OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£8,570VRAM:96 GBMemory bus width:512 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
8.9/10

Overall score

Score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

â–²Better than 80% of graphics cards
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 80%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

44%

9.2

Performance

24%

9.7

Memory

12%

5.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.7

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 81%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

3.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 83%
  • nvidia-rtx-pro-6000-blackwell-max-q-workstation-edition
  • nvidia-rtx-pro-6000-blackwell-max-q-workstation-edition
  • nvidia-rtx-pro-6000-blackwell-max-q-workstation-edition
nvidia-rtx-pro-6000-blackwell-max-q-workstation-edition
nvidia-rtx-pro-6000-blackwell-max-q-workstation-edition
nvidia-rtx-pro-6000-blackwell-max-q-workstation-edition
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components:

44%

9.2

Performance

24%

9.7

Memory

12%

5.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.7

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

9.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

3.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
3.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Popularity:
NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition has a popularity score of 3.3 points, which is lower than that of 52.7% of products in this category.
3.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

8.9

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

6.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
51,776 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 51,776 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 99.9% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
11,695 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 11,695 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 60.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,433 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,433 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 75.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
22,104 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 22,104 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 85.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
110 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 110 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 98.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
96 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 96 GB of VRAM, which is more than 99.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
512 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 512 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 96.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
1,792 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 1,792 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 97.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
4
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 4 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 71.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
300 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 300 W under peak load, which is higher than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
300 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 300 W, which is higher than that of 67.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
300 W
Show more
Size
267x 111x 40 mm
This graphics card measures 267x111x 40 mm, which is more compact than 85.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Length
266.7 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 266.7 mm long, which is shorter than 63.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
111.8 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 111.8 mm tall, which is shorter than 79.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,230 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,230 g, which is heavier than 62.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 148 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (188 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    188 vs 40
  • 148 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (188 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    188 vs 40
  • 84 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (96 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    96 GB vs 12 GB
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.16x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1968 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,968 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 568 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (752 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    752 vs 184
  • 608 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (752 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    752 vs 144
  • 148 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (188 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    188 vs 40
  • 148 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (188 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    188 vs 40
  • 5.16x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1968 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,968 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 568 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (752 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    752 vs 184
  • 608 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (752 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    752 vs 144
  • 2.69x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (439.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    439.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4.87x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (110 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    110 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 3.53x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (51776 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    51,776 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 38.8% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31433 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    31,433 points vs 22,653 points
  • 3.6x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.7 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.73 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 7.25x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (1755.7 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    1,755.7 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 7.43x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (263.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    263.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 19,712 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (24,064 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    24,064 vs 4,352
  • 4.79x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (110 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    110 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 3.7x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (110 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    110 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 83.1% higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (22104 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    22,104 points vs 12,074 points
  • 84 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (96 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    96 GB vs 12 GB
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 256 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (512 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    512 bit vs 256 bit
  • 5.33x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    128 MB vs 24 MB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    April 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 4 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    4 vs 0
  • Supports virtual GPU
    This graphics card supports virtual GPU features, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 4.03x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (92200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    92,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 13.2 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.8 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111.8 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 18.3 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (266.7 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    266.7 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2280 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,280 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • No FSR support
    This graphics card does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 17.2% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1590 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,590 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 16.17x more expensive
    NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition is more expensive than the average graphics card (£8,570 vs £530).
    £8,570 vs £530
  • 10.7% worse value for money
    NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.5 vs 7.2).
    6.5 vs 7.2
  • 0.1% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition has a lower user score than the average graphics card (8.00 vs 8.000).
    8 vs 8
  • 9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2280 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,280 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 17.2% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1590 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,590 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No FSR support
    This graphics card does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 2.54x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (750 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    750 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 21 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    88 °C vs 67 °C
  • 16.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (52 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    52 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 30 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (30 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    30 dB vs 0 dB
  • 36.4% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition

  • Massive 96 GB GDDR7 memory allows running huge language models (LLMs) and complex datasets locally
  • Excellent for professional rendering, AI inference, and CAD workloads
  • Significantly higher performance than consumer cards at 4K resolution and in professional applications
  • Max-Q version provides 300W energy efficiency with a compact 4.4x10.5 inch form factor
  • Stable and certified drivers for workstations
  • Compatible with some older server hardware (e.g., PowerEdge R730xd)
  • Includes 9th Gen NVENC encoder and 6th Gen NVDEC decoders

What we don't like about NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition

  • Extremely high cost (approximately $10,000)
  • Significant audible coil whine reported on some units
  • Marginal performance improvement or sometimes lower, compared to RTX 5090 in lower resolution gaming
  • Lower power limit in Max-Q version may limit maximum potential compute compared to workstation version

Verdict

The Nvidia RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition is an enthusiast-class professional GPU built on the 5nm GB202 Blackwell architecture, featuring 24,064 CUDA cores, 752 fifth-generation Tensor Cores, and 188 fourth-generation RT Cores. A major highlight is its massive 96GB of GDDR7 ECC memory with a 512-bit interface delivering 1,792 GB/s of bandwidth, designed specifically for heavy AI training, 3D rendering, and massive dataset simulations. As a Max-Q variant, it is optimized for high-density multi-GPU workstations with a capped 300W power draw and a standard dual-slot, full-height form factor, supporting PCIe 5.0 and four DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. Main pros include its unprecedented memory capacity and power efficiency for high-density server configurations, though significant cons include a high launch price (approx. $8,565) and lower peak single-precision performance (110 TFLOPS) compared to the standard 600W Workstation Edition.

Compare NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found