Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Pivotal Tracker 1 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Battery life:7 daysScreen size:?Heart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:0 m

Pivotal Tracker 1 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.2

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 81% of fitness-trackers
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

6.8

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.7

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

6.5

Display

8%

5.4

Smart Features

8%

7.5

App & Wellness

4%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Design & Durability

â–¼Worse than 82% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £9

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Pivotal Tracker 1

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

6.8

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.7

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

6.5

Display

8%

5.4

Smart Features

8%

7.5

App & Wellness

4%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Design & Durability

6.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Pivotal Tracker 1 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.4
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
?
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
?
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
15 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
15 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 15 m which is higher than that of 79.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.8% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
N/A
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
?
Display type
PMOLED
Display type
PMOLED
This fitness tracker uses PMOLED display technology which is less advanced than that of 53.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 7.7% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
96x 16
Screen resolution
96x 16
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 96x16 which is lower than that of 65.3% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
15 mm
Show more

Pivotal Tracker 1 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 60% lighter
    Thickness
    10 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (10 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    10 g vs 25 g
  • 2 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    9 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    9 mm vs 11 mm
  • 31.8 mm lower height
    Height
    9 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (9 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    9 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • 7.78x cheaper
    Pivotal Tracker 1 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£9 vs £70).
    £9 vs £70
  • 5 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    15 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (15 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    15 m vs 10 m
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 7.78x cheaper
    Pivotal Tracker 1 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£9 vs £70).
    £9 vs £70
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 5 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    15 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (15 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    15 m vs 10 m
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 60% lighter
    Thickness
    10 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (10 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    10 g vs 25 g
  • 2 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    9 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    9 mm vs 11 mm
  • 31.8 mm lower height
    Height
    9 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (9 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    9 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
    Paid app access required.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    96 x 16
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (96x16 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    96x16 vs 194x368
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 50 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    0 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (0 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    Not waterproof.
    0 m vs 50 m
  • 5 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    0 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (0 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    Not waterproof.
    0 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 5.07x less popular
    Pivotal Tracker 1 has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 7.6% worse value for money
    Pivotal Tracker 1 has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.36 vs 7.9).
    7.36 vs 7.92
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    96 x 16
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (96x16 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    96x16 vs 194x368
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • 50 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    0 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (0 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    Not waterproof.
    0 m vs 50 m
  • 5 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    0 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (0 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    Not waterproof.
    0 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • No exercise diary
    Exercise diary
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have an exercise diary, while the average fitness tracker does. 91% of fitness trackers have an exercise diary.
  • Paid app
    Free app
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a free app, while the average fitness tracker does. 96.2% of fitness trackers have a free app.
    Paid app access required.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
activegearreview.com
24/12/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
19/12/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomsguide.com
02/01/2015
Summary of the review
S
slashgear.com
12/06/2015
Summary of the review
G
geardiary.com
13/01/2015
Summary of the review
Z
zdnet.fr
25/04/2024
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
15/04/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Pivotal Tracker 1

  • Incredibly affordable with a low-cost annual subscription model
  • Includes features like hydration tracking and inactivity alerts
  • Equipped with a silent vibrating alarm and 'Intelligent Awakening' feature
  • Long battery life lasting between 5 to 7 days on a single charge
  • Lightweight and generally comfortable design for daily wear
  • Sleek OLED display for checking stats without a smartphone

What we don't like about Pivotal Tracker 1

  • Not waterproof; only splash-proof and cannot be worn while swimming or showering
  • Inaccurate distance and step tracking algorithm compared to other devices
  • The app is often reported as buggy, slow, or difficult to sync
  • Lacks integration with popular third-party health apps like Apple Health or MyFitnessPal
  • Build-quality concerns such as the screen being prone to scratches
  • Requires manual entry and exit for sleep mode
  • First-generation units suffered from random reboots and hardware resets

Verdict

The Pivotal Tracker 1 is a budget-oriented activity band featuring a blue PMOLED display, a three-axis accelerometer, and Bluetooth 4.0 for syncing with iOS and Android devices. It tracks core metrics including steps, distance, calories, and sleep, while uniquely offering manual hydration and weight logging through its dedicated app. Weighing approximately 10 grams and measuring 15mm wide, the device is water-resistant against sweat and rain and boasts a 5 to 7-day battery life with a quick 60-minute recharge time. Key pros include its extreme affordability—initially sold via a low-cost annual subscription—a silent vibrating alarm, and helpful inactivity alerts. However, notable cons include lack of automatic sleep detection, poor distance tracking accuracy, a proprietary charging cable, and a non-waterproof design that is unsuitable for swimming.

Compare Pivotal Tracker 1 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Pivotal Tracker 1 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found