Scored using Processors Methodology v1.0
Processors Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Processors Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Processors Methodology v1.0

AMD A10 7850K Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£150PassMark benchmark result:3394N. of physical cores:4CPU boost clock speed:4.0 GHzCPU socket:?TDP (Thermal design power):95 W

AMD A10 7850K Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

4.1

Overall score

Score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.2

Technical score

10%

3.4

User score

▼Worse than 86% of processors
4.2

Technical score

Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

3.7

Performance

18%

3.2

Cache & Architecture

10%

4.9

Memory & PCIe

7%

7.1

Power & Thermal

4%

7.4

Platform

1%

7.0

Integrated Graphics

▼Worse than 80% of processors
3.4

User score

User score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.0

User ratings

30%

1.9

Number of reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 99% of processors
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD A10 7850K

Technical score
Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

3.7

Performance

18%

3.2

Cache & Architecture

10%

4.9

Memory & PCIe

7%

7.1

Power & Thermal

4%

7.4

Platform

1%

7.0

Integrated Graphics

4.2
User score
User score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.0

User ratings

30%

1.9

Number of reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
3.4
Popularity
Popularity
1.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
AMD A10 7850K has a popularity score of 1.9 points, which is higher than that of 70.5% of products in this category.
1.9
Value for money
Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.1

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

5.8
Brand name
AMD
Processor type
desktop
Processor type
desktop
This processor belongs to the desktop processor class, which is more advanced than that of 56% of processors and equal to that of 37.9% of processors.
CPU socket
?
Chipset
A88X, A85X, A78, A75, A68H
Chipset
A88X, A85X, A78, A75, A68H
This processor supports A88X, A85X, A78, A75, A68H chipsets, which is narrower compatibility than 65.3% of processors and equal to that of 0.7% of processors.
CPU architecture
x86-64
CPU architecture
x86-64
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
4
N. of physical cores
4
This processor has 4 CPU cores, which is fewer than 50.7% of processors and equal to 28.5% of processors.
CPU threads
4
CPU threads
4
This processor offers 4 CPU threads, which is fewer than 67.4% of processors and equal to 26.5% of processors.
Threads per core
1
Threads per core
1
This processor offers 1 threads per core, which is fewer than 69.8% of processors and equal to 30.2% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
4 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
4 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 4 GHz which is lower than that of 59.8% of processors and equal to that of 5.1% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
4x 3.7 GHz
CPU base clock speed
4x 3.7 GHz
This processor has a base clock of 4x3.7 GHz which is higher than that of 53.7% of processors and equal to that of 0.6% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
28 nm
Semiconductor size
28 nm
This processor uses a 28 nm process node, which is older than that of 94.7% of processors and equal to that of 3% of processors.
Foundry
GlobalFoundries 28 nm
Foundry
GlobalFoundries 28 nm
This processor is built on the GlobalFoundries 28 nm foundry process, which is less advanced than that of 94.8% of processors and equal to that of 2.9% of processors.
L3 cache
0 MB
L3 cache
0 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 0 MB which is smaller than that of 93.6% of processors and equal to that of 6.4% of processors.
L2 cache
4 MB
L2 cache
4 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 4 MB which is larger than that of 55.4% of processors and equal to that of 9.3% of processors.
L1 cache
256 KB
L1 cache
256 KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 256 KB which is smaller than that of 59.4% of processors and equal to that of 18.6% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR3
DDR memory version
DDR3
This processor supports DDR DDR3, which is older than that of 86.3% of processors and equal to that of 13.7% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
2,133 MHz
Maximum memory speed
2,133 MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 2,133 MHz, which is lower than that of 75.5% of processors and equal to 8.9% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR3-2133 MHz
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR3-2133 MHz
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR3-2133 MHz, which is lower than that of 83.9% of processors and equal to 1.4% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
2,400 MHz
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
2,400 MHz
This processor supports XMP/EXPO memory speeds up to 2,400 MHz, which is higher than that of 88.7% of processors and equal to 0.5% of processors.
Maximum memory capacity
64 GB
Maximum memory capacity
64 GB
This processor supports up to 64 GB of memory, which is more than 28.4% of processors and equal to 27.5% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
yes
Integrated graphics
yes
This processor includes integrated graphics. 12.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
AMD Radeon R7
Integrated GPU model
Radeon R7
Integrated GPU model
Radeon R7
This processor uses the Radeon R7 integrated GPU, which is less advanced than that in 82.5% of processors and equal to that in 1.3% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
8
Integrated GPU execution units
8
This processor has 8 GPU execution units, which is fewer than 74% of processors and equal to 7.2% of processors.
Integrated GPU base frequency
720 MHz
Integrated GPU base frequency
720 MHz
This processor has an integrated GPU clock of 720 MHz which is higher than that of 85.2% of processors and equal to that of 0.4% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), MPEG-4 (HW decode), WMV9 (HW decode)
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), MPEG-4 (HW decode), WMV9 (HW decode)
This processor supports H.264 (HW decode/encode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), MPEG-4 (HW decode), WMV9 (HW decode) media codecs, which is narrower support than 50.1% of processors.
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
95 W
TDP (Thermal design power)
95 W
This processor has a TDP of 95 W which is higher than that of 88.7% of processors and equal to that of 1.7% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
95 W
Base power (PL1)
95 W
This processor has a base power of 95 W which is higher than that of 88.9% of processors and equal to that of 1.8% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
?
Tau (power duration limit)
N/A
Configurable TDP
yes
Configurable TDP
yes
This processor supports configurable TDP. 47.3% of processors support configurable TDP.
Show more

AMD A10 7850K vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceCache & ArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated GraphicsPower & Thermal
  • Unlocked for overclocking
    Unlocked multiplier
    yes
    This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
  • Includes stock cooler
    Cooler included
    yes
    This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
  • 27.6 °C lower CPU temperature
    CPU temperature
    72.4 °C
    This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (72.4 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
    72.4 °C vs 100 °C
  • Supports memory overclocking
    Memory overclocking
    yes
    This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • Broader instruction support
    Instruction sets
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, AES, BMI1, ABM, XOP, TBM
    This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, AES, BMI1, ABM, XOP, TBM vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, AES, BMI1, ABM, XOP, TBM vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • Supports HMP
    Uses HMP
    yes
    This processor supports HMP, the average processor does not. 22.7% of processors support HMP.
  • 90.9% more popular
    AMD A10 7850K is more popular than the average processor (1.91 vs 1).
    1.91 vs 1
  • Supports Turbo Core
    Turbo Core version
    3.0
    This processor supports Turbo Core, the average processor does not. 1.00% of processors support Turbo Core.
    3.0 vs 2.0
  • 90.9% more popular
    AMD A10 7850K is more popular than the average processor (1.91 vs 1).
    1.91 vs 1
  • Broader instruction support
    Instruction sets
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, AES, BMI1, ABM, XOP, TBM
    This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, AES, BMI1, ABM, XOP, TBM vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, AES, BMI1, ABM, XOP, TBM vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • Supports HMP
    Uses HMP
    yes
    This processor supports HMP, the average processor does not. 22.7% of processors support HMP.
  • Unlocked for overclocking
    Unlocked multiplier
    yes
    This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
  • Supports Turbo Core
    Turbo Core version
    3.0
    This processor supports Turbo Core, the average processor does not. 1.00% of processors support Turbo Core.
    3.0 vs 2.0
  • 60% larger L2 cache
    L2 cache
    4 MB
    This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (4 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    4 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • Supports memory overclocking
    Memory overclocking
    yes
    This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • 2.06x higher GPU clock speed
    Integrated GPU base frequency
    720 MHz
    This processor has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (720 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
    720 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • Includes stock cooler
    Cooler included
    yes
    This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
  • 27.6 °C lower CPU temperature
    CPU temperature
    72.4 °C
    This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (72.4 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
    72.4 °C vs 100 °C
  • 76.4% lower multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,138
    This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,138 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,138 vs 4,829
  • 67.9% lower PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    3,394
    This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (3,394 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    3,394 vs 10,572.5
  • 40.2% weaker single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    1,495
    This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,495 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    1,495 vs 2,500
  • Less advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Kaveri
    This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Kaveri vs Kaby Lake).
    Kaveri vs Kaby Lake
  • 2.33x larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    28 nm
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (28 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    28 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2 fewer CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    4
    This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    4 vs 6
  • 22.6% lower single-core score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    1,138
    This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,138 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,138 vs 1,471
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    This processor has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 2.37x lower user score
    User score
    3.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD A10 7850K
    the average processor
    AMD A10 7850K has a lower user score than the average processor (3.37 vs 8.000).
    3.37 vs 8
  • 13.6% worse value for money
    AMD A10 7850K has worse value for money than the average processor (5.77 vs 6.6).
    5.77 vs 6.56
  • 6 years older release date
    Release date
    2014
    This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2014 vs 2020).
    January 2014
    2014 vs 2020
  • No crypto acceleration
    Cryptographic acceleration
    AES
    This processor does not include crypto acceleration, the average processor does. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
    AES vs AES, SHA
  • Older TPM support
    TPM type
    fTPM 2.0
    This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
    fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • 67.9% lower PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    3,394
    This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (3,394 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    3,394 vs 10,572.5
  • 76.4% lower multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,138
    This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,138 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,138 vs 4,829
  • 40.2% weaker single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    1,495
    This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,495 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    1,495 vs 2,500
  • 2 fewer CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    4
    This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    4 vs 6
  • 22.6% lower single-core score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    1,138
    This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,138 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,138 vs 1,471
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    This processor has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • No multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    This processor does not support multithreading, the average processor does. 74.2% of processors support multithreading.
  • 7% lower boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    4.0 GHz
    This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    4.0 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 1 fewer threads per core
    Threads per core
    1
    This processor has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
    1 vs 2
  • 37.5% lower bus transfer rate
    Bus transfer rate
    5 GT/s
    This processor has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
    5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
  • Less advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Kaveri
    This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Kaveri vs Kaby Lake).
    Kaveri vs Kaby Lake
  • 2.33x larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    28 nm
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (28 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    28 nm vs 12 nm
  • 38.4% larger die size
    Die size
    245 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (245 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    245 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 33.3% smaller L1 cache
    L1 cache
    256 KB
    This processor has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (256 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
    256 KB vs 384 KB
  • Less advanced foundry
    Foundry
    GlobalFoundries 28 nm
    This processor uses a less advanced foundry process than the average processor (GlobalFoundries 28 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
    GlobalFoundries 28 nm vs Intel 14 nm
  • 51.3% fewer transistors
    N. of transistors
    2.411 billion
    This processor has fewer transistors than the average processor (2.4 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
    2.411 billion vs 4.95 billion
  • Older DDR support
    DDR memory version
    DDR3
    This processor supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3 vs DDR4).
    DDR3 vs DDR4
  • 25.5% lower memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    34.1 GB/s
    This processor has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (34.1 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
    34.1 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
  • 27.3% lower memory speed
    Maximum memory speed
    2,133 MHz
    This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2133 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • Lower JEDEC memory speed
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    DDR3-2133 MHz
    This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR3-2133 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
    DDR3-2,133 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
  • Narrower media codec support
    Integrated media encoders/decoders
    H.264 (HW decode/encode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), MPEG-4 (HW decode), WMV9 (HW decode)
    This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), MPEG-4 (HW decode), WMV9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
    H.264 (HW decode/encode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), MPEG-4 (HW decode), WMV9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)
  • Inferior integrated GPU
    Integrated GPU model
    Radeon R7
    This processor uses an inferior integrated GPU to the average processor (Radeon R7 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
    Radeon R7 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
  • 66.7% fewer GPU execution units
    Integrated GPU execution units
    8
    This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (8 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 24
  • 2.11x higher base power
    Base power (PL1)
    95 W
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    95 W vs 45 W
  • 27.6 °C lower TJ Max
    Maximum operating temperature (TJ Max)
    72.4 °C
    This processor has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (72.4 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
    72.4 °C vs 100 °C
  • 2.11x higher TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    95 W
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    95 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pugetsystems.com
06/01/2014
Summary of the review
P
phoronix.com
14/01/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
30/06/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcgamer.com
06/02/2014
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
27/02/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
16/01/2014
Summary of the review
H
hardwarecanucks.com
13/01/2014
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
30/01/2014
Summary of the review
O
overclockers.com
17/01/2014
Summary of the review
P
planet3dnow.de
15/09/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcgameshardware.de
19/01/2014
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
14/01/2014
Summary of the review
O
overclocking.com
17/07/2014
Summary of the review
H
hardware.fr
14/01/2014
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
14/01/2014
Summary of the review
C
cowcotland.com
24/06/2014
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
20/01/2014
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com.mx
25/03/2014
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
08/05/2014
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com.mx
28/03/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
03/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
02/12/2013
Summary of the review
N
nexthardware.com
26/08/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
21/01/2014
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
14/01/2014
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.nl
10/03/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD A10 7850K

  • Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon R7) for its time, capable of playable 1080p gaming on low/medium settings without a discrete GPU
  • Excellent value for budget builds, small form factor PCs, or Home Theatre PCs (HTPCs)
  • Unlocked 'Black Edition' multiplier allows for easy overclocking of both CPU and GPU cores
  • Supports Dual Graphics mode when paired with a compatible budget AMD Radeon R7 discrete card
  • Improved power efficiency and IPC (Instructions Per Clock) compared to previous generation Richland APUs
  • Native support for high-speed DDR3-2133 memory, which significantly boosts integrated graphics performance
  • Future-facing technologies for its era, including HSA (Heterogeneous System Architecture) and Mantle API support

What we don't like about AMD A10 7850K

  • Weak single-core CPU performance compared to Intel Core i3 and i5 competitors of the same generation
  • CPU performance gains over the previous A10-6800K are marginal or even lower in some single-threaded benchmarks due to lower clock speeds
  • Requires a newer FM2+ socket motherboard, making it incompatible with older FM2 boards
  • Integrated graphics performance is heavily limited by system memory bandwidth; requires expensive high-speed RAM to reach full potential
  • CPU performance can become a bottleneck when paired with high-end discrete graphics cards
  • The included stock cooler can be noisy and struggle under heavy load or during overclocking
  • Not ideal for intensive productivity tasks like heavy video encoding or professional image editing compared to similarly priced Intel chips

Verdict

The AMD A10-7850K is a 'Kaveri' architecture APU featuring four CPU cores with a 3.7GHz base and 4.0GHz turbo clock, paired with integrated Radeon R7 graphics sporting 512 shader cores at 720MHz. Built on a 28nm process for the FM2+ socket, its primary strengths include a highly capable integrated GPU for its era, support for Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) and Mantle API, and an unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking. However, it is held back by a high 95W TDP, modest single-core performance gains over previous generations due to reduced clock speeds, and a heavy dependence on high-speed DDR3-2133 memory to reach its full graphical potential.

Compare AMD A10 7850K with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD A10 7850K and other processors

No results found