Scored using VR headsets Methodology v1.0
VR headsets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo VR headsets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore VR headsets Methodology v1.0

HTC VIVE Cosmos Elite Review | 89 Data compared

Avg. price:~£840Weight:702 gResolution:1440x1700Refresh rate:90 HzDisplay type:LCDDevice type:PC VR

HTC VIVE Cosmos Elite Review: Compare 89 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the VR headsets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the VR headset's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best VR headsets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.2

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

▼Worse than 61% of vr-headsets
6.2

Technical Score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

58%

6.1

Display & Optics

22%

5.9

Tracking & Sensors

10%

7.6

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

8.0

Connectivity

3%

6.7

Design & Power

▼Worse than 55% of vr-headsets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • htc-vive-cosmos-elite
  • htc-vive-cosmos-elite
  • htc-vive-cosmos-elite
  • htc-vive-cosmos-elite
  • htc-vive-cosmos-elite
  • htc-vive-cosmos-elite
htc-vive-cosmos-elite
htc-vive-cosmos-elite
htc-vive-cosmos-elite
htc-vive-cosmos-elite
htc-vive-cosmos-elite
htc-vive-cosmos-elite

Best prices

    N/A~ £840

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of VR headset HTC VIVE Cosmos Elite

Technical Score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

58%

6.1

Display & Optics

22%

5.9

Tracking & Sensors

10%

7.6

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

8.0

Connectivity

3%

6.7

Design & Power

6.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
HTC VIVE Cosmos Elite has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 65.3% of VR headsets.
1.0
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

6.1

Price

6.2
Resolution
1440x1700
Resolution
1440x1700
This vr headset has a screen resolution of 1440x1700 which is higher than that of 51.3% of VR headsets and equal to that of 2.6% of VR headsets.
Screen size
3.4 inches
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Refresh rate
90 Hz
This vr headset supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 18% of VR headsets and equal to that in 51.3% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (horizontal)
97 °
Visible FoV (horizontal)
97 °
This vr headset offers a horizontal FoV of 97 ° which is narrower than that of 63% of VR headsets and equal to that of 4.4% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (vertical)
94 °
Visible FoV (vertical)
94 °
This vr headset offers a vertical FoV of 94 ° which is narrower than that of 60% of VR headsets and equal to that of 5.7% of VR headsets.
Show more
Tracking type
outside-in
360° head tracking
yes
360° head tracking
yes
This vr headset supports full 360° head tracking. 2% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
32
N. of cameras
4
N. of cameras
4
This vr headset has 4 cameras which is more than in 60.4% of VR headsets and equal to that in 12.5% of VR headsets.
Hardware remains on headset.
Tracking frequency
1,000 Hz
Tracking frequency
1,000 Hz
This vr headset has a tracking frequency of 1,000 Hz which is higher than that of 38.1% of VR headsets and equal to that of 57.1% of VR headsets.
100 positional optical.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
OpenXR support
yes
OpenXR support
yes
This vr headset supports OpenXR. 38.8% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Via SteamVR runtime.
Wireless PC streaming
yes
Wireless PC streaming
yes
This vr headset supports wireless PC streaming. 63.3% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Requires official wireless adapter.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This vr headset does not have Wi-Fi. 38.8% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Show more
Touch controllers
yes
Touch controllers
yes
This vr headset includes touch controllers. 28.6% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
Game controller included
yes
Game controller included
yes
This vr headset includes a game controller. 36.7% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
HMD-only version also sold.
Spatial audio
yes
Spatial audio
yes
This vr headset supports spatial audio. 10.6% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
Integrated 3D spatial audio.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
This vr headset has 2 speakers which is more than in 39.1% of VR headsets and equal to that in 60.9% of VR headsets.
Integrated on-ear headphones.
N. of microphones
2
N. of microphones
2
This vr headset includes 2 microphones, which is more than 46.7% of VR headsets and equal to 46.7% of VR headsets.
Show more
Device type
PC VR
Chipset
N/A
CPU clock speed
N/A
GPU model
N/A
RAM capacity
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Weight
702 g
Weight
702 g
This vr headset weighs 702 g which is heavier than 77.8% of VR headsets and equal to the weight of 2.2% of VR headsets.
With headstrap.
Headstrap type
rigid halo
Headstrap type
rigid halo
This vr headset uses a rigid halo headstrap, which is more comfortable than the design on 44.9%.
Flip-up visor design.
Body material
plastic
Show more

HTC VIVE Cosmos Elite vs the average VR headset

246810TotalDisplay & OpticsTracking & SensorsConnectivityControls & AudioHardwareDesign & Power
  • Supports body tracking
    Body tracking
    yes
    This vr headset supports body tracking, the average VR headset does not.
    Via SteamVR/VIVE trackers.
  • Wireless PC VR streaming
    Wireless PC streaming
    yes
    This vr headset supports wireless PC streaming, the average VR headset does not.
    Requires official wireless adapter.
  • Supports SteamVR
    SteamVR support
    yes
    This vr headset supports SteamVR, the average VR headset does not. 50% of VR headsets support this PC VR ecosystem.
  • 2 more cameras
    N. of cameras
    4
    This vr headset has more cameras than the average VR headset (4 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    Hardware remains on headset.
    4 vs 2
  • 5 °C higher maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    40 °C
    This vr headset has a higher maximum operating temperature than the average VR headset (40 °C vs 35 °C). The average VR headset reaches a maximum operating temperature of 35 °C.
    40 °C vs 35 °C
  • Wider IPD adjustment range
    IPD adjustment range
    61–73 mm
    This vr headset has a higher IPD adjustment range than the average VR headset (61–73 mm vs 60–70 mm). The average VR headset supports an IPD adjustment range of 60–70 mm.
    61–73 mm vs 60–70 mm
  • Wider IPD adjustment range
    IPD adjustment range
    61–73 mm
    This vr headset has a higher IPD adjustment range than the average VR headset (61–73 mm vs 60–70 mm). The average VR headset supports an IPD adjustment range of 60–70 mm.
    61–73 mm vs 60–70 mm
  • Supports body tracking
    Body tracking
    yes
    This vr headset supports body tracking, the average VR headset does not.
    Via SteamVR/VIVE trackers.
  • 2 more cameras
    N. of cameras
    4
    This vr headset has more cameras than the average VR headset (4 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    Hardware remains on headset.
    4 vs 2
  • Wireless PC VR streaming
    Wireless PC streaming
    yes
    This vr headset supports wireless PC streaming, the average VR headset does not.
    Requires official wireless adapter.
  • Supports SteamVR
    SteamVR support
    yes
    This vr headset supports SteamVR, the average VR headset does not. 50% of VR headsets support this PC VR ecosystem.
  • 5 °C higher maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    40 °C
    This vr headset has a higher maximum operating temperature than the average VR headset (40 °C vs 35 °C). The average VR headset reaches a maximum operating temperature of 35 °C.
    40 °C vs 35 °C
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    This vr headset uses LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    LCD vs Micro-OLED
  • Requires base stations
    External base station requirement
    yes
    This vr headset requires external base stations, the average VR headset does not. 0% of VR headsets work without external base stations.
  • 1.5 ° narrower vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    94 °
    This vr headset has a lower vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (94 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    94 ° vs 95.5 °
  • 3 ° narrower horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    97 °
    This vr headset has a lower horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (97 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    97 ° vs 100 °
  • 31% heavier controllers
    Controller weight
    203 g
    This vr headset is heavier than the average VR headset (203 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    Uses standard Vive wand controllers.
    203 g vs 155 g
  • 20.4% heavier
    Weight
    702 g
    This vr headset is heavier than the average VR headset (702 g vs 583 g). The average VR headset weighs 583 g.
    With headstrap.
    702 g vs 583 g
  • 4 h shorter controller battery life
    Controller battery life
    8 h
    This vr headset has a lower controller battery life than the average VR headset (8 h vs 12 h). The average controller battery lasts 12 h.
    8 h vs 12 h
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    This vr headset is not compatible with Android, the average VR headset is. 51% of VR headsets support Android pairing or companion apps.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    This vr headset uses LCD for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    LCD vs Micro-OLED
  • 3 ° narrower horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    97 °
    This vr headset has a lower horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (97 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    97 ° vs 100 °
  • 1.5 ° narrower vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    94 °
    This vr headset has a lower vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (94 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    94 ° vs 95.5 °
  • Lower screen resolution
    Resolution
    1440x1700
    This vr headset has a lower screen resolution than the average VR headset (1440x1700 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    1440x1700 vs 1830x1464
  • Requires base stations
    External base station requirement
    yes
    This vr headset requires external base stations, the average VR headset does not. 0% of VR headsets work without external base stations.
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    This vr headset is not compatible with Android, the average VR headset is. 51% of VR headsets support Android pairing or companion apps.
  • 31% heavier controllers
    Controller weight
    203 g
    This vr headset is heavier than the average VR headset (203 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    Uses standard Vive wand controllers.
    203 g vs 155 g
  • 4 h shorter controller battery life
    Controller battery life
    8 h
    This vr headset has a lower controller battery life than the average VR headset (8 h vs 12 h). The average controller battery lasts 12 h.
    8 h vs 12 h
  • 20.4% heavier
    Weight
    702 g
    This vr headset is heavier than the average VR headset (702 g vs 583 g). The average VR headset weighs 583 g.
    With headstrap.
    702 g vs 583 g
  • 30.85 mm higher height
    Height
    143 mm
    This vr headset is taller than the average VR headset (143 mm vs 112.15 mm). The average VR headset has a height of 112.15 mm.
    Visor only.
    143 mm vs 112.15 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
wired.com
02/04/2020
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
09/11/2022
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
29/04/2020
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
21/10/2021
Summary of the review
L
livescience.com
13/04/2022
Summary of the review
G
gamingnexus.com
19/04/2020
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
18/03/2020
Summary of the review
M
mrtv.co
22/04/2021
Summary of the review
E
eftm.com
19/03/2020
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
09/03/2021
Summary of the review
R
rockpapershotgun.com
23/04/2020
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
14/04/2020
Summary of the review
U
uploadvr.com
01/04/2020
Summary of the review
S
space.com
05/10/2021
Summary of the review
G
gbatemp.net
05/10/2020
Summary of the review
R
redbull.com
02/08/2020
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
01/10/2020
Summary of the review
I
inside-digital.de
18/03/2021
Summary of the review
M
mixed.de
19/07/2020
Summary of the review
R
redbull.com
04/08/2020
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
17/12/2020
Summary of the review
R
rescru.de
24/10/2020
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
26/03/2020
Summary of the review
F
futura-sciences.com
06/03/2021
Summary of the review
C
canardpc.com
1er juillet 2020
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
13/12/2020
Summary of the review
R
realovirtual.com
31/03/2021
Summary of the review
P
pocketmags.com
01/05/2021
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.nl
13/12/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about HTC VIVE Cosmos Elite

  • High-resolution display (2880 x 1700 combined) with minimal screen door effect
  • Excellent lighthouse tracking accuracy and reliability compared to original inside-out models
  • Convenient flip-up visor design for easy transitions between VR and reality
  • Modular faceplate system allows for future upgrades and hardware versatility
  • Compatible with the Vive Wireless Adapter for a cable-free experience
  • Integrated high-quality spatial audio with on-ear headphones

What we don't like about HTC VIVE Cosmos Elite

  • Expensive price point compared to similar or superior competitors like the Valve Index
  • Packaged with older 1.0 base stations and legacy Vive wand controllers rather than modern hardware
  • Smaller FOV (Field of View) and 'sweet spot' for clarity compared to rivals
  • Front-heavy design can cause discomfort or neck strain during long sessions
  • Requires a complex setup with external base stations and multiple cables
  • Poor fit for users with glasses and can lead to lens fogging or sweating

Verdict

The HTC Vive Cosmos Elite is a high-end PC-VR headset featuring dual 3.4-inch LCD panels with a combined resolution of 2880 x 1700 (1440 x 1700 per eye), a 90Hz refresh rate, and a 110-degree field of view. Its standout characteristic is the external tracking faceplate, which utilizes SteamVR Lighthouse technology for sub-millimeter precision, alongside a convenient flip-up visor design and modular faceplate compatibility. Main pros include exceptional tracking accuracy, a significant reduction in the screen-door effect compared to previous models, and superior comfort via a halo-style headband with adjustable padding. However, its primary cons include the reliance on dated Vive wand controllers and original 1.0 base stations in the standard bundle, a somewhat narrow sweet spot, and a high price point compared to competitors with more modern peripherals.

Compare HTC VIVE Cosmos Elite with other products in the VR headsets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HTC VIVE Cosmos Elite and other products in the VR headsets category

No results found