OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Philips HR2627/91 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Power:300 WCordless:noWeight:2.04 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Philips HR2627/91 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Philips HR2627/91
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

65%

5.8

Technical score

25%

5.8

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 89% of immersion blenders
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 82%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

45%

4.7

Performance

20%

6.0

Accessories

15%

9.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

4.5

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 73%
5.8

User score

User score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

5.8

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

7.6

Rating

30%

7.8

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 91%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • philips-hr262791
  • philips-hr262791
  • philips-hr262791
  • philips-hr262791
  • philips-hr262791
  • philips-hr262791
  • philips-hr262791
  • philips-hr262791
philips-hr262791
philips-hr262791
philips-hr262791
philips-hr262791
philips-hr262791
philips-hr262791
philips-hr262791
philips-hr262791
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Philips HR2627/91

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

45%

4.7

Performance

20%

6.0

Accessories

15%

9.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

4.5

Dimensions

5.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

6.7
Power
300 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 300 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 79.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.6% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
11,500 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 11,500 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 87.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.9% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
350 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 350 ml, which is smaller than the mini-chopper of 88.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.1% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
500 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 500 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 91.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic, Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.2 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.2 m, which is longer reach than 22.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 27.8% of immersion blenders.
Weight
2.04 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 2.04 kg, which is heavier in hand than 87.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
64.516 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 64.516 cm in height, which is taller than 93.3% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Philips HR2627/91 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 400 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (300 W vs 700 W).
    300 W vs 700 W
  • 3,000 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (11,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    11,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 26.6% lower user score
    User score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    7.6

    Rating

    30%

    7.8

    Popularity

    5.8 vs 7.9
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 87.3% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.04 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 24.52 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (64.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    64.516 cm vs 40 cm
  • 150 ml smaller chopper volume
    This immersion blender has a smaller mini-chopper bowl, requiring multiple chopping batches for meal prep compared to the average immersion blender (350 ml vs 500 ml).
    350 ml vs 500 ml
  • 26.6% lower user score
    User score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    7.6

    Rating

    30%

    7.8

    Popularity

    5.8 vs 7.9
  • 15.5% worse value for money
    Philips HR2627/91 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.69 vs 7.7).
    6.69 vs 7.73
  • 2.11x more expensive
    Philips HR2627/91 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£95 vs £45).
    £95 vs £45
  • 400 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (300 W vs 700 W).
    300 W vs 700 W
  • 3,000 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (11,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    11,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 150 ml smaller chopper volume
    This immersion blender has a smaller mini-chopper bowl, requiring multiple chopping batches for meal prep compared to the average immersion blender (350 ml vs 500 ml).
    350 ml vs 500 ml
  • 87.3% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.04 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 24.52 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (64.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    64.516 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Philips HR2627/91

  • Good blending power for smoothies and soups
  • Intuitive SpeedTouch trigger for seamless variable speed control
  • Easy to clean with a single-button release to quickly switch attachments
  • ProMix triangular blade guard minimizes splashing and provides a smooth blend
  • Comes with convenient accessories like an on-the-go travel tumbler

What customers don't like about Philips HR2627/91

  • The power cord can get in the way during operation
  • Does not work well in shallow containers or with low volumes of food due to the deep dome design
  • Not intended for heavy-duty tasks like crushing ice, bread, or meat
  • Some customers noted discrepancies where a whisk attachment was pictured online but not included in certain regional packages

Verdict

The Philips HR2627/91 ProMix Viva Collection Handblender is a versatile kitchen tool featuring a 300-watt motor, advanced triangular ProMix technology for consistent results, and intuitive SpeedTouch variable speed control with a turbo boost feature. Its main characteristics include an anti-splash blade guard, a single-button release mechanism, dishwasher-safe parts, and a bundle that includes a single whisk, a mini chopper, and a BPA-free on-the-go tumbler. The main pros of this appliance are its effortless accessory swapping, mess-free operation, and smooth blending performance. However, some users have noted cons such as the power cord occasionally getting in the way during operation and the 300W power being relatively modest compared to higher-end models.

Compare Philips HR2627/91 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Philips HR2627/91 and other immersion blenders

No results found