OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Siemens MQ67110 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Power:750 WCordless:noWeight:1 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Siemens MQ67110 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 1 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Siemens MQ67110
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

65%

7.3

Technical score

25%

8.6

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 68% of immersion blenders
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–²Better than 55%
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

45%

8.2

Performance

20%

4.6

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

9.4

Dimensions

â–²Better than 66%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models

70%

8.8

Rating

30%

8.1

Popularity

â–²Better than 54%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • siemens-mq67110
  • siemens-mq67110
  • siemens-mq67110
  • siemens-mq67110
  • siemens-mq67110
siemens-mq67110
siemens-mq67110
siemens-mq67110
siemens-mq67110
siemens-mq67110
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Siemens MQ67110

Technical score
Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

45%

8.2

Performance

20%

4.6

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

9.4

Dimensions

7.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

7.9
Power
750 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 750 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 54.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
12
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 12 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 74.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
20,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 20,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 93.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 1 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 55.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 24.1% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic, Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
2.6 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 2.6 m, which is longer reach than 92.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1 kg, which is lighter in hand than 52.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 9.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
39.3 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 39.3 cm in height, which is more compact than 58.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
5.5

Siemens MQ67110 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 5,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 10 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (12 vs 2).
    12 vs 2
  • 1.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (2.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    2.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 8.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 54% of models

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    8.1

    Popularity

    8.6 vs 7.9
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • 0.7 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (39.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    39.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • 8.2% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 8.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 54% of models

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    8.1

    Popularity

    8.6 vs 7.9
  • 1.9% better value for money
    Siemens MQ67110 has better value for money than the average immersion blender (7.87 vs 7.7).
    7.87 vs 7.73
  • 5,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 10 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (12 vs 2).
    12 vs 2
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • 1.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (2.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    2.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 0.7 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (39.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    39.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • 8.2% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • Is not stated as BPA-free
    This immersion blender is not stated as BPA-free while the average immersion blender is.
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 2.11x more expensive
    Siemens MQ67110 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£95 vs £45).
    £95 vs £45
  • 2.11x more expensive
    Siemens MQ67110 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£95 vs £45).
    £95 vs £45
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Is not stated as BPA-free
    This immersion blender is not stated as BPA-free while the average immersion blender is.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
kuechenkopf.de
≈ estimated
2026
Practical test · Stick blender
Verdict
The Siemens MQ67110 FQ.1 is an attractively designed stick blender with a practical stretch cable, though its mixing head looks weaker than rival models.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Siemens MQ67110

  • Equipped with a highly powerful 750-watt motor capable of blending tough ingredients without overheating.
  • Features 12 variable speed settings plus an additional turbo button for precise consistency control.
  • Features a highly ergonomic design with a non-slip, soft-touch housing and large buttons.
  • Includes an innovative four-blade stainless steel foot that creates perfect blending results.
  • The high-quality stainless steel blending foot is easily detachable via a convenient click mechanism.
  • The foot and included 600ml measuring beaker are fully dishwasher-safe for easy cleanup.
  • Comes with a flexible spiral helix cable providing excellent freedom of movement during operation.

What customers don't like about Siemens MQ67110

  • Does not include extra multi-purpose accessories such as a whisk or a dedicated food chopper attachment.
  • The specialized spiral helix power cord can feel stiff or pull back during extension for some users.
  • Slightly heavier motor body compared to lower-powered, entry-level plastic models.

Verdict

The Siemens MQ67110 is a powerful 750-watt immersion blender featuring a detachable stainless steel foot equipped with an innovative four-blade knife and a flexible spiral helix cord for maximum maneuverability. Main characteristics and pros include its 12 variable speed settings plus an additional turbo button, an ergonomic soft-touch handle with large buttons, and a quiet, low-vibration motor capable of handling tough tasks like grinding nuts without overheating. It also includes a convenient graduated mixing beaker with a lid, and all removable parts are dishwasher safe. However, notable cons include its relatively heavy 1.0 kg net weight, a plastic housing construction for the motor unit, and the limitation that it cannot be used to crush hard ice cubes or process ingredients exceeding 80 °C.

Compare Siemens MQ67110 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Siemens MQ67110 and other immersion blenders

No results found