OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Washing machines Methodology v2.0
Washing machines Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Washing machines Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 80 independent expert reviews and 66 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Washing machines Methodology v2.0

Russell Hobbs RH612W110W Review | 101 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260Capacity:6 kgMaximum spin speed:1200 RPMEnergy efficiency class:DType:self-standingLoading type:front-loading

Russell Hobbs RH612W110W Review: Compare 101 technical specifications and expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Washing machines category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the washing machine's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best washing machines on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

100%

5.8

Technical score

â–¼Worse than 93% of washing-machines
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the washing machine's technical performance, covering five key areas: performance, energy efficiency, washing programs, features, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare washing machines based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

25%

5.5

Performance

25%

5.9

Energy efficiency

20%

6.4

Washing programs

20%

4.5

Features

10%

7.9

Design

â–¼Worse than 93% of washing-machines
?

Review score

Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Too few models in this category have enough reviews yet, so reviews are shown but do not count in the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its overall score is our technical score alone.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £260

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of washing machine Russell Hobbs RH612W110W

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the washing machine's technical performance, covering five key areas: performance, energy efficiency, washing programs, features, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare washing machines based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

25%

5.5

Performance

25%

5.9

Energy efficiency

20%

6.4

Washing programs

20%

4.5

Features

10%

7.9

Design

5.8
Review score
Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Too few models in this category have enough reviews yet, so reviews are shown but do not count in the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its overall score is our technical score alone.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the washing machine.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Russell Hobbs RH612W110W has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 0% of washing machines.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the washing machine's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a washing machine with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

9.1

Price

6.8
Capacity
6 kg
Capacity
6 kg
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <6.5 kg – >10.5 kg
This washing machine holds 6 kg, which is less than 90.3% of washing machines and equal to 7.6% of washing machines.
Drum volume
44 L
Drum volume
44 L
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <43 L – >70 L
This washing machine has a 44 L drum, which is smaller than 88.2% of washing machines and equal to 0.7% of washing machines.
Spin-drying efficiency class
B
Spin-drying efficiency class
B
â–² Better than 10% of models
This washing machine has spin-drying class B, which is more efficient than in 10% of washing machines and the same as in 83.5% of washing machines.
Maximum spin speed
1,200 RPM
Maximum spin speed
1,200 RPM
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <1.2k RPM – >1.4k RPM
This washing machine spins at 1,200 RPM, which is slower than 71.1% of washing machines and equal to 22.3% of washing machines.
Minimum spin speed
800 RPM
Minimum spin speed
800 RPM
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <400 RPM – >800 RPM
This washing machine has a minimum spin of 800 RPM, which is higher than 89.6% of washing machines and equal to 10.4% of washing machines.
Show more
Energy efficiency class
D
Energy efficiency class
D
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
This washing machine has energy class D, which is worse than 82.5% of washing machines and the same as 11.2% of washing machines.
Energy consumption per 100 cycles
65 kWh/100 cycles
Energy consumption per 100 cycles
65 kWh/100 cycles
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <44 kWh/100 cycles – >73 kWh/100 cycles
This washing machine uses 65 kWh/100 cycles, which is higher than 80.9% of washing machines and equal to 2.1% of washing machines.
Annual energy consumption
143 kWh/year
Annual energy consumption
143 kWh/year
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <101.2 kWh/year – >167.2 kWh/year
This washing machine uses 143 kWh/year, which is higher than 78.1% of washing machines and equal to 2.2% of washing machines.
Annual energy cost
35.8 £
Annual energy cost
35.8 £
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <25.3 £ – >41.8 £
This washing machine has a yearly running cost of £35.8, which is higher than 77.7% of washing machines and equal to 2.1% of washing machines.
Water consumption per cycle
46 L
Water consumption per cycle
46 L
â–² Better than 52% of models
Market range: <41 L – >52 L
This washing machine uses 46 L of water per cycle, which is lower than 52% of washing machines and equal to 6.5% of washing machines.
Show more
N. of washing programs
15
N. of washing programs
15
â–² Better than 39% of models
Market range: <12 – >16
This washing machine offers 15 wash programmes, which is more than 39.5% of washing machines and equal to 36.8% of washing machines.
Cotton, Eco 40-60, Cotton Prewash, Cotton 20°C, Colours, Wool, Rinse, Anti-Allergy, Spin / Drain, Hand Wash, Synthetics / Outdoor, Mixed, Jeans / Dark Clothes, Quick 60', Quick 15'
N. of downloadable programs
0
N. of downloadable programs
0
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
Market range: <0 – >40
This washing machine offers 0 downloadable programmes, which is fewer than 10.3% of washing machines and equal to 89.7% of washing machines.
N. of washing programs under 1 hour
2
N. of washing programs under 1 hour
2
â–² Better than 42% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This washing machine has 2 programmes under an hour, which is more than 41.7% of washing machines and equal to 36.5% of washing machines.
Quick 60', Quick 15'
Fastest cycle duration
15 min
Fastest cycle duration
15 min
â–¼ Worse than 30% of models
Market range: <14 min – >30 min
This washing machine has a fastest cycle of 15 min, which is shorter than 25.4% of washing machines and equal to 44.8% of washing machines.
ECO cycle duration
191 min
ECO cycle duration
191 min
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <198 min – >239 min
This washing machine has an ECO cycle of 191 min, which is shorter than 95.9% of washing machines.
Show more
N. of advanced features
1
N. of advanced features
1
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <7 – >21
This washing machine has 1 advanced features, which is fewer than 99.2% of washing machines and equal to 0.7% of washing machines.
Laundry detection system.
Foam control system
no
Foam control system
no
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
This washing machine does not feature a foam control system. 79.1% of washing machines have a foam control system.
Laundry detection system
yes
Laundry detection system
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This washing machine has a laundry detection system. 92.7% of washing machines have this feature.
Eco-Logic technology saves energy, time, and water for half loads, while Eco-Release minimises detergent waste.
Unbalanced load detection
no
Unbalanced load detection
no
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
This washing machine does not have unbalanced load detection. 91.7% of washing machines have unbalanced load detection.
Load balancing system
no
Load balancing system
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This washing machine does not feature a load balancing system. 46.8% of washing machines have a load balancing system.
Show more
Color
white
Color
white
â–² Better than 14% of models
This washing machine comes in white, which is more conventional than the colour in 14% of washing machines and the same as the colour in 86% of washing machines.
Type
self-standing
Type
self-standing
â–² Better than 3% of models
This washing machine is self-standing, which is more flexible to place than the type in 3.3% of washing machines and the same as the type in 96.8% of washing machines.
Loading type
front-loading
Loading type
front-loading
â–² Better than 9% of models
This washing machine is front-loading, which is more practical than the design in 9% of washing machines and the same as the design in 91% of washing machines.
Display
yes
Display
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This washing machine has a display. 96.2% of washing machines have a display.
Child lock
yes
Child lock
yes
Category Benchmark
This washing machine has a child lock. 99.7% of washing machines have a child lock.
Show more

Russell Hobbs RH612W110W vs the average washing machine

246810TotalPerformanceEnergy efficiencyWashing programsFeaturesDesign
  • Has an anti-vibration design
    Anti-vibration design
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This washing machine has an anti-vibration design, the average washing machine does not have. 34.2% of washing machines have an anti-vibration design.
    Boomerang body design and inverter motor reduce noise and vibrations.
  • 2 more temperature settings
    N. of temperature settings
    8
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <5 – >6
    This washing machine offers more temperature settings than the average washing machine (8 vs 6). The average washing machine offers 6 temperature settings.
    cold, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°, 80°, 90°
    8 vs 6
  • 27 min shorter eco cycle
    ECO cycle duration
    191 min
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <198 min – >239 min
    This washing machine has a shorter ECO cycle than the average washing machine (191 min vs 218 min). The average washing machine's ECO cycle takes 218 min.
    191 min vs 218 min
  • Colors cycle
    Colors cycle
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This washing machine has a Colors cycle, which the average washing machine does not offer. 38.2% of washing machines include a Colors cycle.
  • Jeans cycle
    Jeans cycle
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This washing machine has a cycle for jeans, the average washing machine does not have. 49.7% of washing machines have a jeans cycle.
  • 6.8 cm shallower
    Depth
    49.7 cm
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <47.5 cm – >63.2 cm
    This washing machine is shallower than the average washing machine (49.7 cm vs 56.5 cm). The average washing machine is 56.5 cm deep.
    49.7 cm vs 56.5 cm
  • 10.6% smaller volume
    Volume
    250,719.105 cm³
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <216k cm³ – >321.6k cm³
    This washing machine has a smaller volume than the average washing machine (250719.1 cm³ vs 280500 cm³). The average washing machine has a volume of 280500 cm³.
    250,719.105 cm³ vs 280,500 cm³
  • 0.5 cm lower height
    Height
    84.5 cm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <84.5 cm – >86 cm
    This washing machine is shorter than the average washing machine (84.5 cm vs 85 cm). The average washing machine is 85 cm tall.
    84.5 cm vs 85 cm
  • 57.7% cheaper
    Russell Hobbs RH612W110W is cheaper than the average washing machine (£260 vs £410).
    £260 vs £410
  • 2 more temperature settings
    N. of temperature settings
    8
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <5 – >6
    This washing machine offers more temperature settings than the average washing machine (8 vs 6). The average washing machine offers 6 temperature settings.
    cold, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°, 80°, 90°
    8 vs 6
  • 27 min shorter eco cycle
    ECO cycle duration
    191 min
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <198 min – >239 min
    This washing machine has a shorter ECO cycle than the average washing machine (191 min vs 218 min). The average washing machine's ECO cycle takes 218 min.
    191 min vs 218 min
  • Colors cycle
    Colors cycle
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This washing machine has a Colors cycle, which the average washing machine does not offer. 38.2% of washing machines include a Colors cycle.
  • Jeans cycle
    Jeans cycle
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This washing machine has a cycle for jeans, the average washing machine does not have. 49.7% of washing machines have a jeans cycle.
  • Has an anti-vibration design
    Anti-vibration design
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This washing machine has an anti-vibration design, the average washing machine does not have. 34.2% of washing machines have an anti-vibration design.
    Boomerang body design and inverter motor reduce noise and vibrations.
  • 6.8 cm shallower
    Depth
    49.7 cm
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <47.5 cm – >63.2 cm
    This washing machine is shallower than the average washing machine (49.7 cm vs 56.5 cm). The average washing machine is 56.5 cm deep.
    49.7 cm vs 56.5 cm
  • 0.5 cm lower height
    Height
    84.5 cm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <84.5 cm – >86 cm
    This washing machine is shorter than the average washing machine (84.5 cm vs 85 cm). The average washing machine is 85 cm tall.
    84.5 cm vs 85 cm
  • 10.6% smaller volume
    Volume
    250,719.105 cm³
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <216k cm³ – >321.6k cm³
    This washing machine has a smaller volume than the average washing machine (250719.1 cm³ vs 280500 cm³). The average washing machine has a volume of 280500 cm³.
    250,719.105 cm³ vs 280,500 cm³
  • 6.7% lighter
    Weight
    62.5 kg
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <56.5 kg – >76 kg
    This washing machine is lighter than the average washing machine (62.5 kg vs 67 kg). The average washing machine weighs 67 kg.
    62.5 kg vs 67 kg
  • Worse energy grade
    Energy efficiency class
    D
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    This washing machine has a worse energy class than the average washing machine (D vs A).
    D vs A
  • 15 kWh/100 cycles more energy use
    Energy consumption per 100 cycles
    65 kWh/100 cycles
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <44 kWh/100 cycles – >73 kWh/100 cycles
    This washing machine uses more electricity than the average washing machine (65 kWh/100 cycles vs 50 kWh/100 cycles). The average washing machine uses 50 kWh/100 cycles.
    65 kWh/100 cycles vs 50 kWh/100 cycles
  • 200 RPM lower spin speed
    Maximum spin speed
    1,200 RPM
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <1.2k RPM – >1.4k RPM
    This washing machine spins slower than the average washing machine (1200 RPM vs 1400 RPM). The average washing machine spins at 1400 RPM.
    1,200 RPM vs 1,400 RPM
  • Does not have a steam technology
    Steam technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This washing machine does not feature a steam technology, the average washing machine does. 71.1% of washing machines feature a steam technology.
  • 4 dB louder spinning
    Spin noise level
    78 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <71 dB – >79 dB
    This washing machine is louder on spin than the average washing machine (78 dB vs 74 dB). The average washing machine spins at 74 dB.
    78 dB vs 74 dB
  • 400 RPM higher minimum spin
    Minimum spin speed
    800 RPM
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <400 RPM – >800 RPM
    This washing machine has a higher minimum spin than the average washing machine (800 RPM vs 400 RPM). The average washing machine has a minimum spin of 400 RPM.
    800 RPM vs 400 RPM
  • Does not have a special drum design
    Special drum design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This washing machine does not have a special drum design, the average washing machine does. 61.3% of washing machines have a special drum design.
  • 10 fewer advanced features
    N. of advanced features
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <7 – >21
    This washing machine has fewer advanced features than the average washing machine (1 vs 11). The average washing machine has 11 advanced features.
    Laundry detection system.
    1 vs 11
  • 11.7% worse value for money
    Russell Hobbs RH612W110W has worse value for money than the average washing machine (6.79 vs 7.6).
    6.79 vs 7.59
  • 200 RPM lower spin speed
    Maximum spin speed
    1,200 RPM
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <1.2k RPM – >1.4k RPM
    This washing machine spins slower than the average washing machine (1200 RPM vs 1400 RPM). The average washing machine spins at 1400 RPM.
    1,200 RPM vs 1,400 RPM
  • 400 RPM higher minimum spin
    Minimum spin speed
    800 RPM
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <400 RPM – >800 RPM
    This washing machine has a higher minimum spin than the average washing machine (800 RPM vs 400 RPM). The average washing machine has a minimum spin of 400 RPM.
    800 RPM vs 400 RPM
  • 4 dB louder spinning
    Spin noise level
    78 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <71 dB – >79 dB
    This washing machine is louder on spin than the average washing machine (78 dB vs 74 dB). The average washing machine spins at 74 dB.
    78 dB vs 74 dB
  • 2 kg less capacity
    Capacity
    6 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <6.5 kg – >10.5 kg
    This washing machine holds less laundry than the average washing machine (6 kg vs 8 kg). The average washing machine holds 8 kg.
    6 kg vs 8 kg
  • 14 L less drum space
    Drum volume
    44 L
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <43 L – >70 L
    This washing machine has a smaller drum than the average washing machine (44 L vs 58 L). The average washing machine has a drum of 58 L.
    44 L vs 58 L
  • Worse noise class
    Noise emission class
    C
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This washing machine has a worse noise class than the average washing machine (C vs B).
    C vs B
  • 1 fewer spin speeds
    N. of spin speeds
    3
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <4 – >6
    This washing machine has fewer spin speeds than the average washing machine (3 vs 4). The average washing machine has 4 spin speeds.
    800, 1,000, 1,200 RPM
    3 vs 4
  • Worse energy grade
    Energy efficiency class
    D
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    This washing machine has a worse energy class than the average washing machine (D vs A).
    D vs A
  • 15 kWh/100 cycles more energy use
    Energy consumption per 100 cycles
    65 kWh/100 cycles
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <44 kWh/100 cycles – >73 kWh/100 cycles
    This washing machine uses more electricity than the average washing machine (65 kWh/100 cycles vs 50 kWh/100 cycles). The average washing machine uses 50 kWh/100 cycles.
    65 kWh/100 cycles vs 50 kWh/100 cycles
  • 27.5% higher energy use
    Annual energy consumption
    143 kWh/year
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <101.2 kWh/year – >167.2 kWh/year
    This washing machine uses more energy than the average washing machine (143 kWh/year vs 112.2 kWh/year). The average washing machine uses 112.2 kWh/year.
    143 kWh/year vs 112.2 kWh/year
  • 7.7 £ higher yearly running cost
    Annual energy cost
    35.8 £
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <25.3 £ – >41.8 £
    This washing machine costs more to run than the average washing machine (35.8 £ vs 28.1 £). The average washing machine has a yearly running cost of 28.1 £.
    35.8 £ vs 28.1 £
  • Does not have a steam technology
    Steam technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This washing machine does not feature a steam technology, the average washing machine does. 71.1% of washing machines feature a steam technology.
  • Does not have a fast function
    Fast function
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This washing machine does not have a fast function, the average washing machine does. 60.2% of washing machines have a fast function.
  • Does not have an anti-stain cycle
    Anti-stain function
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This washing machine does not have an anti-stain cycle, the average washing machine does. 70.9% of washing machines have an anti-stain cycle.
  • Does not have an anti-crease feature
    Anti-crease function
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This washing machine does not have an anti-crease function, the average washing machine has. 70.6% of washing machines include an anti-crease function.
  • Does not have an extra-rinse function
    Extra rinse function
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This washing machine does not have a special extra-rinse function, the average washing machine does. 85.4% of washing machines feature such function.
  • Does not have a duvet cycle
    Duvet cycle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This washing machine does not have a duvet cycle, the average washing machine does. 53.8% of washing machines have a duvet cycle.
  • Does not have a hygiene cycle
    Hygiene cycle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This washing machine does not have a hygiene cycle, the average washing machine does. 66.4% of washing machines have a hygiene cycle.
  • Does not have a gentle cycle
    Gentle cycle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This washing machine does not have a Gentle cycle, while the average washing machine has it. 87.3% of washing machines have a Gentle cycle.
  • 10 fewer advanced features
    N. of advanced features
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <7 – >21
    This washing machine has fewer advanced features than the average washing machine (1 vs 11). The average washing machine has 11 advanced features.
    Laundry detection system.
    1 vs 11
  • No self-cleaning cycle
    Self-cleaning function
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This washing machine is not self-cleaning, the average washing machine is. 73.8% of washing machines are self-cleaning.
  • Does not feature a foam control system
    Foam control system
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This washing machine does not feature a foam control system, the average washing machine does. 79.1% of washing machines have this feature.
  • No overflow protection
    Overflow protection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This washing machine lacks overflow protection, while the average washing machine includes it. 84.8% of washing machines come with overflow protection.
  • Does not have a pause-and-add feature
    Pause and add
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This washing machine does not have a Pause & Add feature, the average washing machine does. 88.2% of washing machines have a Pause & Add feature.
  • No unbalanced load detection
    Unbalanced load detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This washing machine does not have an unbalanced load detection system, which the average washing machine has. 91.7% of washing machines feature unbalanced load detection.
  • 1 h shorter maximum delay
    Maximum delay start
    23 h
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <19 h – >24 h
    This washing machine can delay its start for less time than the average washing machine (23 h vs 24 h). The average washing machine can delay its start by up to 24 h.
    23 h vs 24 h
  • Does not have a special drum design
    Special drum design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This washing machine does not have a special drum design, the average washing machine does. 61.3% of washing machines have a special drum design.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Russell Hobbs RH612W110W

  • At 49.7 cm deep it suits a narrow space.
  • The 84.5 cm height keeps the machine compact.
  • Eight temperature settings give fine control over fabrics.
  • The ECO cycle takes 191 min.
  • The inverter motor and anti-vibration design help it run steadily.
  • A pre-wash cycle is included for dirtier loads.

What we don't like about Russell Hobbs RH612W110W

  • Class D energy rating and 65 kWh per 100 cycles add to running costs.
  • A 6 kg drum is small for a family's weekly wash.
  • Spin noise reaches 78 dB.
  • Only three spin speeds, and the slowest is 800 RPM.
  • There is no steam, extra rinse or gentle cycle.

Verdict

The Russell Hobbs RH612W110W is a compact 6 kg washing machine with a 1200 RPM spin speed and D energy rating. It has comprehensive temperature control and practical wash programs including a dedicated jeans cycle and colors program. The ECO cycle completes in 191 minutes, which saves 27 minutes compared to average duration on the market.. The machine features an anti-vibration system with a boomerang body design and inverter motor for quieter operation. Its dimensions are optimized for space efficiency, with a notably smaller depth of 49.7 cm and reduced weight of 62.5 kg. However, the machine lacks several advanced features found in similar models. The manufacturer does not specify any special drum design for fabric care, and the machine operates without steam technology, foam control, or self-cleaning capabilities. It also misses convenience features like Pause & Add functionality and anti-crease treatment. The 1200 RPM maximum spin speed falls 200 RPM below typical specifications, and there is no dedicated anti-stain cycle available.

Compare Russell Hobbs RH612W110W with other washing machines

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Russell Hobbs RH612W110W and other washing machines

No results found