OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Razer Nabu X Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£45
Avg. price in US: ~$50
Form factor: wristband
Battery life: 6 days
Screen size: N/A inch

Razer Nabu X review. Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among fitness trackers and if it is worth buying.

5.7

Good

5.8

Good

5.4

Good

6.1
Swimming
Score components:
28.0%
9.0
ATM rating
24.0%
4.0
Open-water swim mode
18.0%
9.0
Waterproof depth rating
15.0%
4.0
GPS
15.0%
2.5
Battery life
5.3
Kids
Score components:
30.0%
2.5
Battery life
25.0%
6.9
Weight
20.0%
9.0
ATM rating
15.0%
0.0
Screen size
10.0%
10
Price

Best prices in UK

£?

Best rankings

Verdict

The Razer Nabu X is a screenless, budget-friendly fitness tracker that utilizes a three-LED notification system and a cylindrical vibration motor to alert users to incoming calls and app alerts. Built with a 3-axis accelerometer, it tracks steps, distance, calories burned, and sleep quality, featuring an IP67 water resistance rating and a battery life lasting between 5 to 7 days. Key advantages include its lightweight, comfortable silicone design, discreet profile, and a unique 'Hi-5' social feature for exchanging contact info with nearby users; however, it is held back by the lack of a real-time display, occasional unresponsiveness, and the requirement of a proprietary charging cable.

Technical Specifications of Razer Nabu X

Overall score

5.7

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.

When it matters: When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.

Health

5.4

Show more

Hide

Heart rate monitor

What it is: Sensor that measures heart rate in real time.

When it matters: When you care about live heart-rate feedback during training or resting trends outside of workouts.

Importance: HIGH

Resting heart rate

What it is: Measures heart rate while resting.

When it matters: When deeper insight into sleep quality, recovery, or overall readiness matters more than raw numbers alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Fast/slow heart rate alerts

What it is: Alerts for heart rates that are too fast or too slow.

When it matters: When you want the tracker to warn you about unusual changes instead of only logging them.

Importance: LOW

Irregular heart rate alerts

What it is: Warns of irregular or abnormal heart rhythms.

When it matters: When you want the tracker to warn you about unusual changes instead of only logging them.

Importance: LOW

Blood oxygen sensor

What it is: Sensor that measures blood oxygen saturation.

When it matters: When blood oxygen readings are part of the health picture you want from the device instead of relying on heart rate and step count alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Sports & Navigation

6.9

Show more

Hide

GPS

What it is: Satellite navigation capability for positioning and tracking.

When it matters: When you train outdoors and want pace, distance, and route tracking without depending completely on your phone.

Importance: LOW

Satellite systems supported

What it is: States which satellite navigation systems the device can use for positioning.

When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

Importance: LOW

GNSS bands supported

What it is: Number and type of GNSS frequency bands supported.

When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

Importance: LOW

Galileo support

What it is: Supports Galileo satellite system.

When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

Importance: LOW

Acquires GPS faster

What it is: Shows whether the tracker includes features that help it lock onto satellite positioning more quickly at the start of an outdoor activity.

When it matters: When you train outdoors and want stronger positioning, route guidance, and navigation independence from your phone.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Smart Features

7.2

Show more

Hide

Notifications

What it is: Delivers smartphone notifications on the watch.

When it matters: When getting calls, messages, and app alerts on your wrist saves you from checking your phone constantly.

Importance: MEDIUM

Vibrating alerts

What it is: Provides vibration-based notifications and alerts.

When it matters: When staying reachable from your wrist helps you avoid checking your phone constantly.

Importance: LOW

Call control

What it is: Allows control of phone calls from the device.

When it matters: When staying reachable from your wrist helps you avoid checking your phone constantly.

Importance: LOW

Call answering

What it is: Allows answering calls directly from the device.

When it matters: When staying reachable from your wrist helps you avoid checking your phone constantly.

Importance: LOW

Calendar sync

What it is: Syncs calendar events with the connected device.

When it matters: When staying reachable from your wrist helps you avoid checking your phone constantly.

Importance: LOW

Show more

App & Wellness

7.7

Show more

Hide

Activity reports

What it is: Generates summaries and insights from activity data.

When it matters: When you want the app to motivate you with goals, reports, coaching, or progress feedback over time.

Importance: LOW

Goal setting

What it is: Allows setting personal fitness or activity goals.

When it matters: When you want the app to motivate you with goals, reports, coaching, or progress feedback over time.

Importance: LOW

Achievements

What it is: Rewards progress and completed milestones.

When it matters: When you want the app to motivate you with goals, reports, coaching, or progress feedback over time.

Importance: LOW

?

Inactivity alerts

What it is: Alerts when the user has been inactive for too long.

When it matters: When account rules, app costs, exports, or software flexibility affect whether the ecosystem suits you long term.

Importance: LOW

Coaching

What it is: Provides guided training and workout advice.

When it matters: When you want the app to motivate you with goals, reports, coaching, or progress feedback over time.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Connectivity

7.3

Show more

Hide

Bluetooth version

What it is: Version of Bluetooth supported by the device.

When it matters: When wireless stability, pairing quality, and long-term phone compatibility matter more than Bluetooth being a simple checkbox.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=5.0

Maximum Bluetooth range

What it is: States the maximum Bluetooth connection range supported under normal conditions.

When it matters: When compatibility with your phone, computer, accessories, or wireless setup affects how well the tracker fits into your ecosystem.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=10 m

NFC

What it is: Supports near-field communication for contactless features.

When it matters: When compatibility with your phone, computer, accessories, or wireless setup affects how well the tracker fits into your ecosystem.

Importance: LOW

Wi-Fi connectivity

What it is: Connects to wireless internet networks.

When it matters: When the tracker should sync, update, or download data directly without always routing everything through the phone.

Importance: LOW

?

Wi-Fi version

What it is: Version of Wi-Fi standard supported.

When it matters: When compatibility with your phone, computer, accessories, or wireless setup affects how well the tracker fits into your ecosystem.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Battery

4.8

Show more

Hide

Battery life

What it is: Total time the battery lasts on a full charge.

When it matters: When the tracker needs to last through travel, sleep tracking, long workouts, or several days between charges.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >5 days

Battery life with GPS on

What it is: Battery duration when GPS tracking is active.

When it matters: When you want fewer charging breaks during travel, longer workouts, sleep tracking, or continuous use.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=8 hours

N/A

Battery life in training mode

What it is: Battery duration during active training sessions.

When it matters: When you want fewer charging breaks during travel, longer workouts, sleep tracking, or continuous use.

Importance: LOW

?

Battery life in power-saving mode

What it is: Battery duration when using power-saving mode.

When it matters: When you want fewer charging breaks during travel, longer workouts, sleep tracking, or continuous use.

Importance: LOW

?

Battery capacity

What it is: Energy storage capacity of the battery.

When it matters: When you want rough battery context behind the runtime claim instead of trusting the advertised hours alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=100 mAh

?

Show more

Display

4.0

Show more

Hide

Display

What it is: Main interface showing information and metrics.

When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

Importance: LOW

Screen size

What it is: Physical size of the device’s display measured diagonally.

When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A

Display type

What it is: Technology used for the screen, such as AMOLED or LCD.

When it matters: When display technology affects contrast, color quality, power efficiency, or how premium the screen feels.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A

Screen resolution

What it is: Total number of pixels displayed on the screen.

When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A

Pixel density

What it is: Number of pixels per inch determining screen sharpness.

When it matters: When easier reading at a glance and better day-to-day screen comfort matter to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=280 ppi

N/A

Show more

Design & Durability

7.3

Show more

Hide

Form factor

What it is: Overall physical design and shape.

When it matters: When materials, shape, and build details affect comfort, durability, or how discreet the device feels.

Importance: LOW

wristband

Hybrid design

What it is: Combines analog and digital display elements.

When it matters: When materials, shape, and build details affect comfort, durability, or how discreet the device feels.

Importance: LOW

Designed for kids

What it is: Indicates whether the fitness tracker is explicitly designed for children, with child-focused sizing, branding, safety limits, or kid-oriented activity features.

When it matters: This matters when you want a tracker that is genuinely child-focused rather than just a smaller adult model.

Importance: LOW

Replaceable watch band

What it is: Ability to replace the wristband with other styles.

When it matters: When strap comfort, fit, or the ability to swap bands matters for sport, style, or replacement.

Importance: LOW

Band width

What it is: Width of the strap where it connects to the watch.

When it matters: When strap comfort, fit, or the ability to swap bands matters for sport, style, or replacement.

Importance: LOW

15 mm

Show more

Razer Nabu X vs the average fitness tracker

Why is Razer Nabu X better than the average fitness tracker?

Show more

Hide

Gesture control
Razer Nabu X supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
Handshake and shake-dismiss gestures.
What it is: Allows control through hand or wrist gestures.
When it matters: When buttons, crowns, gestures, or direct controls affect how quickly you can use the device mid-activity.
Importance: LOW
Razer Nabu X supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
1 mm thinner design
Razer Nabu X is thinner than the average fitness tracker (10 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
What it is: Total depth of the watch case.
When it matters: When overall size, thickness, or weight affects comfort during all-day wear, sleep, or exercise.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <10 mm
Razer Nabu X is thinner than the average fitness tracker (10 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.10 mm vs 11 mm
Gesture control
Razer Nabu X supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
1 mm thinner design
Razer Nabu X is thinner than the average fitness tracker (10 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.

Design & Durability

Why is Razer Nabu X worse than the average fitness tracker?

Show more

Hide

No heart rate monitoring
Razer Nabu X does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
No automatic activity detection
Razer Nabu X does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.3% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
No exercise tagging
Razer Nabu X does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.8% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
4 days shorter battery life
Razer Nabu X has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (6 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
source range 5-7 days.
0.5 hours longer charging time
Razer Nabu X has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
No display
Razer Nabu X does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Uses indicator lights instead of a full display.
No stopwatch
Razer Nabu X does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
Limited ip rating
Razer Nabu X has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
No replaceable watch band
Razer Nabu X does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.7% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
8.8% heavier
Razer Nabu X is heavier than the average fitness tracker (27.2 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
Razer Nabu X has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
No weight tracking
Razer Nabu X does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81.3% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
Only a static profile weight field is supported, not ongoing weight logs.
No inactivity alerts
Razer Nabu X does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Not compatible with smart scales
Razer Nabu X is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 67% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
No BMI tracking
Razer Nabu X does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
No heart rate monitoring
Razer Nabu X does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
What it is: Sensor that measures heart rate in real time.
When it matters: When you care about live heart-rate feedback during training or resting trends outside of workouts.
Importance: HIGH
Razer Nabu X does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
No automatic activity detection
Razer Nabu X does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.3% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
What it is: Automatically recognizes and records physical activities.
When it matters: When you want common workouts captured even on days when you forget to start tracking manually.
Importance: MEDIUM
Razer Nabu X does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.3% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
4 days shorter battery life
Razer Nabu X has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (6 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
source range 5-7 days.
What it is: Total time the battery lasts on a full charge.
When it matters: When the tracker needs to last through travel, sleep tracking, long workouts, or several days between charges.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5 days
Razer Nabu X has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (6 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.6 days vs 10 days
No exercise tagging
Razer Nabu X does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.8% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
What it is: Allows tagging or categorization of specific exercises.
When it matters: When you want the tracker to capture more workouts and training details with less manual effort.
Importance: LOW
Razer Nabu X does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.8% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
0.5 hours longer charging time
Razer Nabu X has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
What it is: Time required for a full charge.
When it matters: When short charging windows matter and you do not want the tracker off your wrist for too long.
Importance: MEDIUM
Razer Nabu X has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.2 hours vs 1.5 hours
No weight tracking
Razer Nabu X does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81.3% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
Only a static profile weight field is supported, not ongoing weight logs.
What it is: Records body weight measurements.
When it matters: When tracking daily habits and body trends beyond workouts matters to your health routine.
Importance: LOW
Razer Nabu X does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81.3% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
Limited ip rating
Razer Nabu X has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
What it is: Dust and water resistance classification according to IP standards.
When it matters: When you plan to swim, shower, dive, or use the tracker regularly around water.
Importance: LOW
Razer Nabu X has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.IP67 vs IP68
No inactivity alerts
Razer Nabu X does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
What it is: Alerts when the user has been inactive for too long.
When it matters: When account rules, app costs, exports, or software flexibility affect whether the ecosystem suits you long term.
Importance: LOW
Razer Nabu X does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.

Design & Durability

Graphic comparison of Razer Nabu X and

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about Razer Nabu X?

Highly comfortable, lightweight, and unobtrusive for all-day wear
Very affordable entry-level price point
Solid battery life, typically lasting between 5 to 7 days
IP67 water resistance allows for use in showers or rain
Discrete design with customizable LED notification colors
Effective silent vibration alarm for waking up without disturbing others

What customers dislike about Razer Nabu X?

Lack of a screen makes notifications difficult to differentiate at a glance
Rubber strap material is a magnet for dust, lint, and hair
Double-tap gesture for checking progress is often unresponsive or finicky
Requires multiple separate apps (Utility and Fitness) to operate fully
Step and sleep tracking can be inconsistent or inaccurate compared to rivals
Uses a proprietary charging cable rather than standard micro-USB
Promised 'social' and 'gaming' features were often buggy or under-delivered
Software support and official updates have long since been discontinued

Expert reviews

memeburn.com

12/11/2015

Razer Nabu X smartband review: more burnable than wearable

The Memeburn review delivers a scathing 4/10 verdict on the Razer Nabu X smartband, concluding that its poor software and screenless design fail to make life any easier. The reviewer heavily criticizes the hardware ergonomics, highlighting a cheap-looking black silicone band that acts as a magnet for lint and utilizes an annoying pop-pin clasp that makes the tracker highly...Read more

gizmodo.com

11/05/2015

Razer Nabu X Review: Fit for Fitness, Not for Gaming - Gizmodo

The Razer Nabu X is a $50 screenless, hypoallergenic silicone fitness tracker that prioritizes basic health metrics over complex gaming features. On the positive side, the device is highly affordable, comfortable to wear, and delivers an impressive battery life that easily lasts over a week on a single charge. It accurately tracks steps, logs sleep data, features a useful silent...Read more

uk.pcmag.com

21/05/2015

Razer Nabu X - PCMag UK

The PCMag review positions the Razer Nabu X as a budget-friendly, $50 entry-level fitness tracker that ultimately feels more like an unfinished prototype than a polished consumer product. On the positive side, the smartband features a comfortable, one-size-fits-all hypoallergenic rubber silicone design and boasts an impressive IP67 water resistance rating, allowing it to survive...Read more

pcmag.com

21/05/2015

Razer Nabu X Review - PCMag

The PCMag review characterizes the $50 Razer Nabu X as an affordable, comfortable, and decent basic fitness tracker for monitoring steps and calories. Despite its comfortable rubber design, the device is criticized for feeling like an unfinished prototype, characterized by an unresponsive interface, a confusing LED notification system, and a lack of promised, unique social features.

techradar.com

14/05/2015

Razer Nabu X review | TechRadar

The Razer Nabu X is an entry-level, $50 (£45, about AU$61.79) fitness tracker specifically aimed at gamers who want a discrete, non-distracting wearable on their wrist. Structurally, the device circumvents the rigid design flaws of competitors like the Jawbone UP24 and the annoying clasps of Fitbit bands. Instead, it features an interchangeable sensor module nestled within a highly...Read more

theverge.com

15/05/2015

Razer Nabu X smartband review - The Verge

The Verge’s review of the $50 Razer Nabu X concludes that the entry-level fitness tracker, while affordable, fails to deliver a satisfying experience due to significant design and functional flaws. Positive aspects include a comfortable, secure silicone band, excellent one-week battery life, and reliable water resistance. However, the tracker suffers from a casing that attracts...Read more

wareable.com

09/02/2015

Razer Nabu X review - Wareable

The Wareable review of the Razer Nabu X characterizes the budget tracker as a comfortable, sleek device with good battery life, a lightweight design, and a responsive tap-to-activate panel. It replaces an OLED screen with three customizable LEDs for discreet notifications, offering a simplified, unobtrusive, and affordable wearable experience. However, the review finds the Nabu X to...Read more

digitaltrends.com

23/08/2019

Razer Nabu X review - Digital Trends

The Razer Nabu X is a lightweight, comfortable, and budget-friendly fitness tracker retailing at $50, designed primarily for casual exercisers and gamers rather than marathon runners. Its physical design features a slim, non-intrusive silicone strap with a removable tracker module that can easily be worn 24 hours a day without causing excessive sweating. On the positive side, the...Read more

frandroid.com

17/05/2015

Razer Nabu X review: well-designed but too buggy

Review Overview The Razer Nabu X is a minimalist smart band that scores a low 4/10 due to severe performance issues despite its good physical design. On the positive side, the tracker is lightweight, highly comfortable to wear, discreet, and boasts a solid 5-day battery life that recharges in just 20 minutes. It provides universal compatibility with both Android and iOS devices,...Read more

igen.fr

30/08/2015

Razer Nabu X smartband review

The Razer Nabu X is a budget-friendly, lightweight, and comfortable fitness tracker featuring a detachable, washable silicone band and a reliable, strong vibration motor for notifications. Priced at €50, this device offers a discreet option for entering the wearable market with stable Bluetooth connectivity. 01 However, the lack of an OLED screen, replaced by confusing, customizable...Read more

01net.com

02/07/2015

Review: Razer Nabu X, a temperamental band and an inaccurate tracker

The 01net review paints the Razer Nabu X as a highly flawed smartband that struggles significantly with its primary functions. Retailing at 60 euros, the device features a split design consisting of a lightweight (20 grams), water-resistant (IP67) rubber strap and a removable electronic module. On the positive side, the reviewer praises its comfort, secure closure clasp, and...Read more

lesnumeriques.com

29/08/2015

Razer Nabu X Review: Low Price, Great Ideas

Razer Nabu X Review Summary The Razer Nabu X is a budget-friendly fitness tracker from the gaming brand that scored 3 out of 5 stars due to its mixture of clever ideas and software shortcomings. On the positive side, the screenless band offers solid 5-day battery life with fast 30-minute charging and features an IP67 waterproof design. Its standout feature is a highly effective,...Read more

elgraficotam.com.mx

10/02/2016

Reviewing the Razer Nabu X Smartband", "Our Review of the Razer Nabu X Smart Wristband", "We Review the Razer Nabu X Smart Band

The review of the Razer Nabu X smartband by Periódico El Gráfico Tamaulipas describes the device as a low-cost, simplified version of the original Nabu tracker. The reviewer notes several key advantages, starting with its highly competitive price of $70, which makes it accessible for basic fitness tracking, goal management, and sleep monitoring. Physically, the band's rubber body is...Read more

elchapuzasinformatico.com

31/08/2015

Razer Nabu X Review - El Chapuzas Informático

The El Chapuzas Informático review highlights the Razer Nabu X as an affordable, screenless fitness tracker featuring a comfortable, hypoallergenic silicone band and a 5-to-7-day battery life. Praised for its lightweight design and IP67 water resistance, it utilizes a three-LED notification system paired with a customizable app for activity tracking and notifications. However, the...Read more

tomshw.it

05/08/2015

Razer Nabu X Review, the budget-friendly and social fitness tracker

Pros and Cons Pros: Highly affordable pricing, comfortable and discreet design, solid IP67 water resistance, reliable smartphone vibration alerts, and an excellent automatic sleep-tracking system. Cons: Slow data synchronization speeds with the companion apps, brief half-second LED flash durations for notifications, a lack of individual workout recording, and limited, unreliable...Read more

androidiani.com

10/06/2015

Razer Nabu X: The Review", "Razer Nabu X Review

The Androidiani review describes the Razer Nabu X as a budget-friendly, button-free fitness tracker featuring a, interchangeable module, a hypoallergenic silicone band, and three RGB LED notifications. Key advantages highlighted include robust IP67 water/dust resistance, 5 to 7 days of battery life, and compatibility with Android 4.3 and later devices. YouTube· Conversely, the...Read more

wired.it

03/06/2015

Nabu X, testing Razer's smartband - Wired Italia

The Razer Nabu X is a budget-friendly fitness tracker and smartband that ditches its predecessor's OLED screen in favor of three simple LED notification lights. On the positive side, the device features a secure rubber strap that stays firmly on the wrist day and night, and its battery easily lasts for about a week on a single charge. Additionally, it boasts a highly powerful...Read more

tuttoandroid.net

15/04/2015

Razer Nabu X Review - TuttoAndroid

The Razer Nabu X is a simple, sports-oriented smartband that relies on a flexible plastic strap containing a small, detachable tracking sensor module. Priced at €59.99, it completely removes the screen found on its predecessor to prioritize lower manufacturing costs and achieve a solid battery life of 5 to 7 days on a single 1.5-hour charge. Its core strengths lie in its hardware...Read more

techtesters.eu

21/06/2015

Razer Nabu X review

The Razer Nabu X is an affordable entry-level smartband and fitness tracker designed to replace its OLED-equipped predecessor with a simpler, screenless alternative. The primary pros of the device highlight its relatively soft price point, costing around €40 in Germany or €50 to €60 in the Dutch market, making it highly accessible compared to higher-end wearables. Additionally, it...Read more

xgn.nl

13/06/2015

Razer Nabu X smartband review - Missing functionality

The Razer Nabu X is a budget-friendly, entry-level smartband that uses a no-screen design with color-coded LED alerts for notifications. It features impressive seven-day battery life, IP67-rated water resistance, and a comfortable design that tracks steps, distance, calories, and sleep. However, the device is plagued by a screenless design that necessitates constant phone...Read more

tweakers.net

21/10/2016

Thorough and independent Razer Nabu X reviews", "Razer Nabu X smartband review - Lacks functionality", "Gearview: Razer Nabu X", "Razer Nabu X review:...

The Razer Nabu X is praised for its comfortable, lightweight design and a reliable week-long battery life, making it a functional, low-profile entry-level smartband. However, the device lacks a screen, relying solely on customizable LED lights for notifications, and omits a heart rate monitor, limiting its appeal for serious fitness tracking. Users reported a mediocre app...Read more

gadgetgear.nl

13/09/2015

Review: Razer Nabu X

The GadgetGear.nl review characterizes the Razer Nabu X as a durable, budget-friendly smartband featuring quick Bluetooth synchronization, long battery life, and water resistance suitable for active use. It offers basic, customizable, three-LED, and vibration-based notifications, though it lacks an informative screen. YouTube· However, the review highlights significant drawbacks,...Read more

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Xiaomi Smart Band 10

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Samsung Galaxy FIT2

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Smart Band 9

Fitness trackers

Morepro Fitness Tracker V19

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Smart Band 8

Fitness trackers

Samsung Galaxy FIT3

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Smart Band 7 Pro

Fitness trackers

Compare Razer Nabu X with

Compare