Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Basis B1 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Battery life:5 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:?Waterproof depth rating:1 m

Basis B1 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.4

Technical score

20%

?

User score

▼Worse than 75% of fitness-trackers
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.7

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.1

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

7.1

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

7.9

App & Wellness

4%

8.3

Connectivity

4%

5.9

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 74% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £130

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Basis B1

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.7

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.1

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

7.1

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

7.9

App & Wellness

4%

8.3

Connectivity

4%

5.9

Design & Durability

6.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Basis B1 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
?
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
no
Vibrating alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts. 84.2% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Supports habit-based goals.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
no
Inactivity alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 77% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
2.1
Bluetooth version
2.1
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 2.1 which is older than in 95.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 1% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Battery life
5 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 79.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12.4% of fitness trackers.
source range 4-6 days.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
190 mAh
Battery capacity
190 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 190 mAh which is higher than that of 75% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
This fitness tracker uses LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 68.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 4.6% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
watch
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
22 mm
Show more

Basis B1 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 72.7% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    190 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (190 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    190 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    Skin temperature tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Tracks skin temperature trends.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Basis Sync.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Basis Sync.
  • Sweat tracking
    Sweat tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports sweat tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 7.7% of fitness trackers support sweat tracking.
    Tracks perspiration via galvanic skin response.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    Skin temperature tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Tracks skin temperature trends.
  • Sweat tracking
    Sweat tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports sweat tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 7.7% of fitness trackers support sweat tracking.
    Tracks perspiration via galvanic skin response.
  • EDA sensor
    EDA sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an EDA sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.6% of fitness trackers have an EDA sensor.
    Skin-conductance sensor.
  • 72.7% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    190 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (190 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    190 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Basis Sync.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Basis Sync.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Firmware update method
    Firmware update method
    over-the-air / USB
    This fitness tracker uses a more convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
    over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air
  • Tracks temperature
    Temperature tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support temperature tracking.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
    Official service discontinued.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 4-6 days.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a battery level indicator, while the average fitness tracker does. 87.2% of fitness trackers have a battery level indicator.
  • 5.07x less popular
    Basis B1 has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 85.7% more expensive
    Basis B1 is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£130 vs £70).
    £130 vs £70
  • 6.2% worse value for money
    Basis B1 has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.46 vs 7.9).
    7.46 vs 7.92
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 4-6 days.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a battery level indicator, while the average fitness tracker does. 87.2% of fitness trackers have a battery level indicator.
  • Old Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    2.1
    This fitness tracker supports an older Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (2.1 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    2.1 vs 4.0
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 76% heavier
    Thickness
    44 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (44 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    44 g vs 25 g
  • 6.2 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    17.2 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (17.2 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    17.2 mm vs 11 mm
  • 3 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    This fitness tracker was released earlier than the average fitness tracker (2013 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    2013 vs 2016
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.6% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
imedicalapps.com
21/01/2014
Summary of the review
G
gizmodo.com
27/03/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
21/01/2014
Summary of the review
L
livescience.com
09/01/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
27/01/2014
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
12/02/2013
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
25/07/2013
Summary of the review
G
gadfit.com
02/02/2014
Summary of the review
S
shellypalmer.com
02/02/2014
Summary of the review
M
mediatum.ub.tum.de
13/10/2016
Summary of the review
F
fitnessmodern.de
03/08/2018
Summary of the review
E
es.scribd.com
21/06/2016
Summary of the review
M
medium.com
03/11/2013
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
25/07/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Basis B1

  • Advanced multi-sensor array including heart rate, skin temperature, and perspiration
  • Highly detailed and automatic sleep tracking (REM, deep, and light sleep)
  • Clever motivational 'Habits' gamification system that encourages behavioral changes
  • Solid battery life lasting 4–5 days on a single charge
  • Accurate activity monitoring for everyday walking and movement

What we don't like about Basis B1

  • Large, bulky, and masculine design that can be uncomfortable or difficult to wear with long sleeves
  • Heart rate monitor is largely inaccurate or unreliable during vigorous exercise
  • Poor screen visibility in bright light and a dim backlight
  • Lack of third-party app integration (e.g., no support for MyFitnessPal or RunKeeper)
  • Syncing issues and occasional glitches with the mobile application

Verdict

The Basis B1 is a comprehensive fitness tracker featuring a robust seven-sensor suite that includes an optical heart rate monitor, perspiration and skin temperature sensors, and a 3D accelerometer. Its primary characteristics include automatic activity detection (Body IQ) for walking, running, and cycling, along with advanced sleep analysis that tracks REM, deep, and light sleep cycles. The device stands out with its 24/7 continuous heart rate monitoring and a high-resolution, transreflective, backlit LCD display that remains always-on. Key pros include highly detailed biometric data, effective habit-based motivational software, and broad compatibility with both Android and iOS via Bluetooth. However, notable cons include its relatively bulky watch-style design, a mediocre battery life of approximately 4 days, and a proprietary charging cable.

Compare Basis B1 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Basis B1 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found