OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,023 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Axisflying Cineon C35 Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350Max flight time:10 minVideo resolution:4KMax transmission distance:13 km

Axisflying Cineon C35 Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 3 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

85%

5.9

Technical score

15%

7.7

Review score ( 0 · 3)

Review score 15% · 7.7 · based on 3 videos
3 videos count as 1.5 of the 4 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 15%, technical score 85%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 57% of drones
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

26%

4.5

Flight

24%

6.2

Camera

20%

5.2

Safety

16%

7.5

Connectivity

14%

7.0

Battery & Design

â–¼Worse than 55% of drones
7.7

Review score

Review score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Grades by review (3)
3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 2

12.5%

9.5

Culture FPV

12.5%

8.0

HELIPIX

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 63% of drones
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £350

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Axisflying Cineon C35

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components:

26%

4.5

Flight

24%

6.2

Camera

20%

5.2

Safety

16%

7.5

Connectivity

14%

7.0

Battery & Design

5.9
Review score
Review score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Grades by review (3)
3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 2

12.5%

9.5

Culture FPV

12.5%

8.0

HELIPIX

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Axisflying Cineon C35 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 74.3% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

8.7

Price

6.9
Max flight time
10 min
Max flight time
10 min
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 10 min, shorter than 81% of drones and equal to 6% of drones.
Max flight distance
1 km
Max flight distance
1 km
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 1 km, farther than 45.9% of drones and equal to 5% of drones.
Limited by the controller range.
Max flight speed
28 m/s
Max flight speed
28 m/s
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone has a max flight speed of 28 m/s, faster than 100% of drones.
Value reflects maximum mode speed (for example Sport/Manual mode).
Max wind resistance
6 m/s
Max wind resistance
6 m/s
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 6 m/s, lower than 79.9% of drones.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Video resolution
4K
Video resolution
4K
â–² Better than 46% of models
This drone records video at 4K, higher than 45.5% of drones and equal to 10.4% of drones.
4K camera
?
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
no
Return to Home (RTH)
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone does not support Return-to-Home (RTH). 67.5% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 35% of models
This drone supports GPS. 35.3% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
GNSS systems supported
GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
â–² Better than 82% of models
This drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou GNSS systems, which are more comprehensive than those of 82.4% and the same as those of 17.6%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
Max transmission distance
13 km
Max transmission distance
13 km
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 13 km, farther than 87.2% of drones and equal to 1.5% of drones.
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
O4
Video transmission system
O4
★ Better than 92% of models
This drone uses O4 for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 92.3% and the same as that used by 6.7%.
Live view quality
1080p@100 fps
Live view quality
1080p@100 fps
★ Better than 93% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 1080p@100 fps, higher-quality than 93.2% of drones and equal to 2.6% of drones.
Remote control
no
Remote control
no
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This drone does not have a handheld remote controller. 95.5% of drones offer this.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,200 mAh
Battery capacity
2,200 mAh
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 2,200 mAh, larger than 49.7% of drones and equal to 4.2% of drones.
Battery not included; typically uses 1,050-2,200 mAh
Battery energy
23.31 Wh
Battery energy
23.31 Wh
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
This drone has battery energy of 23.31 Wh, higher than 65.9% of drones and equal to 0.6% of drones.
Charging time
?
Weight
385 g
Weight
385 g
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 385 g, heavier than 67.5% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

Axisflying Cineon C35 vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • 13 m/s faster flight speed
    Max flight speed
    28 m/s
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a higher max flight speed than the average drone (28 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    Value reflects maximum mode speed (for example Sport/Manual mode).
    28 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • 12 km longer transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    13 km
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a longer max transmission distance than the average drone (13 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    13 km vs 1 km
  • More frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    900 MHz, 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This drone supports 900 MHz, 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    900 MHz, 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • Better live view quality
    Live view quality
    1080p@100 fps
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This drone has better live view quality than the average drone (1080p@100 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    1080p@100 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • Includes propeller guards
    Propeller guards
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This drone has propeller guards, while the average drone does not. 33.3% of drones offer them.
  • FPV camera
    FPV camera
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This drone has an FPV camera, while the average drone does not.
    Built around a dedicated FPV flight camera system.
  • 35.5 mm lower body height
    Height
    27 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is shorter than the average drone (27 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    27 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • More capable transmission system
    Video transmission system
    O4
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This drone uses O4 for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    O4 vs SkyLink 2.0
  • 13 m/s faster flight speed
    Max flight speed
    28 m/s
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a higher max flight speed than the average drone (28 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    Value reflects maximum mode speed (for example Sport/Manual mode).
    28 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • FPV camera
    FPV camera
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This drone has an FPV camera, while the average drone does not.
    Built around a dedicated FPV flight camera system.
  • Includes propeller guards
    Propeller guards
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This drone has propeller guards, while the average drone does not. 33.3% of drones offer them.
  • 3.21x lower takeoff weight
    Max takeoff weight
    800 g
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >1.1k g
    This drone has a lower max takeoff weight than the average drone (800 g vs 249 g). The average drone has a max takeoff weight of 249 g.
    800 g vs 249 g
  • 12 km longer transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    13 km
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a longer max transmission distance than the average drone (13 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    13 km vs 1 km
  • More frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    900 MHz, 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This drone supports 900 MHz, 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    900 MHz, 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • Better live view quality
    Live view quality
    1080p@100 fps
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This drone has better live view quality than the average drone (1080p@100 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    1080p@100 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • More capable transmission system
    Video transmission system
    O4
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This drone uses O4 for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    O4 vs SkyLink 2.0
  • 35.5 mm lower body height
    Height
    27 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is shorter than the average drone (27 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    27 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • 61 mm narrower width
    Width
    180 mm
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is narrower than the average drone (180 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    180 mm vs 241 mm
  • 6.13 Wh more battery energy
    Battery energy
    23.31 Wh
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
    This drone has higher battery energy than the average drone (23.3 Wh vs 17.18 Wh). The average drone battery has 17.18 Wh of energy.
    23.31 Wh vs 17.18 Wh
  • 4.7 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    6 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (6 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    6 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    4K
    â–² Better than 46% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (4K vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    4K vs 4K/100 fps
  • 10 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    10 min
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (10 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    10 min vs 20 min
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No POI mode
    POI mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone does not support POI mode, while the average drone does.
  • 4 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (0 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    0 vs 4
  • No handheld remote
    Remote control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drone does not have a handheld remote controller, while the average drone does. 95.1% of drones offer one.
  • 6.47x less popular
    Axisflying Cineon C35 is less popular than the average drone (1 vs 6.5).
    1 vs 6.47
  • 75% more expensive
    Axisflying Cineon C35 is more expensive than the average drone (£350 vs £200).
    £350 vs £200
  • 4.7 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    6 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (6 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    6 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • 10 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    10 min
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (10 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    10 min vs 20 min
  • Non-foldable design
    Foldable design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not have a foldable design, while the average drone does.
  • 1 years older release date
    Release date
    2022
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is older than the average drone (2022 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    September 2022
    2022 vs 2023
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    4K
    â–² Better than 46% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (4K vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    4K vs 4K/100 fps
  • Fewer color profile options
    Color profiles
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none color profiles, while the average drone supports Normal.
    none vs Normal
  • 3 x lower digital zoom
    Digital zoom
    0 x
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >16 x
    This drone offers less digital zoom than the average drone (0 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
    0 x vs 3 x
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No POI mode
    POI mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone does not support POI mode, while the average drone does.
  • 4 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (0 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    0 vs 4
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This drone does not have a compass, while the average drone does.
  • No headless mode
    Headless mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support headless mode, while the average drone does.
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • No altitude hold
    Altitude hold
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drone does not support altitude hold, while the average drone does.
  • No handheld remote
    Remote control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drone does not have a handheld remote controller, while the average drone does. 95.1% of drones offer one.
  • Basic companion app
    Companion app
    None
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This drone uses the None companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    None vs HS FPV
  • No wireless file transfer
    Wireless file transfer
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This drone does not support wireless file transfer, while the average drone does.
  • 56.5% higher weight
    Weight
    385 g
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is heavier than the average drone (385 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    385 g vs 246 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
HELIPIX
≈ estimated
17/06/2023
Hands-on review · tuning and flight behaviour with GoPro
Verdict
Axisflying Cineon C35 gives stable, clean footage and precise control once tuned, though whoops generally need settings work.
9.5
Culture FPV
≈ estimated
02/11/2022
Hands-on review · flight feel, precision and battery test
Verdict
Axisflying Cineon C35 is the favourite of three 3.5-inch cinewhoops tested, with smooth, precise control and good throttle response.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Overview video

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 3

Reviewers agree it handles beautifully, with smooth, precise control and no recurring complaints so far.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

What we like about Axisflying Cineon C35

  • Stable flight performance with a 'tank-like' robust build quality
  • Innovative quick-release prop guard design for easy maintenance
  • Capable of carrying full-size action cameras and large 6S batteries
  • Minimal 'jello' effect in footage thanks to shock-absorbing gimbal
  • Good wind resistance and relatively low noise for a cinewhoop
  • Standard features include a GPS and a buzzer for recovery

What we don't like about Axisflying Cineon C35

  • Heavy weight (approx. 335g-400g) which can lead to sluggish flight and reduced agility
  • Lack of direct physical access to the DJI O3 SD card slot, requiring USB-C cables for transfers
  • Flight times are significantly reduced (around 4-6 minutes) when carrying heavy payloads
  • Inconsistent OSD functionality and messy default HUD layouts reported by some users
  • Occasional quality control issues like reversed motor directions or unexpected flips upon takeoff

Verdict

The Axisflying Cineon C35 is a 3.5-inch cinewhoop designed for cinematic indoor and outdoor FPV filming, built on a 152mm wheelbase T700 carbon fiber frame with 3.5mm thick plates. It features high-torque C206 1960KV (6S) or 3500KV (4S) motors, a 40A F722 AIO flight controller, and an innovative quick-release guard system that allows for maintenance in under a minute. Key advantages include a triangular shock-absorbing gimbal that significantly reduces jello in footage, a ducted aerodynamic layout for low-noise operation, and a standard-issue beeper for easier retrieval. However, its primary drawbacks are its relatively high weight (approx. 310g-400g without battery), which can lead to sluggish flight characteristics and limited agility compared to lighter competitors, and the lack of direct physical access to the SD card slot on some digital VTX units.

Compare Axisflying Cineon C35 with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Axisflying Cineon C35 and other drones

No results found