Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Fitbit Charge HR Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Battery life:5 daysScreen size:0.7 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:10 m

Fitbit Charge HR Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.6

Technical score

20%

8.4

User score

▼Worse than 53% of fitness-trackers
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.1

Battery

18%

7.0

Health

18%

6.0

Display

8%

6.2

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

5.7

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 66% of fitness-trackers
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on 9,472 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 75% of fitness-trackers
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
  • fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr
fitbit-charge-hr

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Fitbit Charge HR

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.1

Battery

18%

7.0

Health

18%

6.0

Display

8%

6.2

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

5.7

Design & Durability

6.6
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on 9,472 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Fitbit Charge HR has a popularity score of 9.7 points, which is higher than 87.3% of fitness trackers.
9.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

7.8
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
limited to call/SMS alerts.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Fitbit app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
no
Inactivity alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 77% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
20 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
20 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 20 m which is higher than that of 80.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 6.7% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Battery life
5 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 79.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12.4% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
70 mAh
Battery capacity
70 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 70 mAh which is lower than that of 77.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.3% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.7 inch
Screen size
0.7 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.7 inch which is smaller than that of 90.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
OLED
Display type
OLED
This fitness tracker uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 52.8% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 21.5% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
128x 32
Screen resolution
128x 32
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x32 which is lower than that of 51.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
18 mm
Show more

Fitbit Charge HR vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks elevation
    Elevation tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.4% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
    Floors climbed
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • Built-in barometer
    Barometer
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a barometer, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers have a barometer.
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    20 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    20 m vs 10 m
  • 91.1% more popular
    Fitbit Charge HR has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (9.68 vs 5.1).
    9.68 vs 5.07
  • 4.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Fitbit Charge HR
    the average fitness tracker
    Fitbit Charge HR has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.36 vs 8.000).
    8.36 vs 8
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    20 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    20 m vs 10 m
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Firmware update method
    Firmware update method
    over-the-air / USB
    This fitness tracker uses a more convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
    over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 32
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 0.34 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.7 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 36.4% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    70 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (70 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    70 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 4 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    1 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (1 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    1 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 98.4% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.000512 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.000512 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • 40 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    10 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (10 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    10 m vs 50 m
  • 85.7% more expensive
    Fitbit Charge HR is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£130 vs £70).
    £130 vs £70
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 36.4% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    70 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (70 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    70 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 32
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • 0.34 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.7 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Basic display glass
    Display glass type
    plastic
    This fitness tracker uses less durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (plastic vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    plastic vs glass
  • 98.4% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.000512 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.000512 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • 99.2% lower RAM capacity
    RAM capacity
    0.000016 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
    0.000016 GB vs 0.002 GB
  • 4 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    1 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (1 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    1 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 40 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    10 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (10 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    10 m vs 50 m
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -20 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -20 °C vs 0 °C
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.6% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
theguardian.com
13/02/2015
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
02/02/2015
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
26/02/2015
Summary of the review
Gearbrain
Gearbrain
19/10/2016
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
11/01/2017
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
07/10/2016
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
05/03/2015
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
11/02/2015
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
26/02/2015
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
25/10/2021
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
20/08/2015
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
24/01/2019
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
17/11/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
04/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
tomsguide.com
02/02/2015
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
19/03/2015
Summary of the review
F
fitness-uhr.net
23/10/2026
Summary of the review
I
iot-tests.org
24/08/2018
Summary of the review
F
fitnessmodern.de
03/03/2015
Summary of the review
M
maclife.de
26/03/2015
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
17/03/2015
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
17/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
trentejours.com
21/03/2015
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
17/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
trentejours.com
22/03/2015
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
20/09/2023
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
12/03/2015
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
07/02/2015
Summary of the review
L
labolsadelcorredor.com
23/07/2015
Summary of the review
M
medium.com
23/03/2015
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com.mx
04/08/2015
Summary of the review
V
vitonica.com
19/10/2015
Summary of the review
C
correrunamaraton.com
02/06/2015
Summary of the review
L
labolsadelcorredor.com
22/07/2015
Summary of the review
T
teknofilo.com
03/05/2015
Summary of the review
E
elespanol.com
02/02/2015
Summary of the review
E
es.gizmodo.com
02/02/2015
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
17/02/2015
Summary of the review
A
amatech.it
21/01/2016
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
02/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
tech.everyeye.it
30/03/2015
Summary of the review
T
topdigamma.it
16/10/2015
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
25/05/2015
Summary of the review
I
id.nl
06/03/2015
Summary of the review
B
bettyskitchen.nl
22/09/2015
Summary of the review
S
smarthealth.live
24/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
techgirl.nl
05/03/2015
Summary of the review
I
iculture.nl
17/05/2015
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 9,472 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Fitbit Charge HR

  • Continuous heart rate monitoring without a chest strap
  • Excellent companion app with social challenges and easy navigation
  • Slim, discreet design that is comfortable for 24/7 wear
  • Effective automatic sleep and activity tracking
  • Secure watch-style buckle clasp that prevents the device from falling off
  • Helpful features like silent vibrating alarms and basic caller ID
  • Compatibility with a wide range of third-party apps and mobile platforms

What we don't like about Fitbit Charge HR

  • Not waterproof; cannot be worn for swimming or in the shower
  • Heart rate accuracy can drop significantly during high-intensity exercise
  • OLED display is tiny and turns off too quickly to glance at data easily
  • Charging requires a proprietary cable that is short and easy to lose
  • Lacks built-in GPS, making it less ideal for serious runners
  • Durability issues with the rubber band peeling away from the device over time
  • Step tracking can be inaccurate when hands are stationary (e.g., pushing a cart)

Verdict

The Fitbit Charge HR is a sleek, 21mm wide fitness tracker featuring continuous PurePulse optical heart rate monitoring, an integrated OLED display, and a 5-day rechargeable battery. It accurately tracks steps, distance, calories burned, floors climbed, and sleep automatically, while also providing caller ID notifications and silent vibrating alarms. Its primary advantages include 24/7 heart rate tracking without a chest strap, a comfortable textured elastomer band with a secure watch-style buckle, and seamless wireless syncing with a highly rated app. However, it is only water-resistant (not suitable for swimming or showering), lacks built-in GPS, and its heart rate accuracy may decrease during high-intensity workouts.

Compare Fitbit Charge HR with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fitbit Charge HR and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found