OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

ESGE Wand 91021 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£170Power:200 WCordless:noWeight:0.93 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

ESGE Wand 91021 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

ESGE Wand 91021
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

65%

5.6

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 74% of immersion blenders
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

6.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 84%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

5.8

Accessories

15%

5.6

Design

10%

4.9

Usability

10%

9.3

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 78%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
  • esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
  • esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
  • esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
  • esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
  • esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
  • esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
  • esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
esge-wand-91021-douglas-fir
Where to buy
    N/A~ £170
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender ESGE Wand 91021

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

5.8

Accessories

15%

5.6

Design

10%

4.9

Usability

10%

9.3

Dimensions

5.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

6.7

Price

6.5
Power
200 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 200 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 87.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.1% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
17,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 17,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 83.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 4 attachments, which is more versatile than 83% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 11.4% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
no
This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
1.6 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.6 m, which is longer reach than 80.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.6% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.93 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.93 kg, which is lighter in hand than 68.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Height
35 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 35 cm in height, which is more compact than 83.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

ESGE Wand 91021 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 2,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (17,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    17,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 2 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (4 vs 2).
    4 vs 2
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35 cm vs 40 cm).
    35 cm vs 40 cm
  • 14.6% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.93 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (17,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    17,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 2 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (4 vs 2).
    4 vs 2
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35 cm vs 40 cm).
    35 cm vs 40 cm
  • 14.6% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.93 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.
  • 19% worse value for money
    ESGE Wand 91021 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.49 vs 7.7).
    6.49 vs 7.73
  • 19% worse value for money
    ESGE Wand 91021 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.49 vs 7.7).
    6.49 vs 7.73
  • 3.78x more expensive
    ESGE Wand 91021 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£170 vs £45).
    £170 vs £45
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ESGE Wand 91021

  • High-speed performance with a powerful 17,000 RPM robust AC motor
  • Stylish and contemporary design with a unique Douglas Fir finish
  • Ergonomic handle layout providing easy control and user-friendly operation
  • Versatile range of included high-quality accessories, such as the multi-blade, whipping disc, and meat/vegetable blades
  • Excellent build quality and stability due to its robust, one-piece construction
  • Generous 5-year warranty reflecting durability and long-term reliability
  • Long, high-reach power cord allowing excellent freedom of movement in the kitchen

What customers don't like about ESGE Wand 91021

  • High price point that can feel exorbitant compared to standard alternative blenders
  • Some users reported the companion plastic accessories feel somewhat thin-walled or flimsy
  • The removable blades sit extremely tight, which can present a minor safety risk or require extra caution when changing them
  • Fixed, non-detachable blending shaft can make the body more awkward to clean compared to models with a fully removable foot
  • Isolated complaints regarding high noise, strong vibrations, or humming levels on the lowest speed setting

Verdict

The ESGE-Zauberstab 91021 Design Edition Douglas Fir is a premium, Swiss-made immersion blender powered by a robust 200-watt AC motor operating on 220–240V. Designed with a unique wooden-style Douglas fir handle, it features a safety twin switch that toggles between two speed settings of 12,000 RPM and 17,000 RPM, allowing it to process liquid volumes up to 10 liters. Key pros include its highly durable, long-life motor, ergonomic comfort, a generous 160 cm cord for flexible kitchen movement, and a versatile accessory package containing a multi-blade, a whipping disc, meat and vegetable knives, and a storage tripod. On the downside, the device is limited by a short maximum continuous operating time (KB-time) of 5 minutes to prevent overheating, lacks variable speed control beyond its two preset steps, and is explicitly rated as not suitable for permanent commercial use.

Compare ESGE Wand 91021 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ESGE Wand 91021 and other immersion blenders

No results found