OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

AMD Radeon 530 Review | 118 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price: ~£95
  • VRAM: 2 GB
  • Memory bus width: 64 bit
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP): 50 W

AMD Radeon 530 review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

2.4

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

2.4

Technical Score

10.0%

?

User score

Very poor
2.4

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

1.2

Performance

24.0%

1.6

Memory

12.0%

4.2

Power & Cooling

11.0%

5.0

Platform & Features

5.0%

4.0

Design

4.0%

4.6

Connectivity & Media

Very poor
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 3.1
    Gaming

    Score components:

    45.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 4.1
    Video editing

    Score components:

    35.0%

    7.0

    AV1 encode

    30.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    20.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    15.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 2.4
    1080p

    Score components:

    55.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    10.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 2.4
    1440p

    Score components:

    50.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    30.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    15.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 2.7
    4K

    Score components:

    40.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    35.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £95

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The AMD Radeon 530 is an entry-level mobile graphics card launched in 2017, built on a 28 nm process and based on the GCN 3.0 microarchitecture. It typically features 320 to 384 shading units, a base clock of 730 MHz with a boost up to 1,024 MHz, and is paired with up to 4 GB of either DDR3 or GDDR5 memory over a 64-bit interface. Its primary advantages include low power consumption (TDP of approximately 50W) and providing a dedicated alternative to integrated graphics for basic multimedia tasks and casual 720p gaming in older titles. However, it faces significant drawbacks, including outdated performance that struggles with modern AAA games, a reliance on older architecture that AMD ceased supporting in 2021, and common reports of driver instability or system freezing in newer operating systems.

Technical Specifications of AMD Radeon 530

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

?

Performance

24.0%

?

Memory

12.0%

?

Power & Cooling

11.0%

?

Platform & Features

5.0%

?

Design

4.0%

?

Connectivity & Media

2.4
AMD Radeon 530 has a technical score of 2.36 points, which is lower than that of 99.5% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
1.0
AMD Radeon 530 has a popularity of 1 points, which is lower than 55.9% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

2.4

Overall score

40.0%

10

Price

4.7
AMD Radeon 530 has a quality-to-price ratio of 4.7 points, which is lower than 98% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.
When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

443 points
AMD Radeon 530 scores 443 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 99.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.
When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

N/A
PassMark (G3D) result
What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark
When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests
When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

438 points
AMD Radeon 530 scores 438 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 94.6% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.
When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

0.7864 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon 530 delivers 0.7864 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 99.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

2 GB
AMD Radeon 530 has 2 GB of VRAM, which is less than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Memory type
What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)
When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

?
GDDR version
What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

GDDR5
AMD Radeon 530 uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

64 bit
AMD Radeon 530 uses a 64 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 97.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

28.8 GB/s
AMD Radeon 530 reaches 28.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 99% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported
When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

3.0
AMD Radeon 530 supports PCIe 3.0, which is older than on 77.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication
When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

x8
AMD Radeon 530 uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 68.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version
When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

?
Vulkan version
What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version
When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

?
OpenGL version
What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version
When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

4.6
AMD Radeon 530 supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 4.8% of graphics cards and equal to 95.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously
When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

?
Max digital resolution
What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution
When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

?
DisplayPort outputs
What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs
When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

0
AMD Radeon 530 offers 0 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 98.1% of graphics cards and equal to 1.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported
When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

N/A
DisplayPort link rates
What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections
When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

50 W
AMD Radeon 530 has a TDP of 50 W, which is lower than that of 96.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

50 W
AMD Radeon 530 draws 50 W under peak load, which is lower than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply
When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

?
Board power limit
What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board
When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

?
PCIe power spec
What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed
When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Show more
Size
What it is: Physical size of the GPU card
When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?
Length
What it is: Physical length of the GPU card
When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Height
What it is: Physical height of the GPU card
When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Slot width
What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card
When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

?
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the graphics card
When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more

AMD Radeon 530 vs the average graphics card

  • 76.7% lower TDP
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (50 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
    When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (50 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.50 W vs 215 W
  • 4x larger L2 cache
    AMD Radeon 530 has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.
    What it is: Total size of the GPU’s L2 cache memory
    When it matters: When cache size can help the GPU feed data faster in demanding scenes.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon 530 has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.128 MB vs 32 MB
  • 5.58x cheaper
    AMD Radeon 530 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£95 vs £530).
    AMD Radeon 530 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£95 vs £530).£95 vs £530
  • Better FP64 ratio
    AMD Radeon 530 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    What it is: Ratio of double-precision (FP64) to single-precision (FP32) performance
    When it matters: When you need to know whether FP64 is merely present or genuinely useful.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon 530 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).1:16 vs 1:64
  • 77.3% lower peak power draw
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
    When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.50 W vs 220 W
  • 58.9% smaller GPU die
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (125 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².
    What it is: Total die area of the GPU chip
    When it matters: When you are comparing how physically large different GPU chips are across generations and tiers.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (125 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².125 mm² vs 304.25 mm²
  • Better FP64 ratio
    AMD Radeon 530 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
  • 4x larger L2 cache
    AMD Radeon 530 has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.
  • 58.9% smaller GPU die
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (125 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².
  • 76.7% lower TDP
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (50 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
  • 77.3% lower peak power draw
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.

Total
Overall
Performance
Memory
Platform & Features
Power & Cooling
  • 59% lower boost clock speed
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,024 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
  • 34 fewer compute units
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (6 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
  • 62% lower base clock speed
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (730 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
  • 160 fewer TMUs
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (24 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
  • 94.3% lower texture rate
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (21.4 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
  • 95% lower pixel rate
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (8.2 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
  • 56 fewer ROPs
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (8 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
  • 96.1% lower gaming score
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (443 points vs 11,337 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 11,337 points.
  • 90.8% lower compute score
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (438 points vs 4,745 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 4,745 points.
  • 96.6% lower compute throughput
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (0.8 TFLOPS vs 23.105 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 23.105 TFLOPS.
  • 3,968 fewer FP32 units
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (384 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    AMD Radeon 530 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
  • 93.6% lower memory bandwidth
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (28.8 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
  • 76.3% slower memory speed
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (4,500 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
  • 48.6% slower VRAM clock
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (900 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
  • 5.6x larger process node
    AMD Radeon 530 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
  • Older PCIe version
    AMD Radeon 530 supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4.0).
  • 6 older
    AMD Radeon 530 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,017 vs 2,023).
  • No XeSS support
    AMD Radeon 530 does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    AMD Radeon 530 does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    AMD Radeon 530 does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Older OpenCL version
    AMD Radeon 530 supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2 vs 3.0).
  • No sampler feedback
    AMD Radeon 530 does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 100% fewer transistors
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (1 million vs 21,900 million). The average graphics card has 21,900 million transistors.
  • Older shader model
    AMD Radeon 530 supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.5 vs 6.8).
  • 3 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (0 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
  • No AV1 encoding
    AMD Radeon 530 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    AMD Radeon 530 does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    AMD Radeon 530 does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • No HDMI output
    AMD Radeon 530 does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • Not VR ready
    AMD Radeon 530 is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • No 3D output
    AMD Radeon 530 does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    AMD Radeon 530 does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 12 °C lower thermal ceiling
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 93 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 93 °C.
  • 30 °C higher load temperature
    AMD Radeon 530 has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (97 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
  • 59% lower boost clock speed
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,024 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
    What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
    When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,024 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.1024 MHz vs 2500 MHz
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    AMD Radeon 530 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
    When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 530 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.64 bit vs 256 bit
  • 5.6x larger process node
    AMD Radeon 530 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
    When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon 530 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 34 fewer compute units
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (6 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
    When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (6 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.6 vs 40
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
    When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 62% lower base clock speed
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (730 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
    What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
    When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (730 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.730 MHz vs 1920 MHz
  • 160 fewer TMUs
    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (24 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
    When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 530 has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (24 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.24 vs 184
  • 94.3% lower texture rate
    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (21.4 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
    What it is: Number of textured pixels the GPU can process per second
    When it matters: When fast texture handling matters in high-refresh gaming workloads.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 530 has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (21.4 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.21.38 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s
Total
Overall
Performance
Memory
Platform & Features
Connectivity & Media
Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon 530 and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Radeon 530?

  • Reliable for basic productivity tasks like office work and web browsing
  • Capable of running older or less demanding games (e.g., FIFA 17, Overwatch) at low to medium settings
  • Offers a dedicated graphics solution for budget-friendly laptops compared to some older integrated chips
  • Silent operation and low heat production in many laptop configurations
  • Good value for users on a strict budget who do not require high-end performance

What customers dislike about AMD Radeon 530?

  • Underpowered for modern AAA titles or graphically intensive games
  • Often performs similarly to modern integrated graphics solutions (e.g., Intel UHD or Ryzen Vega iGPUs)
  • Limited by a 64-bit memory bus, which significantly bottlenecks higher resolutions like 1080p
  • Based on older GCN architecture rather than more modern Polaris or RDNA chips
  • Versions with DDR3 memory are notably slower than those equipped with GDDR5
  • Not suitable for professional 3D rendering or complex CAD work

Expert reviews

V
videocardbenchmark.net
N/A
Radeon 530 - PassMark - Video Card Benchmarks Would you like to compare the AMD Radeon 530 performance against a specific competing card like the NVID...

Based on the PassMark benchmark data, the AMD Radeon 530 is an entry-level mobile graphics card that primarily serves basic computing needs rather than gaming or intensive creative work. With an average G3D Mark of 1,033, it ranks significantly lower than modern performance cards, such as the GeForce RTX 4090, which scores over 38,000. Its performance in modern environments is...Read more

N
notebookcheck.net
18/03/2019
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IKB (Core i5-7200U, Radeon 530, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

Overview and Performance The Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IKB (81DC00SWGE) is a 15.6-inch budget office laptop that delivers stable system performance but suffers from outdated components and significant hardware weaknesses. Powered by a dual-core Intel Core i5-7200U processor, 8 GB of DDR4 dual-channel RAM, and a 256 GB SATA III Micron SSD, the laptop handles standard internet browsing and...Read more

N
notebooks-und-mobiles.de
16/03/2020
AMD Radeon 530 2 GB GDDR5 (Laptop) im Test

The Notebooks und Mobiles review concludes that the AMD Radeon 530 (2 GB GDDR5) is an entry-level laptop graphics chip that fails to deliver modern gaming performance, operating merely as a rebranded chip from 2015 built on an outdated 28-nm GCN architecture. Testing conducted on an HP 470 G7 laptop equipped with an Intel Core i7-10510U and 16 GB of RAM showed poor benchmark...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1080-g1-gaming
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1080 G1 Gaming

Graphics cards

5.8
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1070-g1-gaming
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming

Graphics cards

5.7
msi-geforce-gtx-980-ti
MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Graphics cards

4.9
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1080-windforce-oc
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1080 WINDFORCE OC

Graphics cards

5.6
asus-rog-strix-rx-vega-64-gaming-oc
ASUS ROG Strix RX Vega 64 Gaming OC

Graphics cards

5.5
amd-radeon-r9-390
AMD Radeon R9 390

Graphics cards

4.8
asus-turbo-geforce-gtx-1080
ASUS Turbo GeForce GTX 1080

Graphics cards

5.4
amd-radeon-rx-vega-64
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Graphics cards

5.4
msi-geforce-gt-1030-2g-lp-oc
MSI GeForce GT 1030 2G LP OC

Graphics cards

4.2
msi-geforce-gtx-1080-gaming-x
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X

Graphics cards

5.2
No image
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Graphics cards

4.0
asus-rog-strix-geforce-gtx-1080
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080

Graphics cards

5.0

Compare AMD Radeon 530 with

VS
VS

Compare