Fitbit Charge HR Review | 171 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£130
  • Avg. price in US: ~$150
  • Form factor: wristband
  • Battery life: 5 days
  • Screen size: 0.7 inch

Fitbit Charge HR review. Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among fitness trackers and if it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.

Score components:

80.0%

6.6

Technical Score

20.0%

8.5

User score

Very good
6.6

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the fitness tracker's technical performance, covering eight key areas: health tracking, sports features, connectivity, display, battery, smart features, design, and app support.

When it matters: When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

20.0%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20.0%

4.0

Battery

18.0%

7.0

Health

18.0%

5.7

Display

8.0%

6.2

Smart Features

8.0%

8.8

App & Wellness

4.0%

8.7

Connectivity

4.0%

6.8

Design & Durability

Good
8.5

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.

When it matters: When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

7.8

User reviews

30.0%

10

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
(9472)

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

Excellent
  • 3.1
    Swimming

    Score components:

    28.0%

    2.8

    ATM rating

    24.0%

    4.0

    Open-water swim mode

    18.0%

    2.8

    Waterproof depth rating

    15.0%

    4.0

    GPS

    15.0%

    2.0

    Battery life

  • 4.3
    Kids

    Score components:

    30.0%

    2.0

    Battery life

    25.0%

    7.2

    Weight

    20.0%

    2.8

    ATM rating

    15.0%

    2.4

    Screen size

    10.0%

    9.8

    Price

  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The Fitbit Charge HR is a sleek, 21mm wide fitness tracker featuring continuous PurePulse optical heart rate monitoring, an integrated OLED display, and a 5-day rechargeable battery. It accurately tracks steps, distance, calories burned, floors climbed, and sleep automatically, while also providing caller ID notifications and silent vibrating alarms. Its primary advantages include 24/7 heart rate tracking without a chest strap, a comfortable textured elastomer band with a secure watch-style buckle, and seamless wireless syncing with a highly rated app. However, it is only water-resistant (not suitable for swimming or showering), lacks built-in GPS, and its heart rate accuracy may decrease during high-intensity workouts.

Technical Specifications of Fitbit Charge HR

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the fitness tracker's technical performance, covering eight key areas: health tracking, sports features, connectivity, display, battery, smart features, design, and app support.

When it matters: When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

20.0%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20.0%

4.0

Battery

18.0%

7.0

Health

18.0%

5.7

Display

8.0%

6.2

Smart Features

8.0%

8.8

App & Wellness

4.0%

8.7

Connectivity

4.0%

6.8

Design & Durability

6.6
Fitbit Charge HR has a technical score of 6.6 points, which is lower than 68.5% of fitness trackers.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.

When it matters: When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

7.8

User reviews

30.0%

10

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
(9472)

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

8.5
Fitbit Charge HR has a user score of 8.46 points, which is higher than 68.1% of fitness trackers.
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters: When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
10
Fitbit Charge HR has a popularity of 10 points, which is higher than 60.1% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.

Score components:

60.0%

7.0

Overall score

40.0%

9.8

Price

7.8
Fitbit Charge HR has a quality-to-price ratio of 7.8 points, which is lower than 54.9% of products in this category.
Heart rate monitor
What it is: Sensor that measures heart rate in real time.
When it matters: When you care about live heart-rate feedback during training or resting trends outside of workouts.

Importance: HIGH

yes
Fitbit Charge HR supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
What it is: Measures heart rate while resting.
When it matters: When deeper insight into sleep quality, recovery, or overall readiness matters more than raw numbers alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
Fitbit Charge HR supports Resting heart rate. 52% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Tracks resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
What it is: Alerts for heart rates that are too fast or too slow.
When it matters: When you want the tracker to warn you about unusual changes instead of only logging them.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 33.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
What it is: Warns of irregular or abnormal heart rhythms.
When it matters: When you want the tracker to warn you about unusual changes instead of only logging them.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 11.5% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
What it is: Sensor that measures blood oxygen saturation.
When it matters: When blood oxygen readings are part of the health picture you want from the device instead of relying on heart rate and step count alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 26.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
What it is: Satellite navigation capability for positioning and tracking.
When it matters: When you train outdoors and want pace, distance, and route tracking without depending completely on your phone.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
What it is: States which satellite navigation systems the device can use for positioning.
When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
What it is: Number and type of GNSS frequency bands supported.
When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
What it is: Supports Galileo satellite system.
When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
What it is: Shows whether the tracker includes features that help it lock onto satellite positioning more quickly at the start of an outdoor activity.
When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support faster GPS acquisition. 7.2% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
What it is: Delivers smartphone notifications on the watch.
When it matters: When getting calls, messages, and app alerts on your wrist saves you from checking your phone constantly.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
Fitbit Charge HR supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
limited to call/SMS alerts.
Vibrating alerts
What it is: Provides vibration-based notifications and alerts.
When it matters: When staying reachable from your wrist helps you avoid checking your phone constantly.

Importance: LOW

yes
Fitbit Charge HR supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
What it is: Allows control of phone calls from the device.
When it matters: When staying reachable from your wrist helps you avoid checking your phone constantly.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support call controls. 41.1% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
What it is: Allows answering calls directly from the device.
When it matters: When staying reachable from your wrist helps you avoid checking your phone constantly.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
What it is: Syncs calendar events with the connected device.
When it matters: When staying reachable from your wrist helps you avoid checking your phone constantly.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support calendar sync. 19.9% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
What it is: Generates summaries and insights from activity data.
When it matters: When you want the app to motivate you with goals, reports, coaching, or progress feedback over time.

Importance: LOW

yes
Fitbit Charge HR supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Fitbit app
Goal setting
What it is: Allows setting personal fitness or activity goals.
When it matters: When you want the app to motivate you with goals, reports, coaching, or progress feedback over time.

Importance: LOW

yes
Fitbit Charge HR supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
What it is: Rewards progress and completed milestones.
When it matters: When you want the app to motivate you with goals, reports, coaching, or progress feedback over time.

Importance: LOW

yes
Fitbit Charge HR supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Includes milestone trophies.
Inactivity alerts
What it is: Alerts when the user has been inactive for too long.
When it matters: When account rules, app costs, exports, or software flexibility affect whether the ecosystem suits you long term.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support inactivity alerts. 76.9% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
What it is: Provides guided training and workout advice.
When it matters: When you want the app to motivate you with goals, reports, coaching, or progress feedback over time.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support coaching. 33% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
What it is: Version of Bluetooth supported by the device.
When it matters: When wireless stability, pairing quality, and long-term phone compatibility matter more than Bluetooth being a simple checkbox.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=5.0

4.0
Fitbit Charge HR supports Bluetooth 4.0 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.5% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
What it is: States the maximum Bluetooth connection range supported under normal conditions.
When it matters: When compatibility with your phone, computer, accessories, or wireless setup affects how well the tracker fits into your ecosystem.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=10 m

20 m
Fitbit Charge HR offers a Bluetooth range of 20 m which is higher than that of 84.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 5.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
What it is: Supports near-field communication for contactless features.
When it matters: When compatibility with your phone, computer, accessories, or wireless setup affects how well the tracker fits into your ecosystem.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not have NFC. 10.1% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
What it is: Connects to wireless internet networks.
When it matters: When the tracker should sync, update, or download data directly without always routing everything through the phone.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
What it is: Version of Wi-Fi standard supported.
When it matters: When compatibility with your phone, computer, accessories, or wireless setup affects how well the tracker fits into your ecosystem.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
What it is: Total time the battery lasts on a full charge.
When it matters: When the tracker needs to last through travel, sleep tracking, long workouts, or several days between charges.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >5 days

5 days
Fitbit Charge HR offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 79.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12.4% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
What it is: Battery duration when GPS tracking is active.
When it matters: When you want fewer charging breaks during travel, longer workouts, sleep tracking, or continuous use.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=8 hours

N/A
Battery life in training mode
What it is: Battery duration during active training sessions.
When it matters: When you want fewer charging breaks during travel, longer workouts, sleep tracking, or continuous use.

Importance: LOW

?
Battery life in power-saving mode
What it is: Battery duration when using power-saving mode.
When it matters: When you want fewer charging breaks during travel, longer workouts, sleep tracking, or continuous use.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Battery capacity
What it is: Energy storage capacity of the battery.
When it matters: When you want rough battery context behind the runtime claim instead of trusting the advertised hours alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=100 mAh

70 mAh
Fitbit Charge HR has a battery capacity of 70 mAh which is lower than that of 75.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.5% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
What it is: Main interface showing information and metrics.
When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

Importance: LOW

yes
Fitbit Charge HR has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
What it is: Physical size of the device’s display measured diagonally.
When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

0.7 inch
Fitbit Charge HR has a screen size of 0.7 inch which is smaller than that of 90.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
What it is: Technology used for the screen, such as AMOLED or LCD.
When it matters: When display technology affects contrast, color quality, power efficiency, or how premium the screen feels.

Importance: MEDIUM

OLED
Fitbit Charge HR uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 53% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 21.8% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
What it is: Total number of pixels displayed on the screen.
When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

128 x 32
Fitbit Charge HR has a screen resolution of 128x32 which is lower than that of 51.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
What it is: Number of pixels per inch determining screen sharpness.
When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=280 ppi

?
Show more
Form factor
What it is: Overall physical design and shape.
When it matters: When materials, shape, and build details affect comfort, durability, or how discreet the device feels.

Importance: LOW

wristband
Hybrid design
What it is: Combines analog and digital display elements.
When it matters: When materials, shape, and build details affect comfort, durability, or how discreet the device feels.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
What it is: Indicates whether the fitness tracker is explicitly designed for children, with child-focused sizing, branding, safety limits, or kid-oriented activity features.
When it matters: This matters when you want a tracker that is genuinely child-focused rather than just a smaller adult model.

Importance: LOW

no
Fitbit Charge HR is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
No child-specific positioning found.
Replaceable watch band
What it is: Ability to replace the wristband with other styles.
When it matters: When strap comfort, fit, or the ability to swap bands matters for sport, style, or replacement.

Importance: LOW

?
Band width
What it is: Width of the strap where it connects to the watch.
When it matters: When strap comfort, fit, or the ability to swap bands matters for sport, style, or replacement.

Importance: LOW

18 mm
Show more

Fitbit Charge HR vs the average fitness tracker

  • Lower resting heart rate
    Fitbit Charge HR supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.2% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
    Tracks resting heart rate.
    What it is: Measures heart rate while resting.
    When it matters: When deeper insight into sleep quality, recovery, or overall readiness matters more than raw numbers alone.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Fitbit Charge HR supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.2% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks elevation
    Fitbit Charge HR supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.2% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
    Floors climbed
    What it is: Measures elevation gain and loss during activity.
    When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

    Importance: LOW

    Fitbit Charge HR supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.2% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Fitbit Charge HR supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
    Includes menstrual-cycle tracking.
    What it is: Tracks menstrual cycle and related data.
    When it matters: When cycle tracking is part of your health routine and you want those records kept alongside the rest of your wearable data.

    Importance: LOW

    Fitbit Charge HR supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Fitbit Charge HR has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
    Period reminders via app.
    What it is: Shows whether the platform can send reminders or notifications related to menstrual cycle timing.
    When it matters: When cycle tracking, fertility insight, or related reminders are part of your health routine.

    Importance: LOW

    Fitbit Charge HR has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Windows compatible
    Fitbit Charge HR is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
    What it is: Compatible with Windows computers.
    When it matters: When compatibility with your phone, computer, accessories, or wireless setup affects how well the tracker fits into your ecosystem.

    Importance: LOW

    Fitbit Charge HR is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Fitbit Charge HR is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 27.5% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
    What it is: Compatible with macOS devices.
    When it matters: When compatibility with your phone, computer, accessories, or wireless setup affects how well the tracker fits into your ecosystem.

    Importance: LOW

    Fitbit Charge HR is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 27.5% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
  • Built-in barometer
    Fitbit Charge HR has a barometer, while the average fitness tracker does not. 10.7% of fitness trackers have a barometer.
    What it is: Measures air pressure and elevation changes.
    When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

    Importance: LOW

    Fitbit Charge HR has a barometer, while the average fitness tracker does not. 10.7% of fitness trackers have a barometer.
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Fitbit Charge HR has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    What it is: States the maximum Bluetooth connection range supported under normal conditions.
    When it matters: When compatibility with your phone, computer, accessories, or wireless setup affects how well the tracker fits into your ecosystem.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: >=10 m

    Fitbit Charge HR has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.20 m vs 10 m
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Fitbit Charge HR supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.2% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Fitbit Charge HR supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Fitbit Charge HR has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Fitbit Charge HR predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.4% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Fitbit Charge HR predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.2% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Tracks elevation
    Fitbit Charge HR supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.2% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
  • Built-in barometer
    Fitbit Charge HR has a barometer, while the average fitness tracker does not. 10.7% of fitness trackers have a barometer.
  • Built-in route tracker
    Fitbit Charge HR supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • 7.1% higher maximum altitude
    Fitbit Charge HR has a higher maximum altitude than the average fitness tracker (9,144 m vs 8,534 m). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum altitude of 8,534 m.
  • Windows compatible
    Fitbit Charge HR is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Fitbit Charge HR is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 27.5% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Fitbit Charge HR has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    Fitbit Charge HR has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
  • Firmware update method
    Fitbit Charge HR uses a more convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
  • Gesture control
    Fitbit Charge HR supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Fitbit Charge HR supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • No sleep reports
    Fitbit Charge HR does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
  • 36.4% smaller battery capacity
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (70 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
  • 0.34 inch smaller screen size
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
  • Basic display glass
    Fitbit Charge HR uses less durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (plastic vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
  • 98.4% smaller internal storage
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0.032 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
  • 4 ATM lower water resistance rating
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (1 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
  • 40 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (10 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Fitbit Charge HR has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
  • No inactivity alerts
    Fitbit Charge HR does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    What it is: Total number of pixels displayed on the screen.
    When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.128x32 vs 194x368
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    What it is: Total time the battery lasts on a full charge.
    When it matters: When the tracker needs to last through travel, sleep tracking, long workouts, or several days between charges.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >5 days

    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.5 days vs 10 days
  • 0.34 inch smaller screen size
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    What it is: Physical size of the device’s display measured diagonally.
    When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • No sleep reports
    Fitbit Charge HR does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
    What it is: Shows whether the companion platform turns sleep data into reports or summaries instead of only raw nightly logs.
    When it matters: When you want sleep data turned into clearer nightly summaries instead of digging through raw charts on your own.

    Importance: LOW

    Fitbit Charge HR does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 36.4% smaller battery capacity
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (70 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    What it is: Energy storage capacity of the battery.
    When it matters: When you want rough battery context behind the runtime claim instead of trusting the advertised hours alone.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: >=100 mAh

    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (70 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.70 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 98.4% smaller internal storage
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0.032 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    What it is: Amount of internal data storage available.
    When it matters: When app smoothness, onboard storage, or device-side performance affects your daily experience.

    Importance: LOW

    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0.032 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.0.000512 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • 4 ATM lower water resistance rating
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (1 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    What it is: Water resistance depth measured in atmospheres.
    When it matters: When you plan to swim, shower, dive, or use the tracker regularly around water.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: >=5 ATM

    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (1 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.1 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 40 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (10 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    What it is: Maximum depth the device can withstand underwater.
    When it matters: When you plan to swim, shower, dive, or use the tracker regularly around water.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: >=50 m

    Fitbit Charge HR has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (10 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.10 m vs 50 m

Graphic comparison of Fitbit Charge HR and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about Fitbit Charge HR?

  • Continuous heart rate monitoring without a chest strap
  • Excellent companion app with social challenges and easy navigation
  • Slim, discreet design that is comfortable for 24/7 wear
  • Effective automatic sleep and activity tracking
  • Secure watch-style buckle clasp that prevents the device from falling off
  • Helpful features like silent vibrating alarms and basic caller ID
  • Compatibility with a wide range of third-party apps and mobile platforms

What customers dislike about Fitbit Charge HR?

  • Not waterproof; cannot be worn for swimming or in the shower
  • Heart rate accuracy can drop significantly during high-intensity exercise
  • OLED display is tiny and turns off too quickly to glance at data easily
  • Charging requires a proprietary cable that is short and easy to lose
  • Lacks built-in GPS, making it less ideal for serious runners
  • Durability issues with the rubber band peeling away from the device over time
  • Step tracking can be inaccurate when hands are stationary (e.g., pushing a cart)

Expert reviews

T
theguardian.com
13/02/2015
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
02/02/2015
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
26/02/2015
Summary of the review
Gearbrain
Gearbrain
19/10/2016
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
11/01/2017
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
07/10/2016
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
05/03/2015
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
11/02/2015
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
26/02/2015
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
25/10/2021
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
20/08/2015
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
24/01/2019
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
17/11/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
04/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
tomsguide.com
02/02/2015
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
19/03/2015
Summary of the review
F
fitness-uhr.net
24/07/2026
Summary of the review
I
iot-tests.org
24/08/2018
Summary of the review
F
fitnessmodern.de
03/03/2015
Summary of the review
M
maclife.de
26/03/2015
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
17/03/2015
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
17/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
trentejours.com
21/03/2015
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
17/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
trentejours.com
22/03/2015
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
20/09/2023
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
12/03/2015
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
07/02/2015
Summary of the review
L
labolsadelcorredor.com
23/07/2015
Summary of the review
M
medium.com
23/03/2015
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com.mx
04/08/2015
Summary of the review
V
vitonica.com
19/10/2015
Summary of the review
C
correrunamaraton.com
02/06/2015
Summary of the review
L
labolsadelcorredor.com
22/07/2015
Summary of the review
T
teknofilo.com
03/05/2015
Summary of the review
E
elespanol.com
02/02/2015
Summary of the review
E
es.gizmodo.com
02/02/2015
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
17/02/2015
Summary of the review
A
amatech.it
21/01/2016
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
02/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
tech.everyeye.it
30/03/2015
Summary of the review
T
topdigamma.it
16/10/2015
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
25/05/2015
Summary of the review
I
id.nl
06/03/2015
Summary of the review
B
bettyskitchen.nl
22/09/2015
Summary of the review
S
smarthealth.live
24/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
techgirl.nl
05/03/2015
Summary of the review
I
iculture.nl
17/05/2015
Summary of the review

Video reviews

Compare Fitbit Charge HR with

VS
VS

Compare