OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon R7 360 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95VRAM:2 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):100 W

AMD Radeon R7 360 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon R7 360
3.7/10

Overall score

Score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

90%

3.2

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 99% of graphics cards
5.6

Value for money

Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

3.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 96%
3.2

Technical score

Technical score
3.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

44%

1.5

Performance

24%

1.3

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

6.0

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.1

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 99%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 61%
  • amd-radeon-r7-360
amd-radeon-r7-360
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon R7 360

Technical score
Technical score
3.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

44%

1.5

Performance

24%

1.3

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

6.0

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.1

Connectivity & Media

3.2
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Popularity:
AMD Radeon R7 360 has a popularity score of 7.7 points, which is higher than that of 71.7% of products in this category.
7.7
Value for money
Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

3.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

5.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
1,823 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 1,823 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 96% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
3,122 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 3,122 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 96.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
1,279 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 1,279 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 96.8% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
1.61 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 1.61 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 96.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
2 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 2 GB of VRAM, which is less than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
104 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 104 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 96.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.2
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.2, which is older than on 95.1% of graphics cards and equal to 3.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.5
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.5, which is older than on 98.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
4096x2160
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 1 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal to 8.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
5.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 5.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
100 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 100 W, which is lower than that of 89% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
100 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 100 W under peak load, which is lower than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
100 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 100 W, which is lower than that of 90.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
100 W
Show more
Size
165x 110x 37 mm
Length
165 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 165 mm long, which is shorter than 97% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
110 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 110 mm tall, which is shorter than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
348 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 348 g, which is lighter than 96.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon R7 360 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 53.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (100 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    100 W vs 215 W
  • 120 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (165 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    165 mm vs 285 mm
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 55.6% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (100 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    100 W vs 225 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 5.58x cheaper
    AMD Radeon R7 360 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£95 vs £530).
    £95 vs £530
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 45.8% smaller GPU die
    This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (160 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    160 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 53.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (100 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    100 W vs 215 W
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 55.6% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (100 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    100 W vs 225 W
  • 54.5% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (100 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    100 W vs 220 W
  • 120 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (165 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    165 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 65.9% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (348 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    348 g vs 1,021 g
  • 58.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1050 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,050 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 28 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (12 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    12 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 29.2% worse value for money
    AMD Radeon R7 360 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.57 vs 7.2).
    5.57 vs 7.2
  • 58.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1050 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,050 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 28 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (12 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    12 vs 40
  • 47.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1000 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 136 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (48 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    48 vs 184
  • 86.8% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (50.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    50.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 89.7% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (16.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    16.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 48 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    16 vs 64
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 92.9% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (1.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    1.61 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 86.2% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (3122 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    3,122 points vs 22,653 points
  • 87.6% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (1823 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    1,823 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 89.4% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (1279 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    1,279 points vs 12,074 points
  • 94.6% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (1.6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    1.61 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 93% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (1.6 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    1.61 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 3,584 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (768 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    768 vs 4,352
  • 79.2% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 76.8% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (104 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    104 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 68.4% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (6000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    6,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    16 vs 128
  • 14.3% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1500 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,500 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • No FSR support
    This graphics card does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
  • 8 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2015 vs 2023).
    June 2015
    2,015 vs 2,023
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3 vs 8
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4).
    1.2 vs 1.4
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.5 vs 6.8).
    6.5 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • Older OpenGL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenGL version than the average graphics card (4.5 vs 4.6).
    4.5 vs 4.6
  • 90.9% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (2080 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    2,080 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • 2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    1 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
    1.4a vs 2.1
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
    1.2 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 2.3).
    1.4 vs 2.3
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 73% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 34 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (34 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    34 dB vs 0 dB
  • 16 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (53 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    53 °C vs 37 °C
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
goldfries.com
22/04/2016
Summary of the review
MSI RADEON R7 360 2GD5 OC Graphics Card Review
T
techpowerup.com
20/06/2016
Summary of the review
R7 360 Reviews | TechPowerUp Review Database
D
discover.hubpages.com
19/12/2017
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon R7 360 Graphics Card Review and Benchmarks
S
smallformfactor.net
15/09/2015
Summary of the review
Gigabyte R7-360 – Mid-Range Miniature - SFF.Network
P
popzara.com
23/11/2015
Summary of the review
GIGABYTE Radeon R7 360Go to product viewer dialog for this item. Graphics Card | Computer Reviews
H
hardwaresecrets.com
25/02/2023
Summary of the review
Radeon R7 360 Video Card Review - Hardware Secrets
T
trustedreviews.com
20/11/2015
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon R7 360 Review - Trusted Reviews
H
hardwareluxx.de
03/01/2016
Summary of the review
MSI Radeon R7 360 OC: Einsteiger-Grafikkarte mit FreeSync-Technologie im Test
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
24/06/2015
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon 300-serie Review Tweakers
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD Radeon R7 360

  • Excellent value for money, frequently cited as a top choice for ultra-budget builds
  • Competent performance in esports titles like League of Legends and popular older games like GTA V
  • Full support for DirectX 12, ensuring compatibility with many modern software titles
  • Generally quiet operation and reliable build quality from various board partners
  • Significant upgrade over integrated graphics or older entry-level cards like the GT 730

What we don't like about AMD Radeon R7 360

  • Struggles with modern AAA games, often requiring low settings or lower resolutions (e.g., 900p) for playable frame rates
  • Relatively high power consumption and heat dissipation compared to more efficient architectures
  • Limited 2GB VRAM can cause stuttering or unplayable performance in texture-heavy games
  • Often outperformed by the Nvidia GTX 750 Ti, which frequently offered better efficiency and speed at a similar price point
  • Reused architecture leads to a lack of refinement compared to newer GPU generations

Verdict

The AMD Radeon R7 360 is a budget-friendly graphics card launched in June 2015, utilizing the Tobago GPU core based on GCN 2.0 architecture and a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of up to 112 GB/s, alongside 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs. Main characteristics include a base clock of 1,000 MHz (boostable to 1,050 MHz) and support for DirectX 12 and AMD FreeSync, making it a capable option for entry-level 1080p gaming and popular MOBA titles. Its primary pros are its affordable launch price of $109, a compact single-slot design ideal for small form factor cases, and broad compatibility due to needing only a single 6-pin power connector with a 100W TDP. However, notable cons include its limited 2 GB VRAM which struggles with modern texture-heavy titles, the card's age placing it into a legacy support model with no further driver updates, and its general inability to maintain smooth performance in demanding triple-A games at high settings.

Compare AMD Radeon R7 360 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon R7 360 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found