NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Review | 118 Data compared

This 2014 benchmark review by Tom's Hardware evaluates the PC performance of Watch Dogs across various hardware configurations, focusing heavily on entry-level setups at a low detail setting of 1280x720 with FXAA enabled. The game proved to be surprisingly demanding for its time, separating entry-level hardware into clear playable and unplayable categories. On the positive side, budget-friendly graphics cards like the AMD Radeon R7 250X excel in this environment, maintaining a highly fluid frame rate that never drops below 70 FPS, while the Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 also performs admirably by staying consistently above the 60 FPS threshold. Additionally, frame rates over time remain fairly stable for these capable budget GPUs. Conversely, the game exposes severe limitations on lower-end hardware, serving as a primary drawback for users without mid-range rigs. The AMD Radeon HD 6450 is entirely unplayable, and while the Nvidia GeForce GT 630 GDDR5 and AMD Radeon R7 240 offer passable frame rate minimums of 27 FPS and 30 FPS respectively, they are hindered by heavy frame time variance. This variance manifests as noticeable, distracting on-screen stuttering, with...

Call of Duty: Ghosts PC Performance Review Summary This benchmark review analyzes the PC performance of Call of Duty: Ghosts using 17 different graphics cards to determine the hardware required for smooth gameplay. Testing at the lowest settings and a 1280x720 resolution reveals that the game is quite demanding even on its entry-level presets, which utilize upscaling from an even lower resolution under the "Normal" image quality profile. The testing highlights that entry-level cards like the Nvidia GeForce 210 fail to launch the game entirely, while the GDDR5-equipped GeForce GT 630 cannot maintain a stable 30 frames per second (fps). To achieve ample gaming speeds at this low baseline, players require at least a Radeon HD 6570 DDR3 or a GeForce GT 640, whereas a GeForce GTX 650 Ti provides overkill performance for these minimal parameters. Pros and Cons Pros: The game demonstrates a relatively low frame time variance across most tested hardware at low configurations, indicating stable pacing between frames during standard delivery. Additionally, mainstream mid-range cards easily overpower the lowest settings, meaning budget-conscious players with older mid-tier GPUs...

The Sapphire Radeon HD 7730 review highlights AMD's entry-level Graphics Core Next (GCN) architecture, testing both a 1 GB GDDR5 version and a 2 GB DDR3 version to evaluate their gaming performance and value. In demanding titles like Metro: Last Light, neither card can achieve a smooth 30 frames per second at 1680x1050 resolution on medium settings, meaning the Radeon HD 7750 remains the baseline for acceptable performance. A key technical insight from the review is how GCN architecture handles lower memory bandwidth; the GCN-based 7730 is less severely bottlenecked when switching from GDDR5 to DDR3 compared to older VLIW-based models like the Radeon HD 6670, which serves as a promising indicator for the performance of upcoming Kaveri APUs that rely on system memory. The clear pros of the Radeon HD 7730 include the GDDR5 version's ability to outpace competing budget entry-level cards like the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 and the older Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5. Additionally, the DDR3 variant managed to barely edge out the GeForce GT 630 GDDR5 and the DDR3 version of the HD 6670. On the...

Crysis 3 Performance Analysis The review highlights that Crysis 3 is a heavily GPU-bound title that enforces a strict hardware baseline, completely refusing to launch on older graphics cards due to its mandatory DirectX 11 requirement. When tested at baseline low-detail settings at 1280x720, the game remains visually impressive but immediately crushes entry-level hardware like the Radeon HD 6450 and 6670 DDR3, rendering them unplayable. Stepping up the resolution to 1920x1080 severely intensifies the strain, requiring at least a Radeon HD 7700- or GeForce GTX 650-class graphics card to maintain a barely acceptable minimum target of 30 FPS. A recurring, unexplained performance dip at the end of the benchmark sequences further threatens smooth frame delivery across multiple tested platforms. Pros and Cons Pros Stunning Visuals: The game looks remarkably beautiful and highly detailed even when configured to its lowest preset settings. Low Frame Variance: Consecutive frame-time variance stays relatively low and stable for most mid-range cards at 1080p resolution. Cons Extreme Hardware Requirements: The software entirely locks out older or entry-level legacy hardware by mandating DirectX 11 support to run....

Based on the provided benchmark review of Far Cry 3, here is a summary highlighting the specific findings: Far Cry 3 is a highly demanding game where entry-level graphics cards fail to provide acceptable performance, even on the lowest settings. Benchmarks show that at an entry-level resolution of 1280x720 using the Low detail preset, budget GPUs like the Radeon HD 6450 and GeForce 210 DDR3 are completely insufficient for smooth gameplay. While the GeForce GT 630 GDDR5 and Radeon HD 6670 DDR3 manage to provide acceptable performance at 720p, they quickly become unplayable when the resolution is raised to 1920x1080. For players looking to enjoy the game at 1080p on low settings, the GeForce GTX 650 and Radeon HD 7750 represent the bare minimum hardware requirements. A major pro highlighted by the community and benchmarks is the game's effective scaling with multi-GPU setups, yielding an impressive performance increase of approximately 50% for dual-graphics configurations like SLI and Crossfire. Additionally, the game does not heavily scale with high-end Intel processors, meaning that more affordable CPUs perform comparably to expensive flagships. However,...

Based on the Tom's Hardware performance review, the single-player campaign of Medal of Honor: Warfighter proves to be highly GPU-dependent and demanding on graphics hardware. Even when testing at the baseline "Low" quality preset and a modest 1280x1024 resolution, entry-level discrete graphics cards like the Radeon HD 6450 and GeForce 210 fail completely to deliver playable frame rates. For budget-conscious gamers, a minimum hardware tier of a GeForce GT 630 GDDR5 or a Radeon HD 6670 DDR3 is required just to achieve barely playable performance at these minimum visual settings. Pros & Cons Pro: High visual scalability ensures that mainstream cards like the GeForce GT 650 and Radeon HD 7750 easily handle lower settings, offering plenty of headroom to push resolutions and detail settings higher for a true PC gaming experience. Con: Poor optimization for true entry-level hardware leaves legacy or low-end discrete GPUs completely unplayable, demanding a relatively high performance floor just to run the game at its lowest quality preset.