Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

All-Clad KZ750D42 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Power:600 WCordless:noWeight:2.49 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

All-Clad KZ750D42 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 2 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

65%

5.4

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 80% of immersion blenders
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 83%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

8.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

6.6

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 85%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £130
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender All-Clad KZ750D42

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

8.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

6.6

Dimensions

5.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

6.6
Power
600 W
This immersion blender delivers 600 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
12,000 RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 12,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 77.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
1.6 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.6 m, which is longer reach than 80.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.6% of immersion blenders.
Weight
2.49 kg
This immersion blender weighs 2.49 kg, which is heavier in hand than 90.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
43.815 cm
This immersion blender stands 43.815 cm in height, which is taller than 83.4% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

All-Clad KZ750D42 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2.29x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.49 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 3.82 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (43.8 cm vs 40 cm).
    43.815 cm vs 40 cm
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • 16.3% worse value for money
    All-Clad KZ750D42 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.64 vs 7.7).
    6.64 vs 7.73
  • 2.89x more expensive
    All-Clad KZ750D42 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£130 vs £45).
    £130 vs £45
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2.29x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.49 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 3.82 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (43.8 cm vs 40 cm).
    43.815 cm vs 40 cm

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
foodal.com
≈ estimated
08/12/2018
Hands-on review · Stick blender
Verdict
The All-Clad KZ750D42 is a powerful stick blender with a long wand for big pots, though its locking joint raises reliability concerns.
9.0
thespruceeats.com
≈ estimated
12/10/2023
Kitchen test · Stick blender
Verdict
The All-Clad KZ750D42 is a powerful, easy-to-control stick blender for purees and emulsions, suiting cooks who want one heavy-duty tool without extra attachments.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about All-Clad KZ750D42

  • Powerful 600-watt motor that easily handles frozen fruit, fibrous ingredients, and ice crushing
  • High-quality brushed stainless steel shaft and durable overall construction
  • Extra-long 9.25-inch shaft that easily reaches deep into large bowls and pots
  • Intuitive variable speed control dial coupled with a handy turbo boost button
  • Detachable shaft design makes it quick and straightforward to clean by hand
  • Ergonomic handle grip that provides comfort and simple, one-handed operation
  • Effective splash guard design that minimizes mess and keeps liquids from spraying

What customers don't like about All-Clad KZ750D42

  • Premium price tag compared to other immersion blenders on the market
  • Lacks extra accessories like a blending beaker, whisk attachment, or food processing cups
  • Heavy handle and top-heavy weight distribution can cause hand fatigue during extended use
  • The large diameter of the blending head prevents it from fitting inside standard mason jars
  • The twist-lock mechanism for detaching the shaft can feel overly tight or stiff
  • User manual advises against continuous blending for more than 60 seconds at a time

Verdict

The All-Clad Stainless Steel Immersion Blender (Model KZ750D42) is a heavy-duty, corded kitchen appliance equipped with a high-performance 600-watt motor and a durable, all-stainless steel exterior. Key characteristics include a variable-speed control dial, a turbo boost function, a wide anti-splatter blade guard, and an extra-long 9.25-inch detachable driveshaft designed to reach deep into tall pots and bowls. Main pros highlight its exceptional power for blending thick or fibrous ingredients directly in hot cookware, an ergonomic soft-grip handle, and a breakdown design for easy storage. On the downside, the appliance is noticeably heavier at 2.49 pounds, lacks included accessories like a blending beaker, and requires hand-washing as it is not fully dishwasher-safe.

Compare All-Clad KZ750D42 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of All-Clad KZ750D42 and other immersion blenders

No results found