OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Sync Fit review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:?Screen size:?Heart rate monitor:?GPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Sync Fit Review: Compare 163 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

35%

7.5

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 60% of fitness trackers
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 61%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components

20%

8.2

Sports

20%

7.9

Battery

18%

7.0

Health

18%

6.8

Display

8%

7.6

Smart functions

8%

7.4

Wellness

4%

8.5

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design

â–²Better than 75%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £35
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Sync Fit

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components:

20%

8.2

Sports

20%

7.9

Battery

18%

7.0

Health

18%

6.8

Display

8%

7.6

Smart functions

8%

7.4

Wellness

4%

8.5

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design

7.5
Reviews score
7.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.2
Heart rate monitor
?
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 53% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 32.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 14.4% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 85.6% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.4% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 5.6% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 40.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
?
Goal setting
?
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 23.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 79.1% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 36.4% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
?
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
?
Display type
OLED
This fitness tracker uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 54.6% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 19.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
110 ppi
Market range: <146 ppi – >326 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 110 ppi which is lower than that of 98.3% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 77.1% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
?
Show more

Sync Fit vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Cycle start prediction
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.8% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Voice feedback
    This fitness tracker supports voice feedback, while the average fitness tracker does not. 2.5% of fitness trackers support voice feedback.
  • Removable battery
    This fitness tracker has a removable battery, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12% of fitness trackers have a removable battery.
    Uses a user-replaceable coin-cell battery.
  • Cycle start prediction
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.8% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Removable battery
    This fitness tracker has a removable battery, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12% of fitness trackers have a removable battery.
    Uses a user-replaceable coin-cell battery.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Voice feedback
    This fitness tracker supports voice feedback, while the average fitness tracker does not. 2.5% of fitness trackers support voice feedback.
  • Higher resting heart rate
    This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 55.5% lower pixel density
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (110 ppi vs 247 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi.
    110 ppi vs 247 ppi
  • Limited ip rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No inactivity alerts
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 78.7% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • No replaceable watch band
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.8% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No BMI tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.2% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • No rechargeable battery
    This fitness tracker does not have a rechargeable battery, while the average fitness tracker does. 87.6% of fitness trackers have a rechargeable battery.
    Uses a replaceable non-rechargeable coin-cell battery.
  • Higher resting heart rate
    This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 5 years older release date
    This fitness tracker was released earlier than the average fitness tracker (2012 vs 2017). The average fitness tracker was released in 2017.
    November 2012
    2012 vs 2017
  • No rechargeable battery
    This fitness tracker does not have a rechargeable battery, while the average fitness tracker does. 87.6% of fitness trackers have a rechargeable battery.
    Uses a replaceable non-rechargeable coin-cell battery.
  • 55.5% lower pixel density
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (110 ppi vs 247 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi.
    110 ppi vs 247 ppi
  • Limited ip rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No replaceable watch band
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.8% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 10.4% heavier
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (26.5 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    26.5 g vs 24 g
  • No inactivity alerts
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 78.7% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No BMI tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.2% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Sync Fit

  • Highly affordable with no monthly subscription fees for data access
  • Sleek and comfortable design suitable for daily wear
  • Reliable real-time heart rate monitoring and sleep tracking features
  • Encourages accountability and motivation through step counting and goal setting
  • Useful smart features including call/message notifications and music control
  • Lightweight and functional companion app for workout organization

What customers don't like about Sync Fit

  • Syncing issues reported between watch and phone interfaces, sometimes requiring manual refreshes
  • Occasional app stability issues such as force closing during workouts
  • Interface quirks, such as the potential to accidentally change reps or weights in the app
  • Limited advanced features compared to high-end premium trackers
  • Does not typically include built-in GPS, often requiring a tethered connection to a phone for route tracking

Verdict

The Sync Wrist is a lightweight smart fitness tracker featuring an aluminum-finish plastic body and a 20-day battery life. It monitors 11 vital health metrics, including heart rate, steps, sleep cycles, and blood-pressure trends, and includes an IP67 waterproof rating for protection during swimming or intense workouts. The device integrates an intuitive interface with smart notifications for both Android 5.0+ and iOS 9.0+ devices. Main pros include its impressive battery longevity, durable yet comfortable design, and affordable pricing with no required monthly subscription fees. However, notable cons include a digital display that is not touch-sensitive, a lack of built-in GPS and altimeter, and occasional lag when using the 'raise to wake' feature.

Compare Sync Fit with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sync Fit and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found