OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

Intel Celeron N5095 Review | 78 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£120
  • Avg. price in US: ~$110
  • PassMark benchmark result: 4008
  • N. of physical cores: 4
  • CPU boost clock speed: 2.9 GHz

Intel Celeron N5095 review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

3.3

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

3.3

Technical Score

10.0%

?

User score

Poor
3.3

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.

When it matters: When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

60.0%

1.9

Performance

18.0%

4.9

Cache & Architecture

10.0%

4.0

Memory & PCIe

7.0%

7.5

Power & Thermal

4.0%

7.3

Platform

1.0%

6.3

Integrated Graphics

Poor
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 1.5
    Gaming

    Score components:

    30.0%

    1.8

    PassMark single-core benchmark score

    25.0%

    1.2

    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score

    20.0%

    1.3

    CPU boost clock speed

    17.0%

    1.6

    L3 cache

    8.0%

    1.8

    N. of physical cores

  • 1.5
    Video editing

    Score components:

    45.0%

    1.4

    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score

    20.0%

    1.8

    N. of physical cores

    20.0%

    1.6

    CPU threads

    15.0%

    1.6

    L3 cache

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £120

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a quad-core, four-thread processor from the Jasper Lake family, built on a 10nm process with a base frequency of 2.0 GHz and a burst frequency of up to 2.9 GHz. It features 4MB of L3 cache, a 15W TDP, and integrated Intel UHD Graphics with 16 execution units running up to 750 MHz, supporting dual 4K display output at 60Hz. Its main pros include efficient performance for everyday office tasks, web browsing, and 4K media playback, alongside support for modern connectivity like WiFi 6 and PCIe 3.0. However, its main cons include poor suitability for modern gaming, a lack of support for AVX instructions or AV1 hardware decoding, and its non-replaceable, soldered design that limits future hardware upgrades.

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Celeron N5095

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.

When it matters: When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

60.0%

?

Performance

18.0%

?

Cache & Architecture

10.0%

?

Memory & PCIe

7.0%

?

Power & Thermal

4.0%

?

Platform

1.0%

?

Integrated Graphics

3.3
Intel Celeron N5095 has a technical score of 3.28 points, which is lower than that of 97.7% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
1.0
Intel Celeron N5095 has a popularity of 1 points, which is higher than 0% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

3.3

Overall score

40.0%

9.9

Price

5.3
Intel Celeron N5095 has a quality-to-price ratio of 5.3 points, which is lower than 91.6% of products in this category.
Brand name
What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.
When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel
Processor type
What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.
When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

desktop
Intel Celeron N5095 belongs to the desktop processor class, which is more advanced than that of 56% of processors and equal to that of 37.9% of processors.
CPU socket
What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.
When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

FCBGA1338
Intel Celeron N5095 uses the FCBGA1338 CPU socket, which is older than that of 91.3% of processors and equal to that of 0.5% of processors.
Chipset
What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.
When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

N/A
CPU architecture
What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

x86-64
Intel Celeron N5095 uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

4
Intel Celeron N5095 has 4 CPU cores, which is fewer than 50.7% of processors and equal to 28.5% of processors.
CPU threads
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

4
Intel Celeron N5095 offers 4 CPU threads, which is fewer than 67.3% of processors and equal to 26.6% of processors.
Threads per core
What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.
When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

1
Intel Celeron N5095 offers 1 threads per core, which is fewer than 69.7% of processors and equal to 30.3% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

2.9 GHz
Intel Celeron N5095 reaches a boost clock of 2.9 GHz which is lower than that of 94% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

4 x 2.9 GHz
Intel Celeron N5095 has a base clock of 4x2.9 GHz which is equal to that of 100% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

10 nm
Intel Celeron N5095 uses a 10 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 52.3% of processors and equal to that of 19.1% of processors.
Foundry
What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.
When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel 10 nm
Intel Celeron N5095 is built on the Intel 10 nm foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 52.3% of processors and equal to that of 1.7% of processors.
L3 cache
What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.
When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

4 MB
Intel Celeron N5095 has an L3 cache of 4 MB which is smaller than that of 70.2% of processors and equal to that of 14.6% of processors.
L2 cache
What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.
When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

1.5 MB
Intel Celeron N5095 has an L2 cache of 1.5 MB which is smaller than that of 62.5% of processors and equal to that of 4.6% of processors.
L1 cache
What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.
When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

256 KB
Intel Celeron N5095 has an L1 cache of 256 KB which is smaller than that of 59.4% of processors and equal to that of 18.5% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

DDR4/LPDDR4X
Intel Celeron N5095 supports DDR DDR4/LPDDR4X, which is newer than that of 63.4% of processors and equal to that of 3% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

2,933 MHz
Intel Celeron N5095 supports memory speeds up to 2933 MHz, which is higher than that of 46.3% of processors and equal to 5.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.
When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

2,933 MHz
Intel Celeron N5095 supports JEDEC memory speeds up to 2933 MHz, which is lower than that of 53.9% of processors and equal to 0.6% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.
When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A
Maximum memory capacity
What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

16 GB
Intel Celeron N5095 supports up to 16 GB of memory, which is less than 91.7% of processors and equal to 6.4% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.
When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

yes
Intel Celeron N5095 includes integrated graphics. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.
Intel UHD Graphics
Integrated GPU model
What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.
When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel UHD Graphics
Intel Celeron N5095 uses the Intel UHD Graphics integrated GPU, which is less advanced than that in 63.4% of processors and equal to that in 1.2% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.
When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

16
Intel Celeron N5095 has 16 GPU execution units, which is fewer than 56.5% of processors and equal to 6.2% of processors.
Integrated GPU base frequency
What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.
When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

450 MHz
Intel Celeron N5095 has an integrated GPU clock of 450 MHz which is higher than that of 81.9% of processors and equal to that of 0.3% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.
When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

VC-1 (HW decode)
Intel Celeron N5095 supports VC-1 (HW decode) media codecs, which is narrower support than 82.1% of processors and equal to 3.6% of processors.
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

15 W
Intel Celeron N5095 has a TDP of 15 W which is lower than that of 77.7% of processors and equal to that of 16.1% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

15 W
Intel Celeron N5095 has a base power of 15 W which is lower than that of 77.2% of processors and equal to that of 16.2% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

20 W
Intel Celeron N5095 has a boost power of 20 W which is lower than that of 92.7% of processors and equal to that of 0.4% of processors.
Tau (power duration limit)
What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.
When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

?
Configurable TDP
What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.
When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

no
Intel Celeron N5095 does not support configurable TDP. 52.9% of processors support configurable TDP.
Show more

Intel Celeron N5095 vs the average processor

  • 64.2% smaller die size
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower die size than the average processor (63.8 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
    What it is: The physical area of the processor die, usually measured in square millimeters.
    When it matters: When you are comparing chip scale, packaging density, or broader design differences rather than direct user-visible performance.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: <150 mm²

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower die size than the average processor (63.8 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².63.8 mm² vs 178 mm²
  • 66.7% lower base power
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
    When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <30 W

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
  • 68.8% lower boost power
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (20 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
    What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
    When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <50 W

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (20 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.20 W vs 64 W
  • 5 °C higher TJ Max
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
    What it is: The highest safe operating junction temperature before the CPU starts throttling or protecting itself.
    When it matters: When you tune cooling or monitor thermals under load.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: >=100 °C

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.105 °C vs 100 °C
  • Newer DDR support
    Intel Celeron N5095 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4).
    What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
    When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: DDR5

    Intel Celeron N5095 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4).DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4
  • 66.7% lower TDP
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
    When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: <30 W

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
  • 2 wider front-end design
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher front-end width than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.
    What it is: How many instructions the CPU front end can decode or dispatch per cycle at the architectural level.
    When it matters: When you are comparing deeper architectural throughput rather than user-visible speed in normal buying decisions.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: 4

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher front-end width than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.6 vs 4
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Intel Celeron N5095 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Jasper Lake vs Kaby Lake).
    What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
    When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.

    Importance: LOW

    Intel Celeron N5095 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Jasper Lake vs Kaby Lake).Jasper Lake vs Kaby Lake
  • 2 wider front-end design
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher front-end width than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.
  • 64.2% smaller die size
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower die size than the average processor (63.8 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Intel Celeron N5095 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Jasper Lake vs Kaby Lake).
  • More advanced foundry
    Intel Celeron N5095 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
  • 16.7% smaller process node
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower process node than the average processor (10 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
  • Newer DDR support
    Intel Celeron N5095 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4).
  • 66.7% lower base power
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
  • 68.8% lower boost power
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (20 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
  • 5 °C higher TJ Max
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
  • 66.7% lower TDP
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.

Total
Performance
Cache & Architecture
Memory & PCIe
Power & Thermal
  • Narrower instruction support
    Intel Celeron N5095 supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
  • Older CPU socket
    Intel Celeron N5095 uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1,338 vs FP2).
  • 91.6% weaker multi-core performance
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (234 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
  • 66.6% lower single-core score
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (492 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
  • 32.6% lower boost clock
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (2.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
  • 39.9% weaker single-core performance
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,493 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
  • 51.7% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (234 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
  • 69.9% lower multi-core score
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,443 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
  • 2 fewer CPU cores
    Intel Celeron N5095 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
  • 61.9% lower PassMark score
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (4,008 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
  • No multithreading support
    Intel Celeron N5095 does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    Intel Celeron N5095 has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
  • 1 fewer threads per core
    Intel Celeron N5095 has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
  • No Turbo Boost
    Intel Celeron N5095 does not support Turbo Boost, the average processor does.
  • 8 lower clock multiplier
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (20 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
  • 41.7% less L3 per core
    Intel Celeron N5095 has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
  • 50% smaller L3 cache
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (4 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
  • 91.7% fewer transistors
    Intel Celeron N5095 has fewer transistors than the average processor (0.4 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
  • 40% smaller L2 cache
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (1.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
  • 33.3% smaller L1 cache
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (256 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
  • 24% less L2 per core
    Intel Celeron N5095 has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.4 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
  • 8 fewer PCIe lanes
    Intel Celeron N5095 has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (8 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
  • 75% less memory capacity
    Intel Celeron N5095 has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
  • No configurable TDP
    Intel Celeron N5095 does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
  • 5 °C higher CPU temperature
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher CPU temperature than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
  • 91.6% weaker multi-core performance
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (234 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    What it is: A Cinebench R20 score that reflects how well the processor handles long, heavy rendering workloads across many cores.
    When it matters: When you care about sustained multi-core performance in rendering, compiling, heavy creation work, or productivity workloads that use many threads.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >4700

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (234 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.234 vs 2,783
  • 66.6% lower single-core score
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (492 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
    When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >2000

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (492 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.492 vs 1,471
  • 32.6% lower boost clock
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (2.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
    When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >4.7 GHz

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (2.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.2.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 39.9% weaker single-core performance
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,493 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
    What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
    When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >3200

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,493 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.1,493 vs 2,483
  • 51.7% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (234 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
    What it is: A Cinebench R20 benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
    When it matters: When you care about lighter workloads, interface responsiveness, or software that still depends heavily on one fast core.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >600

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (234 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.234 vs 484
  • 69.9% lower multi-core score
    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,443 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
    When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >8500

    Intel Celeron N5095 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,443 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.1,443 vs 4,793
  • 41.7% less L3 per core
    Intel Celeron N5095 has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    What it is: The amount of L3 cache effectively available per CPU core.
    When it matters: When you are comparing how much shared cache each core can draw on in deeper technical analysis.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: >=2 MB/core

    Intel Celeron N5095 has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
  • 2 fewer CPU cores
    Intel Celeron N5095 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
    When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: 8+

    Intel Celeron N5095 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.4 vs 6
Total
Overall
Platform
Performance
Cache & Architecture
Memory & PCIe
Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of Intel Celeron N5095 and other processors

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Celeron N5095?

  • Excellent for basic tasks such as web browsing, word processing, and multimedia streaming (Netflix/YouTube).
  • Great value for money, often found in very affordable budget laptops and mini PCs.
  • Energy efficient with low power consumption, which can lead to better battery life in portable devices.
  • Features a quad-core architecture that handles light multitasking better than older dual-core Celeron models.
  • Capable of driving multiple 4K displays at 60Hz, making it suitable for modern office setups.
  • Reliable for home server use, such as simple Plex 4K transcoding or as a firewall (pfSense/OPNsense).

What customers dislike about Intel Celeron N5095?

  • Unsuitable for modern gaming; only very old titles or simple indie games run smoothly at lower resolutions.
  • Lacks support for AVX instructions and AV1 hardware decoding, which can lead to stuttering in high-resolution modern video formats.
  • Struggles with resource-intensive professional software like heavy video editing or complex development environments.
  • Noticeably slower performance compared to newer alternatives like the Intel N100 or AMD Ryzen 7320U.
  • Higher TDP (15W) compared to some other N-series chips makes it less ideal for completely fanless, passively cooled designs.
  • Performance can be heavily bottlenecked if paired with low RAM (less than 8GB) or a slow HDD instead of an SSD.

Expert reviews

O
openbenchmarking.org
Q1 2022
Intel Celeron N5095 Benchmarks, Linux Performance

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a 10nm "Jasper Lake" quad-core processor designed for budget small-form-factor systems, featuring a 2.0 GHz base clock (2.9 GHz boost) and a 15W TDP. It excels in basic tasks, offering competent performance for web browsing and office work, while its integrated UHD Graphics supports 4K multimedia decoding. However, it is limited by weak gaming performance...Read more

C
cpubenchmark.net
01/07/2021
Intel Celeron N5095 @ 2.00GHz - CPU Benchmarks Would you like to see a comparison of the N5095 against the newer Intel N100? Copy

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a 10nm Jasper Lake budget processor featuring four cores/threads, a 2.0–2.9 GHz clock speed, and 4 MB L3 cache, providing a significant single-thread performance boost (up to 30%) over older N-series chips for basic tasks, according to PassMark. While its 15W TDP requires active cooling rather than passive, the chip offers solid, mid-range performance...Read more

N
notebookcheck.com
04/12/2021
Intel Celeron N5095 Jasper Lake Benchmarked: Beelink U59 Mini-PC Review | 16/05/2022 | GEEKOM MiniAir 11 Review: Compact Office PC with Jasper Lake

The Beelink U59, powered by the 10nm Intel Celeron N5095 (15W TDP), acts as a capable budget mini PC, offering a 10-20% performance boost over fanless alternatives for daily office tasks and 4K media. Pros include versatile connectivity with dual HDMI 2.0 and USB-C for triple-display setups, along with dual SODIMM slots for RAM upgrades, a 2.5-inch SATA bay, and effective active...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
laurentwillen.be
31/03/2023
Beelink Mini S N5095 Mini PC review

The Beelink Mini S (N5095) is identified by Laurent Willen as a compact, versatile, and budget-friendly computer suitable for daily office tasks, 4K streaming, and light gaming. Its 11th Gen Celeron processor delivers competent performance for its price point, while its 271-gram, space-saving design includes a VESA mount for discreet installation. The device boasts an efficient...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
laptopmedia.com
No specific date
Intel Celeron N5095 - Specifications and Performance Benchmarks

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a 10nm, quad-core Jasper Lake processor released in early 2021 for budget laptops and mini-PCs, featuring a 2.00 GHz base clock and integrated UHD graphics capable of driving multiple displays. It provides a roughly 30% boost in single-thread performance over previous generations, offering competent speed for basic office tasks, though its 15W TDP limits...Read more

(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
29/11/2021
Beelink U59 Review: Intel Celeron N5095 Jasper Lake tested in this mini-PC

The Beelink U59 is an affordable mini PC powered by the Intel Celeron N5095 (Jasper Lake), offering improved performance for office tasks and light media consumption. It features a compact, 330g design supporting up to three 4K 60Hz displays via dual HDMI and USB-C. Key advantages include quiet, energy-efficient operation and excellent internal expandability with dual SODIMM slots...Read more

(Translated)Show original
C
cachem.fr
11/08/2022
GEEKOM MiniAir 11 Review: Intel N5095, 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD

According to Cachem.fr, the Geekom MiniAir 11 is a compact, affordable mini PC with an Intel Celeron N5095 processor, 8GB RAM, and Windows 11 Pro, suitable for daily office tasks and home entertainment. The unit features extensive connectivity, including dual USB-C, three USB-A ports, and a full-size SD card reader, plus it runs quietly with good thermal management. While...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
laptopmedia.com
2021 (update 2024)
Intel Celeron N5095 – Specifications and Benchmark Tests

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a 10nm quad-core Jasper Lake processor designed for budget desktops and laptops, offering a 2.0 GHz base clock and up to 2.9 GHz boost. It provides solid entry-level performance suitable for everyday tasks like web browsing and 4K streaming, with integrated UHD Graphics capable of supporting triple 4K displays. While it features improved architecture and...Read more

(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
29/11/2021
Intel Celeron N5095 Jasper Lake benchmarked: Beelink U59 mini PC review

The Beelink U59 is a budget-friendly mini PC featuring the Intel Celeron N5095 "Jasper Lake" processor, offering solid performance for basic office tasks, web browsing, and 4K video consumption. Key strengths include a clean Windows 11 installation, a versatile port selection with dual HDMI and USB-C for triple-monitor setups, and excellent internal expandability for RAM and...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

intel-core-ultra-5-225
Intel Core Ultra 5 225

Processors

7.8
amd-ryzen-5-8500g
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

Processors

7.3
amd-ryzen-5-7600
AMD Ryzen 5 7600

Processors

7.1
amd-ryzen-7-5700
AMD Ryzen 7 5700

Processors

6.5
amd-ryzen-5-7500f
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Processors

7.0
intel-core-i3-14100
Intel Core i3 14100

Processors

6.4
amd-ryzen-5-8600g
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

Processors

6.9
amd-ryzen-5-7400f
AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Processors

6.8
amd-ryzen-5-5500gt
AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

Processors

6.3
amd-ryzen-5-5600gt
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT

Processors

6.2
amd-ryzen-5-8400f
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Processors

6.9
intel-core-i3-13100
Intel Core i3 13100

Processors

6.0

Compare Intel Celeron N5095 with other processors

VS
VS

Compare