OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Fitbit Sense review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260Screen size:?Battery life:6 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Fitbit Sense Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 89 expert and video reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Fitbit Sense
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 58% of models
Score components

35%

7.1

Technical score

30%

7.1

List score

25%

7.1

Reviews score

10%

8.4

Sentiment score

▲Better than 58% of smartwatches
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

▼Worse than 51%
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

24%

8.2

Health

21%

8.9

Fitness

16%

4.5

Battery

14%

6.7

Smart features

12%

5.7

Connectivity

9%

7.2

Display & Design

4%

6.0

Hardware

▲Better than 64%
7.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 57% of models

7.1

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.5

Average grade

20%

9.6

Popularity

Grades by review (89)
48 reviews + 41 videos, average 7.4/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 57%
7.1

List score

List score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 119 lists (2%)
▲Better than 83%
  • fitbit-sense
  • fitbit-sense
  • fitbit-sense
  • fitbit-sense
  • fitbit-sense
  • fitbit-sense
  • fitbit-sense
  • fitbit-sense
fitbit-sense
fitbit-sense
fitbit-sense
fitbit-sense
fitbit-sense
fitbit-sense
fitbit-sense
fitbit-sense
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Fitbit Sense

Based on 10 · 12

The sharp display and heart monitoring impress, but sluggish performance and the extra subscription cost frustrate many reviewers.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Fitbit Sense

Based on 124 owners sharing their experience in online comments

42%positive9%mixed49%negative

Owners praise long battery life and health tracking, but inaccurate readings, software bugs, and reliability failures often sour the experience.

What owners dislike

  • Hard reset gets stuck on the Fitbit logo or shows a red X with "Data not cleared, sync and try again", often without a logged-in account to fix it.33
  • Owners say the screen lags, the side button is hard to use, and the watch drops its phone connection and freezes, sometimes once a day.11
  • Owners feel the price is too high for what is offered, with sleep and health data held behind a paid Premium subscription.10
  • Owners report heart rate readings that run well above or below a chest strap, especially during high-intensity workouts with sweaty skin.9
  • Owners say the watch disconnects from the phone, won't sync or pair, and setup takes hours, sometimes after a factory reset.9
  • Owners report the face cracking, the watch dying within a year or two, and warranty replacements failing again soon after.9
  • Owners say the battery drains quickly, sometimes lasting only a day or two instead of the advertised six days.7
  • Owners report step counts rising while sitting, sleeping, or driving, with thousands of extra steps logged.6
  • Owners say Fitbit support and warranty handling are poor, with refunds delayed and cracked-glass or replacement claims refused.6
  • Health data lacks useful explanations4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fitbit Sense

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components:

24%

8.2

Health

21%

8.9

Fitness

16%

4.5

Battery

14%

6.7

Smart features

12%

5.7

Connectivity

9%

7.2

Display & Design

4%

6.0

Hardware

7.1
Reviews score
7.1
List score
7.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.8
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
yes
This smartwatch supports ECG. 82.1% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 67.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
6 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 6 days on a charge, which is shorter than 64.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.6% of Smartwatches.
Up to 2 days with always-on.
Battery life in training mode
12 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 12 h on a charge, which is shorter than 64.7% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
10 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 10 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 76% of Smartwatches and the same as 4.7% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
213 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 213 mAh battery, which is smaller than 84.1% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Fitbit OS
This smartwatch runs Fitbit OS, which is more advanced than the system in 56.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.9% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
?
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
336x 336
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 336x336 which is lower than that of 54.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
301 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 301 ppi, which is lower than 65.3% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.8% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nit
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 1,000 nits, which is higher than 53.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 27% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Toshiba FBT18SW
This smartwatch uses the Toshiba FBT18SW processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
4 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 25.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Fitbit Sense vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.6% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Fitbit OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Fitbit OS vs Proprietary OS
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
    Water intake tracking may require manual logging in a companion app or widget.
  • Perspiration monitoring
    This smartwatch tracks perspiration, the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of smartwatches track perspiration.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.6% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 14 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (31 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    31.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    anodized aluminum case
    aluminum, stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 4.5 mm shorter case
    This smartwatch has a shorter case than the average smartwatch (40.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45.0 mm tall.
    40.5 mm vs 45.0 mm
  • 250 nits brighter screen
    This smartwatch has a brighter screen than the average smartwatch (1,000 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 750 nits
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Fitbit OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Fitbit OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 11 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    10 h vs 21 h
  • 40 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (10 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    1 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    10 m vs 50 m
  • 10.1% lower list score
    List score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 119 lists (2%)
    7.1 vs 7.9
  • 8 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (12 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    12 h vs 20 h
  • 92 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (213 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    213 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 70 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (20 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    Up to 20 workout shortcuts can be stored on the watch at once.
    20 vs 90
  • 10.1% lower list score
    List score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 119 lists (2%)
    7.1 vs 7.9
  • 2.36x more expensive
    Fitbit Sense is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£260 vs £110).
    £260 vs £110
  • 1 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    September 2020
    2,020 vs 2,021
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 70 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (20 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    Up to 20 workout shortcuts can be stored on the watch at once.
    20 vs 90
  • 11 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    10 h vs 21 h
  • 8 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (12 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    12 h vs 20 h
  • 92 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (213 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    213 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 1 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (6 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Up to 2 days with always-on.
    6 days vs 7 days
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 40 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (10 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    1 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    10 m vs 50 m
  • 0.65 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.4 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.35 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • 25 ppi less sharp screen
    This smartwatch has a less sharp screen than the average smartwatch (301 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    301 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 2 mm wider strap
    This smartwatch has a wider strap than the average smartwatch (24 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    Uses proprietary/non-standard band connector.
    24.0 mm vs 22 mm
  • No gesture control
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 79.6% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No camera remote
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.5% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.8
AbbyBReviewing
✓ explicit
24/08/2022
Hands-on review · sleep, ECG, calls and battery tests
Verdict
Fitbit Sense is worth it in 2022 if you stay in the Fitbit ecosystem, though it responds slowly and gets sweaty.
6.0
Serg Tech
≈ estimated
08/04/2022
Unboxing and review · hardware, battery, health and workout tests
Verdict
Fitbit Sense is a solid smartwatch with good features, but poor repair options make it a costly disposable.
8.0
Everyday Chris
≈ estimated
03/12/2021
Updated review · a year of use after software updates
Verdict
Fitbit Sense is much better after software updates, but the app is clunky and premium features cost extra.
4.0
The Quantified Scientist
≈ estimated
15/08/2021
Scientific test · heart rate accuracy over 94 workouts
Verdict
Fitbit Sense is still not recommended for heart rate tracking, though it has the most features in the Fitbit lineup.
6.0
Tech for Senior
≈ estimated
08/08/2021
Long-term review · six months of daily use
Verdict
Fitbit Sense is only worthwhile for people with heart concerns or stress-management needs; for others, its limited features do not justify buying.
9.0
The Quantified Scientist
≈ estimated
04/07/2021
Scientific sleep test · 11 nights against EEG device
Verdict
Fitbit Sense tracks sleep very accurately and is a clear recommendation if sleep tracking is your priority.
9.0
Hayls World
≈ estimated
17/01/2021
Feature walkthrough · unboxing, design, charging and apps
Verdict
Fitbit Sense is packed with useful features and a big step up in charging, sleep tracking and watch faces.
8.0
SmartWatch Ticks
≈ estimated
04/01/2021
App walkthrough · phone tethering app and preinstalled apps
Verdict
Fitbit Sense has a capable app with plenty of features, though preinstalled bloatware and paid streaming services are drawbacks.
5.0
The Product Reviewer
≈ estimated
03/01/2021
Hands-on review · features tour and comparison with Versa 3
Verdict
Fitbit Sense loses out to the cheaper Versa 3, since its extra sensors are not needed.
9.5
DIY Life Tech
≈ estimated
17/12/2020
Long-term test · two months of daily wear
Verdict
Fitbit Sense is the best fitness tracker watch on the market right now and the clear choice.
5.0
Simply Mander
≈ estimated
16/12/2020
Updated review · two months of daily use
Verdict
Fitbit Sense is a disappointing upgrade over the Versa 2; its side button and premium paywall are frustrating, so the cheaper Versa may suit better.
5.0
The Run Testers
≈ estimated
02/11/2020
Running review · two months of testing
Verdict
Fitbit Sense is a decent smartwatch for casual runners, but not recommended as a running watch.
More graded video reviews (11)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

5.0
dcrainmaker.com
≈ estimated
22/09/2020
In-depth review · Sensor data
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense packs more sensors than any earlier Fitbit, but its data is hard to trust and not clear enough to act on.
9.0
gq-magazine.co.uk
≈ estimated
06/10/2020
Hands-on review · Stress tracking
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is an attractive, comfortable smartwatch whose EDA stress sensor sets it apart, though it helps only if you act on its readings.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
16/10/2020
Full review · Feature-packed fitness watch
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a feature-packed fitness watch with built-in GPS, EDA stress sensing and good battery life, but it looks almost identical to the Versa 3.
8.0
stuff.tv
✓ explicit
23/10/2020
Hands-on test · Health tracking
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is an ambitious health watch with a great screen and six-day battery, but laggy software and freezes hold it back.
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
05/01/2021
Hands-on test · Health features
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a comfortable, good-looking health watch with stress and ECG tools, but its training features fall behind Garmin.
7.0
theguardian.com
≈ estimated
03/03/2021
Hands-on test · Sustainability focus
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a slim watch with a good ECG and screen, but it has no out-of-warranty repairs and its battery drains fast with always-on display.
7.6
radiotimes.com
✓ explicit
16/03/2021
Hands-on review · Stress tracking
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a sturdy, easy-to-use fitness watch with a six-day battery, but its glitchy setup and fixed watch faces let it down.
8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
30/01/2024
Review · Stress and wellbeing
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense suits anyone wanting to track stress and practise mindfulness, with built-in GPS and a comfortable strap, though many of its tools need Fitbit Premium.
6.0
cnet.com
≈ estimated
27/02/2026
Two-month test · Health and stress
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense suits anyone wanting an ECG and daily health data, though its stress readings feel vague and the Versa 3 covers most needs.
6.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
27/02/2026
Long-term test · Stress and oxygen
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense lasts up to a week and has a bright screen, but its new stress and blood oxygen tools are less helpful than they sound.
9.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
27/02/2026
Hands-on test · Health sensors
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense suits people who want health data, with an ECG app and stress tracking, though its sleep logging needed tweaking and always-on mode shortens battery life.
9.2
techgearlab.com
✓ explicit
27/02/2026
Hands-on test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense suits buyers who want detailed fitness and health tracking, but its touchscreen is less responsive and its smart features are only average.
6.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
21/01/2006
Hands-on test · Health tracking
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a well-built health watch with a clear screen and guided ECG checks, but its automatic workout detection and wrist-raise wake-ups can be frustrating.
8.4
01net.com
✓ explicit
20/11/2005
Field test · Health and stress
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a light, stylish health watch with a 30-second ECG and two-minute stress scan, though its GPS can be slow to lock on.
8.0
vonguru.fr
≈ estimated
20/11/2007
Daily-use test · Stress tracking
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is Fitbit's most complete watch, light and stress-focused, though it can't take a temperature on demand and its meditations are English-only.
5.0
diisign.com
≈ estimated
20/11/2020
Hands-on test · Health sensors
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a compact, well-built watch with a useful skin temperature sensor, but its software feels gimmicky and it lacks alerts.
6.0
tomshw.it
≈ estimated
22/10/2020
Hands-on test · Health sensors
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a strong health watch with accurate heart rate and GPS, but its SpO2 and skin temperature readings are hard to interpret.
8.0
dday.it
≈ estimated
16/11/2020
Hands-on review · Fitness companion
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a sensor-packed fitness companion whose best health insights depend on the Premium subscription.
7.0
andreagaleazzi.com
≈ estimated
07/11/2020
Personal review · Daily use
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is a solid fitness watch with many training modes and quick charging, but you can't control when its overnight readings are taken.
7.0
ilfattoquotidiano.it
≈ estimated
27/10/2020
Hands-on review · Health features
Verdict
The Fitbit Sense is an interesting health watch with a bright screen, but its slow, unresponsive navigation and limited software need work.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Fitbit Sense

  • Comprehensive health sensors (ECG, EDA for stress, skin temperature, SpO2)
  • Vibrant and bright AMOLED/OLED display with high readability
  • Long battery life (typically 5-6 days with always-on display disabled)
  • Slim, lightweight, and comfortable design for all-day wear
  • User-friendly and intuitive Fitbit mobile app interface
  • Effective and detailed sleep tracking and analysis
  • Built-in GPS for tracking outdoor activities without a phone
  • Fast charging capability (e.g., 1 day of battery in 12 minutes)

What customers don't like about Fitbit Sense

  • Significant features and long-term data history require a paid Fitbit Premium subscription
  • The capacitive 'button' is often unresponsive, awkwardly placed, or prone to accidental presses
  • Interface can be laggy and sluggish compared to competitors like Apple Watch
  • Limited third-party app ecosystem and lack of advanced smartwatch functionalities
  • Unreliable step counting and occasional GPS accuracy issues on complex routes
  • Limited notification interaction for iOS users (cannot reply to messages)
  • Concerns over durability and lack of official out-of-warranty repair options
  • Raise-to-wake feature can be slow or inconsistent

Verdict

The Fitbit Sense is a premium health-focused smartwatch featuring a 1.58-inch AMOLED display, built-in GPS, and a 6-day battery life (dropping to approximately 2 days with always-on mode). Its standout characteristics include an advanced sensor suite for ECG heart rhythm assessment, SpO2 blood oxygen monitoring, and a dedicated EDA (electrodermal activity) scan for stress management, alongside on-wrist skin temperature tracking. Key pros include its sleek stainless steel design, vibrant screen, and comprehensive wellness insights, though its cons include a non-intuitive haptic side button, software lag, and the fact that many advanced health metrics and historical data require a paid Fitbit Premium subscription.

Compare Fitbit Sense with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fitbit Sense and other Smartwatches

No results found