Scored using Wi-Fi extenders Methodology v1.0
Wi-Fi extenders Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Wi-Fi extenders Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Wi-Fi extenders Methodology v1.0

TP-Link RE450 Review | 63 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Wi-Fi speed:1750 MbpsCoverage area:?

TP-Link RE450 Review: Compare 63 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Wi-Fi extenders category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the Wi-Fi extender's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to spot the best Wi‑Fi extenders overall.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

7.3

User score

▼Worse than 68% of wi-fi-extenders
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Wi-Fi extenders category across these key areas: Wi-Fi Performance, Network & Security, Ports, Setup & Management, Hardware & Deployment.
When it matters
When you want to compare Wi‑Fi extenders based on speed, coverage, ports, and wireless features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

5.8

Wi-Fi Performance

30%

6.0

Network & Security

12%

8.7

Setup & Management

10%

4.8

Hardware & Deployment

8%

7.8

Ports

▼Worse than 67% of wi-fi-extenders
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the Wi-Fi extender.
When it matters
When you want to know how a Wi‑Fi extender performs in daily use and how reliably it maintains a stable connection over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

5.0

Number of reviews

Based on 96 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 85% of wi-fi-extenders
  • tp-link-re450
tp-link-re450

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of Wi-Fi extender TP-Link RE450

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Wi-Fi extenders category across these key areas: Wi-Fi Performance, Network & Security, Ports, Setup & Management, Hardware & Deployment.
When it matters
When you want to compare Wi‑Fi extenders based on speed, coverage, ports, and wireless features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

40%

5.8

Wi-Fi Performance

30%

6.0

Network & Security

12%

8.7

Setup & Management

10%

4.8

Hardware & Deployment

8%

7.8

Ports

6.3
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the Wi-Fi extender.
When it matters
When you want to know how a Wi‑Fi extender performs in daily use and how reliably it maintains a stable connection over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

5.0

Number of reviews

Based on 96 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the Wi-Fi extender.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a Wi‑Fi extender that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
TP-Link RE450 has a popularity score of 5 points, which is lower than 64.7% of Wi-Fi extenders.
5.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the Wi-Fi extender's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a Wi‑Fi extender with a good balance between performance and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
This wi-fi extender supports Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), more advanced than 9.8% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 44.1% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Wi-Fi bands
Dual-band
Wi-Fi bands
Dual-band
This wi-fi extender supports Dual-band, more versatile than 10.8% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 74.5% of Wi-Fi extenders.
6 GHz band support
no
6 GHz band support
no
This wi-fi extender does not support the 6 GHz band. 5.9% of Wi-Fi extenders support the 6 GHz band.
Wi-Fi speed
1,750 Mbps
Wi-Fi speed
1,750 Mbps
This wi-fi extender reaches 1,750 Mbps Wi-Fi speed, slower than 54.9% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 2.9% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Max speed 2.4 GHz
450 Mbps
Max speed 2.4 GHz
450 Mbps
This wi-fi extender reaches 450 Mbps on 2.4 GHz, faster than 49% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 2.9% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Show more
Ethernet backhaul
?
Mesh compatibility
OneMesh
Mesh standard
EasyMesh
Roaming feature
yes
Roaming feature
yes
This wi-fi extender supports roaming. 17.7% of Wi-Fi extenders support roaming.
Requires mesh system.
802.11k support
yes
802.11k support
yes
This wi-fi extender supports 802.11k. 24% of Wi-Fi extenders support 802.11k.
Requires OneMesh/EasyMesh.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
1
N. of LAN ports
1
This wi-fi extender has 1 LAN port/s, more than 9.8% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 74.5% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Ethernet port speed
1 Gbps
Ethernet port speed
1 Gbps
This wi-fi extender offers 1 Gbps Ethernet speed, faster than 25.5% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 63.7% of Wi-Fi extenders.
N. of USB ports
0
N. of USB ports
0
This wi-fi extender has 0 USB port/s, fewer than 2.9% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 97.1% of Wi-Fi extenders.
PoE standard
N/A
Dedicated smartphone app
yes
Dedicated smartphone app
yes
This wi-fi extender comes with a dedicated smartphone app. 15.7% of Wi-Fi extenders come with a dedicated smartphone app.
TP-Link Tether app.
Web UI management
yes
Web UI management
yes
This wi-fi extender has a web management interface. 2% of Wi-Fi extenders have a web management interface.
Web UI at tplinkrepeater.net.
Automatic firmware updates
no
Automatic firmware updates
no
This wi-fi extender does not have automatic firmware updates. 46.1% of Wi-Fi extenders have automatic firmware updates.
LED control
yes
LED control
yes
This wi-fi extender has LED control. 14.7% of Wi-Fi extenders have LED control.
Night Mode for LEDs.
Buttons present
wps, reset, power, led
Show more
Mounting type
wall-plug
Portable design
yes
Portable design
yes
This wi-fi extender has a portable design. 34.3% of Wi-Fi extenders have a portable design.
Height
163 mm
Height
163 mm
This wi-fi extender is 163 mm tall, taller than 81.4% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 3.9% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Width
163 mm
Width
163 mm
This wi-fi extender is 163 mm wide, wider than 86.3% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 1% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Thickness
66.5 mm
Thickness
66.5 mm
This wi-fi extender is 66.5 mm thick, thicker than 87.3% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 1% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Show more

TP-Link RE450 vs the average Wi-Fi extender

246810TotalWi-Fi PerformanceNetwork & SecurityPortsSetup & ManagementHardware & Deployment
  • 6.2 W lower power consumption
    Operating power consumption
    3.3 W
    This wi-fi extender uses less power than the average Wi-Fi extender (3.3 W vs 9.5 W). The average Wi-Fi extender uses 9.5 W of power.
    10 W maximum also appears in specs.
    3.3 W vs 9.5 W
  • 1 more antennas
    Wi-Fi speed
    3 Mbps
    This wi-fi extender has more antennas than the average Wi-Fi extender (3 vs 2). The average Wi-Fi extender has 2 antennas.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports DFS
    DFS support
    yes
    This wi-fi extender supports DFS, while the average Wi-Fi extender does not. 43.2% of Wi-Fi extenders support DFS.
  • 1 more spatial streams
    Spatial streams per band
    3
    This wi-fi extender has more spatial streams per band than the average Wi-Fi extender (3 vs 2). The average Wi-Fi extender has 2 spatial streams per band.
    3 vs 2
  • 2x cheaper
    TP-Link RE450 is cheaper than the average Wi-Fi extender (£35 vs £70).
    £35 vs £70
  • 21.4% lighter
    Weight
    220 g
    This wi-fi extender is lighter than the average Wi-Fi extender (220 g vs 280 g). The average Wi-Fi extender weighs 280 g.
    220 g vs 280 g
  • 2x cheaper
    TP-Link RE450 is cheaper than the average Wi-Fi extender (£35 vs £70).
    £35 vs £70
  • 1 more antennas
    Wi-Fi speed
    3 Mbps
    This wi-fi extender has more antennas than the average Wi-Fi extender (3 vs 2). The average Wi-Fi extender has 2 antennas.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports DFS
    DFS support
    yes
    This wi-fi extender supports DFS, while the average Wi-Fi extender does not. 43.2% of Wi-Fi extenders support DFS.
  • 1 more spatial streams
    Spatial streams per band
    3
    This wi-fi extender has more spatial streams per band than the average Wi-Fi extender (3 vs 2). The average Wi-Fi extender has 2 spatial streams per band.
    3 vs 2
  • 6.2 W lower power consumption
    Operating power consumption
    3.3 W
    This wi-fi extender uses less power than the average Wi-Fi extender (3.3 W vs 9.5 W). The average Wi-Fi extender uses 9.5 W of power.
    10 W maximum also appears in specs.
    3.3 W vs 9.5 W
  • 21.4% lighter
    Weight
    220 g
    This wi-fi extender is lighter than the average Wi-Fi extender (220 g vs 280 g). The average Wi-Fi extender weighs 280 g.
    220 g vs 280 g
  • No QoS support
    QoS support
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support QoS, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 52.4% of Wi-Fi extenders support QoS.
  • No MU-MIMO support
    MU-MIMO
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support MU-MIMO, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 71.8% of Wi-Fi extenders support MU-MIMO.
    Wi-Fi 5 AC1750 Wave 1 lacks MU-MIMO
  • No 802.11r support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support 802.11r, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 57.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support 802.11r.
    EasyMesh + OneMesh on V4+.
  • No 802.11v support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support 802.11v, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 66.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support 802.11v.
    EasyMesh + OneMesh on V4+.
  • No band steering
    Band steering
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not have band steering, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 65% of Wi-Fi extenders have band steering.
  • No IPv6 support
    IPv6 support
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support IPv6, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 85.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support IPv6.
  • 50% less RAM
    RAM capacity
    128 MB
    This wi-fi extender has less RAM than the average Wi-Fi extender (128 MB vs 256 MB). The average Wi-Fi extender has 256 MB of RAM.
    128 MB vs 256 MB
  • 1 dBi lower antenna gain
    Antenna gain
    3 dBi
    This wi-fi extender has lower antenna gain than the average Wi-Fi extender (3 dBi vs 4 dBi). The average Wi-Fi extender has 4 dBi antenna gain.
    3 dBi vs 4 dBi
  • 9.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the Wi-Fi extender.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a Wi‑Fi extender performs in daily use and how reliably it maintains a stable connection over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    TP-Link RE450
    the average Wi-Fi extender
    TP-Link RE450 has a lower user score than the average Wi-Fi extender (7.28 vs 8.000).
    7.28 vs 8
  • 7% worse value for money
    TP-Link RE450 has a lower value-for-money score than the average Wi-Fi extender (7.52 vs 8.1).
    7.52 vs 8.05
  • 33.1% less popular
    TP-Link RE450 has a lower popularity than the average Wi-Fi extender (4.95 vs 6.6).
    4.95 vs 6.59
  • No MU-MIMO support
    MU-MIMO
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support MU-MIMO, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 71.8% of Wi-Fi extenders support MU-MIMO.
    Wi-Fi 5 AC1750 Wave 1 lacks MU-MIMO
  • No band steering
    Band steering
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not have band steering, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 65% of Wi-Fi extenders have band steering.
  • 1 dBi lower antenna gain
    Antenna gain
    3 dBi
    This wi-fi extender has lower antenna gain than the average Wi-Fi extender (3 dBi vs 4 dBi). The average Wi-Fi extender has 4 dBi antenna gain.
    3 dBi vs 4 dBi
  • 1.4% slower Wi-Fi speed
    Wi-Fi speed
    1,750 Mbps
    This wi-fi extender reaches slower Wi-Fi speed than the average Wi-Fi extender (1750 Mbps vs 1775 Mbps). The average Wi-Fi extender reaches 1775 Mbps Wi-Fi speed.
    1,750 Mbps vs 1,775 Mbps
  • No QoS support
    QoS support
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support QoS, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 52.4% of Wi-Fi extenders support QoS.
  • No 802.11r support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support 802.11r, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 57.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support 802.11r.
    EasyMesh + OneMesh on V4+.
  • No 802.11v support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support 802.11v, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 66.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support 802.11v.
    EasyMesh + OneMesh on V4+.
  • No IPv6 support
    IPv6 support
    no
    This wi-fi extender does not support IPv6, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 85.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support IPv6.
  • 50% less RAM
    RAM capacity
    128 MB
    This wi-fi extender has less RAM than the average Wi-Fi extender (128 MB vs 256 MB). The average Wi-Fi extender has 256 MB of RAM.
    128 MB vs 256 MB
  • 20.5 mm thicker
    Thickness
    66.5 mm
    This wi-fi extender is thicker than the average Wi-Fi extender (66.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average Wi-Fi extender has a thickness of 46 mm.
    66.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • Limited temperature range
    Operating temperature range
    0-30
    This wi-fi extender operates within a narrower temperature range than the average Wi-Fi extender (0-30 vs 0-40). The average Wi-Fi extender operates within 0-40.
    0-30 vs 0-40
  • 81.6 mm wider
    Width
    163 mm
    This wi-fi extender is wider than the average Wi-Fi extender (163 mm vs 81.4 mm). The average Wi-Fi extender has a width of 81.4 mm.
    163 mm vs 81.4 mm
  • 41 mm taller
    Height
    163 mm
    This wi-fi extender is taller than the average Wi-Fi extender (163 mm vs 122 mm). The average Wi-Fi extender has a height of 122 mm.
    163 mm vs 122 mm
  • 5 older release date
    Release date
    2015
    This wi-fi extender was released earlier than the average Wi-Fi extender (2015 vs 2020). The average Wi-Fi extender was released in 2020.
    June 2015
    2015 vs 2020
  • 50% less flash storage
    Flash storage
    8 MB
    This wi-fi extender has less flash storage than the average Wi-Fi extender (8 MB vs 16 MB). The average Wi-Fi extender has 16 MB of flash storage.
    8 MB vs 16 MB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
moviesgamesandtech.com
22/05/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitalcitizen.life
30/09/2025
Summary of the review
T
toptenreviews.com
29/08/2018
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
27/01/2016
Summary of the review
V
vividrepairs.co.uk
02/02/2026
Summary of the review
F
faz.net
09/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
techtest.org
10/11/2015
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/04/2026
Summary of the review
T
tests-et-bons-plans.fr
13/01/2019
Summary of the review
I
it-connect.fr
12/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
tp-link.com
2020
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
24/01/2016
Summary of the review
R
redeszone.net
24/03/2021
Summary of the review
B
bestewifiversterker.nl
05/11/2025
Summary of the review
R
rudybrinkman.nl
09/09/2025
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
16/03/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 96 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about TP-Link RE450

  • Simple and quick setup process, often described as 'plug-and-play' via the WPS button
  • Excellent long-range throughput, particularly on the 2.4GHz band
  • Helpful smart signal indicator light for finding the optimal placement
  • Includes a high-speed Gigabit Ethernet port for stable wired connections to consoles or TVs
  • Reliable and stable connection once configured, requiring minimal reboots

What we don't like about TP-Link RE450

  • Bulky design that often blocks the adjacent wall outlet and lacks an AC pass-through
  • May create separate network IDs (SSIDs) ending in '_EXT' rather than a seamless mesh
  • Lacks support for newer WiFi 6 technology, limiting its future-proofing
  • Glossy plastic finish is a magnet for fingerprints and dust
  • Advanced users may find the administration interface lacks deep configuration options

Verdict

The TP-Link RE450 is a dual-band AC1750 Wi-Fi range extender capable of delivering speeds up to 1300Mbps on the 5GHz band and 450Mbps on the 2.4GHz band. Key characteristics include three adjustable external antennas for optimized coverage, a high-speed Gigabit Ethernet port for wired devices, and an intelligent signal light that helps users find the ideal installation spot. Main pros include its easy setup via the RE button and Tether app, solid throughput performance at long distances, and its versatile ability to double as a wireless access point. However, users should note its bulky design, which often blocks adjacent wall outlets, and the lack of an integrated AC pass-through socket.

Compare TP-Link RE450 with other products in the Wi-Fi extenders category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of TP-Link RE450 and other products in the Wi-Fi extenders category

No results found