OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Black+Decker BXHB1000E Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Power:1000 WCordless:noWeight:1.1 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Black+Decker BXHB1000E Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Black+Decker BXHB1000E
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

65%

7.3

Technical score

25%

9.2

User score

10%

8.3

List score

▲Better than 77% of immersion blenders
8.3

Value for money

Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 76% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

▲Better than 76%
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

45%

9.0

Performance

20%

4.7

Accessories

15%

6.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.1

Dimensions

▲Better than 64%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models

70%

8.8

Rating

30%

10

Popularity

▲Better than 86%
8.3

List score

List score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
★Better than 90%
  • blackdecker-bxhb1000e
  • blackdecker-bxhb1000e
  • blackdecker-bxhb1000e
  • blackdecker-bxhb1000e
  • blackdecker-bxhb1000e
  • blackdecker-bxhb1000e
  • blackdecker-bxhb1000e
blackdecker-bxhb1000e
blackdecker-bxhb1000e
blackdecker-bxhb1000e
blackdecker-bxhb1000e
blackdecker-bxhb1000e
blackdecker-bxhb1000e
blackdecker-bxhb1000e
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Black+Decker BXHB1000E

Technical score
Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components:

45%

9.0

Performance

20%

4.7

Accessories

15%

6.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.1

Dimensions

7.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 76% of models
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

8.3
Power
1,000 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 1,000 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 65.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
20
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 20 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 85.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.2% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 1 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 55.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 24.1% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic, Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.1 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.1 m, which is shorter reach than 77.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.3% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.1 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.1 kg, which is heavier in hand than 50.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.6% of immersion blenders.
Height
42.5 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 42.5 cm in height, which is taller than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.8% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
10.2

Black+Decker BXHB1000E vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 18 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (20 vs 2).
    20 vs 2
  • 300 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,000 W vs 700 W).
    1,000 W vs 700 W
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 16.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 86% of models

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    10

    Popularity

    9.2 vs 7.9
  • 7.9% better value for money
    Black+Decker BXHB1000E has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.33 vs 7.7).
    8.33 vs 7.73
  • 16.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 86% of models

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    10

    Popularity

    9.2 vs 7.9
  • 7.9% better value for money
    Black+Decker BXHB1000E has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.33 vs 7.7).
    8.33 vs 7.73
  • 18 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (20 vs 2).
    20 vs 2
  • 300 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,000 W vs 700 W).
    1,000 W vs 700 W
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Is not stated as BPA-free
    This immersion blender is not stated as BPA-free while the average immersion blender is.
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 2.5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (42.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    42.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 0.1 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 2.4% lower list score
    List score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
    8.3 vs 8.5
  • 1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2.4% lower list score
    List score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
    8.3 vs 8.5
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Is not stated as BPA-free
    This immersion blender is not stated as BPA-free while the average immersion blender is.
  • 2.5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (42.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    42.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 0.1 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.1 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Black+Decker BXHB1000E

  • Powerful 1000-watt motor effortlessly handles thick mixtures and crushes ice
  • Offers precise control with 20 adjustable speed levels and a dedicated Turbo function
  • Features 4 robust stainless steel blades that produce ultra-smooth, lump-free textures
  • Anti-splash dome design keeps kitchen surfaces clean and free of splatters
  • Detachable blending arm is easy to clean by hand or inside the dishwasher
  • Anti-fingerprint stainless steel finish remains clean and smudge-free

What customers don't like about Black+Decker BXHB1000E

  • The high-power motor unit makes the device feel relatively heavy during extended tasks
  • Can become noisy when operating at maximum speed or using the Turbo button
  • Plastic attachment coupling joints feel less premium than the steel exterior and can show wear over time

Verdict

The Black+Decker BXHB1000E is a robust, corded immersion blender featuring a powerful 1000-watt AC motor and a durable, removable stainless steel blending leg equipped with 4 high-performance, double-acting blades. It offers exceptional texture customization through 20 variable speed settings and a dedicated turbo function for rapid processing. Main pros include its capability to effortlessly crush ice and hard ingredients, an anti-splash cone design that prevents kitchen messes, an anti-fingerprint surface coating, and dishwasher-safe detachable parts for straightforward maintenance. However, a potential con includes its heavy reliance on corded electric placement near power outlets, and the multi-component accessory kit may occupy extra storage space in smaller kitchens.

Compare Black+Decker BXHB1000E with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Black+Decker BXHB1000E and other immersion blenders

No results found