Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Sigma 65mm F 2 DG DN Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£630Lens mount:Sony E, L-MountMaximum focal length:65 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):2Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:36.8 °

Sigma 65mm F 2 DG DN Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical score

20%

8.3

User score

â–²Better than 86% of camera-lenses
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

8.8

Optics & Aperture

24%

8.6

Build & Handling

20%

7.2

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

â–²Better than 87% of camera-lenses
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

6.7

Number of reviews

Based on 183 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 51% of camera-lenses
  • sigma-65mm-f-2-dg-dn
  • sigma-65mm-f-2-dg-dn
  • sigma-65mm-f-2-dg-dn
  • sigma-65mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-65mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-65mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-65mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-65mm-f-2-dg-dn

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Sigma 65mm F 2 DG DN

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

8.8

Optics & Aperture

24%

8.6

Build & Handling

20%

7.2

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

7.5
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

6.7

Number of reviews

Based on 183 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sigma 65mm F 2 DG DN has a popularity score of 6.7 points, which is lower than 57.2% of camera lenses.
6.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.7

Overall score

40%

7.2

Price

7.5
Lens type
prime
Lens mount
Sony E, L-Mount
Sensor format coverage
Full-frame
Filter thread size
62 mm
Teleconverter compatibility
no
Teleconverter compatibility
no
This camera lens does not support teleconverters. 15.3% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Show more
Minimum focal length
65 mm
Maximum focal length
65 mm
Optical zoom
N/A
Maximum angle of view
36.8 °
Minimum angle of view
36.8 °
Show more
Focus motor
STM
Minimum focus distance
0.55 m
Minimum focus distance
0.55 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 0.55 m, which is farther than 74.1% of camera lenses and equal to 0.3% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.147xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.147x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.147x, which is lower than 64.3% of camera lenses and equal to 7.2% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
yes
Full-time manual focus
yes
This camera lens supports full-time manual focus. 68.3% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
462 g
Weight
462 g
This camera lens weighs 462 g, which is lighter than 56% of camera lenses.
Lens length
74.7 mm
Lens length
74.7 mm
This camera lens is 74.7 mm long, which is shorter than 68.5% of camera lenses and equal to the length of 0.6% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
72 mm
Lens diameter
72 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 72 mm, which is slimmer than 66.6% of camera lenses and equal to that of 1% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
This camera lens supports weather sealing. 50.2% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Sigma 65mm F 2 DG DN vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • Has aperture ring
    Aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has an aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 31.3% of camera lenses include an aperture ring.
  • Has de-clickable aperture ring
    De-clickable aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has a de-clickable aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 18.3% of camera lenses support a de-clickable aperture ring.
    De-clickable aperture ring.
  • 17.55 mm shorter lens
    Lens length
    74.7 mm
    This camera lens is shorter than the average camera lens (74.7 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    74.7 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2020
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2020 vs 2016
  • 5 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    72 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (72 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    72 mm vs 77 mm
  • 48 g lighter
    Weight
    462 g
    This camera lens is lighter than the average camera lens (462 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    462 g vs 510 g
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • Has aperture ring
    Aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has an aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 31.3% of camera lenses include an aperture ring.
  • Has de-clickable aperture ring
    De-clickable aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has a de-clickable aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 18.3% of camera lenses support a de-clickable aperture ring.
    De-clickable aperture ring.
  • 17.55 mm shorter lens
    Lens length
    74.7 mm
    This camera lens is shorter than the average camera lens (74.7 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    74.7 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2020
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2020 vs 2016
  • 5 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    72 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (72 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    72 mm vs 77 mm
  • 48 g lighter
    Weight
    462 g
    This camera lens is lighter than the average camera lens (462 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    462 g vs 510 g
  • 1 fewer low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    1
    This camera lens has fewer low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (1 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    1 vs 2
  • 0.25 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.55 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.6 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.55 m vs 0.3 m
  • 0.05 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.147 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.1 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.147 x vs 0.192 x
  • 1 fewer low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    1
    This camera lens has fewer low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (1 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    1 vs 2
  • 0.25 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.55 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.6 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.55 m vs 0.3 m
  • 0.05 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.147 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.1 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.147 x vs 0.192 x

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

F
findingrange.com
28/04/2021
Summary of the review
D
dustinabbott.net
22/12/2020
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
21/01/2021
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
18/02/2021
Summary of the review
5
5050travelog.com
03/04/2025
Summary of the review
O
opticallimits.com
03/12/2022
Summary of the review
F
fstoppers.com
19/08/2021
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
16/02/2021
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
10/05/2026
Summary of the review
L
lenstip.com
27/02/2021
Summary of the review
F
fstoppers.com
03/04/2021
Summary of the review
P
photofocus.com
27/07/2021
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
14/12/2021
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
18/02/2021
Summary of the review
Z
zielfoto.com
06/02/2025
Summary of the review
L
les-guides-sony.com
15/12/2020
Summary of the review
D
digitalcamaralens.com
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
N
nadir.it
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
S
shoot.be
20/10/2022
Summary of the review
S
sigmabenelux.com
2021
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 183 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sigma 65mm F 2 DG DN

  • Outstanding center-to-edge sharpness even at f/2
  • Premium all-metal build quality with a tactile manual aperture ring
  • Beautiful and smooth bokeh rendering
  • Fast, quiet, and accurate autofocus with reliable Eye AF
  • Compact and portable form factor ideal for street photography
  • Excellent control of chromatic aberrations and flare
  • Unique magnetic lens cap included as part of the I-series design

What we don't like about Sigma 65mm F 2 DG DN

  • Lack of comprehensive weather sealing (only a mount gasket)
  • Unusual 65mm focal length may be polarizing for some users
  • Noticeable focus breathing, which can be distracting for video
  • Strong pincushion distortion that requires software correction
  • Maximum aperture of f/2 is slower than competitors' f/1.8 options
  • Relatively long minimum focus distance (0.55m) limits close-up shots

Verdict

The Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN Contemporary is a premium full-frame 'I Series' prime lens featuring a unique 36.8° angle of view that bridges the gap between standard and portrait focal lengths. Weighing 405g with an all-metal chassis, it utilizes 12 elements in 9 groups (including one SLD and two aspherical elements) and a 9-blade rounded diaphragm for exceptional central sharpness and smooth bokeh. Key pros include its high-resolution optics, tactile manual aperture ring, fast stepping motor AF, and the inclusion of a magnetic metal lens cap. However, it lacks a de-click switch for the aperture, exhibits noticeable focus breathing in video, and features only basic weather sealing at the mount rather than full environmental protection.

Compare Sigma 65mm F 2 DG DN with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sigma 65mm F 2 DG DN and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found