.6 mm shorter watch height
    Height
    39.4 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is shorter than the average smartwatch (39.4 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    39.4 mm vs 45 mm
  • 7 g lighter weight
    Weight
    38.0 g
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (38 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    38.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
    Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Fitbit OS
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Fitbit OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Fitbit OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No low-power mode
    Low power mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a low power mode, the average smartwatch does. 92.5% of smartwatches include a low power mode.
  • 6.12x less popular
    Fitbit Versa has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • 60 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    20
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (20 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 20 exercise modes.
    20 vs 80
  • No low-power mode
    Low power mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a low power mode, the average smartwatch does. 92.5% of smartwatches include a low power mode.
  • 3 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    4 days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 4 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    4 days vs 7 days
  • 130 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    170 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (170 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    170 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 7.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    12 h
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (12 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    12 h vs 19.25 h
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch supports an older Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • 0.06 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.34 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.34 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Less practical form
    Form
    square
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    300 x 300
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 300x300, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    300x300 vs 352x430
  • 2 mm wider band
    Width of band
    24.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a wider band width than the average smartwatch (24 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    24.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No camera remote
    Camera remote control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.6% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    Number of microphones
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch includes 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 3 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2018
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2018 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    April 2018
    2018 vs 2021
  • Slower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    0.096 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.096 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    0.096 GHz vs 1 GHz

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Techy Agent
≈ estimated
30/04/2018
Hands-on review · workouts, heart rate and music tests
Verdict
Fitbit Versa is highly recommended for fitness tracking; stiff bands and overestimated distance are minor drawbacks.
8.0
MobileTechReview
≈ estimated
12/04/2018
Hands-on review · display, app, sleep and heart rate tests
Verdict
Fitbit Versa is a good fitness band with an excellent heart rate sensor, but a weak choice as a full smartwatch.
8.0
Engadget
≈ estimated
26/03/2018
Hands-on review · design, fitness, app and battery tests
Verdict
Fitbit Versa is a cheaper, better-looking Fitbit that feels like a proper smartwatch, though it lacks built-in GPS and the base model has no NFC.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 11

Reviewers like the bright touchscreen, long battery and accurate tracking, but the lack of built-in GPS and limited notifications disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
11/03/2021
Hands-on review · Design and battery
Verdict
The Fitbit Versa suits everyday wearers who want a light, comfortable watch that lasts for days, but not those who need built-in GPS.
9.0
androidauthority.com
≈ estimated
04/03/2020
One-week review · Daily fitness
Verdict
The Fitbit Versa is a comfortable, bright fitness watch that lasts days on one charge, but it has fewer apps and smart features than Apple Watch or Wear OS.
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
≈ estimated
17/07/2019
Expert review · Sleep and battery
Verdict
The Fitbit Versa is a slim, comfortable watch with excellent battery life and detailed sleep data, but it lacks GPS and has limited smartwatch features.
8.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
12/07/2019
Feature overview · Health tracking
Verdict
The Fitbit Versa is a small watch that lasts four days and tracks health well, but it only suits people willing to carry their phone on runs.
uk.pcmag.com
05/06/2018
Not graded yet
8.0
cnet.com
✓ explicit
27/02/2026
Long-term review · Everyday smartwatch
Verdict
The Fitbit Versa is a light watch that lasts several days and handles notifications and fitness well, though it lacks the Apple Watch's tighter iPhone integration.
trustedreviews.com
27/07/2018
Not graded yet
8.0
ragnarheil.de
≈ estimated
23/08/2025
User review · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Fitbit Versa suits people who track many sports and sleep, lasting over four days, but it needs a phone for GPS and has a limited app selection.
glamupyourlifestyle.com
20/01/2019
Not graded yet
galaxus.de
16/04/2018
Not graded yet
nakan.ch
11/05/2018
Not graded yet
montre-cardio-gps.fr
04/06/2018
Not graded yet
tomsguide.fr
17/05/2018
Not graded yet
watchgeneration.fr
24/04/2018
Not graded yet
9.0
happinessmaker.fr
≈ estimated
08/07/2021
Personal review · Fitness and sleep
Verdict
The Fitbit Versa is a light, attractive watch that tracks steps, heart rate and sleep reliably, but by itself it won't get you moving more.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Fitbit Versa

  • Sleek and lightweight design that is comfortable for 24/7 wear
  • Excellent battery life, typically lasting 4 to 6+ days
  • Top-tier sleep tracking with detailed insights into sleep stages
  • Bright and high-quality OLED display that is easy to read in sunlight
  • Strong fitness ecosystem with accurate heart rate monitoring and diverse workout modes
  • Native support for female health tracking

What we don't like about Fitbit Versa

  • Lack of built-in GPS in original Versa and Versa 2 models (requires phone connection)
  • Limited third-party app ecosystem compared to Apple Watch or Wear OS
  • Proprietary charging cradles are often bulky and non-standard
  • Some essential health data and advanced features are paywalled behind Fitbit Premium
  • Syncing issues and notification delays reported by some Android users
  • Finicky strap-changing mechanism on certain models

Verdict

The Fitbit Versa is a lightweight fitness smartwatch featuring a square 1.34-inch color touchscreen with 300x300 pixel resolution and up to 1,000 nits of brightness. It comes equipped with a 3-axis accelerometer, 3-axis gyroscope, optical heart rate monitor, altimeter, and SpO2 sensor for comprehensive tracking of steps, sleep stages, and over 15 exercise modes. Key pros include a slim, comfortable design suitable for smaller wrists, water resistance up to 50 metres for swimming, and an impressive battery life that typically lasts 4 to 5 days on a single charge. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, which requires a paired smartphone for route tracking, and a bulky proprietary charging cradle.

Compare Fitbit Versa with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fitbit Versa and other Smartwatches

No results found