OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Processors Methodology v1.0
Processors Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Processors Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Processors Methodology v1.0

Intel Core i7 6950X Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£310PassMark benchmark result:17570N. of physical cores:10CPU boost clock speed:4.0 GHzCPU socket:LGA2011-3TDP (Thermal design power):140 W

Intel Core i7 6950X Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

Intel Core i7 6950X
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

90%

6.2

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–²Better than 61% of processors
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

â–²Better than 66%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components

60%

6.6

Performance

18%

5.0

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.1

Memory & PCIe

7%

4.3

Power & Thermal

4%

7.7

Platform

1%

4.0

Integrated Graphics

â–²Better than 59%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 190 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 80%
  • intel-core-i7-6950x
  • intel-core-i7-6950x
  • intel-core-i7-6950x
  • intel-core-i7-6950x
  • intel-core-i7-6950x
  • intel-core-i7-6950x
  • intel-core-i7-6950x
  • intel-core-i7-6950x
  • intel-core-i7-6950x
intel-core-i7-6950x
intel-core-i7-6950x
intel-core-i7-6950x
intel-core-i7-6950x
intel-core-i7-6950x
intel-core-i7-6950x
intel-core-i7-6950x
intel-core-i7-6950x
intel-core-i7-6950x
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i7 6950X

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components:

60%

6.6

Performance

18%

5.0

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.1

Memory & PCIe

7%

4.3

Power & Thermal

4%

7.7

Platform

1%

4.0

Integrated Graphics

6.2
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 190 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Popularity:
Intel Core i7 6950X has a popularity score of 6.9 points, which is higher than that of 83.4% of products in this category.
6.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

7.2
Brand name
Intel
Processor type
workstation
This processor belongs to the workstation processor class, which is more advanced than that of 95.1% of processors and equal to that of 4.9% of processors.
CPU socket
LGA2011-3
This processor uses the LGA2011-3 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 59.7% of processors and equal to that of 0.4% of processors.
Chipset
?
CPU architecture
x86-64
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
10
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has 10 CPU cores, which is more than 77.1% of processors and equal to 4.3% of processors.
CPU threads
20
Market range: <4 – >24
This processor offers 20 CPU threads, which is more than 85.3% of processors and equal to 4.5% of processors.
Threads per core
2
Market range: <0 – >2.5
This processor offers 2 threads per core, which is more than 30.3% of processors and equal to 69.7% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
4 GHz
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 4 GHz which is lower than that of 59.8% of processors and equal to that of 5.1% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
10x 3 GHz
This processor has a base clock of 10x3 GHz which is higher than that of 84.9% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
14 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor uses a 14 nm process node, which is older than that of 50.6% of processors and equal to that of 33.9% of processors.
Foundry
Intel 14 nm
This processor is built on the Intel 14 nm foundry process, which is less advanced than that of 55.2% of processors and equal to that of 29.3% of processors.
L3 cache
25 MB
Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 25 MB which is larger than that of 87.6% of processors and equal to that of 0.4% of processors.
L2 cache
2.5 MB
Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 2.5 MB which is larger than that of 49.1% of processors and equal to that of 1.3% of processors.
L1 cache
320 KB
Market range: <128 KB – >1.2k KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 320 KB which is smaller than that of 55.2% of processors and equal to that of 4.1% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR4
This processor supports DDR DDR4, which is newer than that of 26.3% of processors and equal to that of 31.7% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
2,400 MHz
Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 2,400 MHz, which is lower than that of 63% of processors and equal to 12.4% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-2400 MHz
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR4-2400 MHz, which is lower than that of 66.4% of processors and equal to 11.5% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
?
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
This processor supports up to 128 GB of memory, which is more than 61.9% of processors and equal to 21.4% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
no
This processor does not include integrated graphics. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
N/A
Integrated GPU execution units
N/A
Integrated GPU base frequency
N/A
Integrated media encoders/decoders
N/A
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
140 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a TDP of 140 W which is higher than that of 94.7% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
140 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a base power of 140 W which is higher than that of 94.8% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
140 W
Market range: <25 W – >150 W
This processor has a boost power of 140 W which is higher than that of 82.9% of processors and equal to that of 1.6% of processors.
Tau (power duration limit)
?
Configurable TDP
no
This processor does not support configurable TDP. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
Show more

Intel Core i7 6950X vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceCache & ArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated GraphicsPower & Thermal
  • 12 more CPU threads
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (20 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    20 vs 8
  • 86% higher multi-core score
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (8,981 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    8,981 vs 4,829
  • 24 more PCIe lanes
    This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (40 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    40 vs 16
  • 4 more CPU cores
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (10 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    10 vs 6
  • Unlocked for overclocking
    This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
  • 66.2% higher PassMark score
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (17,570 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    17,570 vs 10,572.5
  • Higher base clock
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (10x3 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    10x3 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • 3.13x larger L3 cache
    This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (25 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
    25 MB vs 8 MB
  • 6.93x more popular
    Intel Core i7 6950X is more popular than the average processor (6.93 vs 1).
    6.93 vs 1
  • 0.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Intel Core i7 6950X
    the average processor
    Intel Core i7 6950X has a higher user score than the average processor (8.07 vs 8.000).
    8.07 vs 8
  • Higher-end processor class
    This processor belongs to a higher-end processor class than the average processor (workstation vs mobile).
    workstation vs mobile
  • Modern CPU socket
    This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA2011-3 vs FP4).
    LGA2011-3 vs FP4
  • 12 more CPU threads
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (20 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    20 vs 8
  • 86% higher multi-core score
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (8,981 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    8,981 vs 4,829
  • 4 more CPU cores
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (10 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    10 vs 6
  • Unlocked for overclocking
    This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
  • 66.2% higher PassMark score
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (17,570 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    17,570 vs 10,572.5
  • Higher base clock
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (10x3 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    10x3 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • 3.13x larger L3 cache
    This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (25 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
    25 MB vs 8 MB
  • 45.9% more L3 per core
    This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.5 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    2.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
  • 24 more PCIe lanes
    This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (40 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    40 vs 16
  • Supports memory overclocking
    This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • 67.7% higher memory bandwidth
    This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (76.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
    76.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
  • 2x more memory capacity
    This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • No configurable TDP
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 3.11x higher base power
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    140 W vs 45 W
  • 2.33x higher boost power
    This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
    140 W vs 60 W
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    14 nm vs 12 nm
  • 39% larger die size
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (246 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    246 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 50% less L2 per core
    This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
    0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
  • 7% lower boost clock
    This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    4.0 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 3.11x higher TDP
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    140 W vs 45 W
  • 24% more expensive
    Intel Core i7 6950X is more expensive than the average processor (£310 vs £250).
    £310 vs £250
  • 4 years older release date
    This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2016 vs 2020).
    May 2016
    2016 vs 2020
  • No crypto acceleration
    This processor does not include crypto acceleration, the average processor does. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
    AES vs AES, SHA
  • 7% lower boost clock
    This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    4.0 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 6.7% weaker single-core performance
    This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,332 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    2,332 vs 2,500
  • 6.9% lower single-core score
    This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,369 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,369 vs 1,471
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    14 nm vs 12 nm
  • 50% less L2 per core
    This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
    0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
  • 39% larger die size
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (246 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    246 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • Less advanced microarchitecture
    This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Broadwell vs Kaby Lake).
    Broadwell vs Kaby Lake
  • Lower JEDEC memory speed
    This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2400 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
    DDR4-2,400 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
  • 18.2% lower memory speed
    This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2400 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • 2 fewer memory channels
    This processor has fewer memory channels than the average processor (4 vs 2). The average processor supports 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • No integrated graphics
    This processor does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.
  • No configurable TDP
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 3.11x higher base power
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    140 W vs 45 W
  • 2.33x higher boost power
    This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
    140 W vs 60 W
  • 3.11x higher TDP
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    140 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

5.0
Nexus Tech
≈ estimated
19/07/2026
Hands-on review · benchmarks, power and gaming tests
Verdict
Intel Core i7-6950X delivers strong performance for its time, but its price is hard to justify for most users.
7.0
Linus Tech Tips
≈ estimated
07/07/2016
Hands-on review · benchmarks, overclocking and gaming tests
Verdict
Intel Core i7-6950X is only worth it for heavy multi-core work; for gaming and most users, the six-core is better value.
5.0
Hardware Unboxed
≈ estimated
10/06/2016
Hands-on review · video export, gaming and power tests
Verdict
Intel Core i7-6950X offers strong performance and efficiency, but its high price makes it hard to recommend.
8.0
Paul's Hardware
≈ estimated
31/05/2016
Hands-on review · benchmarks and overclocking tests
Verdict
The Intel Core i7-6950X is extremely fast and efficient, but its very high price puts it out of reach for most buyers.
7.0
PC Perspective
≈ estimated
31/05/2016
Hands-on review · overclocking and performance tests
Verdict
Intel Core i7-6950X is the fastest consumer processor available, but its price is hard to justify.
7.0
Real Hardware Reviews
≈ estimated
03/07/2016
Short overclocking test · cooling, power and gaming gains
Verdict
Intel Core i7-6950X is a great, long-lasting chip with strong overclocking room, but heat and power costs run high.
6.0
TechSource
≈ estimated
23/06/2016
Hands-on review · rendering, Cinebench and gaming benchmarks
Verdict
Intel Core i7-6950X's gaming gains are minimal; only heavy 3D rendering and editing justify its price.
6.0
TechteamGB
≈ estimated
11/06/2016
Hands-on review · benchmarks and value assessment
Verdict
Intel Core i7-6950X offers impressive performance, but its price is hard to justify next to Xeon and 14-core alternatives.
Overview video
Overview video
Not graded
Not graded

Third-party reviews

Based on 190 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: October 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Intel Core i7 6950X

  • Exceptional multi-threaded performance with 10 physical cores and 20 threads
  • Highly effective for professional workstations (video editing, 3D rendering, and VR content creation)
  • Unlocked multiplier allows for substantial overclocking headroom
  • Introduction of Turbo Boost Max 3.0 helps optimize performance for single-threaded tasks
  • Drop-in compatibility with existing X99 motherboards via BIOS update
  • Quad-channel DDR4 memory support provides high memory bandwidth
  • Improved power efficiency compared to previous generation Haswell-E chips under similar loads

What we don't like about Intel Core i7 6950X

  • Extremely high launch price (approx. $1,723), making it a poor value for most consumers
  • Lower base and boost clock speeds compared to mainstream quad-core alternatives
  • Underwhelming performance in gaming and lightly-threaded applications relative to its cost
  • High thermal output (140W TDP) necessitates expensive, high-end cooling solutions
  • Diminishing returns on investment compared to the eight-core i7-6900K

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-6950X is a high-end Broadwell-E Extreme Edition processor featuring 10 physical cores and 20 threads via Hyper-Threading. It operates at a base clock speed of 3.0 GHz, with a Max Turbo frequency of 3.5 GHz and up to 4.0 GHz using Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0. Built on a 14nm process for the LGA 2011-v3 socket, it includes a massive 25MB Smart Cache, 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes, and support for quad-channel DDR4-2400 memory within a 140W TDP. Its primary advantages are unmatched multi-threaded performance for professional workloads like video rendering and content creation, along with unlocked multipliers for overclocking. However, it is hindered by a prohibitively high launch price of over $1,700, relatively lower single-core clock speeds compared to mainstream counterparts, and the lack of an integrated GPU.

Compare Intel Core i7 6950X with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i7 6950X and other processors

No results found