Scored using Washing machines Methodology v3.0
Washing machines Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Washing machines Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Washing machines Methodology v3.0

Corberó CLACSM6524 review: 101 specs compared

Avg. price:~£310Capacity:6.5 kgMaximum spin speed:1200 RPMEnergy efficiency class:CType:self-standingLoading type:top-loading

Corberó CLACSM6524 Review: Compare 168 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Washing machines category and whether it is worth buying.

Corberó CLACSM6524
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 70%, User score 25%, List score 5%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

Technical score

25%

7.9

User score

5%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▲Better than 54% of washing machines
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the washing machine's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a washing machine with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

▲Better than 78%
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 70% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

7.1

Performance

25%

7.6

Energy efficiency

20%

9.0

Washing programs

20%

8.3

Features

10%

8.4

Design

▲Better than 57%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

7.9

Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.4 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.0

Rating

20%

8.0

Popularity

▼Worse than 75%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 5% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • corbero-clacsm6524
  • corbero-clacsm6524
  • corbero-clacsm6524
  • corbero-clacsm6524
  • corbero-clacsm6524
  • corbero-clacsm6524
  • corbero-clacsm6524
  • corbero-clacsm6524
  • corbero-clacsm6524
  • corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
corbero-clacsm6524
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Washing machines model ranking

Ranked #200 of 903 models in Washing machines (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of washing machine Corberó CLACSM6524

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 70% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

7.1

Performance

25%

7.6

Energy efficiency

20%

9.0

Washing programs

20%

8.3

Features

10%

8.4

Design

7.9
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the washing machine's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a washing machine with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

8.1
Capacity
6.5 kg
This washing machine holds 6.5 kg, which is less than 90% of washing machines and equal to 0.2% of washing machines.
Drum volume
?
Spin-drying efficiency class
?
Maximum spin speed
1,200 RPM
This washing machine spins at 1,200 RPM, which is slower than 71.1% of washing machines and equal to 22.3% of washing machines.
Minimum spin speed
?
Show more
Energy efficiency class
C
This washing machine has energy class C, which is worse than 73.9% of washing machines and the same as 8.5% of washing machines.
Energy consumption per 100 cycles
57 kWh/100 cycles
This washing machine uses 57 kWh/100 cycles, which is higher than 70% of washing machines and equal to 2.3% of washing machines.
Annual energy consumption
125.4 kWh/year
This washing machine uses 125.4 kWh/year, which is higher than 66.3% of washing machines and equal to 2.1% of washing machines.
Annual energy cost
31.4 £
This washing machine has a yearly running cost of £31.4, which is higher than 65.8% of washing machines and equal to 2.1% of washing machines.
Water consumption per cycle
44 L
This washing machine uses 44 L of water per cycle, which is lower than 68.7% of washing machines and equal to 7.2% of washing machines.
Show more
N. of washing programs
16
This washing machine offers 16 wash programmes, which is more than 76.4% of washing machines and equal to 15.8% of washing machines.
N. of downloadable programs
?
N. of washing programs under 1 hour
2
This washing machine has 2 programmes under an hour, which is more than 41.7% of washing machines and equal to 36.5% of washing machines.
Fastest cycle duration
15 min
This washing machine has a fastest cycle of 15 min, which is shorter than 25.4% of washing machines and equal to 44.8% of washing machines.
ECO cycle duration
203 min
This washing machine has an ECO cycle of 203 min, which is shorter than 86.2% of washing machines.
Show more
N. of advanced features
?
Foam control system
yes
This washing machine features a foam control system. 79.1% of washing machines have a foam control system.
Laundry detection system
?
Unbalanced load detection
?
Load balancing system
?
Show more
Color
white
This washing machine comes in white, which is more conventional than the colour in 14% of washing machines and the same as the colour in 86% of washing machines.
Type
self-standing
This washing machine is self-standing, which is more flexible to place than the type in 3.3% of washing machines and the same as the type in 96.8% of washing machines.
Loading type
top-loading
This washing machine is top-loading, which is less practical than the design in 91.1% of washing machines and the same as the design in 8.9% of washing machines.
Display
yes
This washing machine has a display. 96.2% of washing machines have a display.
Child lock
yes
This washing machine has a child lock. 99.7% of washing machines have a child lock.
Show more

Corberó CLACSM6524 vs the average washing machine

246810TotalPerformanceEnergy efficiencyWashing programsFeaturesDesign
  • 1 more wash programmes
    This washing machine offers more wash programmes than the average washing machine (16 vs 15). The average washing machine offers 15 wash programmes.
    16 vs 15
  • 16.4% lighter
    This washing machine is lighter than the average washing machine (56 kg vs 67 kg). The average washing machine weighs 67 kg.
    56 kg vs 67 kg
  • 23.5% smaller volume
    This washing machine has a smaller volume than the average washing machine (214720 cm³ vs 280500 cm³). The average washing machine has a volume of 280500 cm³.
    214,720 cm³ vs 280,500 cm³
  • 3 L less water per cycle
    This washing machine uses less water per cycle than the average washing machine (44 L vs 47 L). The average washing machine uses 47 L of water per cycle.
    44 L vs 47 L
  • 15 min shorter eco cycle
    This washing machine has a shorter ECO cycle than the average washing machine (203 min vs 218 min). The average washing machine's ECO cycle takes 218 min.
    203 min vs 218 min
  • 19.8 cm narrower
    This washing machine is narrower than the average washing machine (40 cm vs 59.8 cm). The average washing machine is 59.8 cm wide.
    40 cm vs 59.8 cm
  • 32.3% cheaper
    Corberó CLACSM6524 is cheaper than the average washing machine (£310 vs £410).
    £310 vs £410
  • 32.3% cheaper
    Corberó CLACSM6524 is cheaper than the average washing machine (£310 vs £410).
    £310 vs £410
  • 3 L less water per cycle
    This washing machine uses less water per cycle than the average washing machine (44 L vs 47 L). The average washing machine uses 47 L of water per cycle.
    44 L vs 47 L
  • 1 more wash programmes
    This washing machine offers more wash programmes than the average washing machine (16 vs 15). The average washing machine offers 15 wash programmes.
    16 vs 15
  • 15 min shorter eco cycle
    This washing machine has a shorter ECO cycle than the average washing machine (203 min vs 218 min). The average washing machine's ECO cycle takes 218 min.
    203 min vs 218 min
  • 16.4% lighter
    This washing machine is lighter than the average washing machine (56 kg vs 67 kg). The average washing machine weighs 67 kg.
    56 kg vs 67 kg
  • 23.5% smaller volume
    This washing machine has a smaller volume than the average washing machine (214720 cm³ vs 280500 cm³). The average washing machine has a volume of 280500 cm³.
    214,720 cm³ vs 280,500 cm³
  • 19.8 cm narrower
    This washing machine is narrower than the average washing machine (40 cm vs 59.8 cm). The average washing machine is 59.8 cm wide.
    40 cm vs 59.8 cm
  • 200 RPM lower spin speed
    This washing machine spins slower than the average washing machine (1200 RPM vs 1400 RPM). The average washing machine spins at 1400 RPM.
    1,200 RPM vs 1,400 RPM
  • Worse energy grade
    This washing machine has a worse energy class than the average washing machine (C vs A).
    C vs A
  • 7 kWh/100 cycles more energy use
    This washing machine uses more electricity than the average washing machine (57 kWh/100 cycles vs 50 kWh/100 cycles). The average washing machine uses 50 kWh/100 cycles.
    57 kWh/100 cycles vs 50 kWh/100 cycles
  • 1.5 kg less capacity
    This washing machine holds less laundry than the average washing machine (6.5 kg vs 8 kg). The average washing machine holds 8 kg.
    6.5 kg vs 8 kg
  • 4.5 cm deeper
    This washing machine is deeper than the average washing machine (61 cm vs 56.5 cm). The average washing machine is 56.5 cm deep.
    61 cm vs 56.5 cm
  • 3 cm higher height
    This washing machine is taller than the average washing machine (88 cm vs 85 cm). The average washing machine is 85 cm tall.
    88 cm vs 85 cm
  • Less practical loading
    This washing machine has a less practical loading design than the average washing machine (top-loading vs front-loading).
    top-loading vs front-loading
  • 3.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    7.9

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.4 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.0

    Rating

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    7.9 vs 8.2
  • 3.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    7.9

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.4 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.0

    Rating

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    7.9 vs 8.2
  • 200 RPM lower spin speed
    This washing machine spins slower than the average washing machine (1200 RPM vs 1400 RPM). The average washing machine spins at 1400 RPM.
    1,200 RPM vs 1,400 RPM
  • 1.5 kg less capacity
    This washing machine holds less laundry than the average washing machine (6.5 kg vs 8 kg). The average washing machine holds 8 kg.
    6.5 kg vs 8 kg
  • Worse energy grade
    This washing machine has a worse energy class than the average washing machine (C vs A).
    C vs A
  • 7 kWh/100 cycles more energy use
    This washing machine uses more electricity than the average washing machine (57 kWh/100 cycles vs 50 kWh/100 cycles). The average washing machine uses 50 kWh/100 cycles.
    57 kWh/100 cycles vs 50 kWh/100 cycles
  • 4.5 cm deeper
    This washing machine is deeper than the average washing machine (61 cm vs 56.5 cm). The average washing machine is 56.5 cm deep.
    61 cm vs 56.5 cm
  • Less practical loading
    This washing machine has a less practical loading design than the average washing machine (top-loading vs front-loading).
    top-loading vs front-loading
  • 3 cm higher height
    This washing machine is taller than the average washing machine (88 cm vs 85 cm). The average washing machine is 85 cm tall.
    88 cm vs 85 cm

Third-party reviews

What we like about Corberó CLACSM6524

  • 16 programs give you plenty of choice.
  • Steam and an anti-crease function help shirts come out flatter.
  • At 40 cm wide, it fits a narrow gap.
  • The fastest cycle finishes in 15 min.
  • Two programs finish in under an hour.
  • The delay start of up to 24 h lets you set a wash for later.

What we don't like about Corberó CLACSM6524

  • The 6.5 kg drum is small for a family.
  • At 88 cm high and 61 cm deep, it takes up room in a small kitchen.
  • Energy class C, with 57 kWh per 100 cycles, is high for daily use.
  • The ECO cycle takes 203 min.

Verdict

For a flat with a narrow hallway and a small load each day, the Corberó CLACSM6524 is a budget top-loader worth a look. At 40 cm wide it fits a narrow gap, and at 56 kg it stays put during a fast spin. Its 16 programs are the main reason to buy it, and steam with an anti-crease function helps keep shirts flatter. A quick cycle takes 15 min. The real limit is the 6.5 kg drum. It is small for a family, so a week of towels takes several loads. The ECO cycle takes 203 min, and the use of 57 kWh per 100 cycles is high for a machine this size. The delay start, up to 24 h, lets you set a wash for later.

Compare Corberó CLACSM6524 with other washing machines

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Corberó CLACSM6524 and other washing machines

No results found