Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£13,200Lens mount:Nikon ZMaximum focal length:560 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):4Optical image stabilization:yesMaximum angle of view:6.2 °

Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical score

20%

6.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 52% of camera-lenses
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

6.3

Optics & Aperture

24%

6.9

Build & Handling

20%

5.7

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

10

Stabilization

3%

10

Mount & Format

â–²Better than 63% of camera-lenses
6.3

User score

User score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

3.2

Number of reviews

Based on 5 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 98% of camera-lenses
  • nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s
  • nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s
  • nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s
  • nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s
  • nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s
nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s
nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s
nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s
nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s
nikon-nikkor-z-400mm-f-2-8-tc-vr-s

Best prices

    N/A~ £13,200

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

6.3

Optics & Aperture

24%

6.9

Build & Handling

20%

5.7

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

10

Stabilization

3%

10

Mount & Format

6.9
User score
User score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

3.2

Number of reviews

Based on 5 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.3
Popularity
Popularity
3.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S has a popularity score of 3.2 points, which is lower than 85.9% of camera lenses.
3.2
Value for money
Value for money
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.8

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

5.1
Lens type
telephoto prime
Lens mount
Nikon Z
Sensor format coverage
Full-frame
Filter thread size
N/A
Teleconverter compatibility
yes
Teleconverter compatibility
yes
This camera lens supports teleconverters. 15.2% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Built-in 1.4x extender; also supports external extenders.
Show more
Minimum focal length
400 mm
Maximum focal length
560 mm
Optical zoom
1.4xx
Maximum angle of view
6.2 °
Minimum angle of view
4.5 °
Show more
Focus motor
VCM
Minimum focus distance
2.5 m
Minimum focus distance
2.5 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 2.5 m, which is farther than 97% of camera lenses and equal to 0.6% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.23xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.23x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.23x, which is higher than 64.3% of camera lenses and equal to 2.4% of camera lenses.
0.17 without built-in teleconverter.
Full-time manual focus
yes
Full-time manual focus
yes
This camera lens supports full-time manual focus. 68.3% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
yes
Optical image stabilization
yes
This camera lens supports optical image stabilization. 29% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
5.5 stops
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
5.5 stops
This camera lens offers 5.5 stops of stabilization, which is stronger than 90.1% of camera lenses and equal to 6.5% of camera lenses.
Weight
2,950 g
Weight
2,950 g
This camera lens weighs 2,950 g, which is heavier than 97.5% of camera lenses.
Lens length
380 mm
Lens length
380 mm
This camera lens is 380 mm long, which is longer than 98.5% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
156 mm
Lens diameter
156 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 156 mm, which is wider than 98.5% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
This camera lens supports weather sealing. 50.2% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    This camera lens has optical image stabilization, the average camera lens does not. 29% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
  • Teleconverter compatible
    Teleconverter compatibility
    yes
    This camera lens supports teleconverters, while the average camera lens does not.
    Built-in 1.4x extender; also supports external extenders.
  • 1.5 stops stronger stabilization
    Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
    5.5 stops
    This camera lens has a higher stabilization effectiveness than the average camera lens (5.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average lens has stabilization effectiveness of 4 stops.
    5.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • Has fluorine coating
    Fluorine coating
    yes
    This camera lens has a fluorine coating, the average camera lens does not. 32.6% of camera lenses use a fluorine coating.
  • Has drop-in filter support
    Drop-in / rear filter
    yes
    This camera lens supports drop-in or rear filters, while the average camera lens does not.
    46 mm drop-in filter.
  • Has focus limiter switch
    Focus limiter switch
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus limiter switch, the average camera lens does not. 16.4% of camera lenses include a focus limiter switch.
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2022
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2022 vs 2016
  • 1 more low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    3
    This camera lens has more low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    3 vs 2
  • Teleconverter compatible
    Teleconverter compatibility
    yes
    This camera lens supports teleconverters, while the average camera lens does not.
    Built-in 1.4x extender; also supports external extenders.
  • Has drop-in filter support
    Drop-in / rear filter
    yes
    This camera lens supports drop-in or rear filters, while the average camera lens does not.
    46 mm drop-in filter.
  • 1 more low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    3
    This camera lens has more low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    3 vs 2
  • Has focus limiter switch
    Focus limiter switch
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus limiter switch, the average camera lens does not. 16.4% of camera lenses include a focus limiter switch.
  • 0.04 x higher maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.23 x
    This camera lens has a higher maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.2 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.17 without built-in teleconverter.
    0.23 x vs 0.192 x
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    This camera lens has optical image stabilization, the average camera lens does not. 29% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
  • 1.5 stops stronger stabilization
    Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
    5.5 stops
    This camera lens has a higher stabilization effectiveness than the average camera lens (5.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average lens has stabilization effectiveness of 4 stops.
    5.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • Has fluorine coating
    Fluorine coating
    yes
    This camera lens has a fluorine coating, the average camera lens does not. 32.6% of camera lenses use a fluorine coating.
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2022
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2022 vs 2016
  • 2,440 g heavier
    Weight
    2,950 g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (2950 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    2,950 g vs 510 g
  • 1.2 higher f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    4
    This camera lens has a dimmer maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/4 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2.8 without the built-in teleconverter.
    4 vs 2.8
  • 287.75 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    380 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (380 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    380 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 2 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    0
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (0 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    0 vs 2
  • 79 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    156 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (156 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    156 mm vs 77 mm
  • 2.2 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    2.5 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (2.5 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    2.5 m vs 0.3 m
  • 24.91x more expensive
    Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S is more expensive than the average camera lens (£13,200 vs £530).
    £13,200 vs £530
  • 33.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S
    the average camera lens
    Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S has a lower user score than the average camera lens (6.28 vs 8.360).
    6.28 vs 8.36
  • 24.91x more expensive
    Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S is more expensive than the average camera lens (£13,200 vs £530).
    £13,200 vs £530
  • 33.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S
    the average camera lens
    Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S has a lower user score than the average camera lens (6.28 vs 8.360).
    6.28 vs 8.36
  • 36.3% worse value for money
    Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera lens (5.05 vs 6.9).
    5.05 vs 6.89
  • 2.28x less popular
    Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S is less popular than the average camera lens (3.2 vs 7.3).
    3.2 vs 7.29
  • 1.2 higher f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    4
    This camera lens has a dimmer maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/4 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2.8 without the built-in teleconverter.
    4 vs 2.8
  • 2 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    0
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (0 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    0 vs 2
  • 2 fewer fluorite elements
    Fluorite elements
    2
    This camera lens has fewer fluorite elements than the average camera lens (2 vs 0). The average lens has 0 fluorite elements.
    2 vs 0
  • 2.2 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    2.5 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (2.5 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    2.5 m vs 0.3 m
  • 2,440 g heavier
    Weight
    2,950 g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (2950 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    2,950 g vs 510 g
  • 287.75 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    380 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (380 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    380 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 79 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    156 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (156 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    156 mm vs 77 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
photographylife.com
12/10/2025
Summary of the review
Z
zsystemuser.com
07/05/2022
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
26/05/2022
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
23/02/2022
Summary of the review
Z
zsystemuser.com
07/05/2022
Summary of the review
Z
zielfoto.com
02/06/2025
Summary of the review
L
lukas-moesch.ch
09/07/2023
Summary of the review
P
phototrend.fr
05/12/2024
Summary of the review
N
nikonland.it
09/12/2023
Summary of the review
S
shoot.be
21/10/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 5 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S

  • Built-in 1.4x teleconverter allows instant switching between 400mm f/2.8 and 560mm f/4
  • Exceptional edge-to-edge sharpness and resolution even when used wide open
  • Significant weight reduction (approx. 2.95 kg) compared to previous F-mount versions makes it handheld-capable
  • Highly effective vibration reduction (VR) system providing up to 5.5 stops of stabilization
  • Near-silent and blazing fast 'Silky Swift' VCM autofocus system
  • Robust, weather-sealed build quality suitable for professional wildlife and sports photography
  • Excellent bokeh quality with smooth transitions and minimal chromatic aberration

What we don't like about Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S

  • Extremely high price point (approx. $14,000+ USD)
  • Noticeable focus breathing, which may be a drawback for high-end videography
  • Tripod foot design and scattered lens controls received mixed reviews regarding ergonomics
  • Front element fluorine coating reported by some to attract dust more readily than expected
  • Minor vignetting and cat-eye bokeh shapes can appear at the frame edges at f/2.8
  • Delicate tripod collar tightening screw can be damaged if over-tightened

Verdict

The Nikon Nikkor Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S is a professional-grade super-telephoto prime lens featuring a built-in 1.4x teleconverter that instantly extends the focal length to 560mm at f/4. Its advanced optical design includes 25 elements in 19 groups, incorporating fluorite, Super ED, and SR glass to virtually eliminate chromatic aberration, while Meso Amorphous and ARNEO coatings provide industry-leading anti-reflection performance. Key pros include a revolutionary Silky Swift VCM autofocus system for near-silent, lightning-fast tracking, 5.5 stops of built-in Vibration Reduction, and a remarkably lightweight magnesium alloy body weighing approximately 2,950g. However, main cons include its exceptionally high retail price of roughly $14,000 USD, noticeable focus breathing in some video scenarios, and a bulky form factor that remains a challenge for prolonged handheld use.

Compare Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm F 2 8 TC VR S and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found