OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD FirePro W2100 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45VRAM:2 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):26 W

AMD FirePro W2100 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD FirePro W2100
3.5/10

Overall score

Score
3.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

90%

3.1

Technical score

10%

7.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 99% of graphics cards
5.5

Value for money

Value for money
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

3.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 97%
3.1

Technical score

Technical score
3.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

44%

1.4

Performance

24%

1.4

Memory

12%

6.9

Power & Cooling

11%

5.7

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.8

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 99%
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 94%
  • amd-firepro-w2100
  • amd-firepro-w2100
amd-firepro-w2100
amd-firepro-w2100
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD FirePro W2100

Technical score
Technical score
3.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

44%

1.4

Performance

24%

1.4

Memory

12%

6.9

Power & Cooling

11%

5.7

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.8

Connectivity & Media

3.1
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Popularity:
AMD FirePro W2100 has a popularity score of 6.4 points, which is higher than that of 61.3% of products in this category.
6.4
Value for money
Value for money
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

70%

3.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

5.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
851 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 851 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 99.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
452 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 452 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 99.4% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
0.44 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 0.44 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 99.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
2 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 2 GB of VRAM, which is less than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR version
DDR3
This graphics card uses DDR3 memory, which is older than on 99.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 28.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 99.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.2
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.2, which is older than on 95.1% of graphics cards and equal to 3.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
2
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 2 displays, which is fewer than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
4096x2160
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
5.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 5.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
26 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 26 W, which is lower than that of 98.9% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
26 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 26 W under peak load, which is lower than 99.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
250 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 250 W PSU, which is lower than that of 99.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
26 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 26 W, which is lower than that of 99.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
26 W
Show more
Size
168x 69x 19 mm
Length
168 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 168 mm long, which is shorter than 95.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Height
69 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 69 mm tall, which is shorter than 92.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
1 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 1 slot/s, which is slimmer than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Weight
165 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 165 g, which is lighter than 99.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD FirePro W2100 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 87.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (26 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    26 W vs 215 W
  • 61.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (250 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    250 W vs 650 W
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 117 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (168 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    168 mm vs 285 mm
  • 56 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (69 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    69 mm vs 125 mm
  • 88.4% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (26 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    26 W vs 225 W
  • 10 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (85 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    85 °C vs 95 °C
  • 11.78x cheaper
    AMD FirePro W2100 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£45 vs £530).
    £45 vs £530
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports virtual GPU
    This graphics card supports virtual GPU features, the average graphics card does not.
  • 73.9% smaller GPU die
    This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (77 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    77 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 87.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (26 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    26 W vs 215 W
  • 61.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (250 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    250 W vs 650 W
  • 88.4% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (26 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    26 W vs 225 W
  • 10 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (85 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    85 °C vs 95 °C
  • 12.4 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (23 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    23 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 88.2% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (26 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    26 W vs 220 W
  • 12 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (55 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    55 °C vs 67 °C
  • 58.3% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (5 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    5 W vs 12 W
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 117 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (168 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    168 mm vs 285 mm
  • 56 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (69 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    69 mm vs 125 mm
  • 83.8% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (165 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    165 g vs 1,021 g
  • 72.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (680 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 35 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (5 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    5 vs 40
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 67.2% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (630 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    630 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 31.8% worse value for money
    AMD FirePro W2100 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.46 vs 7.2).
    5.46 vs 7.2
  • 9.6% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD FirePro W2100
    the average graphics card
    AMD FirePro W2100 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.30 vs 8.000).
    7.3 vs 8
  • 72.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (680 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 35 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (5 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    5 vs 40
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 67.2% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (630 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    630 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 164 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (20 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    20 vs 184
  • 96.4% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (13.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    13.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 96.7% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (5.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    5.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 56 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (8 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    8 vs 64
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 98.2% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (0.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    0.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 96.2% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (851 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    851 points vs 22,653 points
  • 96.3% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (452 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    452 points vs 12,074 points
  • 98.5% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.4 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    0.44 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 98.1% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (0.4 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    0.44 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 93.8% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.03 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 4,032 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (320 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    320 vs 4,352
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 93.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (28.8 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    28.8 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 90.5% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1800 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    1,800 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 48.6% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (900 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    900 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    16 vs 128
  • Older GDDR version
    This graphics card uses an older GDDR version than the average graphics card (DDR3 vs GDDR6).
    DDR3 vs GDDR6
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • No FSR support
    This graphics card does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
  • 9 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2014 vs 2023).
    August 2014
    2,014 vs 2,023
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2 vs 8
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4).
    1.2 vs 1.4
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 3).
    1.2 vs 3.0
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6 vs 6.8).
    6.0 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 95.5% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (1040 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    1,040 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 2 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (2 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    2 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No VRR support
    This graphics card does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
    1.2 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 2.3).
    1.2 vs 2.3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 73% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No overclocking support
    This graphics card does not support overclocking, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

3
3dmark.com
10/04/2017
Summary of the review
Score 949 with AMD FirePro W2100(1x) and AMD A6-5200 Would you like to see gaming performance data or workstation/CAD benchmark results for this card?...
N
notebookcheck.net
17/12/2015
Summary of the review
AMD FirePro W2100 and FirePro W4100 Review
D
develop3d.com
14/10/2014
Summary of the review
AMD FirePro GPUs

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD FirePro W2100

  • Energy efficient with a very low maximum power consumption of approximately 26W
  • Compact single-slot and low-profile design fits easily into small-form-factor workstation PCs
  • Reliable drivers optimized and certified for professional CAD and engineering applications
  • Cost-effective entry-level option for basic professional workflows and multi-monitor setups
  • No additional power connectors required, as it draws all necessary power from the PCIe slot

What we don't like about AMD FirePro W2100

  • Poor performance for modern gaming; struggle with even entry-level 1080p gaming tasks
  • Uses older DDR3 memory technology, which significantly limits bandwidth compared to GDDR5 alternatives
  • Lacks modern features like HDMI outputs, requiring DisplayPort cables or specific adapters
  • Limited to two DisplayPort outputs, which may be restrictive for complex multi-display setups
  • Outdated architecture (GCN 1.0) that lacks support for modern technologies like Ray Tracing or DLSS/FSR upscaling

Verdict

The AMD FirePro W2100 is an entry-level professional workstation graphics card launched in 2014, built on the 28nm GCN 1.0 architecture with 320 stream processors and a core clock speed up to 680 MHz. It features 2GB of DDR3 memory on a 128-bit interface, delivering 28.8 GB/s bandwidth while supporting two DisplayPort 1.2a outputs for 4K resolutions and certified ISV drivers for CAD applications. Its primary advantages include an ultra-low power consumption of just 26W (requiring no external power connectors), a compact low-profile form factor, and ECC memory support for professional reliability. However, its performance is limited by the aging DDR3 memory type and a low shader count, making it unsuitable for modern gaming or heavy 3D rendering workloads.

Compare AMD FirePro W2100 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD FirePro W2100 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found