OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Projectors Methodology v3.0
Projectors Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Projectors Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Projectors Methodology v3.0

Acer V7850 review: 86 specs compared

Avg. price:~£2,630Native panel resolution:2716x1528ANSI lumens:2200Throw ratio:1.39-2.22:1Lamp life:4000 hours

Acer V7850 Review: Compare 86 technical specifications and 10 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Projectors category and whether it is worth buying.

Acer V7850
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

35%

6.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.3

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 66% of projectors
5.4

Value for money

Value for money
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the projector's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a projector with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 94%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components

42%

8.0

Image Quality

22%

5.0

Projection & Lens

12%

6.3

HDMI & Gaming

10%

6.9

Audio & Features

8%

5.8

Connectivity

6%

5.3

Design & Power

â–²Better than 59%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (10)
8 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 51%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • acer-v7850
  • acer-v7850
  • acer-v7850
  • acer-v7850
  • acer-v7850
  • acer-v7850
  • acer-v7850
  • acer-v7850
acer-v7850
acer-v7850
acer-v7850
acer-v7850
acer-v7850
acer-v7850
acer-v7850
acer-v7850
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Acer V7850

Based on 8 · 2

Reviewers praise the sharp picture and quiet running, are split on color and HDR, and criticize the lens and black levels.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of projector Acer V7850

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components:

42%

8.0

Image Quality

22%

5.0

Projection & Lens

12%

6.3

HDMI & Gaming

10%

6.9

Audio & Features

8%

5.8

Connectivity

6%

5.3

Design & Power

6.7
Reviews score
8.3
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the projector's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a projector with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

5.4
ANSI lumens
2,200
Market range: <280 – >4k
This projector reaches 2,200 ANSI lumens, brighter than 46.2% of projectors and equal to 4.3% of projectors.
Contrast ratio
1,200,000:1
This projector has a contrast ratio of 1200000:1, higher than 87.6% of projectors and equal to 0.6% of projectors.
Dynamic contrast ratio.
Native panel resolution
2716x1528
This projector uses a native resolution of 2716x1528, higher than 89.2% of projectors and equal to 1.8% of projectors.
Output resolution
3840x2160
This projector supports output resolution up to 3840x2160, higher than 71.2% of projectors and equal to 24.6% of projectors.
Via XPR pixel shifting.
Projection technology
DLP
Show more
What reviewers say
Throw ratio
1.39-2.22:1
Min throw distance
1.3 m
Market range: <0.5 m – >1.651 m
This projector needs a minimum throw distance of 1.3 m, longer than 72.2% of projectors and equal to 3.5% of projectors.
Max projection size
302 inch
Market range: <120 inch – >301 inch
This projector supports projection sizes up to 302 inch, larger than 91.2% of projectors and equal to 1.7% of projectors.
Zoom ratio
1.6
Market range: <1.1 – >2.06
This projector offers a zoom ratio of 1.6, wider than 61.5% of projectors and equal to 17% of projectors.
Motorized zoom
no
This projector does not have motorised zoom. 14.8% of projectors offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Input lag
77 ms
Market range: <8 ms – >68 ms
This projector has input lag of 77 ms, higher than 92.6% of projectors and equal to 0.2% of projectors.
Auto low latency mode (ALLM)
no
This projector does not switch to low-latency mode automatically. 16.1% of projectors offer this.
Variable refresh rate (VRR)
no
This projector does not support variable refresh rate. 1.8% of projectors offer this.
HDMI version
2
This projector supports HDMI 2, more modern than 46.1% of projectors and equal to 35.9% of projectors.
Different HDMI ports use 2 and 1.4.
Max HDMI bandwidth
18 Gbps
Market range: <10.2 Gbps – >48 Gbps
This projector supports HDMI bandwidth up to 18 Gbps, higher than 48.9% of projectors and equal to 39.7% of projectors.
Different HDMI ports reach 18 and 10.2 Gbps.
Show more
What reviewers say
N. of HDMI ports
2
Market range: <1 – >2
This projector has 2 HDMI port/s, more than 45.9% of projectors and equal to 47.3% of projectors.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This projector does not connect to Wi-Fi networks. 53.4% of projectors offer this.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This projector does not support Bluetooth. 50.7% of projectors offer this.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Show more
Smart TV features
no
This projector does not have built-in smart TV features. 43.9% of projectors offer this.
Operating system
none
Android OS
no
This projector does not run Android OS. 19.1% of projectors run Android OS.
Dedicated smartphone app
no
This projector does not come with a dedicated smartphone app. 36.8% of projectors come with a dedicated smartphone app.
Remote control
yes
This projector includes a remote control. 1.5% of projectors offer this.
Show more
Light source type
lamp
This projector uses lamp light source technology, less advanced than 66.5% of projectors and equal to 33.5% of projectors.
Laser light source
no
This projector does not have a laser light source. 26.8% of projectors offer this.
Lamp life
4,000 hours
Market range: <3.5k hours – >30k hours
This projector offers lamp life of 4,000 hours, longer than 78.8% of projectors and equal to 9.6% of projectors.
Lamp life (eco mode)
10,000 hours
Market range: <5k hours – >30k hours
This projector offers eco-mode lamp life of 10,000 hours, longer than 64.8% of projectors and equal to 9.7% of projectors.
ExtremeEco mode rating.
Operating power consumption
315 W
Market range: <57 W – >390 W
This projector uses 315 W of power, more than 76.4% of projectors and equal to 0.7% of projectors.
Show more
What reviewers say

Acer V7850 vs the average projector

246810TotalImage QualityProjection & LensHDMI & GamingConnectivityAudio & FeaturesDesign & Power
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This projector has a higher contrast ratio than the average projector (1200000:1 vs 10000:1). The average projector has 10000:1 of contrast ratio.
    Dynamic contrast ratio.
    1,200,000:1 vs 10,000:1
  • Higher output resolution
    This projector supports a higher output resolution than the average projector (3840x2160 vs 1920x1080). The average projector outputs at 1920x1080 resolution.
    Via XPR pixel shifting.
    3840x2160 vs 1920x1080
  • High native resolution
    This projector has a higher native panel resolution than the average projector (2716x1528 vs 1920x1080). The average projector has a native panel resolution of 1920x1080.
    2716x1528 vs 1920x1080
  • 52 inch larger image size
    This projector has a higher projection size than the average projector (302 inch vs 250 inch). The average projector has 250 inch of projection size.
    302 inch vs 250 inch
  • Supports pixel shifting
    This projector supports pixel shifting, while the average projector does not. 26.6% of projectors support pixel shifting.
    Via XPR technology.
  • 0.19 inch larger DMD chip
    This projector has a higher DMD chip size than the average projector (0.7 inch vs 0.47 inch). The average projector has 0.47 inch of DMD chip size.
    0.66 inch vs 0.47 inch
  • Includes stereo speakers
    This projector has stereo speakers, while the average projector does not. 47.8% of projectors have stereo speakers.
  • Supports motion smoothing
    This projector supports motion smoothing, while the average projector does not. 34.1% of projectors offer this.
    Via AcuMotion.
  • 12.2% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 51% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (10)
    8 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.4
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This projector has a higher contrast ratio than the average projector (1200000:1 vs 10000:1). The average projector has 10000:1 of contrast ratio.
    Dynamic contrast ratio.
    1,200,000:1 vs 10,000:1
  • Higher output resolution
    This projector supports a higher output resolution than the average projector (3840x2160 vs 1920x1080). The average projector outputs at 1920x1080 resolution.
    Via XPR pixel shifting.
    3840x2160 vs 1920x1080
  • High native resolution
    This projector has a higher native panel resolution than the average projector (2716x1528 vs 1920x1080). The average projector has a native panel resolution of 1920x1080.
    2716x1528 vs 1920x1080
  • Supports pixel shifting
    This projector supports pixel shifting, while the average projector does not. 26.6% of projectors support pixel shifting.
    Via XPR technology.
  • 0.19 inch larger DMD chip
    This projector has a higher DMD chip size than the average projector (0.7 inch vs 0.47 inch). The average projector has 0.47 inch of DMD chip size.
    0.66 inch vs 0.47 inch
  • 41.2% higher refresh rate
    This projector has a higher refresh rate than the average projector (120 Hz vs 85 Hz). The average projector has 85 Hz of refresh rate.
    120 Hz vs 85 Hz
  • 52 inch larger image size
    This projector has a higher projection size than the average projector (302 inch vs 250 inch). The average projector has 250 inch of projection size.
    302 inch vs 250 inch
  • 0.3 2x wider zoom range
    This projector has a higher zoom ratio than the average projector (1.6 vs 1.3). The average projector has 1.3 of zoom ratio.
    1.6 vs 1.3
  • Supports motion smoothing
    This projector supports motion smoothing, while the average projector does not. 34.1% of projectors offer this.
    Via AcuMotion.
  • 1 more RJ45 ports
    This projector has more RJ45 ports than the average projector (1 vs 0). The average projector has 0 RJ45 ports.
    1 vs 0
  • 1 more USB ports
    This projector has more USB ports than the average projector (2 vs 1). The average projector has 1 USB ports.
    2 vs 1
  • VGA input included
    This projector supports VGA input, while the average projector does not. 44.1% of projectors support VGA input.
  • Includes stereo speakers
    This projector has stereo speakers, while the average projector does not. 47.8% of projectors have stereo speakers.
  • 1 more audio input ports
    This projector has more audio input ports than the average projector (1 vs 0). The average projector has 0 audio input ports.
    1 vs 0
  • 9 dB quieter eco mode
    This projector has a lower audible noise in eco mode than the average projector (19 dB vs 28 dB). The average projector has 28 dB of audible noise in eco mode.
    19 dB vs 28 dB
  • 5 dB quieter operation
    This projector has a lower audible noise than the average projector (26 dB vs 31 dB). The average projector has 31 dB of audible noise.
    26 dB vs 31 dB
  • Basic light source
    This projector has Basic light source than the average projector (lamp vs laser). The average projector uses a laser light source.
    lamp vs laser
  • 50 ms higher input lag
    This projector has a higher input lag than the average projector (77 ms vs 27 ms). The average projector has 27 ms of input lag.
    77 ms vs 27 ms
  • 49 % less vertical lens shift
    This projector has fewer vertical lens shift than the average projector (15 % vs 64 %). The average projector has 64 % vertical lens shift.
    15 % vs 64 %
  • No Wi-Fi connectivity
    This projector does not connect to Wi-Fi networks, while the average projector does. 53.4% of projectors offer this.
  • No Bluetooth connectivity
    This projector does not support Bluetooth, while the average projector does. 50.6% of projectors offer this.
  • Limited HDMI format
    This projector supports a less capable max HDMI input format than the average projector (4K/60Hz vs 4K/120Hz). The average projector supports a max HDMI input format of 4K/120Hz.
    4K/60Hz vs 4K/120Hz
  • 0.29 m longer throw distance
    This projector has a higher throw distance than the average projector (1.3 m vs 1 m). The average projector has 1.0055 m of throw distance.
    1.3 m vs 1.0055 m
  • No 3D video
    This projector does not support 3D video, while the average projector does. 55.4% of projectors support 3D video.
  • 27.9% worse value for money
    Acer V7850 has a lower value-for-money score than the average projector (5.43 vs 6.9).
    5.43 vs 6.95
  • 3.98x more expensive
    Acer V7850 is more expensive than the average projector (£2,630 vs £660).
    £2,630 vs £660
  • No 3D video
    This projector does not support 3D video, while the average projector does. 55.4% of projectors support 3D video.
  • 4 earlier release
    This projector was released earlier than the average projector (2017 vs 2021). The average projector was released in 2021.
    August 2017
    2017 vs 2021
  • No 3D glasses support
    This projector does not display 3D with glasses, while the average projector does. 54.4% of projectors offer 3D with glasses.
  • 49 % less vertical lens shift
    This projector has fewer vertical lens shift than the average projector (15 % vs 64 %). The average projector has 64 % vertical lens shift.
    15 % vs 64 %
  • 0.29 m longer throw distance
    This projector has a higher throw distance than the average projector (1.3 m vs 1 m). The average projector has 1.0055 m of throw distance.
    1.3 m vs 1.0055 m
  • 50 ms higher input lag
    This projector has a higher input lag than the average projector (77 ms vs 27 ms). The average projector has 27 ms of input lag.
    77 ms vs 27 ms
  • Limited HDMI format
    This projector supports a less capable max HDMI input format than the average projector (4K/60Hz vs 4K/120Hz). The average projector supports a max HDMI input format of 4K/120Hz.
    4K/60Hz vs 4K/120Hz
  • No Wi-Fi connectivity
    This projector does not connect to Wi-Fi networks, while the average projector does. 53.4% of projectors offer this.
  • No Bluetooth connectivity
    This projector does not support Bluetooth, while the average projector does. 50.6% of projectors offer this.
  • Basic light source
    This projector has Basic light source than the average projector (lamp vs laser). The average projector uses a laser light source.
    lamp vs laser
  • 16,000 hours shorter lamp life
    This projector has a lower lamp life than the average projector (4,000 hours vs 20,000 hours). The average projector has 20,000 hours of lamp life.
    4,000 hours vs 20,000 hours
  • 10,000 hours shorter eco lamp life
    This projector has a lower lamp life in eco mode than the average projector (10,000 hours vs 20,000 hours). The average projector has 20,000 hours of lamp life in eco mode.
    ExtremeEco mode rating.
    10,000 hours vs 20,000 hours
  • 77.9% heavier weight
    This projector is heavier than the average projector (5.3 kg vs 2.98 kg). The average projector weighs 2.98 kg.
    5.3 kg vs 2.98 kg
  • 85 W higher power use
    This projector uses more power than the average projector (315 W vs 230 W). The average projector uses 230 W of power.
    315 W vs 230 W
  • 101 mm wider body
    This projector is wider than the average projector (398 mm vs 297 mm). The average projector has a width of 297 mm.
    398 mm vs 297 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
this reviewer
≈ estimated
17/08/2017
Short hands-on review · picture quality and features
Verdict
Acer V7850 has a sharp, detailed picture and a compact build, but weak black levels and no HDR support limit it.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
14/07/2017
Hands-on review · Living room 4K projector
Verdict
The Acer V7850 is a compact, quiet 4K projector that performs best in dim rooms, though it cannot produce deep black.
7.0
avforums.com
✓ explicit
03/10/2017
Lab-tested review · Entry-level 4K projector
Verdict
The Acer V7850 is sharp and accurate out of the box, but calibrated output is only about 900 lumens and its calibration controls had no effect in testing.
8.0
techaeris.com
≈ estimated
26/11/2017
Hands-on test · Gaming and films
Verdict
The Acer V7850 is a sharp 4K HDR projector with quick response, best for films and Xbox gaming, though its 4K is produced by pixel shifting.
8.0
rehders.de
≈ estimated
31/07/2017
Lab test · Portable 4K projector
Verdict
The Acer V7850 is a sharp, light 4K projector for living rooms and trips, held back by weak contrast and calibration changes that are lost when powered off.
9.6
lite-magazin.de
✓ explicit
25/07/2017
Hands-on test · Living room 4K projector
Verdict
The Acer V7850 is a sharp 4K projector for light living rooms, best in Standard mode, since Hell mode turns films green.
9.0
hifitest.de
✓ explicit
23/09/2017
Lab and hands-on test · Compact 4K projector
Verdict
The Acer V7850 looks modest but delivers sharp, accurate Rec.709 colour and quiet operation, while lacking motorized lens controls and 3D.
7.2
audiovision.de
✓ explicit
16/11/2017
Lab test · Compact 4K projector
Verdict
The Acer V7850 is a quiet, compact 4K projector whose Dynamic Black deepens dark scenes, but its picture is softer than native 4K cinema projectors.
7.5
connect-living.de
✓ explicit
20/09/2017
Hands-on test · Home cinema projector
Verdict
The Acer V7850 is a sharp 4K projector that handles HDR well, but the test unit's firmware lost colour changes and it has no 3D support.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Acer V7850

  • Delivers a crisp and jaw-droppingly sharp image due to its single-chip DLP design and 4K UHD pixel-shifting technology
  • Excellent out-of-the-box color accuracy for Rec. 709 content, providing lifelike skin tones and natural colors
  • Quiet operation, especially in 'Silent' mode which effectively eliminates fan noise
  • Compact and lightweight chassis for a 4K-capable projector, making it relatively portable
  • Flexible installation options with a generous 1.6x zoom ratio and vertical lens shift
  • Includes a backlit remote control, which is helpful for adjustments in dark theater environments

What customers don't like about Acer V7850

  • Native contrast is limited, resulting in poor black levels and lack of shadow detail, particularly in dark rooms
  • Does not support wide color gamut (WCG); it down-converts HDR content to the more limited Rec. 709 color space
  • HDR performance can be finicky, sometimes requiring manual toggling to activate correctly
  • Lacks motorized lens memory or power zoom/focus, making it less ideal for wide-aspect 'scope' screens
  • Built-in 5W speakers are thin-sounding and lack bass, making an external sound system necessary for most
  • AcuMotion frame interpolation can introduce distracting digital artifacts and a 'soap opera effect'

Verdict

The Acer V7850 is a high-end 4K UHD home cinema projector that utilizes DLP XPR technology to deliver a 3840 x 2160 resolution with 8.3 million on-screen pixels. It features 2,200 ANSI lumens of brightness, a 1,200,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio, and an RGBRGB colour wheel optimized for Rec. 709 and Rec. 2020 color accuracy. Key pros include its HDR10 compatibility, sharp single-chip image quality, 1.6x manual zoom, and vertical lens shift for flexible installation. However, notable cons include moderately high black levels compared to premium rivals, a lack of wide colour gamut support, and occasional 'rainbow effect' artifacts inherent to single-chip DLP systems.

Compare Acer V7850 with other products in the Projectors category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer V7850 and other products in the Projectors category

No results found