OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

ESGE M 100 D Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Power:120 WCordless:noWeight:0.9 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

ESGE M 100 D Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 1 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

ESGE M 100 D
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

65%

4.6

Technical score

25%

9.1

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 88% of immersion blenders
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 82%
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

45%

3.1

Performance

20%

4.1

Accessories

15%

6.7

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

9.3

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 97%
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models

70%

9.1

Rating

30%

9.0

Popularity

â–²Better than 83%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
  • esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
  • esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
  • esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
  • esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
  • esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
  • esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
esge-zauberstab-esge-m-100-d
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender ESGE M 100 D

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

45%

3.1

Performance

20%

4.1

Accessories

15%

6.7

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

9.3

Dimensions

4.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

6.7
Power
120 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 120 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 98.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
10,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 10,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 93.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 1 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 55.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 24.1% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.6 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.6 m, which is longer reach than 80.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.6% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.9 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.9 kg, which is lighter in hand than 70.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.7% of immersion blenders.
Height
35 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 35 cm in height, which is more compact than 83.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.9

ESGE M 100 D vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35 cm vs 40 cm).
    35 cm vs 40 cm
  • 15.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 83% of models

    70%

    9.1

    Rating

    30%

    9.0

    Popularity

    9.1 vs 7.9
  • 17.4% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.9 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 15.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 83% of models

    70%

    9.1

    Rating

    30%

    9.0

    Popularity

    9.1 vs 7.9
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35 cm vs 40 cm).
    35 cm vs 40 cm
  • 17.4% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.9 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 580 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (120 W vs 700 W).
    120 W vs 700 W
  • 4,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (10,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    10,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Is not stated as BPA-free
    This immersion blender is not stated as BPA-free while the average immersion blender is.
  • 14.7% worse value for money
    ESGE M 100 D has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.74 vs 7.7).
    6.74 vs 7.73
  • 2x more expensive
    ESGE M 100 D is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£90 vs £45).
    £90 vs £45
  • 580 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (120 W vs 700 W).
    120 W vs 700 W
  • 4,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (10,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    10,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Is not stated as BPA-free
    This immersion blender is not stated as BPA-free while the average immersion blender is.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

10
kuechentipps.de
✓ explicit
19/11/2010
Review · Entry-level stick blender
Verdict
The ESGE-Zauberstab M 100 Design is a well-built, easy-to-use starter stick blender for singles and small households, but it is too weak to power the Zauberette kitchen machine.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ESGE M 100 D

  • Extremely robust, high-quality, and solid build construction
  • Equipped with a long-lasting, durable Swiss-made AC motor
  • Operates relatively quietly during use compared to higher-wattage alternatives
  • Easy to clean because you only need to rinse the removable blades rather than a whole blending foot
  • No splashing issues due to well-designed, controlled rotational speeds
  • Excellent long-term reliability and availability of replacement parts

What customers don't like about ESGE M 100 D

  • The soft-touch membrane pressure switch can feel a bit spongy or imprecise to press
  • Removing the tightly fitting interchangeable blades requires extra caution to avoid cuts
  • The 120-watt entry-level power is perceived by some users as slightly weak for extremely heavy pureeing tasks
  • The aesthetic looks somewhat bulky or dated compared to modern alternatives

Verdict

The Swiss-made ESGE-Zauberstab M 100 Design is an entry-level immersion blender featuring a durable 120-watt AC motor, an ergonomic handle, and a 165 cm power cord. It operates using a twin-stage soft-touch membrane switch that provides two speeds—7,000 and 10,000 rpm—capable of processing up to 10 liters of liquid. Key advantages include its robust and solid construction, a long-lasting Swiss motor backed by a 5-year guarantee, a convenient clip-on centering guide for quick accessory attachment, and the inclusion of a wall bracket and multi-blade. However, notable drawbacks include its heavier 930g plastic and stainless steel body, a slightly spongy membrane button pressure point, a non-removable blending foot that complicates thorough cleaning, and a coarser blending texture compared to higher-wattage alternatives.

Compare ESGE M 100 D with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ESGE M 100 D and other immersion blenders

No results found