OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Caso HB 2200 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Power:170 WCordless:noWeight:1 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Caso HB 2200 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Caso HB 2200
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

65%

6.4

Technical score

25%

6.4

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 70% of immersion blenders
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 69%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

45%

6.2

Performance

20%

7.0

Accessories

15%

6.0

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

9.2

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 57%
6.4

User score

User score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

6.4

Mark 8.2 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.5

Rating

30%

7.7

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 82%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • caso-hb-2200
  • caso-hb-2200
  • caso-hb-2200
  • caso-hb-2200
  • caso-hb-2200
caso-hb-2200
caso-hb-2200
caso-hb-2200
caso-hb-2200
caso-hb-2200
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Caso HB 2200

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components:

45%

6.2

Performance

20%

7.0

Accessories

15%

6.0

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

9.2

Dimensions

6.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.3
Power
170 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 170 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 96.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
?
Maximum RPM
22,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 22,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 97.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Titanium
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
no
This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
1.6 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.6 m, which is longer reach than 80.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.6% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1 kg, which is lighter in hand than 52.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 9.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
34 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 34 cm in height, which is more compact than 87.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.6% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
70x 100

Caso HB 2200 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 7,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (22,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    22,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 6 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34 cm vs 40 cm).
    34 cm vs 40 cm
  • 8.2% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 22.2% cheaper
    Caso HB 2200 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£55 vs £45).
    £55 vs £45
  • 22.2% cheaper
    Caso HB 2200 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£55 vs £45).
    £55 vs £45
  • 7,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (22,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    22,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 6 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34 cm vs 40 cm).
    34 cm vs 40 cm
  • 8.2% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 530 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (170 W vs 700 W).
    170 W vs 700 W
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 19.0% lower user score
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.4

    Mark 8.2 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.5

    Rating

    30%

    7.7

    Popularity

    6.4 vs 7.9
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.
  • 5.5% worse value for money
    Caso HB 2200 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.32 vs 7.7).
    7.32 vs 7.73
  • 19.0% lower user score
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.4

    Mark 8.2 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.5

    Rating

    30%

    7.7

    Popularity

    6.4 vs 7.9
  • 5.5% worse value for money
    Caso HB 2200 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.32 vs 7.7).
    7.32 vs 7.73
  • 530 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (170 W vs 700 W).
    170 W vs 700 W
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Caso HB 2200

  • Equipped with a powerful and durable 170-watt AC motor operating at 22,000 RPM
  • Provides exceptionally quiet performance during operation
  • Features a solid, durable build quality with a stainless steel blending shaft
  • Includes a versatile array of accessories like a titanium-coated multi-blade, whisk disc, and meat knife
  • Comes with a convenient 2-in-1 storage base to keep the blender and attachments organized
  • Ergonomically designed handle ensures a secure and comfortable grip
  • Detachable parts make it quick and easy to clean

What customers don't like about Caso HB 2200

  • Offers only a single speed setting rather than a variable speed control dial
  • Swapping or mounting the sharp cutting blades can sometimes be tedious and requires the included fork tool
  • The 140 mm blending shaft may be too short to comfortably reach the bottom of very deep pots

Verdict

The CASO Design HB 2200 Pro is a powerful, quiet immersion blender equipped with a durable 170-watt AC motor operating at a high-performance 22,000 RPM, alongside a 140 mm stainless steel blending shaft and built-in overheat protection. It comes with versatile, easily interchangeable attachments stored in a compact 2-in-1 base, including a titanium-coated multi-blade, a stainless steel whisk disc, and a meat knife. Main pros include its energy-efficient, robust motor that handles pureeing, whipping, and mincing with ease, its highly organized accessory storage, and comfortable ergonomic design. However, notable cons include a strict 1-minute continuous operation limit requiring cool-down periods, parts that are not dishwasher safe, and an inability to process very hard ingredients like ice cubes or coffee beans.

Compare Caso HB 2200 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Caso HB 2200 and other immersion blenders

No results found