OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Portable Air Conditioners Methodology v1.0
Portable Air Conditioners Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Portable Air Conditioners Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Portable Air Conditioners Methodology v1.0

Electrolux WP71-265WT Review | 44 Data compared

Avg. price:~£340Cooling capacity:9000 BTU/hMaximum room size:25 m²Maximum noise level:64 dBHeating function:yesCooling Energy Efficiency Class:A+

Electrolux WP71-265WT Review: Compare 44 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Portable Air Conditioners category and whether it is worth buying.

Electrolux WP71-265WT
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of products in the Portable Air Conditioners category, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best products in the Portable Air Conditioners category.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

80%

6.5

Technical score

20%

7.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 71% of portable air conditioners
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the overall score of products in the Portable Air Conditioners category with their prices.
When it matters
When you are comparing products in the Portable Air Conditioners category and want a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 75%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Portable Air Conditioners category across these key areas: Performance, Features, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare products in the Portable Air Conditioners category by technical performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

55%

5.4

Performance

30%

8.0

Features

15%

7.3

Design

â–¼Worse than 66%
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Portable Air Conditioners category.
When it matters
When you want to know how products in the Portable Air Conditioners category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 87%
  • electrolux-wp71-265wt
  • electrolux-wp71-265wt
  • electrolux-wp71-265wt
  • electrolux-wp71-265wt
  • electrolux-wp71-265wt
  • electrolux-wp71-265wt
  • electrolux-wp71-265wt
  • electrolux-wp71-265wt
electrolux-wp71-265wt
electrolux-wp71-265wt
electrolux-wp71-265wt
electrolux-wp71-265wt
electrolux-wp71-265wt
electrolux-wp71-265wt
electrolux-wp71-265wt
electrolux-wp71-265wt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of portable air conditioner Electrolux WP71-265WT

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Portable Air Conditioners category across these key areas: Performance, Features, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare products in the Portable Air Conditioners category by technical performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components:

55%

5.4

Performance

30%

8.0

Features

15%

7.3

Design

6.5
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Portable Air Conditioners category.
When it matters
When you want to know how products in the Portable Air Conditioners category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by products in the Portable Air Conditioners category.
When it matters
When you prefer products in the Portable Air Conditioners category that have been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Popularity:
Electrolux WP71-265WT has a popularity score of 6.4 points, which is higher than 53.7% of products in this category.
6.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the overall score of products in the Portable Air Conditioners category with their prices.
When it matters
When you are comparing products in the Portable Air Conditioners category and want a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

6.9
Cooling capacity
9,000 BTU/h
Market range: <7k BTU/h – >12k BTU/h
This portable air conditioner delivers 9,000 BTU/h cooling capacity, which is higher than that of 26.6% of portable air conditioners and equal to that of 30.3% of portable air conditioners.
Rated input power
?
Cooling Energy Efficiency Class
A+
This portable air conditioner has cooling energy efficiency class A+, which ranks higher than 89.9% of portable air conditioners and equal to 8.9% of portable air conditioners.
Heating energy efficiency class
A+
This portable air conditioner has heating energy efficiency class A+, which ranks higher than 50% of portable air conditioners and equal to 37.5% of portable air conditioners.
Number of speeds
3
Market range: <0 – >5
This portable air conditioner offers 3 fan speeds, which is more than 36.8% of portable air conditioners and equal to 61.1% of portable air conditioners.
Show more
Fan-only mode
yes
This portable air conditioner includes a fan-only mode. 99.5% of portable air conditioners support this mode.
Airflow direction control
automatic
This portable air conditioner provides automatic airflow direction control, which ranks higher than 47.3% of portable air conditioners and equal to 52.7% of portable air conditioners.
Night mode
no
This portable air conditioner does not include a dedicated night mode. 74.3% of portable air conditioners offer night mode.
Timer
yes
This portable air conditioner includes a built-in timer. 99.5% of portable air conditioners feature a timer.
Maximum timer duration
24 hours
Market range: <0 hours – >25 hours
This portable air conditioner supports a timer of up to 24 hours, which is longer than that of 7.4% of portable air conditioners and equal to that of 92.6% of portable air conditioners.
Show more
Color
white
Display
yes
This portable air conditioner includes an integrated display. 99.5% of portable air conditioners feature a display.
Control type
physical
Remote control
yes
This portable air conditioner comes with a remote control. 99% of portable air conditioners include a remote.
Handles
yes
This portable air conditioner includes built-in handles for easier carrying. 99.5% of portable air conditioners feature handles.
Show more

Electrolux WP71-265WT vs the average portable air conditioner

246810TotalPerformanceFeaturesDesign
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This portable air conditioner supports Wi-Fi, the average portable air conditioner does not.
  • Higher cooling energy efficiency class
    This portable air conditioner has a better cooling energy efficiency class than the average portable air conditioner (A+ vs A).
    A+ vs A
  • Supports voice control
    This portable air conditioner supports voice control, the average portable air conditioner does not.
  • Provides heating
    This portable air conditioner provides heating, the average portable air conditioner does not.
  • 7.4% more popular
    Electrolux WP71-265WT is more popular than the average portable air conditioner (6.45 vs 6).
    6.45 vs 6.01
  • 2.9% cheaper
    Electrolux WP71-265WT is cheaper than the average portable air conditioner (£340 vs £350).
    £340 vs £350
  • 7.4% more popular
    Electrolux WP71-265WT is more popular than the average portable air conditioner (6.45 vs 6).
    6.45 vs 6.01
  • 2.9% cheaper
    Electrolux WP71-265WT is cheaper than the average portable air conditioner (£340 vs £350).
    £340 vs £350
  • Higher cooling energy efficiency class
    This portable air conditioner has a better cooling energy efficiency class than the average portable air conditioner (A+ vs A).
    A+ vs A
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This portable air conditioner supports Wi-Fi, the average portable air conditioner does not.
  • Supports voice control
    This portable air conditioner supports voice control, the average portable air conditioner does not.
  • Provides heating
    This portable air conditioner provides heating, the average portable air conditioner does not.
  • No night mode
    This portable air conditioner does not include a night mode, while the average portable air conditioner does.
  • 1 °C higher minimum temperature
    This portable air conditioner has a higher minimum temperature setting than the average portable air conditioner (17 °C vs 16 °C).
    17 °C vs 16 °C
  • 37.6% higher weight
    This portable air conditioner is heavier than the average portable air conditioner (35.1 kg vs 25.5 kg).
    35.1 kg vs 25.5 kg
  • 8.4 l/24 h lower dehumidification capacity
    This portable air conditioner offers lower moisture removal than the average portable air conditioner (24 l/24 h vs 32.4 l/24 h).
    24 l/24 h vs 32.4 l/24 h
  • 2 °C lower maximum temperature
    This portable air conditioner has a lower maximum temperature setting than the average portable air conditioner (30 °C vs 32 °C).
    30 °C vs 32 °C
  • 24 cm taller cabinet
    This portable air conditioner is taller than the average portable air conditioner (95 cm vs 71 cm).
    95 cm vs 71 cm
  • 7 dB louder minimum operation
    This portable air conditioner is louder at minimum output than the average portable air conditioner (58 dB vs 51 dB).
    Lowest stated operating noise.
    58 dB vs 51 dB
  • 30 m³/h lower high-speed airflow
    This portable air conditioner delivers lower high-speed airflow than the average portable air conditioner (320 m³/h vs 350 m³/h).
    320 m³/h vs 350 m³/h
  • 14.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Portable Air Conditioners category.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how products in the Portable Air Conditioners category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Electrolux WP71-265WT
    the average portable air conditioner
    Electrolux WP71-265WT has a lower user score than the average portable air conditioner (6.97 vs 8.000).
    6.97 vs 8
  • 3.5% worse value for money
    Electrolux WP71-265WT offers worse value for money than the average portable air conditioner (6.89 vs 7.1).
    6.89 vs 7.13
  • 1 °C higher minimum temperature
    This portable air conditioner has a higher minimum temperature setting than the average portable air conditioner (17 °C vs 16 °C).
    17 °C vs 16 °C
  • 2 °C lower maximum temperature
    This portable air conditioner has a lower maximum temperature setting than the average portable air conditioner (30 °C vs 32 °C).
    30 °C vs 32 °C
  • 7 dB louder minimum operation
    This portable air conditioner is louder at minimum output than the average portable air conditioner (58 dB vs 51 dB).
    Lowest stated operating noise.
    58 dB vs 51 dB
  • 30 m³/h lower high-speed airflow
    This portable air conditioner delivers lower high-speed airflow than the average portable air conditioner (320 m³/h vs 350 m³/h).
    320 m³/h vs 350 m³/h
  • 5 m² smaller room coverage
    This portable air conditioner covers a smaller room area than the average portable air conditioner (25 m² vs 30 m²).
    25 m² vs 30 m²
  • 10 m³/h lower low-speed airflow
    This portable air conditioner delivers lower low-speed airflow than the average portable air conditioner (240 m³/h vs 250 m³/h).
    240 m³/h vs 250 m³/h
  • No night mode
    This portable air conditioner does not include a night mode, while the average portable air conditioner does.
  • 8.4 l/24 h lower dehumidification capacity
    This portable air conditioner offers lower moisture removal than the average portable air conditioner (24 l/24 h vs 32.4 l/24 h).
    24 l/24 h vs 32.4 l/24 h
  • 37.6% higher weight
    This portable air conditioner is heavier than the average portable air conditioner (35.1 kg vs 25.5 kg).
    35.1 kg vs 25.5 kg
  • 24 cm taller cabinet
    This portable air conditioner is taller than the average portable air conditioner (95 cm vs 71 cm).
    95 cm vs 71 cm
  • No wheels
    This portable air conditioner does not include wheels, while the average portable air conditioner does.
  • 2.5 cm deeper cabinet
    This portable air conditioner is deeper than the average portable air conditioner (38 cm vs 35.5 cm).
    38 cm vs 35.5 cm
  • 33.7% larger external volume
    This portable air conditioner has a larger external volume than the average portable air conditioner (137180 cm³ vs 102623.4 cm³).
    137,180 cm³ vs 102,623.407656 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

Q
quechoisir.org
30/04/2020
Summary of the review
Test Electrolux WP71-265WT - Climatiseur mobile - Que Choisir.
Q
quechoisir.org
30/04/2020
Summary of the review
Review: Electrolux WP71-265WT Portable Air Conditioner - Que Choisir
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
30/04/2020
Summary of the review
Review: Electrolux WP71-265WT - Portable Air Conditioner - Que Choisir
(Translated)Show original
A
altroconsumo.it
15/05/2026
Summary of the review
Electrolux portable air conditioners - Altroconsumo
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Electrolux WP71-265WT

  • Unique and elegant cylindrical design that serves as an aesthetic decor piece
  • Convenient remote management via the dedicated smartphone app over Wi-Fi
  • Equipped with both cooling and heating functions for year-round versatility
  • Patented AirSurround system allows cool air to blow upward for uniform distribution
  • Comes with a useful magnetic remote control that easily attaches to the unit

What we don't like about Electrolux WP71-265WT

  • Noisy compressor operation, making it difficult to sleep while it is running on higher modes
  • Disappointing cooling performance in some instances, failing to quickly drop room temperatures
  • Heavy and bulky unit that makes it difficult to move around despite being portable
  • Large, cumbersome exhaust hose that is inconvenient to set up and plug in
  • The included window adapter/connection kit feels unrefined or incomplete to some users

Verdict

The Electrolux WP71-265WT is a versatile, cylindrical portable air conditioner designed for rooms up to 40 m², featuring an A+ energy rating, a 9,000 BTU/h (2.6 kW) cooling capacity, a 2.1 kW heating capacity, and a dehumidification rate of 1 liter per hour. Utilizing eco-friendly R290 refrigerant, it operates across four power levels with a maximum airflow of 320 m³/h, and includes a 24-hour timer, a premium window kit, a magnetic remote control, and built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi for smartphone app integration. Its primary advantages are its multi-functional 4-in-1 capabilities (cooling, heating, dehumidifying, and ventilating), its patented AirSurround system for indirect, uniform airflow distribution, and its sleek, minimalist design. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively high operating noise level that reaches up to 64 dB(A), occasional smart app connectivity issues, and a heavy frame weighing 35.5 kg, which compromises its physical portability.

Compare Electrolux WP71-265WT with other products in the Portable Air Conditioners category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Electrolux WP71-265WT and other products in the Portable Air Conditioners category

No results found