OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£390RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 4

Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

90%

5.0

Technical score

10%

7.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 81% of tablets
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

22%

4.9

Performance

20%

5.4

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

2.9

Battery

12%

5.6

Connectivity

8%

5.4

Software & Features

5%

4.8

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 86% of tablets
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

â–¼Worse than 75% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £390

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
2GB + 64GBCheck price
Other versions:
2GB + 32GB2GB + 16GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

22%

4.9

Performance

20%

5.4

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

2.9

Battery

12%

5.6

Connectivity

8%

5.4

Software & Features

5%

4.8

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

5.0
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

7.5
Popularity
Popularity
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Popularity:
Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) has a popularity of 1.7 points, which is higher than 63.5% of Tablets.
1.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

8.5

Price

6.2
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 4
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 4
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 4 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 64% of tablets and equal to those in 0.8% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Pixel density
224 ppi
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi which is higher than that of 50% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than that of 93.5% of tablets and equal to that of 5.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
?
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,375 mAh
Battery capacity
3,375 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 3,375 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 94.5% of tablets.
Charging speed
20 W
Charging speed
20 W
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 20 W which is faster than in 60.4% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.2% of tablets.
Battery life
6 hours
Battery life
6 hours
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6 hours, which is shorter than that of 92% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
NFC
yes
â–² Better than 89% of models
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
653 g
Weight
653 g
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 653 g which is heavier than 84.2% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Supports NFC
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 68 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    72
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (72 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    72 vs 4
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Nvidia Tegra 4
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 4 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 4 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • 68 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    72
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (72 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    72 vs 4
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Nvidia Tegra 4
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 4 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 4 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports NFC
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 6 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • 48.7% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,375 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3375 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    3,375 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    ULP GeForce
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • 13.9% worse value for money
    Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.23 vs 7.1).
    6.23 vs 7.1
  • 6.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Hp Slatebook X2
    the average tablet
    Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.52 vs 8.000).
    7.52 vs 8
  • 50% more expensive
    Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£390 vs £260).
    £390 vs £260
  • 2.79x less popular
    Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1.73 vs 4.8).
    1.73 vs 4.81
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    ULP GeForce
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.8 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    1,600 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Tempered Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    972:1
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (972:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    972:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 6 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • 48.7% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,375 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3375 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    3,375 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    Ethernet support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 33.3% heavier
    Weight
    653 g
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (653 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    653 g vs 490 g
  • 109.7 mm wider
    Width
    285 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (285 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    285 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 1.5 mm thicker
    Thickness
    9.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    9.5 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 6 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    August 2013
    2013 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
expertreviews.co.uk
06/03/2014
Summary of the review
HP Slatebook 10 X2 review
A
androidcentral.com
10/02/2014
Summary of the review
HP SlateBook X2 review - Android Central
T
trustedreviews.com
15/11/2013
Summary of the review
HP Slatebook x2 Review
T
telegraph.co.uk
30/09/2013
Summary of the review
HP Slatebook x2 review - The Telegraph
A
allthingsd.com
29/08/2013
Summary of the review
HP SlateBook x2: Two Devices in One, Master of None
U
uk.pcmag.com
22/08/2013
Summary of the review
HP SlateBook x2 - Review 2013 - PCMag UK
P
pcmag.com
22/08/2013
Summary of the review
HP SlateBook x2 Review
I
independent.co.uk
21/08/2013
Summary of the review
A week with: The HP Slatebook X2
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
HP SlateBook x2 - PCMag UK Are you looking for specific technical specifications or teardown guides for this specific Nvidia Tegra 4 model?
A
androidpolice.com
11/09/2013
Summary of the review
HP SlateBook x2 Review: A Potentially Good Device With One Unfixable Flaw
F
frandroid.com
06/06/2013
Summary of the review
HP SlateBook X2: un "Transformer" sous Android et Tegra 4
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
14/01/2022
Summary of the review
Test de la HP Slatebook x2: une tablette Android avec processeur NVIDIA Tegra 4
(Translated)Show original
L
lesandroides.net
17/09/2013
Summary of the review
Test : SlateBook x2, une tablette hybride qui doit beaucoup à son dock
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
29/05/2013
Summary of the review
Fiche technique hp Slatebook x2 - 01net.com
(Translated)Show original
T
techtudo.com.br
11/03/2014
Summary of the review
Review HP SlateBook X2 - TechTudo Would you like me to find English-language professional reviews or a summary of the technical specifications for thi...
(Translated)Show original
T
tecmundo.com.br
14/03/2014
Summary of the review
Review: tablet HP Slatebook X2 [vídeo]
(Translated)Show original
D
dday.it
29/11/2013
Summary of the review
HP SlateBook X2 in prova: Tegra 4 convince, il resto meno
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
06/08/2013
Summary of the review
HP Slatebook X2, la recensione completa
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
28/08/2013
Summary of the review
Review: HP SlateBook x2
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
08/11/2013
Summary of the review
Review: HP SlateBook 10 x2 - Pagina 6 van 8 - Techzine.nl
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
08/11/2013
Summary of the review
Review: HP SlateBook 10 x2
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
20/08/2013
Summary of the review
Review: HP Slatebook X2, geslaagde hybride tussen laptop en tablet
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB)

  • Powerful Nvidia Tegra 4 processor provides very fast and snappy performance
  • Versatile convertible design with a detachable keyboard dock
  • Comfortable keyboard that offers a good typing experience
  • Includes a variety of ports such as full USB, HDMI, and dual memory card slots
  • Dual-battery system (one in tablet, one in dock) can provide extended runtime

What we don't like about Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB)

  • Display suffers from a noticeable yellowish tint and low maximum brightness
  • Cameras are poor quality, with the 2MP rear shooter often described as grainy or 'awful'
  • Software bugs, including issues where the screen turns on randomly and drains the battery
  • Device is relatively heavy and bulky when the keyboard is attached
  • Lack of built-in GPS hardware
  • Cramped keyboard layout and sluggish trackpad performance for some users

Verdict

The HP SlateBook x2 (2GB + 32GB) is a 10.1-inch Android hybrid tablet powered by a quad-core 1.8GHz NVIDIA Tegra 4 processor and featuring a 1920x1200 resolution IPS display. Its standout design includes a detachable keyboard dock with a built-in secondary battery, which extends use to approximately 10-12 hours, alongside a full-size SD card slot, a USB 2.0 port, and an HDMI output. Main advantages are its strong gaming performance and the convenience of a dual-battery system and physical keyboard included in the box. However, it suffers from a dim screen with a noticeable yellow tint, a cramped keyboard layout, and a lack of GPS hardware.

Compare Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Hp Slatebook X2 (2GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found