OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,940Lens mount:Four ThirdsMaximum focal length:35 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):2Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:75 °

Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

7.5

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components

80%

7.3

Technical score

20%

7.9

User score

â–²Better than 76% of camera-lenses
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

35%

8.9

Optics & Aperture

24%

7.0

Build & Handling

20%

7.0

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

8.2

Mount & Format

â–²Better than 81% of camera-lenses
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on 39 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 76% of camera-lenses
  • olympus-zuiko-ed-14-35mm-f2-0-swd
  • olympus-zuiko-ed-14-35mm-f2-0-swd
  • olympus-zuiko-ed-14-35mm-f2-0-swd
olympus-zuiko-ed-14-35mm-f2-0-swd
olympus-zuiko-ed-14-35mm-f2-0-swd
olympus-zuiko-ed-14-35mm-f2-0-swd

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD

Technical score
Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components:

35%

8.9

Optics & Aperture

24%

7.0

Build & Handling

20%

7.0

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

8.2

Mount & Format

7.3
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on 39 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Popularity:
Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD has a popularity score of 4.9 points, which is lower than 77% of camera lenses.
4.9
Value for money
Value for money
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

60%

7.5

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

5.5
Lens type
zoom
Lens mount
Four Thirds
Sensor format coverage
Four Thirds
Filter thread size
77 mm
Teleconverter compatibility
yes
Teleconverter compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 85% of models
This camera lens supports teleconverters. 15.2% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Supports Olympus EC-14 and EC-20.
Show more
Minimum focal length
14 mm
Maximum focal length
35 mm
Optical zoom
2.5xx
Maximum angle of view
75 °
Minimum angle of view
34 °
Show more
Focus motor
SWD
Minimum focus distance
0.35 m
Minimum focus distance
0.35 m
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <0.18 m – >1.1 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 0.35 m, which is farther than 53.7% of camera lenses and equal to 3.1% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.12xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.12x
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <0.11 x – >0.39 x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.12x, which is lower than 81.3% of camera lenses and equal to 5.3% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
yes
Full-time manual focus
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This camera lens supports full-time manual focus. 68.3% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Override via AF+MF setting.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
1,060 g
Weight
1,060 g
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <171 g – >1.3k g
This camera lens weighs 1,060 g, which is heavier than 84.8% of camera lenses and equal to the weight of 0.1% of camera lenses.
Lens length
123 mm
Lens length
123 mm
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <46 mm – >189 mm
This camera lens is 123 mm long, which is longer than 76.1% of camera lenses and equal to the length of 0.5% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
86 mm
Lens diameter
86 mm
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <62.4 mm – >94.7 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 86 mm, which is wider than 74.6% of camera lenses and equal to that of 0.4% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
â–² Better than 50% of models
This camera lens supports weather sealing. 50.2% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • Teleconverter compatible
    Teleconverter compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    This camera lens supports teleconverters, while the average camera lens does not.
    Supports Olympus EC-14 and EC-20.
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.4 – >5.6
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • Has de-clickable aperture ring
    De-clickable aperture ring
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This camera lens has a de-clickable aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 18.3% of camera lenses support a de-clickable aperture ring.
    De-clickable aperture ring.
  • Has focus distance scale
    Focus distance scale
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This camera lens has a focus distance scale, the average camera lens does not. 48.6% of camera lenses include a focus distance scale.
  • 1 more low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    3
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <0 – >4
    This camera lens has more low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    3 vs 2
  • Teleconverter compatible
    Teleconverter compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    This camera lens supports teleconverters, while the average camera lens does not.
    Supports Olympus EC-14 and EC-20.
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.4 – >5.6
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • 1 more low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    3
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <0 – >4
    This camera lens has more low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    3 vs 2
  • Has de-clickable aperture ring
    De-clickable aperture ring
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This camera lens has a de-clickable aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 18.3% of camera lenses support a de-clickable aperture ring.
    De-clickable aperture ring.
  • Has focus distance scale
    Focus distance scale
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This camera lens has a focus distance scale, the average camera lens does not. 48.6% of camera lenses include a focus distance scale.
  • 550 g heavier
    Weight
    1,060 g
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <171 g – >1.3k g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (1060 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    1,060 g vs 510 g
  • Fixed lens hood
    Reversible lens hood
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This camera lens does not include a reversible lens hood, the average camera lens does. 81.4% of camera lenses include a reversible lens hood.
  • 30.75 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    123 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <46 mm – >189 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (123 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    123 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2005
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera lens was released earlier than the average camera lens.
    2005 vs 2016
  • 1 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (1 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    1 vs 2
  • 9 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    86 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <62.4 mm – >94.7 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (86 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    86 mm vs 77 mm
  • 0.07 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.12 x
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <0.11 x – >0.39 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.1 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.12 x vs 0.192 x
  • 3.66x more expensive
    Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD is more expensive than the average camera lens (£1,940 vs £530).
    £1,940 vs £530
  • 3.66x more expensive
    Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD is more expensive than the average camera lens (£1,940 vs £530).
    £1,940 vs £530
  • 24.8% worse value for money
    Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera lens (5.52 vs 6.9).
    5.52 vs 6.89
  • 48.9% less popular
    Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD is less popular than the average camera lens (4.89 vs 7.3).
    4.89 vs 7.29
  • 5.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD
    the average camera lens
    Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD has a lower user score than the average camera lens (7.90 vs 8.360).
    7.9 vs 8.36
  • 1 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (1 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    1 vs 2
  • 0.07 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.12 x
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <0.11 x – >0.39 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.1 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.12 x vs 0.192 x
  • 0.05 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.35 m
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0.18 m – >1.1 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.4 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.35 m vs 0.3 m
  • 550 g heavier
    Weight
    1,060 g
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <171 g – >1.3k g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (1060 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    1,060 g vs 510 g
  • Fixed lens hood
    Reversible lens hood
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This camera lens does not include a reversible lens hood, the average camera lens does. 81.4% of camera lenses include a reversible lens hood.
  • 30.75 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    123 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <46 mm – >189 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (123 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    123 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2005
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera lens was released earlier than the average camera lens.
    2005 vs 2016
  • 9 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    86 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <62.4 mm – >94.7 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (86 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    86 mm vs 77 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
lenstip.com
30/08/2010
Summary of the review
Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14-35 mm f/2.0 SWD review - Introduction
I
imaging-resource.com
23/06/2008
Summary of the review
Olympus 14-35mm f/2 ED SWD Zuiko Digital Review
P
popphoto.com
16/12/2010
Summary of the review
Tested: Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14–35mm f/2 SWD
S
shutterbug.com
01/11/2008
Summary of the review
Three Olympus Zuiko Digital Lenses; 14-35mm f/2 ED SWD, 12-60mm f/2.8-4 ED SWD, and 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 ED SWD
D
digitalkamera.de
25/08/2008
Summary of the review
Olympus E-3 and E-520 tested with the 14-35mm F2.0 SWD by DCTau
(Translated)Show original
D
digitalcamaralens.com
26/08/2025
Summary of the review
Olympus Digital 14-35mm f/2 ED SWD - Test - Review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 39 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD

  • Exceptional image quality with high sharpness even wide open at f/2.0
  • World's first standard zoom lens with a fast constant f/2.0 aperture
  • Robust, professional-grade build quality with extensive weather sealing
  • Beautiful color rendition and high contrast
  • Well-corrected chromatic aberration and low distortion beyond 17mm
  • Smooth, mechanically-coupled zoom and focus rings

What we don't like about Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD

  • Large and heavy, leading to balance issues on smaller camera bodies
  • Very high retail price, making it a significant investment
  • Autofocus can be slow, prone to hunting, or slightly inaccurate in certain conditions
  • Lower light transmission (around 84-85%) compared to some f/2.8 rivals
  • Casts a shadow at wide focal lengths when using built-in camera flashes
  • Lack of built-in image stabilization (relies on in-body stabilization)

Verdict

The Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14-35mm f/2.0 SWD is a Super High Grade standard zoom lens for the Four Thirds system, offering a 28-70mm equivalent focal range and a world-first constant f/2.0 maximum aperture. It features a sophisticated optical design with 18 elements in 17 groups, including ED and aspherical glass, and utilizes a Supersonic Wave Drive (SWD) motor for quiet, high-speed autofocus. Its primary advantages include exceptional edge-to-edge sharpness, beautiful bokeh, professional-tier weather-sealed construction, and a mechanically-interlocked manual focus ring for precision. However, common drawbacks include its substantial weight of 915g, large 86mm diameter, lack of internal image stabilization, and occasional autofocus hunting on certain camera bodies.

Compare Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus Zuiko ED 14 35mm F2 0 SWD and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found