Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£700RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:5.7 inchesMain camera megapixels:19 MP

Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4/10

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.1

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

▼Worse than 96% of smartphones
5.8

Value for money

Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

6.8

Price

▼Worse than 99%
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.5

Camera

15%

4.0

Display

15%

5.0

Battery

10%

4.3

Software

10%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

6.4

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

▼Worse than 97%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

▲Better than 70%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.5

Camera

15%

4.0

Display

15%

5.0

Battery

10%

4.3

Software

10%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

6.4

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

5.1
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

8.1
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 7.5 points, which is higher than 69.4% of smartphones.
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

6.8

Price

5.8
Brand name
Sony
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 processor model which is slower than processors in 68.7% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.7% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.45 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.45 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 50.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 8 Oreo
Android version
Android 8 Oreo
This smartphone runs Android version Android 8 Oreo which is older than that found in 96.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 1.7% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
no
This smartphone does not offer dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
no
This smartphone does not include a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
19 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 19 MP which is lower than that of 85.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is narrower than that of 93.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
28.3 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 28.3 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 70.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.22 µm which is larger than in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to the size in 3% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
1
This smartphone has 1 SIM slots, which is fewer than in 96.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 3.7% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
5.7 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 5.7 inches which is smaller than the screens of 96.5% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.5% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2160 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2160 px which is lower than that of 75.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
424 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 424 ppi which is higher than that of 72.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,700 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 2,700 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 99% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
18 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 18 W which is slower than in 76% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 11.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
153 mm
This smartphone has a height of 153 mm which is shorter than 92.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
72 mm
This smartphone has a width of 72 mm which is narrower than 92.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Thickness
11.1 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 11.1 mm which is thicker than 90.6% of smartphones.
Weight
198 g
This smartphone weighs 198 g which is heavier than 52.3% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
121,176 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 121,176 cm³ which is larger than 88.1% of smartphones.
Show more

Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 0.42 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.2 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.22 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 3.45x higher PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a better PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (3,405 vs 988). The average single-core score is 988.
    3,405 vs 988
  • 50% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (9 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    9 W vs 6 W
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.1 vs 2
  • Supports laser autofocus
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • 1.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sony Xperia XZ2
    the average smartphone
    Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.13 vs 8).
    8.13 vs 8
  • 38.3% more popular
    Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (7.52 vs 5.4).
    7.52 vs 5.44
  • 3.45x higher PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a better PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (3,405 vs 988). The average single-core score is 988.
    3,405 vs 988
  • 50% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (9 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    9 W vs 6 W
  • 50% more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (1,536 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    1,536 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.45 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.45 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 2.1% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.45 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 16.4% higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (29.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    29.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 0.42 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.2 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.22 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.1 vs 2
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • 7.3% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (424 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    424 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Higher GSMArena battery life score
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena battery life score than the average smartphone (14:49 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s). The average score is 13:30 hour/s.
    14:49 hour/s vs 13:30 hour/s
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 4 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (72 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    72 mm vs 76 mm
  • 10.6 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (153 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    153 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 46% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (2,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    2,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 0.97 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5.7 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 26.4% worse value for money
    Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (5.8 vs 7.3).
    5.8 vs 7.34
  • 2.69x more expensive
    Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£700 vs £260).
    £700 vs £260
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 25.3% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (710 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    710 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 66.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (10 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    10 nm vs 6 nm
  • 70.9% fewer transistors
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (3,000 million vs 10,300 million). The average smartphone has 10,300 million transistors.
    3,000 million vs 10,300 million
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • 41.1% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (555 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    555 vs 942
  • 32.1% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 50% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4,096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 68% lower 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (1,224 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    1,224 vs 3,825
  • 54% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (1,432 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    1,432 vs 3,115
  • 58.9% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (504 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    504 vs 1,226
  • 22.4% lower PassMark benchmark
    This smartphone has a lower PassMark score than the average smartphone (3,405 vs 4,389). The average smartphone scores 4,389 in PassMark.
    3,405 vs 4,389
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 8 Oreo vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 8 Oreo vs Android 14
  • No location privacy controls
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Lacks dark mode
    This smartphone does not support dark mode, the average smartphone does. 95.8% of smartphones have dark mode.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (19 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    19 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Single-lens main camera
    This smartphone has a single-lens main camera, while the average smartphone has a multi-lens setup. 93.7% of smartphones use multiple lenses.
  • No timelapse video
    This smartphone does not support timelapse video, the average smartphone does. 92.3% of smartphones include timelapse modes.
  • 11.6% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (28.3 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    28.3 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (13 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    13 MP vs 16 MP
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • 1 fewer SIM slot/s
    This smartphone has fewer SIM slots than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 SIM slots.
    1 vs 2
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 0.97 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5.7 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a lower contrast ratio than the average smartphone (1400:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone has a contrast ratio of 1000000:1.
    1,400:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • 275.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (618 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    618 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2160 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2160 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 382 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (618 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    618 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 46% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (2,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    2,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 41.3% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (461 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    461 min vs 786 min
  • 45.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (18 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    18 W vs 33 W
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (88 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    88 vs 99.5
  • 6 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2018 vs 2024). 6.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    February 2018
    2018 vs 2024
  • 2.8 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (11.1 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    11.1 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    Japan vs China
  • 23.9% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (121,176 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    121,176 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.6
VoloKin Project
✓ explicit
06/12/2018
Full review · design, screen, camera, battery and scoring
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 gets a very positive overall verdict: a good choice for Sony fans and good value at its price.
8.0
Pedals & Pixels
≈ estimated
15/08/2018
Full review · daily use, battery and performance tests
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 is a good phone, but its size, weight and slippery glass body are real drawbacks.
9.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
20/07/2018
Long-term review · several months of use
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 is still a premium phone through and through, despite its faults, and is recommended even as the successor nears.
8.0
MakeUseOf
✓ explicit
16/07/2018
Hands-on review · camera, battery, design and software
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 has an excellent camera and top performance, but many people love or hate its design.
9.0
Useful Vids
≈ estimated
08/07/2018
Two-month review · daily use and features
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 is highly recommended: fast, snappy, with a battery that lasts a day or more.
7.0
Darius K
≈ estimated
13/06/2018
Long-term review · two months of use
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 is a step in the right direction, but laggy software and an average camera make rival phones more appealing.
8.0
GadgetMatch
≈ estimated
08/06/2018
Hands-on review · video recording, display and battery tests
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 is a solid choice for video creators and multimedia fans, though rivals take better photos overall.
9.0
Android Headlines - Android News & Tech News
≈ estimated
28/05/2018
Camera review · side-by-side tests with rival phones
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 has impressive camera results, though its slow, outdated camera interface needs a major update.
9.0
Matthew Moniz
≈ estimated
13/05/2018
Full review · camera, battery and daily use
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 is a great, consistent phone, though it is not the best in any single category.
8.0
Canoopsy
≈ estimated
12/05/2018
Hands-on review · daily use, camera and battery tests
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 has Sony's best exterior design yet, but its slippery grip and quirks hold it back.
5.0
iNandoTV
≈ estimated
08/05/2018
Final review · everyday use problems and comparison
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 feels outdated, and its awkward fingerprint placement makes it hard to recommend against rivals.
8.0
The Tech Chap
≈ estimated
24/04/2018
Hands-on review · design, camera, slow-motion and battery tests
Verdict
Sony Xperia XZ2 is not perfect, but it is a great phone, especially for its design and battery.
More graded video reviews (17)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techradar.com
11/04/2018
Hands-on review · Flagship phone
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 lasts a long time on one charge and has a feature-packed camera, but its plain design and Full HD screen trail flagship rivals.
pcmag.com
10/05/2018
Benchmark review · Flagship phone
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a fast, sleek phone with a strong 4K HDR camera, but short battery life is its weak point.
cnet.com
17/05/2018
Hands-on review · Camera and speakers
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a solid, comfortable phone with a good camera, but the Huawei P20 Pro and Galaxy S9 are the stronger choices.
xda-developers.com
29/05/2018
Two-week review · Camera focus
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 suits photographers with natural, unfiltered photos and true HDR video, but dim-light shots trail the Pixel 2 XL and Galaxy S9.
wired.com
31/05/2018
Full review · Camera and build
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 has an excellent camera and fast chip, but its thick, slippery body and mediocre battery make rivals like the Galaxy S9 more compelling.
androidcentral.com
18/06/2018
Full review · Camera and usability
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a smooth, entertainment-focused phone, but its bulky, slippery body and camera exposure problems hold it back.
techadvisor.com
15/07/2019
In-depth review · Design and camera
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a bright, good-sounding phone with a curved back, but its chunky body and missing portrait mode leave rivals ahead.
digitaltrends.com
25/04/2023
Hands-on review · Design and performance
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a fast, sharp-screened phone with a capable camera, but app crashes and a fingerprint sensor placed too low hold it back.
tomsguide.com
14/05/2018
Full review · Benchmarks and design
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a fast, distinctive alternative to look-alike Android flagships, but it doesn't necessarily offer the best value.
ubergizmo.com
14/06/2018
Full review · Multimedia and camera
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a multimedia phone with a natural-looking camera and loud speakers, but its single rear lens offers no zoom or blurred-background portraits.
androidheadlines.com
23/10/2018
Hands-on review · Curved design
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a bold, distinctive redesign with a bright screen and two sizes, but its curved, slippery body is hard to handle.
engadget.com
03/04/2018
Hands-on review · Entertainment focus
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a fast, smooth phone with a vibrant screen, but its battery drain and gimmicky vibration feature hold it back against the Galaxy S9.
D
droid-life.com
20/06/2018
Summary of the review
notebookcheck.net
25/04/2018
Lab test · Benchmark results
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a Snapdragon 845 flagship that beats the Galaxy S9 in most graphics and system benchmarks.
expertreviews.co.uk
18/02/2019
Hands-on review · Flagship phone
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a stylish, fast flagship lasting a day and a half, but stuttering 4K HDR video makes it hard to choose over the Galaxy S9.
gsmarena.com
Not Dated
Lab-tested review · Flagship phone
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 suits buyers wanting a new-look flagship with a louder speaker, but its camera lacks optical stabilization.
photographylife.com
04/06/2018
Hands-on camera test · Single lens
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 takes strong, well-exposed photos in daylight, but its single camera, weaker stabilization and low-light noise hold it back.
smartworld.it
26/03/2018
Full review · Design and camera
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 looks distinctive and its battery lasts a full day, but its slippery body, missing headphone jack and shaky 4K video hold it back.
wired.it
23/04/2018
Hands-on review · Media and battery
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a well-built, reliable phone with a strong screen for media, but its weight and wobbly curved back make everyday handling awkward.
tomshw.it
13/04/2018
Full review · Display and battery
Verdict
The Sony Xperia XZ2 offers one of the best screens and over five hours of screen time, but its heavy, curved body feels awkward in the hand.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Extremely fast and smooth performance thanks to the Snapdragon 845 processor and optimized, near-stock Android software.
  • Excellent battery life, with many users reporting it can last through a full day of heavy use or even two days of moderate use.
  • High-quality display that is bright, vivid, and supports HDR content, with good outdoor readability.
  • Camera takes detailed, sharp photos in good lighting and can record 4K HDR video and 960fps super slow-motion, which reviewers found impressive, even if tricky to use perfectly.
  • Solid and premium build quality with a comfortable, curved design, although opinions on its feel vary.
  • Features a dedicated, physical two-stage camera shutter button, which is popular among users.
  • Includes helpful features like IP65/IP68 water resistance, a microSD card slot for expandable storage, and wireless charging support (on the standard XZ2 model).
  • Audio quality is generally above average with loud, clear, front-facing stereo speakers.
  • Comes with minimal pre-installed bloatware, which is appreciated by many users.

What customers don't like about Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB)

  • The phone is very slippery and prone to attracting fingerprints, making a case almost necessary.
  • The fingerprint scanner's location on the back is too low for many users, who often mistake the camera lens for the scanner.
  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack is a common complaint, requiring the use of a USB-C adapter (which is included).
  • Camera performance in low-light conditions is a weak point, with images appearing noisy or less detailed compared to competitors.
  • The 5MP front-facing camera is considered a bit low-resolution and underwhelming, with a noticeable lack of detail.
  • The phone is relatively heavy and thick compared to other flagships in its class.
  • Some users report the speakers sound tinny, especially on speakerphone.
  • The dynamic vibration system is largely considered a gimmick that many users turn off.
  • The SIM card tray is described as flimsy and difficult to use.

Verdict

The Sony Xperia XZ2 with 4GB RAM and 64GB storage is a flagship smartphone from 2018, powered by the high-end Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor and featuring a 5.7-inch Full HD+ HDR display with a modern 18:9 aspect ratio. Its main pros include the powerful processor that ensures fast performance, the world's first ability to record 4K HDR video and 960fps super slow-motion video at 1080p, a solid 19MP main camera, IP68 water resistance, expandable storage up to 400GB, and the convenience of Qi wireless charging. Primary cons include a chunky and heavy design with an awkwardly placed rear fingerprint sensor (often mistaken for the camera lens), the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, a relatively low-resolution 5MP front camera, and an average battery life compared to some rivals.

Compare Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony Xperia XZ2 (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found