OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

VEVOR 750W 855mm Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Power:750 WCordless:noWeight:4.4 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

VEVOR 750W 855mm Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

VEVOR 750W 855mm
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

65%

6.3

Technical score

25%

6.3

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▼Worse than 73% of immersion blenders
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

▼Worse than 80%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

45%

6.9

Performance

20%

5.0

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

2.8

Dimensions

▼Worse than 59%
6.3

User score

User score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 84% of models

6.3

Mark 8.3 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.4

Rating

30%

7.8

Popularity

▼Worse than 84%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
  • vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
vevor-750w-855mm
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender VEVOR 750W 855mm

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

45%

6.9

Performance

20%

5.0

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

2.8

Dimensions

6.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

6.8
Power
750 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 750 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 54.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
20,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 20,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 93.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic, Aluminium
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
4.4 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 4.4 kg, which is heavier in hand than 96.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
75.5 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 75.5 cm in height, which is taller than 95.7% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
147x 102

VEVOR 750W 855mm vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 5,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • 5,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 4.04x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (4.4 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    4.4 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 35.5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (75.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    75.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 20.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models

    6.3

    Mark 8.3 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.4

    Rating

    30%

    7.8

    Popularity

    6.3 vs 7.9
  • 14% worse value for money
    VEVOR 750W 855mm has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.78 vs 7.7).
    6.78 vs 7.73
  • 20.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models

    6.3

    Mark 8.3 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.4

    Rating

    30%

    7.8

    Popularity

    6.3 vs 7.9
  • 14% worse value for money
    VEVOR 750W 855mm has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.78 vs 7.7).
    6.78 vs 7.73
  • 2.89x more expensive
    VEVOR 750W 855mm is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£130 vs £45).
    £130 vs £45
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 4.04x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (4.4 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    4.4 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 35.5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (75.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    75.5 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about VEVOR 750W 855mm

  • Powerful 750W copper motor handles thick mixtures and large batches easily
  • Variable speed adjustment (8,000–20,000 RPM) provides precise texture control
  • Detachable shaft and dishwasher-safe stainless steel blades make cleaning easy
  • Lock button feature reduces hand fatigue during continuous, prolonged use
  • Includes convenient accessories like a wall-mount hook and replacement blade
  • Solid, durable commercial-grade build quality

What customers don't like about VEVOR 750W 855mm

  • Heavy physical weight (around 9.7 lbs / 4.4 kg) makes it cumbersome for casual users
  • Large physical size (855mm total length) makes it difficult to use in standard home pots
  • Strict duty cycle requires letting the motor rest for 2 minutes after every 5 minutes of continuous use

Verdict

The VEVOR 750W Commercial Immersion Blender (Model HB6089E-GS) is a heavy-duty kitchen appliance measuring 855 x 147 x 102 mm and weighing 9.7 lbs (4.4 kg). Powered by a pure copper motor with an idle power consumption of 300W ± 15%, it features a variable speed range of 8,000 to 20,000 RPM controlled via a user-friendly single button press with a locking mechanism for extended operation. Its primary pros include a durable 304 food-grade stainless steel blade, a detachable and dishwasher-safe blending foot designed to prevent food residue, a comfortable rubberized grip, and built-in overheat protection. However, a notable con is its strict duty cycle constraint dictated by the overheat protection, which requires the operator to pause and let the unit rest for 2 minutes after every 5 minutes of continuous use.

Compare VEVOR 750W 855mm with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of VEVOR 750W 855mm and other immersion blenders

No results found