Google Pixel 4 (6GB + 64GB) review. Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among smartphones and if it's worth buying.
Overall score
What it is: An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score components:
90.0%
Technical Score
10.0%
User score
Technical Score
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
User score
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.
#22 in Best Google Phones
#30 in Best Smartphones Under £100
#47 in Best Compact Smartphones
#198 in Best Camera Smartphones
#232 in Best Smartphones Under £200
#365 in Best Smartphones Under £250
#486 in Best Smartphones Under £300
#625 in Best Smartphones Under £400
#689 in Best NFC Smartphones
#698 in Best Android Smartphones
#713 in Best Smartphones Under £500
#742 in Best AI Smartphones
#744 in Best Smartphones
#1223 in Best Value Smartphones
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
What it is: An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters: When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score components:
60.0%
Overall score
40.0%
Price
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3.2 GHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >1500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >4000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 8+
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >950 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >700
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >2500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >6000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8000
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >5000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1800
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3200 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 5
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: > 50 GB/s
Importance: LOW
Good value: 4
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >16 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <6 nm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >9 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >8192 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >2048 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >512 KB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >100000 million
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.3
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.2
Importance: LOW
Good value: 2.0/3.0
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >50 MP
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥1.2 µm
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2.5x
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >16 MP
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >130
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >120
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >5.2
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.1/3.2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >400 ppi
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >300 Hz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1300 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <45 min
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >40 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >10 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥3
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: <162 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <75 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <8 mm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <190 g
Importance: LOW
Good value: <98cm³
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥1.5 m
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2.5x
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥3
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >950 MHz
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800
(Reviews last updated: August 2026)
(Reviews last updated: August 2026)
In a 60-day re-review, Hardware Canucks characterizes the Google Pixel 4 as a polarizing device, praising its top-tier software experience and exceptional camera performance. The device is highlighted for its clean Android interface, useful AI features, and the impressive "Astrophotography" mode, which remains a key selling point despite hardware limitations. Hardware CanucksHowever, the review criticizes the hardware for lagging behind 2019 competitors, specifically citing the lack of an ultra-wide camera, slow 18W charging, and insufficient 64GB base storage. Furthermore, the 90Hz "Smooth Display" is noted for its inconsistent refresh rate, and the battery life is described as a major drawback. The final verdict advises against purchasing the smaller Pixel 4 due to its "terrible" battery, recommending the larger Pixel 4 XL only for users prioritizing camera performance. Ultimately, the review deems the phone's launch price too high, suggesting it is only worth buying after significant price reductions.
Ben Sin's Forbes review describes the 2019 Google Pixel 4 as a device with exceptional software, a superior 90Hz OLED screen, and an industry-leading camera, particularly with improved Night Sight. However, the review highlights critical, "user-hostile" hardware limitations, including poor battery life from the 2,800 mAh cell and the lack of an ultra-wide lens. Ultimately, while the refined Android 10 experience and build quality are praised, the, 64GB base storage and subpar battery make it hard to recommend over competitors.
Rene Ritchie's review for iMore highlights the Google Pixel 4’s cohesive design, praising its matte finish, fast Face Unlock, and smooth 90Hz display, which marks a shift toward a more Apple-like, "singular object" feel. While the computational photography, particularly the Super Res Zoom and live HDR+ preview, is described as industry-leading, the review points out the lack of an ultra-wide lens and the absence of 4K 60fps video as significant cons. Despite these strengths, the device is considered hard to recommend due to poor battery life, limited utility from the Soli-powered Motion Sense, and a reliance on aggressive, often frustrating power management.
The TechRadar review describes the Google Pixel 4 as a powerful, compact flagship with a phenomenal rear camera system featuring Astrophotography and Live HDR+. Key pros include a smooth 90Hz OLED display, clean Android 10 software, and excellent AI-powered imaging performance. However, the device is significantly limited by a small 2,800mAh battery that struggles to last a full day. TechRadarThe phone's design relies on face unlock rather than a fingerprint scanner, and the innovative Motion Sense radar gestures are deemed limited in practical, daily use. While the Snapdragon 855 chipset provides strong performance, the, 64GB base storage is considered low for a flagship, and it lacks the previously offered free unlimited original-quality photo storage. Ultimately, the Pixel 4 is recommended for users prioritizing camera capabilities over battery longevity, according to the analysis. Its combination of excellent camera performance and mediocre battery life makes it a highly specialized, rather than general, recommendation. TechRadar
According to CNBC, the Google Pixel 4 offers an excellent camera, a smooth 90Hz display, and fast Face Unlock, but it falls short of competitors due to poor battery life and a lack of a wide-angle lens. While praising the software and unique Soli radar features, the review notes the phone lacks a headphone jack, offers limited storage, and feels expensive for what it delivers. Ultimately, the review suggests consumers consider the Pixel 3a or iPhone 11 instead. CNBC
The Google Pixel 4 is reviewed as a device balancing high-end features with notable drawbacks. Pros include a class-leading camera with sophisticated AI and astrophotography mode, and a 90Hz Smooth Display P-OLED screen. Cons are the small 2,800mAh battery, a large top bezel, and the removal of the fingerprint scanner in favor of Face Unlock which lacked initial app support. For more details, visit 3G.co.uk.
According to an ITPro review, the Google Pixel 4 is a "clever little phone" with outstanding camera performance and a smooth software experience, featuring a 90Hz display and useful apps like the Recorder. However, these positives are significantly hampered by poor battery life, the absence of a fingerprint sensor in favor of facial recognition, and a modest 64GB of base storage. The review concludes that while the Pixel 4 offers "market-leading software," fundamental issues like battery life and the removal of the fingerprint sensor prevent it from being a clear recommendation, suggesting the more affordable Pixel 3a might offer a better balance. Google Pixel 4£180.00& more prices4.1(1.2k)Google Pixel 3a£189.99& more prices4.6(1.8k)
Wired reviewed the Google Pixel 4, finding it powerful due to Google's software but hampered by hardware issues, citing the pure Android 10 experience, 90Hz display, and Titan M security chip as pros, along with exclusive apps like Recorder. The review highlighted the camera's second telephoto lens and computational photography features like Live HDR+ and Night Sight with Astrophotography as strengths, but noted the lack of an ultra-wide lens as a con. Significant flaws included mediocre battery life, gimmicky Motion Sense gestures, the removal of the fingerprint sensor, and limited 64GB storage without an SD slot.
According to a 2019 review, the Pixel 4 is a solid but ultimately underwhelming "software-first" device with pros including a bright OLED screen, an excellent camera system with a new telephoto lens, and innovative software like automatic voice recorder transcription. However, significant cons include a less secure face scanner compared to the iPhone and a lack of hardware versatility found in competing flagship devices. The review concludes that while the Pixel 4 is best for those prioritizing pure Google software, its price and lack of hardware innovation make it difficult to recommend over rivals.
The Google Pixel 4 is described as having potential but is hindered by poor battery life. Pros include an excellent camera, a 90Hz display, and a compact design, while cons include a lack of third-party Face Unlock support and insufficient screen brightness for direct sunlight. The Guardian concluded that even the lower price couldn't compensate for a phone that struggles to last a full day.
The Google Pixel 4 features a significant design update and a notable 90Hz OLED display. It continues Google's strong camera performance with a new dual-lens setup and exclusive software features like Motion Sense and a real-time transcription Recorder app. However, the device is criticized for limited storage options (max 128GB) and a battery life that falls short of many modern flagships, despite powerful hardware.
Engadget describes the 2019 Google Pixel 4 and 4 XL as ambitious, high-performance devices held back by significant hardware compromises. Pros include a 90Hz "Smooth Display," a fast Face Unlock system using Soli radar, and a refined design with a matte finish. The camera remains a highlight, featuring excellent zoom capabilities, astrophotography mode, and industry-leading software features like on-device Assistant and a real-time transcription recorder. Conversely, critical cons include disappointing battery life that struggles to last a full day and the limited utility of Motion Sense gestures, which do not justify the thick top bezel. The camera setup lacks an ultra-wide-angle lens, and the device removes the secondary wide-angle selfie camera. Additionally, the 64GB base storage and absence of a headphone jack or bundled earbuds detract from the overall value proposition.
According to a review, the Google Pixel 4 XL is an ambitious device prioritizing user experience with a 90Hz "Smooth Display" and fast Face Unlock, enhanced by the Soli radar chip for Motion Sense gestures. While its camera excels at still photos with a new telephoto lens and software like Live HDR+, it notably lacks an ultra-wide lens and struggles with mediocre video quality. Practical drawbacks include middling battery life, limited 64GB base storage without free original-quality Google Photos backups, and a high launch price, making it a challenging recommendation despite a cohesive software experience.
After six months, the Google Pixel 4 is lauded for its top-tier camera performance, featuring advanced computational photography, Night Sight, and a fluid 90Hz display, all within a compact, one-handed form factor. The device boasts a clean, fast Android experience with exclusive, useful features, though it lacks an Conversely, the review highlights significant drawbacks, most notably the poor battery life from the 2,800mAh cell, which struggles to last a full day. Furthermore, the lack of a fingerprint sensor and limited 64GB or 128GB non-expandable storage are noted as major, Ultimately, the device is considered a "divisive" choice that shines in software and camera capabilities but is severely hindered by limited battery stamina. While the Motion Sense technology offers innovative, if somewhat gimmicky, features, the constant requirement to charge limits its appeal as a versatile long-term device.
The Google Pixel 4 features an excellent 90Hz OLED "Smooth Display," advanced AI-driven software, and a top-tier dual-camera system with a dedicated Astrophotography mode. However, the device is significantly hindered by an underwhelming 2,800mAh battery that struggles to last a full day, alongside the lack of an ultra-wide-angle lens. Ultimately, it is positioned as a niche device for enthusiasts prioritizing camera and software over hardware longevity.
The Google Pixel 4 is highlighted by NextPit as a technically impressive, compact Android device featuring a superior 90Hz "Smooth Display," a clean Android 10 interface, and innovative Motion Sense radar gestures. Camera performance is a strong point, with new software capabilities like Dual Exposure and Astrophotography, though the lack of a wide-angle lens in favor of a telephoto sensor is noted as a drawback. Despite these strengths, the phone's "appalling" battery life, stemming from a small 2,800 mAh cell and power-intensive features, makes it difficult to recommend for average users.
Der Spiegel reviews the Google Pixel 4 and 4 XL as ambitious devices excelling in software and photography, featuring a new 16MP telephoto lens and exceptional Night Sight. Pros include a 90Hz "Smooth Display" and advanced Soli radar for facial recognition. However, critical cons include a 2,800mAh battery that fails to last a full day, the lack of an ultra-wide lens, and inconsistent gesture controls. While praised for its "pure Android" experience and camera quality, the review finds the hardware compromises make it a difficult recommendation at its price point.
The Google Pixel 4 is a compact, high-speed flagship offering a smooth experience powered by the Snapdragon 855, 6GB of RAM, and a 90Hz display. Its premium matte glass design is paired with innovative, albeit niche, features like Face Unlock and Motion Sense. While the camera, now featuring a 16MP telephoto lens, delivers industry-leading low-light performance with Night Sight and Astrophotography, the absence of an ultra-wide lens is a notable drawback. The primary drawback is the very poor battery life from the 2,800mAh cell, compounded by a large top bezel, lack of a fingerprint sensor, and limited base storage.
The Google Pixel 4 is characterized by exceptional camera performance paired with critical, debilitating battery issues, according to a review by Android MT (Ouest-France). Praised for its 90Hz OLED display, compact form factor, and fast Motion Sense face unlock, the device is held back by a 2,800 mAh battery that often fails to last a full day. While the telephoto lens and photography capabilities received a 10/10 rating, the lack of an ultra-wide camera, missing headphone jack, and limited storage options in France limit its overall appeal.
The Google Pixel 4 is a technologically advanced, compact Android device featuring a 90Hz OLED display, a high-performing Snapdragon 855 processor, and a superior dual-camera system. Its key strengths include clean software, fast face unlock, and innovative, albeit underutilized, radar-based Motion Sense features. However, the device is severely limited by a small 2,800 mAh battery that fails to last a full day, along with a lack of an ultra-wide lens and a dated forehead bezel. Despite its excellent display and camera, the poor battery life makes it hard to recommend, as highlighted in the 100-day follow-up which deemed the endurance issues unworkable.
According to Numerama, the Google Pixel 4 excels as a photography powerhouse, featuring a 90Hz OLED "Smooth Display" and the intuitive Android 10 experience. The device boasts superior imaging capabilities, including a 16MP telephoto lens, Night Sight, and specialized Astrophotography mode. What Hi-Fi? +3However, the review highlights significant drawbacks, most notably poor battery life from the small 2,800mAh cell. Other cons include the lack of an ultra-wide camera, high initial price, and inconsistent performance of the new radar-based Motion While considered a strong "good" smartphone, the Pixel 4 is ultimately deemed a "compromised" device for daily use, hindered by the lack of a fingerprint sensor and limited storage options.
Journal du Geek’s review of the Google Pixel 4 highlights a device defined by a superior 90Hz OLED display, a compact, ergonomic design, and a top-tier camera, yet severely limited by its hardware. The camera is praised for its "imaging wizardry," offering excellent low-light capabilities, alongside quick 3D face unlock and a refined, pure Android experience.
The Google Pixel 4 delivers exceptional performance and high-quality photography, but suffers from significant durability issues, according to a review from Que Choisir. While the device boasts a top-tier camera and improved scratch resistance compared to its predecessors, it failed to survive the organization's drop tests. The review concludes that the phone's extreme fragility makes it a risky choice despite its technical prowess. UFC-Que Choisir
Mathieu Flaig's one-month review of the Google Pixel 4 highlights the device's improved design, featuring a matte finish and a 90Hz display, while praising the fast, reliable Face Unlock. The camera is lauded for its new telephoto lens, dual exposure controls, and superior Night Sight capability, paired with a clean Android 10 software experience. Conversely, the review identifies critical drawbacks, specifically poor, non-all-day battery life, gimmicky Motion Sense gestures, and the absence of an ultra-wide lens.
iGen’s review of the Google Pixel 4 highlights a "bittersweet" experience, praising the stellar camera performance—particularly the "Night Sight" mode—and the fast Face Unlock system. The 90Hz "Smooth Display" is also noted as a major advantage, offering a responsive user interface. However, the device is heavily criticized for its disappointing, short-lived 2,800mAh battery and the lack of an ultra-wide-angle camera lens. Additionally, the design feels dated due to the large top bezel, and the Motion Sense radar feature is deemed more of a novelty Describing the device as a "work in progress," the review suggests that despite its innovations, the, Pixel 4 is hard to recommend over competitors like the OnePlus 7T due to these significant drawbacks.
The Phonandroid review of the Google Pixel 4 highlights a device defined by contrasting, cutting-edge software and significant hardware compromises. Pros include the fluid Android 10 experience, a responsive 90Hz OLED "Smooth Display," and exceptional computational photography powered by the 8x Super Res Zoom, Night Sight, and Astrophotography modes. However, the device is hindered by the lack of an ultra-wide-angle lens and no 4K/60fps video recording. The most critical flaw identified is the underwhelming 2,800mAh battery, which frequently fails to last a full day. Additionally, while innovative, the Motion Sense radar gestures and Face Unlock face limited third-party app support at launch. The design, featuring a large top bezel, and the removal of the fingerprint sensor are also noted Ultimately, the Pixel 4 is presented as a camera-centric, compact smartphone with top-tier performance that is hampered by its poor stamina. Despite its,, advanced software features, the hardware limitations, particularly regarding battery, prevent it from competing with other 2019 flagships.
The Presse-Citron review of the Google Pixel 4 highlights a premium, compact design with a matte finish and an exceptionally fluid 90Hz "Smooth Display". Key strengths include a top-tier dual-camera system featuring improved Night Sight, astrophotography, and 2x optical zoom, alongside advanced software features like Motion Sense gestures and fast 3D Face Unlock. Conversely, the review identifies significant flaws, primarily the poor battery life from the 2,800mAh cell, the absence of an ultra-wide lens, and limited For the full analysis, read the review at Presse-Citron.
Le Figaro’s review of the Google Pixel 4 highlights a device that fails to meet high expectations, with significant disappointments regarding battery life and, at a price of 769 euros, a difficult-to-justify value proposition. While praised for its exceptional photography—featuring advanced astrophotography and dual exposure controls—and a fluid 90Hz display, the device suffers from a "comically poor" battery and gimmicky Motion Sense radar, according to the review. The review concludes that despite improvements in face unlock and photo quality, the lack of an ultra-wide lens and 4K/60fps support makes the Pixel 4 less versatile than its competition.
The Google Pixel 4 is a compact, comfortable flagship featuring a 5.7-inch OLED screen with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate, though its design is hindered by large top bezels. Its standout camera system offers exceptional photo quality, including advanced Night Sight and a 16MP telephoto lens, yet lacks an ultra-wide-angle option for added versatility. Critically, the device is severely limited by a 2,800mAh battery that struggles to last a full day under moderate use.
The Google Pixel 4, as reviewed by Frandroid, is lauded for its "Android lover's dream" software, excellent 90Hz "Smooth Display" OLED panel, and exceptional camera performance featuring Night Sight and Astrophotography. However, the device suffers from significant drawbacks, most notably poor battery life from its small 2,800mAh capacity, a dated design with a large top bezel, and the omission of an ultra-wide lens. Ultimately, while featuring advanced tech like Face Unlock and Motion Sense, the Pixel 4 is described as a compromised device, making it difficult to recommend over competitors due to its fundamental hardware limitations.
The Google Pixel 4 is characterized as a premium, compact device featuring a superior 90Hz OLED display and innovative, though sometimes impractical, features like Motion Sense radar and Face Unlock. Key pros include a refined design and top-tier software integration. The camera system, featuring a 12.2MP main sensor and 16MP telephoto lens, offers industry-leading performance, particularly with its Night Sight and astrophotography modes. However, the lack of an ultra-wide-angle lens is a notable shortcoming. The most significant cons, according to the review, are the underwhelming 2,800 mAh battery that often fails to last a full day, the absence of a fingerprint sensor, and limited base storage.
The TechRadar review describes the Google Pixel 4 as a device defined by its stellar camera and frustratingly low battery life. Pros include the 90Hz "Smooth Display," fast performance with 6GB of RAM, and superior, AI-driven photo quality featuring a new astrophotography mode. Conversely, significant cons are the small 2,800mAh battery, the lack of an ultra-wide lens, and gimmicky Motion Sense radar gestures. While offering a clean, fast Android experience, the phone's limited storage and high price relative to its hardware make it hard to recommend over competitors.
The DDay.it review highlights the Google Pixel 4 as a device defined by high ambitions and significant compromises, showcasing the innovative Soli radar sensor for Motion Sense gestures and ultra-fast 3D Face Unlock. Key positives include the 90Hz "Smooth Display" and a matte design that provides excellent grip, while the software experience and AI-driven features, such as the Recorder app, are lauded. However, the device is heavily criticized for poor battery life, with the 2,800mAh cell struggling to last a full day, alongside a disappointing lack of an ultra-wide camera lens. Despite its exceptional still photography and Night Sight capabilities, the lack of a fingerprint sensor and limited 64GB base storage make it a difficult recommendation.
Andrea Galeazzi describes the Google Pixel 4 as a "love and hate" device, praising its compact ergonomics, satin-finished glass, and vibrant 90Hz OLED display. The user experience is highlighted by a clean Android 10 interface and a reliable 3D face unlock system. However, the device is criticized for lacking an ultra-wide camera lens and a 3.5mm headphone jack. The camera system is considered a standout feature, with the 12MP main sensor and 2X telephoto lens delivering high-quality, software-driven images, particularly in low-light conditions. Despite the strong performance, Galeazzi emphasizes the extremely poor battery life from the 2,800 mAh cell as a major drawback, often failing to last through a full day of heavy use. Ultimately, while the software experience and camera quality are positive, the hardware compromises—specifically the limited battery and lack of storage expansion—lead to a mixed recommendation. Due to these, he suggests the Pixel 4a may be a more sensible alternative.
The Wired Italy review of the Google Pixel 4 emphasizes a strong focus on artificial intelligence, featuring Motion Sense radar for gesture control and face unlock, alongside the "purest" Android experience. While praising the advanced computational photography, including a new telephoto lens, Live HDR+, and a fluid 90Hz display, the review highlights critical drawbacks such as poor battery life, low screen brightness, and the absence of an ultra-wide-angle lens. Ultimately, the Pixel 4 is characterized as a device offering high-end, intelligent software functionality but lagging behind in essential, modern hardware capabilities.
The Google Pixel 4 is a compact, high-performance flagship featuring a 90Hz OLED "Smooth Display," excellent build quality with a matte finish, and a powerful Snapdragon 855 processor. Its standout camera system offers industry-leading still photography, including advanced Night Sight and Astrophotography modes, while introducing radar-based Motion Sense gestures. However, the device is significantly limited by poor battery life from its 2,800mAh cell, lacks an ultra-wide camera, and features a 64GB base storage option without expansion.
The Google Pixel 4 review highlights a device excelling in software and photography, featuring an industry-leading 16MP camera with Night Sight and a 90Hz "Smooth Display". Key advantages include fast 3D Face Unlock, innovative Motion Sense radar gestures, and a clean Android 10 experience. However, the device is heavily criticized for severe battery limitations, lacking an ultra-wide lens, and featuring low maximum screen brightness. Despite its compact design, the 64GB base storage and high price make it difficult to recommend over rivals, particularly due to the poor battery life. What Hi-Fi? +2
The Google Pixel 4 is a "pragmatist's flagship" featuring a 5.7-inch, 90Hz OLED "Smooth Display" and a Snapdragon 855 chipset with 6GB of RAM, prioritizing a clean software experience and high-quality photography. Its camera capabilities are a major pro, offering exceptional low-light, point-and-shoot results, a 2x telephoto lens, and an "astrophotography" mode. Additionally, the phone boasts a solid, easy-to-grip design with a rubberized frame and integrates "Soli" radar technology for motion-sense gestures. Significant drawbacks include a "frustratingly short" battery life due to a small 2,800mAh capacity that often fails to last a full day. The device is further hindered by the removal of a fingerprint scanner in favor of an occasionally finicky face unlock system and the limited utility of motion-sense gestures. Furthermore, critics note the lack of an ultra-wide lens and limited storage options (starting at 64GB) as drawbacks compared to 2019 competitors. TechRadar
The Tweakers review highlights the Google Pixel 4 and 4 XL as a bold, camera-focused, but ultimately flawed attempt to push "ambient computing" through innovative sensors like Soli radar for Motion Sense. Key positives include the exceptionally smooth 90Hz display, superior computational photography, and fast Face Unlock, though the design features a polarizing large top bezel. The devices suffer from critical drawbacks, most notably poor battery life on the smaller 2800mAh model, combined with relatively slow 18W charging and no expandable storage. While the camera, software, and screen are considered top-tier, these limitations make the high price point difficult to justify for average users, according to the analysis.
Compare
