Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,450Lens mount:L-MountMaximum focal length:135 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):4.5Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:28 °

Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

5.2

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.0

Technical score

20%

5.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 96% of camera-lenses
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

4.5

Optics & Aperture

24%

6.1

Build & Handling

20%

5.4

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

â–¼Worse than 90% of camera-lenses
5.9

User score

User score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

3.2

Number of reviews

Based on 10 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 99% of camera-lenses
  • leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph
  • leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph
  • leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph
  • leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph
  • leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph
leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph
leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph
leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph
leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph
leica-apo-vario-elmar-tl-55-135-mm-f-3-5-4-5-asph

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

4.5

Optics & Aperture

24%

6.1

Build & Handling

20%

5.4

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

5.0
User score
User score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

3.2

Number of reviews

Based on 10 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
5.9
Popularity
Popularity
3.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH has a popularity score of 3.2 points, which is lower than 85.9% of camera lenses.
3.2
Value for money
Value for money
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.2

Overall score

40%

2.9

Price

4.5
Lens type
zoom
Lens mount
L-Mount
Sensor format coverage
APS-C
Filter thread size
60 mm
Teleconverter compatibility
no
Teleconverter compatibility
no
This camera lens does not support teleconverters. 15.3% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Show more
Minimum focal length
55 mm
Maximum focal length
135 mm
Optical zoom
2.5xx
Maximum angle of view
28 °
Minimum angle of view
12 °
Show more
Focus motor
STM
Minimum focus distance
1 m
Minimum focus distance
1 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 1 m, which is farther than 86.8% of camera lenses and equal to 1.6% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.125xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.125x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.125x, which is lower than 75.8% of camera lenses and equal to 5.5% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
yes
Full-time manual focus
yes
This camera lens supports full-time manual focus. 68.3% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Electronic override in One-Shot AF.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Barrel extends only during zooming.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
547 g
Weight
547 g
This camera lens weighs 547 g, which is heavier than 55% of camera lenses and equal to the weight of 0.1% of camera lenses.
Lens length
110 mm
Lens length
110 mm
This camera lens is 110 mm long, which is longer than 66.3% of camera lenses and equal to the length of 0.4% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
68 mm
Lens diameter
68 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 68 mm, which is slimmer than 77.3% of camera lenses and equal to that of 1.1% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
no
Weather sealing (splashproof)
no
This camera lens does not support weather sealing. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • 9 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    68 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (68 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    68 mm vs 77 mm
  • 9 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    68 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (68 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    68 mm vs 77 mm
  • Not weather-sealed
    Weather sealing (splashproof)
    no
    This camera lens does not support weather sealing, the average camera lens does. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
  • 1.7 higher f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    4.5
    This camera lens has a dimmer maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/4.5 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    4.5 vs 2.8
  • No rounded blades
    Rounded aperture blades
    no
    This camera lens does not use rounded aperture blades, the average camera lens does. 87.8% of camera lenses use rounded aperture blades.
  • 0.7 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    1 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (1 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    1 m vs 0.3 m
  • 1 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    1
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (1 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    1 vs 2
  • 17.75 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    110 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (110 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    110 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 0.07 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.125 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.1 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.125 x vs 0.192 x
  • 42.7% lower user score
    User score
    5.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH
    the average camera lens
    Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH has a lower user score than the average camera lens (5.86 vs 8.360).
    5.86 vs 8.36
  • 42.7% lower user score
    User score
    5.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH
    the average camera lens
    Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH has a lower user score than the average camera lens (5.86 vs 8.360).
    5.86 vs 8.36
  • 52.9% worse value for money
    Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera lens (4.5 vs 6.9).
    4.5 vs 6.89
  • 2.74x more expensive
    Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH is more expensive than the average camera lens (£1,450 vs £530).
    £1,450 vs £530
  • 2.28x less popular
    Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH is less popular than the average camera lens (3.2 vs 7.3).
    3.2 vs 7.29
  • 1.7 higher f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    4.5
    This camera lens has a dimmer maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/4.5 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    4.5 vs 2.8
  • No rounded blades
    Rounded aperture blades
    no
    This camera lens does not use rounded aperture blades, the average camera lens does. 87.8% of camera lenses use rounded aperture blades.
  • 1 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    1
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (1 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    1 vs 2
  • 0.7 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    1 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (1 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    1 m vs 0.3 m
  • 0.07 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.125 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.1 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.125 x vs 0.192 x
  • Not weather-sealed
    Weather sealing (splashproof)
    no
    This camera lens does not support weather sealing, the average camera lens does. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
  • 17.75 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    110 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (110 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    110 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 37 g heavier
    Weight
    547 g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (547 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    547 g vs 510 g
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2015
    This camera lens was released earlier than the average camera lens.
    2015 vs 2016

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
macfilos.com
10/01/2018
Summary of the review
S
shige-art.net
01/07/2024
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
23/02/2016
Summary of the review
F
findingrange.com
09/05/2019
Summary of the review
M
macfilos.com
16/05/2025
Summary of the review
L
l-camera-forum.com
13/03/2018
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
29/03/2018
Summary of the review
D
dasfotoportal.de
22/05/2018
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
29/03/2018
Summary of the review
M
mpb.com
01/11/2023
Summary of the review
M
mpb.com
10/05/2026
Summary of the review
M
matteottistudio.com
07/10/2019
Summary of the review
G
giacomosardi.com
07/10/2019
Summary of the review
M
mpb.com
28/10/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 10 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH

  • Exceptional center-to-edge sharpness and micro-detail clarity
  • Beautiful color rendering and natural-looking skin tones
  • High contrast with minimal chromatic aberration or color fringing
  • Excellent resistance to lens flare
  • Premium, rugged build quality that feels dense and structurally seamless
  • Relatively light and compact form factor for a telephoto zoom range
  • Smooth and precise mechanical movement of the zoom ring
  • Fast, accurate, and snappy autofocus capabilities
  • Great performance for portraiture, landscape, and travel photography

What we don't like about Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH

  • Lacks built-in optical image stabilization (OIS), requiring fast shutter speeds to prevent camera shake
  • Slow and variable maximum aperture (f/3.5 - f/4.5), which limits its performance in low-light environments
  • Very high purchase price compared to other APS-C telephoto zoom lenses
  • Enforces a strict APS-C crop mode when mounted to full-frame L-mount camera bodies, reducing sensor resolution
  • Some noticeable vignetting when shooting wide open
  • Lacks a dedicated tripod collar, which can cause the setup to sag on tripods
  • Can feel slightly unbalanced when using the lens hood on smaller T-style camera bodies

Verdict

The Leica APO-Vario-Elmar-TL 55-135mm f/3.5-4.5 ASPH is a high-performance telephoto zoom lens designed for APS-C L-mount cameras, offering a versatile 35mm equivalent focal range of 80-200mm. Its optical construction features 12 elements in 10 groups, including one aspherical element and an apochromatic design that significantly reduces chromatic aberrations and distortion. Key characteristics include a durable black anodized metal barrel, an electronically controlled autofocus system with full-time manual override, and a compact weight of approximately 500g. Main pros include exceptional edge-to-edge sharpness, beautiful bokeh for portraiture, and a portable design ideal for travel and wildlife. However, notable cons include its relatively slow variable aperture (f/3.5-4.5) and the lack of built-in optical image stabilisation, which may require higher shutter speeds or a tripod in low-light conditions.

Compare Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Leica APO Vario Elmar TL 55 135mm F 3 5 4 5 ASPH and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found