OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0
Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0

GAOMON PD1560 Review | 66 Data compared

Avg. price:~£270Type:pen displayActive drawing area:66626 mm²Resolution:1920x1080Pen pressure levels:8192Report rate:233 RPS

GAOMON PD1560 Review: Compare 66 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drawing tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drawing tablet's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drawing tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

90%

6.3

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

▼Worse than 70% of drawing-tablets
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Drawing tablets category across these key areas: Form Factor, Display & Color, Pen & Input, Connectivity, Controls & Extras.
When it matters
When you want to compare drawing tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

50%

7.0

Pen & Input

40%

5.4

Display & Color

4%

6.7

Form Factor

3%

5.6

Connectivity

3%

7.2

Controls & Extras

▼Worse than 80% of drawing-tablets
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on 7,735 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 82% of drawing-tablets
  • gaomon-pd1560
  • gaomon-pd1560
  • gaomon-pd1560
  • gaomon-pd1560
  • gaomon-pd1560
  • gaomon-pd1560
  • gaomon-pd1560
  • gaomon-pd1560
  • gaomon-pd1560
gaomon-pd1560
gaomon-pd1560
gaomon-pd1560
gaomon-pd1560
gaomon-pd1560
gaomon-pd1560
gaomon-pd1560
gaomon-pd1560
gaomon-pd1560

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drawing tablet GAOMON PD1560

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Drawing tablets category across these key areas: Form Factor, Display & Color, Pen & Input, Connectivity, Controls & Extras.
When it matters
When you want to compare drawing tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

50%

7.0

Pen & Input

40%

5.4

Display & Color

4%

6.7

Form Factor

3%

5.6

Connectivity

3%

7.2

Controls & Extras

6.3
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on 7,735 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Popularity:
GAOMON PD1560 has a popularity score of 9.1 points, which is higher than 82% of drawing tablets.
9.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drawing tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drawing tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

9.1

Price

7.3
Type
pen display
Display
yes
Display
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This drawing tablet has a display. This feature is present on 47.9% of drawing tablets.
Compatibility
Windows / macOS / Linux
Wireless capability
no
Wireless capability
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This drawing tablet does not support wireless use. 18.6% of drawing tablets support wireless use.
Weight
1,580 g
Weight
1,580 g
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
This drawing tablet weighs 1,580 g, heavier than 76.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 0.5% of drawing tablets.
Tablet only; separate stand excluded.
Show more
Active drawing area
66,626 mm²
Active drawing area
66,626 mm²
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
This drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 66,626 mm², larger than that of 66.7% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 4.2% of drawing tablets.
344.16 x 193.59 mm.
Screen size
15.6 inch
Screen size
15.6 inch
▼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <11.6 inch – >23.8 inch
This drawing tablet has a screen size of 15.6 inch, larger than that of 34.4% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 21.5% of drawing tablets.
Resolution
1920x1080
Resolution
1920x1080
▲ Better than 53% of models
This drawing tablet has a display resolution of 1920x1080, higher than that of 52.6% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of drawing tablets.
Pixel density
141 ppi
Pixel density
141 ppi
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
This drawing tablet has a pixel density of 141 ppi, lower than that of 62.4% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 12.9% of drawing tablets.
Typical brightness
220 nits
Typical brightness
220 nits
▼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
This drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 220 nits, lower than that of 57.1% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 34.1% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Stylus included
yes
Stylus included
yes
Category Benchmark
This drawing tablet comes with a stylus. This feature is present on 100% of drawing tablets.
Pen technology
EMR (battery-powered)
Pen technology
EMR (battery-powered)
▼ Worse than 96% of models
This drawing tablet uses EMR (battery-powered) pen technology, less advanced than that of 95.9% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 3.6% of drawing tablets.
Rechargeable pen.
Pen pressure levels
8,192
Pen pressure levels
8,192
▼ Worse than 15% of models
Market range: <8.2k – >16.4k
This drawing tablet supports 8,192 pen pressure levels, more than 9.3% of drawing tablets and equal to 75.8% of drawing tablets.
Pen resolution
5,080 LPI
Pen resolution
5,080 LPI
▲ Better than 6% of models
Market range: <5.1k LPI – >5.1k LPI
This drawing tablet supports a pen resolution of 5,080 LPI, higher than that of 5.7% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 94.3% of drawing tablets.
Report rate
233 RPS
Report rate
233 RPS
▼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
This drawing tablet has a report rate of 233 RPS, higher than that of 45.1% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 6% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 13% of models
This drawing tablet does not support Bluetooth. 13.1% of drawing tablets support Bluetooth.
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports
0
▼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports, fewer than 17.4% of drawing tablets and equal to 82.6% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
0
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports, fewer than 51.8% of drawing tablets and equal to 48.2% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports
0
▼ Worse than 1% of models
Market range: <0 – >0
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports, fewer than 1.1% of drawing tablets and equal to 99% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports
0
▼ Worse than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >0
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports, fewer than 1.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 98.4% of drawing tablets.
Show more
N. of express keys
10
N. of express keys
10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Market range: <0 – >10
This drawing tablet has 10 express keys, more than 86.3% of drawing tablets and equal to 4.7% of drawing tablets.
N. of dials
0
N. of dials
0
▼ Worse than 22% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This drawing tablet has 0 dials, fewer than 21.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 78.4% of drawing tablets.
Stand included
yes
Stand included
yes
▲ Better than 71% of models
This drawing tablet comes with a stand. This feature is present on 29.5% of drawing tablets.
Fold-out legs
no
Fold-out legs
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This drawing tablet does not have fold-out legs. 7.3% of drawing tablets have fold-out legs.
Pen stand included
yes
Pen stand included
yes
▲ Better than 41% of models
This drawing tablet comes with a pen stand. This feature is present on 58.9% of drawing tablets.
Pen holder stores spare nibs.
Show more

GAOMON PD1560 vs the average drawing tablet

246810TotalForm FactorDisplay & ColorPen & InputConnectivityControls & Extras
  • 1 % wider sRGB coverage
    sRGB coverage
    100 %
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <96 % – >100 %
    This drawing tablet covers more sRGB than the average drawing tablet (100 % vs 99 %). The average drawing tablet covers 99 % of sRGB.
    100 % vs 99 %
  • Anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This drawing tablet has an anti-reflection coating, while the average drawing tablet does not. 47.7% of drawing tablets have an anti-reflection coating.
  • Integrated display
    Display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This drawing tablet has a display, while the average drawing tablet does not. 48.2% of drawing tablets have a display.
  • 25,862 mm² larger work area
    Active drawing area
    66,626 mm²
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
    This drawing tablet has a larger active drawing area than the average drawing tablet (66626 mm² vs 40764 mm²). The average drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 40764 mm².
    344.16 x 193.59 mm.
    66,626 mm² vs 40,764 mm²
  • 4 more express keys
    N. of express keys
    10
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This drawing tablet has more express keys than the average drawing tablet (10 vs 6). The average drawing tablet has 6 express keys.
    10 vs 6
  • 1 more HDMI ports
    HDMI ports
    1
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This drawing tablet has more HDMI ports than the average drawing tablet (1 vs 0). The average drawing tablet has 0 HDMI ports.
    1 vs 0
  • Stand included
    Stand included
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This drawing tablet comes with a stand, while the average drawing tablet does not. 29.8% of drawing tablets come with a stand.
  • 0.3 m longer cable
    Cable length
    1.8 m
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >1.8 m
    This drawing tablet has a longer cable than the average drawing tablet (1.8 m vs 1.5 m). The average drawing tablet has a cable length of 1.5 m.
    1.8 m vs 1.5 m
  • 11.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GAOMON PD1560
    the average drawing tablet
    GAOMON PD1560 has a higher user score than the average drawing tablet (8.93 vs 8.000).
    8.93 vs 8
  • 47.5% more popular
    GAOMON PD1560 has a higher popularity than the average drawing tablet (9.08 vs 6.2).
    9.08 vs 6.16
  • Integrated display
    Display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This drawing tablet has a display, while the average drawing tablet does not. 48.2% of drawing tablets have a display.
  • 1 % wider sRGB coverage
    sRGB coverage
    100 %
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <96 % – >100 %
    This drawing tablet covers more sRGB than the average drawing tablet (100 % vs 99 %). The average drawing tablet covers 99 % of sRGB.
    100 % vs 99 %
  • Anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This drawing tablet has an anti-reflection coating, while the average drawing tablet does not. 47.7% of drawing tablets have an anti-reflection coating.
  • 25,862 mm² larger work area
    Active drawing area
    66,626 mm²
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
    This drawing tablet has a larger active drawing area than the average drawing tablet (66626 mm² vs 40764 mm²). The average drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 40764 mm².
    344.16 x 193.59 mm.
    66,626 mm² vs 40,764 mm²
  • 1 more HDMI ports
    HDMI ports
    1
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This drawing tablet has more HDMI ports than the average drawing tablet (1 vs 0). The average drawing tablet has 0 HDMI ports.
    1 vs 0
  • 0.3 m longer cable
    Cable length
    1.8 m
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >1.8 m
    This drawing tablet has a longer cable than the average drawing tablet (1.8 m vs 1.5 m). The average drawing tablet has a cable length of 1.5 m.
    1.8 m vs 1.5 m
  • 4 more express keys
    N. of express keys
    10
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This drawing tablet has more express keys than the average drawing tablet (10 vs 6). The average drawing tablet has 6 express keys.
    10 vs 6
  • Stand included
    Stand included
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This drawing tablet comes with a stand, while the average drawing tablet does not. 29.8% of drawing tablets come with a stand.
  • Less advanced pen technology
    Pen technology
    EMR (battery-powered)
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drawing tablet uses less advanced pen technology than the average drawing tablet (EMR (battery-powered) vs EMR (battery-free)). The average drawing tablet uses EMR (battery-free) pen technology.
    Rechargeable pen.
    EMR (battery-powered) vs EMR (battery-free)
  • 20 % narrower Adobe RGB coverage
    Adobe RGB coverage
    72 %
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <72 % – >99 %
    This drawing tablet covers less Adobe RGB than the average drawing tablet (72 % vs 92 %). The average drawing tablet covers 92 % of Adobe RGB.
    72 % vs 92 %
  • 2 fewer nibs included
    N. of nibs included
    8
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <6 – >20
    This drawing tablet includes fewer replacement nibs than the average drawing tablet (8 vs 10). The average drawing tablet includes 10 replacement nibs.
    8 vs 10
  • 25% heavier pen
    Pen weight
    16.5 g
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <10 g – >16 g
    This drawing tablet includes a heavier pen than the average drawing tablet (16.5 g vs 13.2 g). The average drawing tablet pen weighs 13.2 g.
    16.5 g vs 13.2 g
  • 11 ms slower response
    Response time
    25 ms
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <8 ms – >25 ms
    This drawing tablet has a slower response time than the average drawing tablet (25 ms vs 14 ms). The average drawing tablet has a response time of 14 ms.
    25 ms vs 14 ms
  • 30 nits dimmer display
    Typical brightness
    220 nits
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
    This drawing tablet has lower typical brightness than the average drawing tablet (220 nits vs 250 nits). The average drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 250 nits.
    220 nits vs 250 nits
  • 15.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    141 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
    This drawing tablet has a lower pixel density than the average drawing tablet (141 ppi vs 166 ppi). The average drawing tablet has a pixel density of 166 ppi.
    141 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • 1 fewer USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 ports
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
    0
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >2
    This drawing tablet has fewer USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports than the average drawing tablet (0 vs 1). The average drawing tablet has 1 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports.
    0 vs 1
  • 3.7% worse value for money
    GAOMON PD1560 has a lower value-for-money score than the average drawing tablet (7.33 vs 7.6).
    7.33 vs 7.6
  • 68.8% more expensive
    GAOMON PD1560 is more expensive than the average drawing tablet (£270 vs £160).
    £270 vs £160
  • Older release
    Release date
    2017
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drawing tablet was released earlier than the average drawing tablet.
    2,017 vs 2,021
  • 2.14x heavier design
    Weight
    1,580 g
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
    This drawing tablet is heavier than the average drawing tablet (1580 g vs 740 g). The average drawing tablet weighs 740 g.
    Tablet only; separate stand excluded.
    1,580 g vs 740 g
  • 95.6 mm bulkier body
    Width
    452.4 mm
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <211 mm – >567 mm
    This drawing tablet is wider than the average drawing tablet (452.4 mm vs 356.8 mm). The average drawing tablet is 356.8 mm wide.
    452.4 mm vs 356.8 mm
  • 9 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    19.5 mm
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <7.5 mm – >26 mm
    This drawing tablet is thicker than the average drawing tablet (19.5 mm vs 10.5 mm). The average drawing tablet is 10.5 mm thick.
    19.5 mm vs 10.5 mm
  • 29 mm taller body
    Height
    252 mm
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <139.2 mm – >359 mm
    This drawing tablet is taller than the average drawing tablet (252 mm vs 223 mm). The average drawing tablet is 223 mm tall.
    252 mm vs 223 mm
  • 20 % narrower Adobe RGB coverage
    Adobe RGB coverage
    72 %
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <72 % – >99 %
    This drawing tablet covers less Adobe RGB than the average drawing tablet (72 % vs 92 %). The average drawing tablet covers 92 % of Adobe RGB.
    72 % vs 92 %
  • 11 ms slower response
    Response time
    25 ms
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <8 ms – >25 ms
    This drawing tablet has a slower response time than the average drawing tablet (25 ms vs 14 ms). The average drawing tablet has a response time of 14 ms.
    25 ms vs 14 ms
  • 30 nits dimmer display
    Typical brightness
    220 nits
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
    This drawing tablet has lower typical brightness than the average drawing tablet (220 nits vs 250 nits). The average drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 250 nits.
    220 nits vs 250 nits
  • 15.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    141 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
    This drawing tablet has a lower pixel density than the average drawing tablet (141 ppi vs 166 ppi). The average drawing tablet has a pixel density of 166 ppi.
    141 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • 2 bit lower color depth
    Bit depth
    6 bit
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <8 bit – >10 bit
    This drawing tablet has a lower color depth than the average drawing tablet (6 bit vs 8 bit). The average drawing tablet has a color depth of 8 bit.
    6 bit vs 8 bit
  • Less advanced pen technology
    Pen technology
    EMR (battery-powered)
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drawing tablet uses less advanced pen technology than the average drawing tablet (EMR (battery-powered) vs EMR (battery-free)). The average drawing tablet uses EMR (battery-free) pen technology.
    Rechargeable pen.
    EMR (battery-powered) vs EMR (battery-free)
  • 2 fewer nibs included
    N. of nibs included
    8
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <6 – >20
    This drawing tablet includes fewer replacement nibs than the average drawing tablet (8 vs 10). The average drawing tablet includes 10 replacement nibs.
    8 vs 10
  • 25% heavier pen
    Pen weight
    16.5 g
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <10 g – >16 g
    This drawing tablet includes a heavier pen than the average drawing tablet (16.5 g vs 13.2 g). The average drawing tablet pen weighs 13.2 g.
    16.5 g vs 13.2 g
  • 1 fewer USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 ports
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
    0
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >2
    This drawing tablet has fewer USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports than the average drawing tablet (0 vs 1). The average drawing tablet has 1 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
airbrush-video.de
17/11/2017
Summary of the review
Gaomon PD1560 Pen Display Review
(Translated)Show original
T
tablettegraphique.fr
02/01/2018
Summary of the review
GAOMON PD1560 Review & Testing - Drawing Tablet
(Translated)Show original
T
tablette-graphique.net
20/02/2020
Summary of the review
Gaomon PD1560 Review - An Overview of This Excellent Model
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 7,735 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about GAOMON PD1560

  • Exceptional value for the price, often cited as a more affordable alternative to Wacom Cintiq models.
  • High pressure sensitivity with 8,192 levels, providing smooth and responsive line control.
  • Includes a high-quality, adjustable stand that is stable and reduces wrist fatigue.
  • Generous accessory bundle often including a drawing glove, screen protector, and carrying case.
  • Strong customer support, with many users reporting proactive and helpful post-purchase assistance.
  • Good screen quality with a 1080p IPS display that offers decent color accuracy and viewing angles.

What we don't like about GAOMON PD1560

  • Uses an older rechargeable pen design that requires a separate USB cable to charge, rather than being battery-free.
  • Noticeable parallax (the gap between the pen tip and the cursor) that requires frequent software calibration.
  • Cable management can be cluttered due to a thick 3-in-1 multi-cable that may be too short for some desk setups.
  • The pre-applied or included screen protector is notoriously difficult to apply without trapping dust or air bubbles.
  • Drivers can be finicky to install, particularly on Mac OS or when conflicting with previous tablet drivers.
  • The 10 express keys on the side are occasionally described as feeling wobbly or inexpensive in build.

Verdict

The Gaomon PD1560 is a budget-friendly 15.6-inch pen display featuring a Full HD 1920x1080 IPS screen with a 72% NTSC color gamut and 10 customizable express keys. It includes a rechargeable digital pen with 8,192 levels of pressure sensitivity and 5,080 LPI resolution, supported by an adjustable stand for ergonomic positioning. Main pros include its exceptional value for money, generous accessory package (drawing glove, carrying case, and extra nibs), and vibrant display colors. However, notable cons include significant parallax between the pen tip and cursor, the lack of pen tilt support, and a non-laminated screen that can feel less direct than premium models.

Compare GAOMON PD1560 with other products in the Drawing tablets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GAOMON PD1560 and other products in the Drawing tablets category

No results found