OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Ninja CI100EUSTGD Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Power:850 WCordless:noWeight:2.0 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Ninja CI100EUSTGD Review: Compare 40 technical specifications, 1 expert reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Ninja CI100EUSTGD
7.6/10

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Score components

65%

6.9

Technical score

25%

8.9

User score

10%

8.5

List score

▲Better than 65% of immersion blenders
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

▼Worse than 55%
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Score components

45%

5.9

Performance

20%

7.7

Accessories

15%

9.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.2

Dimensions

▲Better than 53%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models

70%

9.3

Rating

30%

7.9

Popularity

▲Better than 73%
8.5

List score

List score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 29 lists (7%)
★Better than 96%
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
  • ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
ninja-ci100eustgd
Where to buy
    N/A~ £110
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #596 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Ninja CI100EUSTGD

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Score components:

45%

5.9

Performance

20%

7.7

Accessories

15%

9.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.2

Dimensions

6.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components:

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

7.7
Power
850 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 850 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 63.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.4% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
15,500 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 15,500 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 71% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
700 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 700 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 86.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.4% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
700 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 700 ml, which is larger than the cup of 47% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 21% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.5 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.5 m, which is longer reach than 63.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 12.3% of immersion blenders.
Weight
2 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 2 kg, which is heavier in hand than 85.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
40.4 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 40.4 cm in height, which is taller than 57.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
7.6x 6.9

Ninja CI100EUSTGD vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 200 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (700 ml vs 500 ml).
    700 ml vs 500 ml
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the double beater
    This immersion blender includes the double beater while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 150 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (850 W vs 700 W).
    850 W vs 700 W
  • 0.3 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.5 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.5 m vs 1.2 m
  • 12.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 73% of models

    70%

    9.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    8.9 vs 7.9
  • 12.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 73% of models

    70%

    9.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    8.9 vs 7.9
  • 1,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 150 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (850 W vs 700 W).
    850 W vs 700 W
  • 200 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (700 ml vs 500 ml).
    700 ml vs 500 ml
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the double beater
    This immersion blender includes the double beater while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.3 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.5 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.5 m vs 1.2 m
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 83.7% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.0 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2.44x more expensive
    Ninja CI100EUSTGD is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£110 vs £45).
    £110 vs £45
  • 0.4 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (40.4 cm vs 40 cm).
    40.4 cm vs 40 cm
  • 0.2% worse value for money
    Ninja CI100EUSTGD has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.71 vs 7.7).
    7.71 vs 7.73
  • 2.44x more expensive
    Ninja CI100EUSTGD is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£110 vs £45).
    £110 vs £45
  • 0.2% worse value for money
    Ninja CI100EUSTGD has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.71 vs 7.7).
    7.71 vs 7.73
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 83.7% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.0 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 0.4 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (40.4 cm vs 40 cm).
    40.4 cm vs 40 cm

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.6
chip.de
✓ explicit
23/11/2023
Lab test · Stick blender
Verdict
The Ninja CI100EUSTGD Foodi 3-in-1 is a stick blender with a long cord and whisk, chopper and hand mixer attachments, but it is heavy and loud.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Ninja CI100EUSTGD

  • Highly versatile 3-in-1 system that replaces a hand blender, mixer, and chopper, saving cupboard space
  • Powerful 850-watt motor that effortlessly purees thick or fibrous ingredients like kale and dates
  • Smart PowerBase automatically recognizes the connected attachment and optimizes speed settings
  • Gradual soft-start feature helps minimize kitchen splatters when mixing or blending
  • Robust, sturdy construction that feels durable and built to last
  • Relatively quiet motor operation even when using high-speed or turbo modes
  • Most interchangeable accessories and components are top-rack dishwasher safe for easy cleaning

What customers don't like about Ninja CI100EUSTGD

  • The main PowerBase and overall hand blender assembly can feel heavy and bulky during prolonged use
  • Water can sometimes get trapped inside the cavities and attachments during washing
  • The blade guard and inner seals can be tricky to clean thoroughly by hand if food gets trapped underneath
  • Requires holding down the power button continuously while simultaneously toggling speeds, which can feel unergonomic
  • May struggle or trigger the automatic overheat safety shut-off when continuous blending is used on highly stubborn mixtures

Verdict

The Ninja Foodi 3-in-1 Hand Blender, Mixer & Chopper (CI100EUSTGD) features an exclusive Stone Gold aesthetic powered by an 850-watt SmartTorque motor that automatically optimizes settings using intelligent PowerBase technology. This versatile corded electric appliance features a 1.5-meter cord, a 700ml processing bowl capacity, 2 blending speeds, 5 mixing speeds, and dishwasher-safe attachments including a stainless steel immersion wand, dual whisks, and dough hooks. Key pros include its multi-functional space-saving design, its gradual soft-start function that prevents ingredient splattering, and a self-standing motor base that reduces kitchen counter messes. However, notable cons include its non-detachable, bulky power cord, and the limitation that the main motorized handle itself is not submersible or dishwasher safe.

Compare Ninja CI100EUSTGD with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ninja CI100EUSTGD and other immersion blenders

No results found