OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£420RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:9.7 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon S3

Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

90%

4.6

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

▼Worse than 95% of tablets
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

5.1

Display

16%

4.2

Camera

14%

4.0

Battery

12%

5.3

Connectivity

8%

4.1

Software & Features

5%

4.0

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 98% of tablets
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

▼Worse than 73% of tablets
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
  • hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb
hp-touchpad-32gb-1gb-32gb

Best prices

    N/A~ £420

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
1GB + 16GBCheck price
Other versions:
1GB + 32GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

5.1

Display

16%

4.2

Camera

14%

4.0

Battery

12%

5.3

Connectivity

8%

4.1

Software & Features

5%

4.0

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

4.6
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

7.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Popularity:
Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) has a user popularity of 7.5 points, which is lower than 73.6% of Tablets.
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

60%

4.9

Overall score

40%

8.3

Price

5.9
RAM capacity
1 GB
RAM capacity
1 GB
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
45 nm
Process node
45 nm
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 45 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 94.9% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3
▼ Worse than 76% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 76.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1024×768
Screen resolution
1024×768
▼ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1024×768 which is lower than that of 90.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
132 ppi
Pixel density
132 ppi
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 132 ppi which is lower than that of 97.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.9% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
▲ Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
▼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.3 MP which is lower than in 80.8% of tablets and equal to that in 5.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
6,300 mAh
Battery capacity
6,300 mAh
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,300 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 52.5% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Battery life
8 hours
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
Wireless charging
yes
Wireless charging
yes
★ Better than 99% of models
This tablet supports wireless charging. 98.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
▼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
GPS
no
▼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
webOS
Operating system
webOS
▼ Worse than 99% of models
This tablet uses the webOS operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 99.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
▼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
740 g
Weight
740 g
▼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 740 g which is heavier than 90.8% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Wider color gamut
    Color gamut
    Adobe RGB
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (Adobe RGB vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    Adobe RGB vs sRGB
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 220
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 220 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 220 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This tablet supports wireless charging, the average tablet does not. 1.5% of tablets are wireless charging compatible.
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    450 nits
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    8
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 220
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 220 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 220 vs Mali-G51
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    8
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Wider color gamut
    Color gamut
    Adobe RGB
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (Adobe RGB vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    Adobe RGB vs sRGB
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    450 nits
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This tablet supports wireless charging, the average tablet does not. 1.5% of tablets are wireless charging compatible.
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    webOS
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (webOS vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    webOS vs Android
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 41.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    132 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (132 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    132 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.2 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3.21x larger process node
    Process node
    45 nm
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 20.4% worse value for money
    Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (5.9 vs 7.1).
    5.9 vs 7.1
  • 61.5% more expensive
    Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£420 vs £260).
    £420 vs £260
  • 5.6% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Hp Touchpad
    the average tablet
    Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.58 vs 8.000).
    7.58 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.2 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3.21x larger process node
    Process node
    45 nm
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    2
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 59.1% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    266 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (266 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    266 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 42.8% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    8.53 GB/s
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (8.5 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    8.53 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Older DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR2
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 41.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    132 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (132 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    132 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1024×768
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×768 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×768 vs 1920×1200
  • 89 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    132 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (132 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    132 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    910:1
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (910:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    910:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 0.4 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    9.7 inches
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (9.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    9.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    HDR photo mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    8 hours
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    2.1
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    2.1 vs 5.0
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    webOS
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (webOS vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    webOS vs Android
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Hp Touchpad
    the average tablet
    Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    This tablet does not support voice commands, the average tablet does. 96.3% of tablets include voice command support.
  • No widgets
    Widgets support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    This tablet does not support widgets, the average tablet does. 93.5% of tablets support widgets.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    Offline voice recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 51% heavier
    Weight
    740 g
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (740 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    740 g vs 490 g
  • 5.7 mm thicker
    Thickness
    13.7 mm
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (13.7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    13.7 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 8 older release date
    Release date
    2011
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019).
    July 2011
    2011 vs 2019
  • 40 mm taller
    Width
    240.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (240 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    240.0 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

U
uk.pcmag.com
21/06/2012
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad (Wi-Fi) - Review 2012 - PCMag UK Would you like me to find specific technical specifications or benchmarks from these reviews for the HP T...
T
tomshardware.com
09/08/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad Review: A Tablet For Productivity? - Tom's Hardware
T
techdigest.tv
27/07/2011
Summary of the review
REVIEW: HP TouchPad The Guardian
T
trustedreviews.com
26/07/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad Review - Trusted Reviews
M
mobiletechreview.com
12/07/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad Review - Tablet Reviews by MobileTechReview
T
theguardian.com
30/06/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad tablet – review(www.techradar.com) | 29 June 2011 | HP TouchPad review
Z
zdnet.com
29/06/2011
Summary of the review
Review: HP TouchPad is the productivity tablet - ZDNET
W
wired.com
29/06/2011
Summary of the review
Review: HP TouchPad - WIRED
T
techradar.com
29/06/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad review - TechRadar
T
theverge.com
29/06/2011
Summary of the review
TouchPad review | The Verge
C
cnet.com
29/06/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad review: HP TouchPad(www.engadget.com) | 29 June 2011 | HP TouchPad review
B
businessinsider.com
07/07/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad Review
T
tomshardware.com
09/08/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad Review: A Tablet For Productivity?
C
cnet.com
30/06/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad review: HP TouchPad
C
connect.de
25/02/2011
Summary of the review
HP Touchpad im ersten Test - connect
(Translated)Show original
H
hifitest.de
27/10/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad - Tablets im Test - hifitest.de
(Translated)Show original
C
computerwoche.de
24/08/2011
Summary of the review
HP-Tablet mit 9,7 Zoll und webOS 3.0: Das HP TouchPad
(Translated)Show original
S
spiegel.de
30/06/2011
Summary of the review
HPs TouchPad im Test: Eleganter Einzelkämpfer gegen iPad und Co.
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
22/07/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad (Tablet) Test - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
M
maximejohnson.com
29/06/2011
Summary of the review
Essai de la tablette HP TouchPad et du (toujours) superbe webOS
(Translated)Show original
L
lapresse.ca
30/06/2011
Summary of the review
Essai du HP TouchPad: le pavé (tactile) dans la mare des tablettes Android
(Translated)Show original
L
lemondenumerique.ouest-france.fr
30/06/2011
Summary of the review
Test HP TouchPad - Le Monde Numérique
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
01/07/2011
Summary of the review
Test tablette : HP TouchPad, webOS se propagera-t-il
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
16/12/2013
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad - Videos et tests - CNET France
(Translated)Show original
T
tecnophone.it
30/08/2011
Summary of the review
HP TouchPad: La video recensione
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
30/06/2011
Summary of the review
TouchPad alla prova: le recensioni negli USA
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
30/06/2011
Summary of the review
TouchPad alla prova: le conclusioni dei tester USA
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB)

  • Innovative 'Cards' multitasking interface and intuitive webOS 3.0 software
  • High-quality, bright 9.7-inch IPS display with a 4:3 aspect ratio
  • Excellent stereo speakers with Beats Audio enhancement
  • Seamless integration (Synergy) with social networks and email services
  • Support for Adobe Flash within the web browser
  • Elegant optional 'Touchstone' wireless charging stand

What we don't like about Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB)

  • Severe lack of third-party applications compared to iOS and Android
  • Inconsistent and often sluggish system performance (frequent loading icons)
  • Bulky, heavy, and thick hardware design compared to the iPad 2
  • Glossy plastic build that attracts significant fingerprints and smudges
  • Lack of a rear-facing camera (front-facing only)
  • Software bugs and occasional unresponsiveness in the touchscreen and orientation sensor

Verdict

The HP TouchPad is a 9.7-inch tablet featuring a 1024 x 768 IPS LED-backlit display and running the intuitive webOS 3.0 operating system. Powered by a 1.2GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon APQ8060 processor and 1GB of RAM, this 32GB model provides a unique card-based multitasking interface and integrated Beats Audio for enhanced sound. Main pros include its smooth multitasking, high-quality stereo speakers, and a full-featured web browser with Flash support. However, it suffers from a significant lack of third-party apps, a relatively heavy and bulky plastic build (1.6 lbs), and occasional software sluggishness.

Compare Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Hp Touchpad (1GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found