OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Qualcomm Adreno 509 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£25
Avg. price in US: ~$35
VRAM: 4 GB
Memory bus width: 64 bit
Thermal Design Power (TDP): ?

Qualcomm Adreno 509 review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

2.7

Very poor

2.7

Very poor

?

6.1
Gaming
Score components:
45.0%
10
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version
6.3
Video editing
Score components:
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
10
Floating-point performance
15.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version
7.0
1080p
Score components:
55.0%
10
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.3
VRAM
10.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version
6.2
1440p
Score components:
50.0%
10
Floating-point performance
30.0%
2.3
VRAM
15.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.4
4K
Score components:
40.0%
10
Floating-point performance
35.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £25

Best rankings

#614 in Best Budget Graphic Cards
#2190 in Best Graphic Cards

Verdict

The Qualcomm Adreno 509 is an integrated mobile graphics card found in the Snapdragon 636 SoC, built on the Adreno 500 architecture and manufactured using a 14nm process. It features a clock speed of approximately 430 MHz to 720 MHz, providing roughly 180 GFLOPS of raw processing power with support for modern APIs such as Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, and DirectX 12. Its main pros include efficient power consumption and solid performance for mid-range gaming and Full HD+ displays, further enhanced by Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to optimize memory throughput. However, its main cons are its aging architecture, which lacks support for modern features like hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and its limited performance when handling high-resolution 4K content or the most demanding contemporary 3D titles.

Technical Specifications of graphics card Qualcomm Adreno 509

Overall score

2.7

Show more

Hide

?

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.

Performance

1.6

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.

When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?

3DMark Port Royal score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.

When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

PassMark (G3D) result

What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark

When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests

When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?

Floating-point performance

What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.

When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Memory

1.7

Show more

Hide

VRAM

What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card

When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

Memory type

What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)

When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

N/A

GDDR version

What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

?

Memory bus width

What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

Maximum memory bandwidth

What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory

When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Platform & Features

6.1

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported

When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

?

PCIe lanes

What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication

When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

?

DirectX version

What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version

When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

Vulkan version

What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version

When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

OpenGL version

What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version

When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Connectivity & Media

5.1

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously

When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

Max digital resolution

What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution

When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

1920x1200

DisplayPort outputs

What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs

When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

?

DisplayPort version

What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported

When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

?

DisplayPort link rates

What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections

When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Power & Cooling

3.9

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)

When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

?

Power consumption while under peak load

What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.

When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

?

Recommended PSU wattage

What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply

When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

?

Board power limit

What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board

When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

?

PCIe power spec

What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed

When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Design

5.1

Show more

Hide

Size

What it is: Physical size of the GPU card

When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?

Length

What it is: Physical length of the GPU card

When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

?

Height

What it is: Physical height of the GPU card

When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

?

Slot width

What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card

When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

?

Weight

What it is: Total weight of the graphics card

When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Qualcomm Adreno 509 vs the average graphics card

Why is Qualcomm Adreno 509 better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

21.2x cheaper
Qualcomm Adreno 509 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£25 vs £530).
Qualcomm Adreno 509 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£25 vs £530).£25 vs £530
7.62x higher compute throughput
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (175 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.
When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.
Importance: LOW
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (175 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.175 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
7.62x higher compute throughput
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (175 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.

Why is Qualcomm Adreno 509 worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

71.3% lower boost clock speed
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (720 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
40 fewer ray tracing cores
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
62.5% lower base clock speed
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (720 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
No CUDA support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
99% lower pixel rate
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (1.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
144 fewer AI cores
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
99.5% lower FP32 performance
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
98.8% lower FP16 performance
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.4 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
89.6% lower FP64 performance
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
4,256 fewer FP32 units
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (96 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
192 bit narrower memory bus
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
8 GB less VRAM
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
95.2% lower memory bandwidth
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (21.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
58.9% slower VRAM clock
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (720 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
2.8x larger process node
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
No DLSS support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
No ray tracing
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
No FSR support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
No AI upscalers
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
5 older
Qualcomm Adreno 509 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2018 vs 2023).
February 2018
No mesh shaders
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
No XeSS support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
Older Vulkan version
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1 vs 1.4).
No DirectStorage support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
Worse SAM support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
Lower VRS tier
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
Older shader model
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (5 vs 6.8).
Older DirectX version
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
No sampler feedback
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
Older OpenGL version
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports an older OpenGL version than the average graphics card (3.2 vs 4.6).
No AV1 encoding
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
2 fewer displays supported
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (2 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
No AV1 decoding
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No DSC support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
Older HDMI version
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
No VRR support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
Narrower encode codec support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
Narrower decode codec support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
Lower display resolution
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (1920x1200 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
Not VR ready
Qualcomm Adreno 509 is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
2 fewer monitors per output type
Qualcomm Adreno 509 supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
No overclocking support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support overclocking, the average graphics card does.
No dual BIOS
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
No fan stop
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
No backplate
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
No RGB lighting
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
71.3% lower boost clock speed
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (720 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (720 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.720 MHz vs 2505 MHz
192 bit narrower memory bus
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.64 bit vs 256 bit
8 GB less VRAM
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.4 GB vs 12 GB
40 fewer ray tracing cores
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
What it is: Number of dedicated ray tracing processing cores or units
When it matters: When you care about ray-traced lighting, reflections, and shadows in newer games.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.0 vs 40
62.5% lower base clock speed
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (720 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (720 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.720 MHz vs 1920 MHz
2.8x larger process node
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.
Importance: MEDIUM
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.14 nm vs 5 nm
No CUDA support
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports CUDA parallel computing platform
When it matters: When your apps or AI tools specifically depend on the CUDA software stack.
Importance: MEDIUM
Qualcomm Adreno 509 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
95.2% lower memory bandwidth
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (21.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 509 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (21.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.21.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s

Platform & Features

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 509 and other products in the Graphics cards category

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Qualcomm Adreno 509?

Improved gaming performance compared to predecessors (Adreno 506/508)
Supports modern APIs including Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, and DirectX 12
Efficient power consumption suitable for mid-range mobile devices
Capable of running high-demanding games at 1080p with decent frame rates
Uses Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to optimize memory performance

What customers dislike about Qualcomm Adreno 509?

Strictly a mid-range GPU, not suitable for extreme high-end gaming
Can suffer from thermal throttling under intense, sustained workloads
Performance is significantly lower than flagship Snapdragon 8-series GPUs
Limited to low-demanding desktop-level gaming if used in budget laptops
Aging architecture compared to newer Adreno 600 or 700 series

Expert reviews

inside-digital.de

28/04/2019

Summary of the review

Sony Xperia 10 im Test: Das Kleine, das überrascht

The Sony Xperia 10 is a mid-range smartphone defined by its unique 21:9 aspect ratio and a 6-inch Full-HD+ LCD display, which provides sharp visuals with a pixel density of 457 ppi. Despite its plastic construction, the device is lightweight, ergonomic, and well-built, featuring gorilla glass protection and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. In terms of performance, it operates on a Snapdragon 630 processor paired with a somewhat restrictive 3 GB of RAM and 64 GB of expandable storage via a hybrid dual-SIM slot. Its 2,870 mAh battery delivers surprisingly strong endurance, yielding 68% battery remaining after an 8-hour intensive test phase. The camera system features a 13 MP and 5 MP dual setup alongside an 8 MP front camera, capable of filming in 4K resolution. Several key pros and cons emerge from the daily usage review. On the positive side, the 21:9 display form factor offers excellent split-screen multitasking capabilities and enhances gaming immersion, supported by a helpful "Side Sense" one-handed navigation UI. The dual-camera setup delivers surprisingly strong color reproduction and sharp contrasts under good lighting, while the battery...

smartzone.de

30/03/2019

Summary of the review

Lenovo S5 Pro Testbericht

Review Overview The Lenovo S5 Pro is a solid mid-range smartphone built with a premium black metal back, a 6.2-inch Full HD+ IPS display (402 PPI), and dual-brand branding featuring both Lenovo and Motorola logos. Powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 processor paired with 6 GB of RAM and 64 GB of expandable storage, it offers an agile everyday performance that matches the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Key advantages of this device include its exceptional build quality, clear and loud hybrid stereo speakers (utilizing the earpiece alongside the bottom speaker), and a fast fingerprint sensor. Additionally, its biometrics are enhanced by an infrared-supported Face Unlock feature that functions reliably even in complete darkness. The camera array is also quite functional, featuring a dual rear setup (12 MP + 20 MP) capable of clean bokeh shots and a 2x zoom, plus a 20 MP + 8 MP dual front-facing camera for high-detail selfies. Drawbacks and Verdict Despite its strong structural design, the Lenovo S5 Pro suffers from a few notable drawbacks. The software experience via the ZUI launcher (based on...

netzwelt.de

26/02/2019

Summary of the review

Xperia 10 (Plus)Go to product viewer dialogue for this item. im Kurztest: Günstige Handys mit...

The Sony Xperia 10 and Xperia 10 Plus are mid-range smartphones defined by their unique, elongated 21:9 aspect ratio displays, designed to mimic the cinematic screen format. On the positive side, this narrow design makes the devices exceptionally slim and highly practical for split-screen multitasking, allowing users to run two apps simultaneously alongside a full keyboard without obstructing content. Additionally, both models offer solid build quality despite utilizing a plastic unibody with a metallic coating, and they feature a convenient, tool-free SIM and microSD card tray. The displays are also well-optimized for multimedia content, offering a more immersive experience for select Netflix streams and games like Fortnite and Asphalt 9. However, the review highlights several notable drawbacks, particularly regarding hardware performance and battery life. Both smartphones run on older Qualcomm processors—the Snapdragon 630 and 636—which struggle to deliver top-tier graphics capabilities for modern games and are typically found in much cheaper devices. The battery capacities are critically low for their large display sizes, with the standard Xperia 10 carrying an underwhelming 2,870 mAh cell. Furthermore, neither phone includes water or...

computerbase.de

26/02/2019

Summary of the review

Motorola Moto G7, G7 Plus, G7 Power im Test

The Motorola Moto G7 series aims to capture the mid-range smartphone market by offering four distinct models ranging from €150 to €300, all running a clean version of Android 9.0 Pie with a promised upgrade to Android 10. The build quality across the tested models—the Moto G7, G7 Plus, and G7 Power—is highly commendable, featuring premium slightly curved glass backs (except for the plastic-backed entry-level Play model) wrapped around a protective plastic frame designed to absorb impacts. A notable design advantage is that all models retain the traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. However, the design suffers from aesthetic clutter due to Lenovo unnecessarily squeezing the "Motorola" brand name onto the front bottom bezel alongside the rear fingerprint scanner logo. Additionally, none of the devices carry official IP67 or IP68 water resistance certifications, making them vulnerable to full water submersion. The display performance is a mixed bag where pricing does not entirely equate to better quality. The more expensive Moto G7 (€250) and G7 Plus (€300) excel in sharpness with their crisp Full HD+ resolutions (1080 × 2270) and discrete teardrop notches....

smartzone.de

15/01/2019

Summary of the review

Asus Zenfone Max Pro (M1) Testbericht

The Asus Zenfone Max Pro (M1) review by Smartzone highlights a robust mid-range contender that successfully targets competitors like Xiaomi. Driven by a capable Snapdragon 636 processor paired with up to 6GB of RAM, the smartphone delivers fluid daily performance, solid multitasking, and smooth casual gaming via its Adreno 509 GPU. Its standout features include a sharp, bright 6-inch Full-HD IPS display (free of a notch) and a highly practical triple-slot tray supporting two nano-SIM cards and a microSD card simultaneously. On top of that, the inclusion of a multi-colored notification LED, strong overall signal reception (including VoLTE and Wi-Fi Calling), and a clean stock Android 8.1 software skin over a bloated UI help secure an impressive overall rating of 87%. Despite its strengths, the device is held back by several notable limitations. The mammoth 5000 mAh battery easily yields two days of intensive use but lacks quick-charging capabilities, leading to a long three-hour charging process through an outdated micro-USB port. While the 13MP dual-rear camera takes sharp, natural pictures in ideal daylight settings, it suffers from poor dynamic range,...

deathmetalmods.de

02/09/2018

Summary of the review

BQ Aquaris X2 – Mein Testbericht zum Hoffnungsträger aus Spanien

The DeathMetalMods review highlights the BQ Aquaris X2 as a promising mid-range device featuring clean Android One software, reliable performance from the Snapdragon 636, and strong build quality. Key advantages include timely updates and a pure software experience, while the main compromises involve the limited 3GB RAM/32GB storage on the base model compared to the superior Pro variant. The reviewer notes that the device is a capable, budget-friendly option, but stresses that users needing higher performance for heavy multitasking should consider the faster Snapdragon 660-equipped Pro version. Ultimately, the review presents the X2 as a secure, "hopeful" device from Spain, provided users accept the constraints of the entry-level configuration.

smartzone.de

04/04/2018

Summary of the review

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Testbericht

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 is highly praised as a dominant mid-range smartphone that offers an excellent price-to-performance ratio, delivering an experience dangerously close to flagships that cost three times as much. Powered by a pfeilschnell (lightning-fast) Snapdragon 636 processor combined with MIUI, it handles standard tasks and gaming smoothly without micro-lags. Notable pros include its high-quality metal body construction, a sharp 6-inch 18:9 IPS display with accurate colors that remains legible under direct sunlight, and exceptional dual-pixel autofocus camera performance in daylight+. Furthermore, its massive 4000 mAh battery delivers outstanding runtime, easily lasting up to two days with 10–12 hours of screen-on time, and supports Quick Charge for fast top-ups+. Despite its high marks, the review highlights a few clear disadvantages. The most prominent criticism is the outdated Micro-USB port, which the reviewer notes has no business being on a phone in this category. Additionally, vital cellular frequencies like LTE Band 20 are completely absent unless you buy the specific Global Version, making the China variant less practical for rural European users+. Minor low-light camera issues also emerge as...

connect.de

07/12/2018

Summary of the review

Gaming-Smartphones im Test: Honor Play, Moto Z3 Play und Asus ZenFone 5 im Benchmark

The Connect.de review compares gaming-focused smartphones against flagships, highlighting the Razer Phone 2's 120Hz display, vapor-chamber cooling, and stereo speakers as top features for hardcore gamers. However, the device suffers from a blocky, uncomfortable design, poor outdoor brightness, and subpar camera performance, while the Honor Play offers a budget alternative. For versatility, the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 is praised for its superior OLED screen, 4,000 mAh battery, and S-Pen, although it costs more and lacks a high-refresh-rate screen. The Google Pixel 3 is noted for software optimization but, along with the other devices, lacks the specialized gaming focus of the Razer Phone 2.

lesnumeriques.com

17/05/2019

Summary of the review

Test Sony Xperia 10 Plus : le 21:9 pour seul argument

The Sony Xperia 10 Plus is a unique mid-range smartphone defined heavily by its distinct 21:9 aspect ratio 6-inch display, which targets cinema lovers but ultimately falls short of its high ambitions. Under the hood, it is equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 processor and 4 GB of RAM, which provides basic performance for daily tasks but suffers from occasional slowdowns and significant heating issues, exceeding 40°C after just 10 minutes of Full HD video recording. Visually, the phone features a high-quality metallic finish, but its elongated design (167 mm long) makes single-handed use difficult, and the side buttons are awkwardly placed. Furthermore, the phone completely lacks an IP water-resistance certification, and its 3,000 mAh battery delivers a mediocre runtime of 13 hours and 48 minutes, requiring over two hours to recharge. On the positive side, the smartphone features clean Android Stock software with a clever customizable sidebar, a high-quality 3.5 mm mini-jack connection, and a screen that offers good maximum brightness (555 cd/m²) for outdoor reading. It also includes a dedicated 2x optical zoom module. However, its overall performance...

lesnumeriques.com

22/02/2019

Summary of the review

Test Motorola Moto G7 Plus : la Formule 1 de la recharge

Motorola Moto G7 Plus Review Summary The Motorola Moto G7 Plus is a mid-range smartphone that offers a solid build quality, smooth overall performance, and an elegant design with tapered edges for a comfortable grip. Its standout feature is its 27W "TurboPower" fast charging, which allows the 3,000 mAh battery to reach a 100% charge in just under an hour. The device features a 6.2-inch Full HD+ IPS display with thin bezels and a waterdrop notch, providing excellent legibility in direct sunlight and low minimum brightness for comfortable night viewing. Powered by a Snapdragon 636 processor with 4GB of RAM, the phone delivers fluid multitasking and runs a clean, near-stock version of Android 9.0 Pie. Additional practical highlights include dual-SIM capabilities, microSD storage expansion, and a dedicated 3.5mm headphone jack. Despite its strengths, the phone falls short in key areas compared to its market competitors. The dual-camera setup (16MP + 5MP) performs decently during the day but suffers from significant detail loss, heavy smoothing, and dull colours in low-light environments. While its battery life is respectable—lasting just over 14 hours...

phonandroid.com

31/10/2018

Summary of the review

Test Xiaomi Mi Max 3 : finalement la taille ça compte

Xiaomi Mi Max 3 Review Overview The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 is a massive, budget-friendly Android smartphone that sets itself apart with an expansive 6.9-inch Full HD+ IPS display (2160 x 1080 pixels) and an extraordinary 5500 mAh battery. Powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 processor paired with up to 6GB of RAM, the device delivers fluid day-to-day performance and handles resource-heavy gaming with only minor, occasional drops in frame rates. It operates on the highly clean, gesture-capable MIUI 10 interface and features an impressive dual rear camera setup (12MP Sony IMX363 + 5MP) capable of 4K video recording, utilizing artificial intelligence for optimized scene detection. Key Pros and Cons The standout advantages of this device include its vibrant, high-quality giant screen, an unmatched battery life that easily lasts 2 to 4 days depending on use, and a highly competitive, affordable price point. Additionally, audio enthusiasts will appreciate the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and the camera delivers remarkably good daytime photos for a mid-range phone. On the downside, its heavy 221-gram weight and massive physical footprint make it...

computerhoy.20minutos.es

25/12/2018

Summary of the review

Nokia 7.1, análisis y opinión

Review Overview The Nokia 7.1 is a premium mid-range Android phone that delivers excellent build quality and a high-end feel for under 300 euros. Its standout features are its striking, unique design characterized by clean lines and an aluminum and glass chassis, and its exceptional 5.84-inch PureDisplay panel. This screen supports HDR 10 content, providing outstanding brightness, contrast, and color accuracy that punches well above its price class. On the software side, it benefits from the clean, fluid experience of Android One and comes with a prompt update to Android 9.0 Pie. Furthermore, its dual rear cameras—engineered in partnership with Zeiss—capture highly accurate daytime photos with a very natural-looking background bokeh effect. Notable Drawbacks However, the device cuts significant corners regarding internal hardware and raw power. Equipped with a Snapdragon 636 processor and only 3 GB of RAM and 32 GB of base storage, the phone struggles with intensive tasks. While daily app navigation remains smooth, gaming performance is disappointing; heavy titles like PUBG and Asphalt 9 force low graphic settings and long loading times. Photography also suffers in low-light...

zoomtecnologico.com

08/06/2019

Summary of the review

Review – Moto G7Go to product viewer dialogue for this item.: Gran experiencia de usuario para un gama media

The Motorola Moto G7 is a well-built, mid-range smartphone that offers a clean and fluid user experience by utilizing stock Android 9 Pie. It features a slim-bezel 6.2-inch Max Vision IPS display with a discrete waterdrop notch, yielding an 81.4% screen-to-body ratio that delivers excellent sharpness and high brightness levels. Powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 processor, Adreno 509 GPU, 4GB of RAM, and 64GB of expandable storage, the device operates reliably without accidental freezes or overheating during daily use. Additional hardware highlights include a built-in TurboPower fast charger for its 3,000mAh battery, a headphone jack enhanced with Dolby Audio, and biometric security features via a fast facial unlock and a rear-mounted fingerprint scanner integrated into the brand's logo. Evaluating its advantages and drawbacks reveals a clear trade-off between performance and multimedia capabilities. The primary pros of the Moto G7 are its highly positive user experience, smooth everyday performance, rapid fingerprint and facial unlocking, and a clean software design that promises long-term usability. Conversely, the main cons focus heavily on its cameras and battery life. While the dual rear camera...

tech.everyeye.it

18/06/2018

Summary of the review

Honor 10 e ASUS ZenFone 5 a confronto: diversi tra loro, ma...

The Honor 10 and ASUS ZenFone 5 both entered the market priced at €399, but they target completely different segments, with the Honor 10 aiming to be a budget flagship and the ZenFone 5 serving as a feature-rich mid-ranger. The Honor 10 stands out with its compact, ergonomic glass design featuring a striking shifting colour effect, and it delivers superior raw performance, faster multitasking, and shorter charging times thanks to its AI-focused Kirin 970 chip and 5V 4.5A wall charger. Its dual rear camera setup (16MP RGB + 24MP monochrome) captures exceptionally sharp photos in both daylight and low-light scenarios, further enhanced by a dedicated hardware Neural Processing Unit (NPU). However, its core cons include a slow and inaccurate front ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, a lack of bundled earphones, poorer 4K video stabilization, an inaccurate indoor GPS that struggles to lock location, and a front camera that frequently overexposes backgrounds. Conversely, the ASUS ZenFone 5 shines with its highly immersive 6.2-inch Super IPS display, featuring thin bezels, a 90% screen-to-body ratio, DCI-P3 colour space support, and an Apple-like automatic white balance...

andreagaleazzi.com

22/09/2018

Summary of the review

Recensione XIAOMI REDMI NOTE 5

Andrea Galeazzi defines the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Global as a premier budget "best buy," driven by a robust Snapdragon 636 processor, 4GB RAM, and a 4,000 mAh battery that easily lasts through an intense day. Key strengths include excellent cellular reception with Banda 20, a solid 5.99-inch FHD+ display, and a 12 MP rear camera capable of taking sharp photos with fast, accurate autofocus, particularly in daylight. YouTube · Conversely, the review highlights the use of an outdated micro-USB port, which requires over two hours for a full charge, alongside a lack of 4G+ carrier aggregation. Furthermore, the Global ROM exhibits software quirks, specifically missing AI face unlock in Italy unless the region is changed to India or Hong Kong, and low-light photography suffers from a lack of OIS. YouTube

Video reviews

Best alternatives

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon HD 7850

Graphics cards

ATI Radeon HD 5450

Graphics cards

EVGA GeForce GTX 650

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon HD 6670

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce GT 630 2GB

Graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K600

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Graphics cards

XFX Radeon HD 7870

Graphics cards

Compare Qualcomm Adreno 509 with other products in the Graphics cards category

Compare