OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Philips HR2650/90 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Power:800 WCordless:noWeight:1 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Philips HR2650/90 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications, 1 expert reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Philips HR2650/90
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 54% of models
Score components

65%

6.3

Technical score

25%

9.4

User score

10%

8.3

List score

▲Better than 54% of immersion blenders
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

▲Better than 51%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

45%

6.4

Performance

20%

4.3

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.0

Dimensions

▼Worse than 60%
9.4

User score

User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models

70%

9.4

Rating

30%

9.6

Popularity

★Better than 96%
8.3

List score

List score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
★Better than 90%
  • philips-hr265090
  • philips-hr265090
  • philips-hr265090
  • philips-hr265090
  • philips-hr265090
  • philips-hr265090
philips-hr265090
philips-hr265090
philips-hr265090
philips-hr265090
philips-hr265090
philips-hr265090
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Philips HR2650/90

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

45%

6.4

Performance

20%

4.3

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.0

Dimensions

6.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

7.8
Power
800 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 800 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 57.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
11,500 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 11,500 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 87.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.9% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 1 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 55.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 24.1% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
500 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 500 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 91.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
plastic ABS, stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.2 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.2 m, which is longer reach than 22.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 27.8% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1 kg, which is lighter in hand than 52.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 9.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
25.3 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 25.3 cm in height, which is more compact than 95% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Philips HR2650/90 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 14.7 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (25.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    25.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • 19.0% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 96% of models

    70%

    9.4

    Rating

    30%

    9.6

    Popularity

    9.4 vs 7.9
  • 100 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (800 W vs 700 W).
    800 W vs 700 W
  • 8.2% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 19.0% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 96% of models

    70%

    9.4

    Rating

    30%

    9.6

    Popularity

    9.4 vs 7.9
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 100 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (800 W vs 700 W).
    800 W vs 700 W
  • 14.7 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (25.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    25.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • 8.2% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 3,000 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (11,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    11,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 2.4% lower list score
    List score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
    8.3 vs 8.5
  • 33.3% more expensive
    Philips HR2650/90 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£60 vs £45).
    £60 vs £45
  • 2.4% lower list score
    List score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
    8.3 vs 8.5
  • 33.3% more expensive
    Philips HR2650/90 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£60 vs £45).
    £60 vs £45
  • 3,000 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (11,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    11,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.8
kuechenkopf.de
✓ explicit
14/05/2024
Practical test · Stick blender set
Verdict
The Philips HR2650/90 is an inexpensive stick blender with stepless speed and a 900W motor that suits smoothies, though its black plastic parts feel cheap and its cup disappoints.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Philips HR2650/90

  • Powerful 800W motor easily handles tough ingredients and stubborn chunks
  • Intuitive SpeedTouch pressure-sensitive trigger gives seamless variable speed control
  • Effective ProMix anti-splash blade guard design keeps the kitchen clean
  • Convenient on-the-go travel tumbler bottle allows blending smoothies directly in the container
  • Simple maintenance with single-button release and dishwasher-safe components
  • Versatile performance suitable for hot soups, purees, and fruit shakes

What customers don't like about Philips HR2650/90

  • Plastic elements on the main blending attachment can feel less durable over time
  • The power cord can restrict movement compared to modern cordless alternatives
  • Motor unit can become quite warm when continuously processing thick mixtures
  • Higher power modes generate substantial noise during operation
  • Some users find the single-trigger control design fatiguing during longer blending sessions

Verdict

The Philips Viva Collection HR2650/90 is a powerful immersion blender equipped with a robust 800-watt motor that reaches speeds of up to 11,500 RPM, working alongside a triangular ProMix blending cage and an anti-splash blade guard to maximize ingredient flow and cleanliness. Its main characteristics include an intuitive SpeedTouch variable speed trigger for seamless single-handed power adjustment, a single-button accessory release, and an included BPA-free, leak-proof 2-in-1 on-the-go drinking tumbler. Key pros are its strong performance with tough ingredients, smooth blending consistency, easy-to-clean dishwasher-safe parts, and the convenience of blending smoothies directly into the travel bottle; however, notable cons include its limited accessory bundle compared to other Viva sub-models—lacking a dedicated whisk or chopping bowl—and a dependence on continuous manual pressure on the power trigger during operation.

Compare Philips HR2650/90 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Philips HR2650/90 and other immersion blenders

No results found