OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£8,960VRAM:96 GBMemory bus width:512 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):400 W

NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

9.2/10

Overall score

Score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

90%

9.2

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 94% of graphics cards
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

▼Worse than 74%
9.2

Technical score

Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

44%

9.6

Performance

24%

9.8

Memory

12%

5.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 93%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
    N/A~ £8,960
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

Technical score
Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

44%

9.6

Performance

24%

9.8

Memory

12%

5.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

9.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components:

70%

9.2

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

6.7
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
50,237 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 50,237 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 99.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
40,000 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 40,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 100% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
27,523 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 27,523 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 64.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
13,582 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 13,582 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 53.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
126 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 126 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 99.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
96 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 96 GB of VRAM, which is more than 99.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
512 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 512 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 96.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
1,597 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 1,597 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 97.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
5360x8640
DisplayPort outputs
4
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 4 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
400 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 400 W, which is higher than that of 93.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
600 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 600 W under peak load, which is higher than 98.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
600 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 600 W, which is higher than that of 98% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
600 W
Show more
Size
267x 111x 40 mm
This graphics card measures 267x111x 40 mm, which is more compact than 85.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Length
266.7 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 266.7 mm long, which is shorter than 63.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
111.76 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 111.76 mm tall, which is shorter than 79.9% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,194 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,194 g, which is heavier than 58.9% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 148 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (188 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    188 vs 40
  • 148 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (188 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    188 vs 40
  • 84 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (96 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    96 GB vs 12 GB
  • 3.56x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1597 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,597 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.16x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1968 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,968 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 568 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (752 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    752 vs 184
  • 3.08x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (502.5 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    502.5 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 148 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (188 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    188 vs 40
  • 148 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (188 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    188 vs 40
  • 5.16x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1968 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,968 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 568 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (752 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    752 vs 184
  • 3.08x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (502.5 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    502.5 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 608 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (752 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    752 vs 144
  • 4.5% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2617 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,617 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 5.18x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (117 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    117 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 4.36x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (40000 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    40,000 points vs 9,166 points
  • 3.42x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (50237 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    50,237 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 28.17x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (1000 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    1,000 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 3.81x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.8 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.83 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 19,712 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (24,064 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    24,064 vs 4,352
  • 4.24x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (126 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    126 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 5.48x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (126 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    126 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 84 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (96 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    96 GB vs 12 GB
  • 3.56x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1597 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,597 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 256 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (512 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    512 bit vs 256 bit
  • 5.33x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    128 MB vs 24 MB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 32x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    128 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Supports virtual GPU
    This graphics card supports virtual GPU features, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 4.03x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (92200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    92,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (Unlimited vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    Unlimited vs 8
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 13.24 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.8 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111.76 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 18.3 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (266.7 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    266.7 mm vs 285 mm
  • 3 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (0 vs 3).
    0 vs 3
  • 86% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (400 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    400 W vs 215 W
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 17.2% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1590 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,590 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 2.67x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (600 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    600 W vs 225 W
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 16.91x more expensive
    NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is more expensive than the average graphics card (£8,960 vs £530).
    £8,960 vs £530
  • 4.22x less popular
    NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 6.9% worse value for money
    NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.73 vs 7.2).
    6.73 vs 7.2
  • 17.2% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1590 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,590 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 98.5% lower INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a lower INT8 performance than the average graphics card (3.7 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    3.7 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • 2.54x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (750 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    750 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (5360x8640 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    5360x8640 vs 7680x4320
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • 3 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (0 vs 3).
    0 vs 3
  • 86% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (400 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    400 W vs 215 W
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 2.67x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (600 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    600 W vs 225 W
  • 2.73x higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (600 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    600 W vs 220 W
  • 16 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (83 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    83 °C vs 67 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hackernoon.com
02/09/2025
Summary of the review
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Blackwell Server Edition: Tests, Benchmarks and Comparison

Third-party reviews

What we like about NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

  • Massive 96 GB GDDR7 ECC memory allows for handling huge datasets and complex LLM inference tasks entirely on-device.
  • Passive cooling design is ideal for high-density server rack deployments and lacks dust-prone mechanical fans.
  • Significant performance leap in AI inference and ray tracing over the previous Ada generation (~20-80% gains in specific tasks).
  • Superior stability and reliability for enterprise workloads compared to consumer-grade cards like the RTX 5090.
  • Configurable power modes allow it to operate efficiently at 300W or boost performance in 600W mode.
  • More cost-effective alternative for inference-only server tasks compared to data-center specific GPUs like the H100.

What we don't like about NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

  • Extremely high power consumption in boost mode (up to 600W) requires specialized server chassis and power delivery.
  • Lack of integrated display outputs makes it unsuitable for local workstation use without network-based access.
  • Early software and driver limitations, specifically reports of no official Windows Server driver support at launch.
  • Significant price premium makes it a questionable value for users who do not strictly need the 96 GB VRAM buffer.
  • High operating temperatures (up to 90°C) when pushed in 600W boost mode, requiring extreme airflow management.
  • Requires modern Linux kernels (version 6.0+) and specific compiler versions for optimal driver compatibility.

Verdict

The NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is a high-performance data center GPU built on the GB202 Blackwell architecture, featuring 24,064 CUDA cores, 752 fifth-generation Tensor Cores, and 188 fourth-generation RT cores. This dual-slot, passively cooled card is equipped with 96 GB of ultra-fast GDDR7 ECC memory and a 512-bit interface, delivering a massive 1,597 GB/s of bandwidth and 120 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power. Its primary advantages include groundbreaking AI inference speeds (up to 4 PFLOPS in FP4), support for PCIe 5.0, and Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) capabilities for partitioning resources into four isolated virtual workstations. Potential drawbacks include a high and configurable power draw of up to 600W that requires high-pressure external airflow for cooling and a significant cost premium compared to consumer or previous-generation Ada Lovelace hardware.

Compare NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell Server Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found