Scored using Processors Methodology v1.0
Processors Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Processors Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Processors Methodology v1.0

Intel Core i9 7900X Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£320PassMark benchmark result:20883N. of physical cores:10CPU boost clock speed:4.5 GHzCPU socket:LGA2066TDP (Thermal design power):140 W

Intel Core i9 7900X Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–²Better than 64% of processors
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

6.7

Performance

18%

6.0

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.2

Memory & PCIe

7%

4.1

Power & Thermal

4%

7.5

Platform

1%

4.0

Integrated Graphics

â–²Better than 62% of processors
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 87 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 81% of processors
  • intel-core-i9-7900x
  • intel-core-i9-7900x
  • intel-core-i9-7900x
intel-core-i9-7900x
intel-core-i9-7900x
intel-core-i9-7900x

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i9 7900X

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.7

Performance

18%

6.0

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.2

Memory & PCIe

7%

4.1

Power & Thermal

4%

7.5

Platform

1%

4.0

Integrated Graphics

6.4
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 87 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Intel Core i9 7900X has a popularity score of 6.9 points, which is higher than that of 83.4% of products in this category.
6.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

8.8

Price

7.3
Brand name
Intel
Processor type
workstation
Processor type
workstation
This processor belongs to the workstation processor class, which is more advanced than that of 95.1% of processors and equal to that of 4.9% of processors.
CPU socket
LGA2066
CPU socket
LGA2066
This processor uses the LGA2066 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 74.7% of processors and equal to that of 1.5% of processors.
Chipset
X299
Chipset
X299
This processor supports X299 chipsets, which is broader compatibility than 95.3% of processors and equal to that of 1.6% of processors.
CPU architecture
x86-64
CPU architecture
x86-64
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
10
N. of physical cores
10
This processor has 10 CPU cores, which is more than 77.1% of processors and equal to 4.3% of processors.
CPU threads
20
CPU threads
20
This processor offers 20 CPU threads, which is more than 85.3% of processors and equal to 4.5% of processors.
Threads per core
2
Threads per core
2
This processor offers 2 threads per core, which is more than 30.3% of processors and equal to 69.7% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
4.5 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
4.5 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 4.5 GHz which is higher than that of 56.5% of processors and equal to that of 5.4% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
10x 3.3 GHz
CPU base clock speed
10x 3.3 GHz
This processor has a base clock of 10x3.3 GHz which is higher than that of 88.6% of processors and equal to that of 0.1% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
14 nm
Semiconductor size
14 nm
This processor uses a 14 nm process node, which is older than that of 50.6% of processors and equal to that of 33.9% of processors.
Foundry
Intel 14 nm
Foundry
Intel 14 nm
This processor is built on the Intel 14 nm foundry process, which is less advanced than that of 55.2% of processors and equal to that of 29.3% of processors.
L3 cache
13.75 MB
L3 cache
13.75 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 13.75 MB which is larger than that of 63.5% of processors.
L2 cache
10 MB
L2 cache
10 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 10 MB which is larger than that of 80.5% of processors and equal to that of 1.8% of processors.
L1 cache
640 KB
L1 cache
640 KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 640 KB which is larger than that of 74.5% of processors and equal to that of 2.5% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR4
DDR memory version
DDR4
This processor supports DDR DDR4, which is newer than that of 26.3% of processors and equal to that of 31.7% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
2,666 MHz
Maximum memory speed
2,666 MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 2,666 MHz, which is lower than that of 54.7% of processors and equal to 8.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-2666 MHz
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-2666 MHz
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR4-2666 MHz, which is lower than that of 58.3% of processors and equal to 8% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
2,666 MHz
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
2,666 MHz
This processor supports XMP/EXPO memory speeds up to 2,666 MHz, which is higher than that of 89.3% of processors and equal to 0.9% of processors.
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
This processor supports up to 128 GB of memory, which is more than 61.9% of processors and equal to 21.4% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
no
Integrated graphics
no
This processor does not include integrated graphics. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
N/A
Integrated GPU execution units
N/A
Integrated GPU base frequency
N/A
Integrated media encoders/decoders
N/A
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
140 W
TDP (Thermal design power)
140 W
This processor has a TDP of 140 W which is higher than that of 94.7% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
140 W
Base power (PL1)
140 W
This processor has a base power of 140 W which is higher than that of 94.8% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
140 W
Boost power (PL2)
140 W
This processor has a boost power of 140 W which is higher than that of 82.9% of processors and equal to that of 1.6% of processors.
Tau (power duration limit)
?
Configurable TDP
no
Configurable TDP
no
This processor does not support configurable TDP. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
Show more

Intel Core i9 7900X vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceCache & ArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated GraphicsPower & Thermal
  • 12 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    20
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (20 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    20 vs 8
  • 97.5% higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    20,883
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (20,883 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    20,883 vs 10,572.5
  • 28 more PCIe lanes
    PCIe lane count
    44
    This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (44 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    44 vs 16
  • 82% higher multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    8,787
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (8,787 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    8,787 vs 4,829
  • 4 more CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    10
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (10 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    10 vs 6
  • 89.4% better multi-core performance
    Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
    5,286
    This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (5,286 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    5,286 vs 2,791
  • 4x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache
    10 MB
    This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (10 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    10 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • Unlocked for overclocking
    Unlocked multiplier
    yes
    This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
  • 6.87x more popular
    Intel Core i9 7900X is more popular than the average processor (6.87 vs 1).
    6.87 vs 1
  • 1.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Intel Core i9 7900X
    the average processor
    Intel Core i9 7900X has a higher user score than the average processor (8.09 vs 8.000).
    8.09 vs 8
  • Modern CPU socket
    CPU socket
    LGA2066
    This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA2066 vs FP4).
    LGA2066 vs FP4
  • Higher-end processor class
    Processor type
    workstation
    This processor belongs to a higher-end processor class than the average processor (workstation vs mobile).
    workstation vs mobile
  • 12 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    20
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (20 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    20 vs 8
  • 97.5% higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    20,883
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (20,883 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    20,883 vs 10,572.5
  • 82% higher multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    8,787
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (8,787 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    8,787 vs 4,829
  • 4 more CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    10
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (10 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    10 vs 6
  • 89.4% better multi-core performance
    Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
    5,286
    This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (5,286 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    5,286 vs 2,791
  • Unlocked for overclocking
    Unlocked multiplier
    yes
    This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
  • Higher base clock
    CPU base clock speed
    10 x 3.3 GHz
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (10x3.3 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    10x3.3 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • 4.7% higher boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    4.5 GHz
    This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    4.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • Supports Turbo Core
    Turbo Core version
    3.0
    This processor supports Turbo Core, the average processor does not. 1.00% of processors support Turbo Core.
    Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3
    3.0 vs 2.0
  • 4x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache
    10 MB
    This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (10 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    10 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • 2x more L2 per core
    L2 per core
    1 MB/core
    This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
    1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
  • 66.7% larger L1 cache
    L1 cache
    640 KB
    This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (640 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
    640 KB vs 384 KB
  • 71.9% larger L3 cache
    L3 cache
    13.75 MB
    This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (13.8 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
    13.75 MB vs 8 MB
  • 28 more PCIe lanes
    PCIe lane count
    44
    This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (44 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    44 vs 16
  • 85.6% higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    85 GB/s
    This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (85 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
    85 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
  • Supports memory overclocking
    Memory overclocking
    yes
    This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • 2x more memory capacity
    Maximum memory capacity
    128 GB
    This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 5 °C lower CPU temperature
    CPU temperature
    95 °C
    This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
    95 °C vs 100 °C
  • No configurable TDP
    Configurable TDP
    no
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 3.11x higher base power
    Base power (PL1)
    140 W
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    140 W vs 45 W
  • Narrower instruction support
    Instruction sets
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512
    This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • 2.33x higher boost power
    Boost power (PL2)
    140 W
    This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
    140 W vs 60 W
  • 55.6% slower Blender rendering
    Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
    172
    This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (172 vs 387.66). The average processor needs 387.66 for the Blender BMW27 test.
    172 vs 387.66
  • 84.2% larger die size
    Die size
    326 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (326 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    326 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 16.7% larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    14 nm
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    14 nm vs 12 nm
  • 19.8% less L3 per core
    L3 per core
    1.375 MB/core
    This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.4 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    1.375 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
  • 28% more expensive
    Intel Core i9 7900X is more expensive than the average processor (£320 vs £250).
    £320 vs £250
  • Narrower instruction support
    Instruction sets
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512
    This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • No crypto acceleration
    Cryptographic acceleration
    AES
    This processor does not include crypto acceleration, the average processor does. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
    AES vs AES, SHA
  • 3 years older release date
    Release date
    2017
    This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2017 vs 2020).
    June 2017
    2017 vs 2020
  • 55.6% slower Blender rendering
    Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
    172
    This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (172 vs 387.66). The average processor needs 387.66 for the Blender BMW27 test.
    172 vs 387.66
  • 84.2% larger die size
    Die size
    326 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (326 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    326 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 16.7% larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    14 nm
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    14 nm vs 12 nm
  • 19.8% less L3 per core
    L3 per core
    1.375 MB/core
    This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.4 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    1.375 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
  • Less advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Skylake
    This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Skylake vs Kaby Lake).
    Skylake vs Kaby Lake
  • 2 fewer memory channels
    Memory channels
    4
    This processor has fewer memory channels than the average processor (4 vs 2). The average processor supports 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Lower JEDEC memory speed
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    DDR4-2666 MHz
    This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2666 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
    DDR4-2,666 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
  • 9.1% lower memory speed
    Maximum memory speed
    2,666 MHz
    This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2666 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    2,666 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • No integrated graphics
    Integrated graphics
    no
    This processor does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.
  • No configurable TDP
    Configurable TDP
    no
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 3.11x higher base power
    Base power (PL1)
    140 W
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    140 W vs 45 W
  • 2.33x higher boost power
    Boost power (PL2)
    140 W
    This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
    140 W vs 60 W
  • 3.11x higher TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    140 W
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    140 W vs 45 W
  • 5 °C lower TJ Max
    Maximum operating temperature (TJ Max)
    95 °C
    This processor has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
    95 °C vs 100 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gamespot.com
19/06/2017
Summary of the review
I
impulsegamer.com
16/11/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
29/11/2017
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
30/06/2017
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
01/07/2017
Summary of the review
A
arstechnica.com
04/07/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
23/06/2017
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
16/06/2017
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
19/06/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
19/06/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
08/06/2018
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
09/08/2017
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
19/06/2017
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
27/06/2017
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
30/06/2017
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
02/08/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
26/07/2017
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
07/07/2017
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
19/06/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.fr
21/06/2017
Summary of the review
C
cowcotland.com
07/08/2017
Summary of the review
H
hardware.fr
29/06/2017
Summary of the review
C
comptoir-hardware.com
25/07/2017
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
08/07/2017
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
13/06/2017
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
20/06/2017
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
19/06/2017
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
25/07/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
20/06/2017
Summary of the review
I
it.ign.com
10/08/2017
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
25/09/2017
Summary of the review
H
hardware.info
03/07/2017
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
19/06/2017
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 87 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Intel Core i9 7900X

  • High core count (10 cores and 20 threads) provides exceptional multi-threaded performance for workstation tasks like video transcoding, rendering, and content creation.
  • Fast single-threaded performance with a high turbo clock speed of up to 4.5GHz, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming when properly tuned.
  • Significant price decrease compared to its 10-core predecessor (i7-6950X), offering better performance at a much lower launch MSRP.
  • Provides 44 PCIe lanes, allowing for extensive connectivity and high-speed NVMe SSD RAID configurations on compatible X299 motherboards.
  • Excellent overclocking potential for enthusiasts, with some users reaching 4.7GHz or even 5GHz across all cores when using high-end cooling solutions.
  • Native support for AVX-512 instructions, which can significantly accelerate specific professional and scientific workloads.

What we don't like about Intel Core i9 7900X

  • Runs extremely hot under load due to high power consumption and the use of thermal interface material (TIM) instead of solder under the heat spreader.
  • Requires high-end, expensive cooling solutions (typically large AIOs or custom water loops) to avoid thermal throttling, especially when overclocked.
  • Gaming performance at 1080p can sometimes be inconsistent or lower than mainstream processors like the i7-7700K due to increased latency from the mesh architecture.
  • Relatively high platform entry cost, requiring a new and often expensive X299 chipset motherboard and quad-channel DDR4 memory.
  • Significant power draw, with some systems pulling over 200W under heavy encoding loads, leading to higher energy costs and heat output.
  • Lacks support for Intel SGX, which prevents the playback of 4K Blu-ray discs on systems using this processor and the X299 platform.

Verdict

The Intel Core i9-7900X is a high-performance Skylake-X enthusiast processor featuring 10 cores and 20 threads with a 3.3 GHz base clock and a 4.5 GHz Max Turbo 3.0 frequency. Built on a 14nm process for the LGA 2066 socket, it offers 44 PCIe lanes, 13.75MB of L3 cache, and quad-channel DDR4-2666 memory support with a 140W TDP. Its main strengths include exceptional multi-threaded performance for workstation tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, significant IPC gains over previous generations, and high overclocking headroom. However, the processor is known for extremely high power consumption under load, high operating temperatures due to the use of thermal paste instead of solder under the heat spreader, and the requirement for an expensive X299 motherboard.

Compare Intel Core i9 7900X with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i9 7900X and other processors

No results found