Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Fantech Raigor II WG10 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:125 HzMaximum DPI:2000 DPIWeight:61 g

Fantech Raigor II WG10 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

Fantech Raigor II WG10
5.2/10

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

4.8

Technical score

20%

6.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 79% of mice
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 81%
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

36%

3.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.0

Controls

16%

8.9

Design

14%

1.9

Features

7%

9.7

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 75%
6.9

User score

User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 91%
  • fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
  • fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
  • fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
  • fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
  • fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
  • fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
  • fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
fantech-raigor-ii-wg10
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Fantech Raigor II WG10

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

36%

3.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.0

Controls

16%

8.9

Design

14%

1.9

Features

7%

9.7

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

4.8
User score
User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.9
Popularity
Popularity
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Fantech Raigor II WG10 has a popularity score of 4.5 points, which is lower than that of 68.9% of products in this category.
4.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.6
Brand name
Fantech
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 75.8% of mice and equal to 23.9% of mice.
Wired polling rate
N/A
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 71.1% of mice and equal to 28.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
2.4GHz only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
AA
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
yes
This mouse uses a removable battery. 77.8% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
6
This mouse has 6 programmable buttons, which is more than 35.6% of mice and equal to 31.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
61 g
This mouse weighs 61 g, which makes it lighter than 74.5% of mice and equal to 1.1% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
N/A
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
no
This mouse does not support firmware upgrades. 77.7% of mice support firmware upgrades.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Fantech Raigor II WG10 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Silent primary switches
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 25.6% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 61 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    61 g vs 82 g
  • Removable battery
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Fantech Raigor II WG10 is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • Versatile connectivity
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 3 newer release date
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    2024 vs 2021
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Fantech Raigor II WG10 is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • Versatile connectivity
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Removable battery
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • Silent primary switches
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 25.6% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 61 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    61 g vs 82 g
  • 3 newer release date
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    2024 vs 2021
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 25 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 5 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    5 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • No firmware upgrades
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 80% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    2,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 16% lower user score
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Fantech Raigor II WG10
    the average mouse
    Fantech Raigor II WG10 has a lower user score than the average mouse (6.9 vs 8).
    6.9 vs 8
  • 10.3% worse value for money
    Fantech Raigor II WG10 has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.63 vs 7.3).
    6.63 vs 7.31
  • 40.7% less popular
    Fantech Raigor II WG10 is less popular than the average mouse (4.54 vs 6.4).
    4.54 vs 6.38
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 80% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    2,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • 2 fewer stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 3 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    3 vs 5
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1,000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 25 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 5 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    5 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • No firmware upgrades
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Fantech Raigor II WG10

  • Highly affordable and offers good value for its price point.
  • Very lightweight (approximately 61g without battery), making it easy to move.
  • Long manufacturer-stated battery life of up to 720 hours.
  • Responsive 2.4GHz wireless connection with minimal noticeable delay for casual use.
  • Includes dedicated DPI switching and side buttons for added functionality.
  • Ambidextrous and ergonomic shape that is comfortable for many users.

What customers don't like about Fantech Raigor II WG10

  • Build quality can feel cheap or 'weak' to some users.
  • Not rechargeable; requires a single AA battery which adds recurring cost.
  • Relatively low maximum DPI (up to 2000) compared to higher-end gaming mice.
  • Low polling rate (125Hz) and maximum speed (30 IPS) limit its performance for competitive FPS gaming.
  • Some users find the size too small for larger hands.
  • Mouse skates can feel scratchy or collect dust easily over time.

Verdict

The Fantech Raigor II WG10 is a budget-oriented wireless gaming mouse featuring a PixArt FCT3065 optical sensor with on-the-fly adjustable sensitivity ranging from 800 to 2,000 DPI. It operates via a 2.4GHz wireless connection with a 125Hz polling rate and is powered by a single AA battery, which can provide up to 720 hours of life due to its power-saving sensor technology. Key characteristics include an ambidextrous ergonomic design, 6 programmable buttons, and Huano switches rated for 5 million clicks. Its main pros are its lightweight 61g build, long battery endurance, and highly affordable price point. However, notable cons include a low 125Hz polling rate that may not satisfy competitive gamers, a relatively low maximum DPI of 2,000, and the lack of a rechargeable battery or RGB lighting.

Compare Fantech Raigor II WG10 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fantech Raigor II WG10 and other products in the Mice category

No results found