OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

All-Clad K2750DGT Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Power:600 WCordless:noWeight:2.4 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

All-Clad K2750DGT Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 1 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

All-Clad K2750DGT
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

65%

5.9

Technical score

25%

9.2

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 57% of immersion blenders
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 69%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

45%

5.8

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

9.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

6.6

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 69%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models

70%

9.0

Rating

30%

9.8

Popularity

â–²Better than 86%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
  • all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
all-clad-k2750dgt
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender All-Clad K2750DGT

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

45%

5.8

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

9.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

6.6

Dimensions

5.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

7.3
Power
600 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 600 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
12,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 12,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 77.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.6 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.6 m, which is longer reach than 80.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.6% of immersion blenders.
Weight
2.4 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 2.4 kg, which is heavier in hand than 89.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Height
44.5 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 44.5 cm in height, which is taller than 84.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.3% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

All-Clad K2750DGT vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 16.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 86% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    9.8

    Popularity

    9.2 vs 7.9
  • 16.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 86% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    9.8

    Popularity

    9.2 vs 7.9
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.4 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2.2x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.4 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.4 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 4.5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (44.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    44.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • 2.11x more expensive
    All-Clad K2750DGT is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£95 vs £45).
    £95 vs £45
  • 5.3% worse value for money
    All-Clad K2750DGT has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.34 vs 7.7).
    7.34 vs 7.73
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2.2x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.4 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.4 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 4.5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (44.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    44.5 cm vs 40 cm

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
thespruceeats.com
≈ estimated
Not Dated
Hands-on test · Stick blender
Verdict
The All-Clad K2750DGT is a powerful stick blender that purees, emulsifies and whips well, suiting cooks who want one heavy-duty tool without extra attachments.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about All-Clad K2750DGT

  • Powerful 600-watt motor that quickly pulverizes tough and fibrous ingredients
  • Extra-long 9.25-inch stainless steel shaft easily reaches deep into large pots
  • Variable speed control dial and turbo button offer precise power adjustments
  • Detachable shaft makes cleanup and drawer storage highly convenient
  • Durable, premium brushed stainless steel construction
  • Creates a strong vortex that blends smoothly with minimal splashing

What customers don't like about All-Clad K2750DGT

  • Premium price point makes it an expensive option for casual users
  • The wide blending head does not fit into standard mason jars
  • Does not include any accessories like a beaker, whisk, or storage case
  • The motor handle is relatively heavy and can cause hand fatigue
  • Operational instructions limit continuous use to under one minute to prevent overheating
  • The exposed stainless steel head can scratch nonstick or enameled cookware

Verdict

The All-Clad K2750DGT (also designated as KZ750DGT) is a heavy-duty corded immersion blender featuring a powerful 600-watt motor and a polished stainless steel exterior. Key technical specifications include an extra-long 9.25-inch detachable stainless steel driveshaft designed to reach deep into large pots, a broad splatter-reducing blending head, an ergonomic soft-grip handle, and a variable-speed control dial paired with pulse and turbo boost buttons. Main advantages include its exceptional ability to quickly crush ice, process tough ingredients like nut butter, and smoothly purée large batches of fibrous vegetables directly in heating cookware without causing messy splatters. However, notable drawbacks include its lack of included accessories like a blending beaker or whisk attachment, a loud operating volume that peaks near 99 decibels, and a somewhat bulky build that some users find less durable and tiring to hold during extended single-handed operation.

Compare All-Clad K2750DGT with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of All-Clad K2750DGT and other immersion blenders

No results found