Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Mi Band Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Battery life:30 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Xiaomi Mi Band Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.7

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 61% of fitness-trackers
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.7

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

4.5

Display

8%

6.9

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

8.8

Design & Durability

â–¼Worse than 60% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £45

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Xiaomi Mi Band

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.7

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

4.5

Display

8%

6.9

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

8.8

Design & Durability

6.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Xiaomi Mi Band has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.7
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Zepp app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 66.5% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Running courses in the Mi Fitness app.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
30 days
Battery life
30 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 30 days which is longer than that of 85.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
41 mAh
Battery capacity
41 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 41 mAh which is lower than that of 91.5% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
no
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 76.4% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
?
Show more

Xiaomi Mi Band vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 20 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    30 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (30 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    30 days vs 10 days
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Running courses in the Mi Fitness app.
  • 48% lighter
    Thickness
    13 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (13 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    Excludes sensor protrusion.
    13 g vs 25 g
  • Built-in route tracker
    Has a route tracker
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
    Uses connected phone GPS for route maps.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses PAI.
  • 1.1 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    9.9 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9.9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    Excludes sensor protrusion.
    9.9 mm vs 11 mm
  • 20 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    30 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (30 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    30 days vs 10 days
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 48% lighter
    Thickness
    13 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (13 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    Excludes sensor protrusion.
    13 g vs 25 g
  • 1.1 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    9.9 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9.9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    Excludes sensor protrusion.
    9.9 mm vs 11 mm
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Running courses in the Mi Fitness app.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses PAI.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 62.7% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    41 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (41 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    41 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • 50% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.016 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.016 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 5.07x less popular
    Xiaomi Mi Band has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 62.7% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    41 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (41 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    41 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • No display
    Display
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • 50% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.016 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.016 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gizchina.com
03/11/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
20/11/2014
Summary of the review
M
medium.com
26/07/2016
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
19/06/2015
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
20/12/2015
Summary of the review
T
tchgdns.de
20/12/2015
Summary of the review
C
china-gadgets.de
17/03/2018
Summary of the review
F
fitness-factory.net
22/02/2016
Summary of the review
K
klein0r.de
01/12/2014
Summary of the review
B
bxnxg.com
12/07/2017
Summary of the review
S
stuffi.fr
08/06/2015
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
24 June 2025*
Summary of the review
A
antoineguilbert.fr
23/03/2015
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/07/2015
Summary of the review
C
corriere.it
27/08/2020
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
24/07/2019
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
15/06/2015
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
03/05/2015
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
11/04/2015
Summary of the review
T
tech.everyeye.it
23/01/2015
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
17/12/2015
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
24/11/2015
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
31/01/2016
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
29/10/2014
Summary of the review
M
mifans.nl
No date
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Xiaomi Mi Band

  • Excellent value for money as an entry-level budget fitness tracker
  • Vibrant AMOLED display with high brightness (up to 1200-1500 nits in newer models) for outdoor visibility
  • Impressive battery life, typically lasting 7 to 14 days with real-world usage
  • Lightweight, slim, and comfortable design that is unobtrusive to wear during sleep
  • Extensive variety of customisable watch faces and third-party strap options
  • Reliable core tracking for daily steps and 5ATM water resistance for swimming
  • Sleek and responsive user interface with smooth 60Hz animations on recent versions

What we don't like about Xiaomi Mi Band

  • Lack of built-in GPS on standard models, requiring a paired smartphone for route tracking
  • Heart rate and sleep tracking accuracy can be inconsistent during high-intensity or dynamic workouts
  • No NFC for contactless payments or built-in microphone/speaker for calls on global versions
  • The companion Mi Fitness app can feel clunky and sometimes has syncing issues with third-party apps like Strava
  • Minimalist design lacks a physical home button, which can make navigation difficult with wet or sweaty hands
  • Screen can feel cramped for reading long notifications or interacting with complex widgets
  • Always-on Display (AOD) mode significantly reduces battery life by more than 50%

Verdict

The Xiaomi Smart Band 10 is a high-value fitness tracker featuring a 1.72-inch AMOLED touchscreen with a smooth 60Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 1,500 nits, housed in a lightweight 16g aluminum alloy frame. It offers comprehensive 24/7 health monitoring—including heart rate, SpO2, stress, and sleep tracking—alongside over 150 sports modes and 5ATM water resistance. Main pros include its exceptional battery life of up to 21 days, a vibrant and responsive always-on display, and a highly affordable price point. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS (requiring a smartphone connection for route tracking), the absence of NFC in most global variants, and the lack of a physical button for navigation.

Compare Xiaomi Mi Band with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Mi Band and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found