OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Mice Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Ardor Gaming Fury Beast Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:12400 DPIWeight:95 g

Ardor Gaming Fury Beast Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

4.5

Overall score

Score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

80%

4.5

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 92% of mice
4.5

Technical score

Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

36%

5.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.3

Controls

16%

6.6

Design

14%

1.9

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 80% of mice
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £20

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Ardor Gaming Fury Beast

Technical score
Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

36%

5.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.3

Controls

16%

6.6

Design

14%

1.9

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

4.5
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Ardor Gaming Fury Beast has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 83.8% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

60%

4.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.2
Brand name
Ardor
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
Connectivity
wired
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
Receiver included
no
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
Rechargeable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
7
N. of buttons
7
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 7 buttons, which is more than 63.3% of mice and equal to 15.1% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
7
N. of programmable buttons
7
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, which is more than 66.9% of mice and equal to 12.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
95 g
Weight
95 g
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 95 g, which is heavier than 63.4% of mice and equal to 1.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–² Better than 18% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
fabric
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
ARDOR GAMING Fury Beast
Firmware upgradable
no
Firmware upgradable
no
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
This mouse does not support firmware upgrades. 77.7% of mice support firmware upgrades.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Ardor Gaming Fury Beast vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • 24% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    12,400 DPI
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    12,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Well-tuned default DPI
    Default DPI
    2,400 DPI
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This mouse defaults to 2400 DPI, while the average mouse defaults to 1000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 75% cheaper
    Ardor Gaming Fury Beast is cheaper than the average mouse (£20 vs £35).
    £20 vs £35
  • 75% cheaper
    Ardor Gaming Fury Beast is cheaper than the average mouse (£20 vs £35).
    £20 vs £35
  • 24% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    12,400 DPI
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    12,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Well-tuned default DPI
    Default DPI
    2,400 DPI
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This mouse defaults to 2400 DPI, while the average mouse defaults to 1000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No firmware upgrades
    Firmware upgradable
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 15.9% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    95 g
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 95 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    95 g vs 82 g
  • 45% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    220 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 220 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    220 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    20 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 6.38x less popular
    Ardor Gaming Fury Beast is less popular than the average mouse (1 vs 6.4).
    1 vs 6.38
  • 18.6% worse value for money
    Ardor Gaming Fury Beast has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.16 vs 7.3).
    6.16 vs 7.31
  • 45% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    220 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 220 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    220 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 25% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    30 G
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 30 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    30 G vs 40 G
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    Connectivity
    wired
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    20 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 15.9% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    95 g
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 95 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    95 g vs 82 g
  • 7 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    73 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 73 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    73 mm vs 66 mm
  • No firmware upgrades
    Firmware upgradable
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

What we like about Ardor Gaming Fury Beast

  • High responsiveness with a 1000 Hz polling rate for gaming
  • Lightweight design at 95g compared to many wired competitors
  • Customizable aesthetics with integrated RGB lighting
  • Versatile sensitivity options with a maximum DPI of 12,400 and dedicated DPI switching button
  • Reliable PixArt PMW3327 sensor for stable tracking
  • Generous 1.8m cable length providing ample freedom of movement
  • Good value with a 2-year manufacturer warranty

What we don't like about Ardor Gaming Fury Beast

  • Wired-only connection via USB lacks the convenience of wireless models
  • Lacks advanced scrolling features like a tilting or thumb scroll wheel
  • No onboard memory for saving multiple custom profiles directly to the device
  • Limited weight customization as it does not include extra insertable weights
  • Ergonomics are restricted to right-handed users only
  • Lacks modern touch-sensitive area or gesture support

Verdict

The Ardor Gaming Fury Beast is a right-handed wired gaming mouse featuring the PixArt PMW3327 optical sensor, which delivers a maximum sensitivity of 12,400 DPI, a tracking speed of 220 IPS, and 30G acceleration. It is equipped with Huano Blue Shell White Dot mechanical switches rated for 20 million clicks, a 1,000 Hz polling rate, and seven programmable buttons, including a dedicated DPI switch. Main pros include its reliable sensor performance for its class, customizable RGB lighting, and a long 1.8-meter cable. However, its relatively high weight of 95g and the lack of advanced features like a tilting scroll wheel or onboard memory profiles may be considered drawbacks for competitive or productivity-focused users.

Compare Ardor Gaming Fury Beast with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ardor Gaming Fury Beast and other products in the Mice category

No results found