OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Intel Core i7-8086K review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£350PassMark multi-core score:14057N. of physical cores:6CPU boost clock speed:5.0 GHzCPU socket:LGA1151TDP (Thermal design power):95 W

Intel Core i7-8086K Review: Compare 74 technical specifications and 26 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

Intel Core i7-8086K

6.6/10

▼Worse than 53% of processors

7.2

▼Worse than 60%

5.8

▲Better than 51%

5.8

▼Worse than 70%

?

Not in any best-of list yet

5.2
Gaming
Gaming
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
5.3
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
5.2
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
8.1
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.1
L3 cache
8.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
5.0
Video editing
Video editing
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
5.9
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
20.0%
6.6
CPU threads
15.0%
2.1
L3 cache

Where to buy

Check price

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the Intel Core i7-8086K

Based on 10 · 7

Reviewers enjoy its overclocking, high turbo speeds and collector appeal, but it runs hot and overall performance feels unremarkable.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Intel Core i7-8086K

Based on 68 owners sharing their experience in online comments

79%positive8%mixed13%negative

Owners praise its strong overclocking and gaming speed, while the price premium and heat are the main frustrations.

What owners like

Many owners run 5.0–5.3 GHz all-core at about 1.27–1.35V, with delidding and liquid metal helping, though some chips need more voltage.35
Runs most games at 60+ fps on high to ultra settings; delidding and 5.2 GHz raised some games' 1% lows about 30 fps.11
Delidding with liquid metal or better paste keeps load temps around 48–73 C at 5.1–5.3 GHz on a basic AIO or air cooler.6
Several owners bought it for about the same price as an 8700K, sometimes less, so the extra cost felt small.6
Owners report years of reliable use, still handling most games and Windows 11 in 2024, with some running 5 GHz for about eight years.6
Stock all-core speed is about 4.3 GHz versus about 4.1 GHz on the 8700K, and it generally overclocks higher and runs cooler.4
Owners use it for editing and DAW music work, with Cinebench R20 around 4,300 at 5.3 GHz reported.4
Comes in a commemorative box with certificate and Intel swag, and owners keep it as a collectible; stock sold out fast at launch.4
Many owners got chips that hit 5.2–5.3 GHz at about 1.28V, though binning varies, and some bought through Silicon Lottery.4

What owners dislike

It often costs noticeably more than an 8700K, and some buyers found benchmarks came in lower, so the premium felt wasted.5
Stock thermal paste runs hot, peaking near 94 C without delidding, so owners often delid and use better paste or liquid metal.5
Memory overclocks often stall around 3200–3800 MHz, even with QVL-listed kits and XMP profiles.3
Some chips fail LINX AVX stress tests even at 4.9 GHz, and VRMs can throttle during long runs at 5.3 GHz and high voltage.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i7-8086K

6.6

Show more

Hide

Platform

7.6

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

Performance

6.2

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

4.9

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

5.6

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated graphics

6.7

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

Power & Thermal

5.0

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

Tau (power duration limit)

?

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

Intel Core i7-8086K vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core i7-8086K better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

13.6% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.0 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
2 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
6 vs 4
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x4 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
6x4.0 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
4 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
33.7% higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (6,966 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
6,966 vs 5,209
26.4% higher sentiment score
9.1 vs 7.2

26.4% higher sentiment score
9.1 vs 7.2

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA1151 vs FP5).
LGA1151 vs FP5

13.6% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.0 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
2 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
6 vs 4
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x4 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
6x4.0 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
4 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
33.7% higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (6,966 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
6,966 vs 5,209
22.6% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (14,057 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
14,057 vs 11,469
10.1% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,816 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
2,816 vs 2,558
11.9% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,717 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,717 vs 1,535
12 higher clock multiplier
This processor has a higher clock multiplier than the average processor (40 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
40 vs 28

8.1% more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
15.8% smaller die size
This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (149 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
149 mm² vs 177 mm²
More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Coffee Lake vs Kaby Lake).
Coffee Lake vs Kaby Lake

Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.

Why is Intel Core i7-8086K worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.11x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W
Narrower instruction support
This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
MMX, SSE, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
2.03x higher boost power
This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (130 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
130 W vs 64 W
13.4% lower review score
Reviews score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
5.8
Mark 7.4 is below the typical mark 7.6 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score
80%
6.9
Average grade
20%
9.4
Popularity
Grades by review (26)
19 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 11 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
5.8 vs 6.7
16.7% larger process node
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
14 nm vs 12 nm
50% less L2 per core
This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
2.11x higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W

13.4% lower review score
Reviews score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
5.8
Mark 7.4 is below the typical mark 7.6 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score
80%
6.9
Average grade
20%
9.4
Popularity
Grades by review (26)
19 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 11 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
5.8 vs 6.7
40% more expensive
Intel Core i7-8086K is more expensive than the average processor (£350 vs £250).
£350 vs £250

Narrower instruction support
This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
MMX, SSE, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
More limited crypto acceleration
This processor offers more limited crypto acceleration than the average processor (AES vs AES, SHA).
AES vs AES, SHA
2 years older release date
This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2018 vs 2020).
June 2018
2018 vs 2020

16.7% larger process node
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
14 nm vs 12 nm
50% less L2 per core
This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
50% smaller L2 cache
This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (1.5 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
1.5 MB vs 3 MB
39.4% fewer transistors
This processor has fewer transistors than the average processor (3 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
3 billion vs 4.95 billion

16.7% lower memory speed
This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2,666 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
2,666 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
11.3% lower memory bandwidth
This processor has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (41.6 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.
41.6 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s
Lower JEDEC memory speed
This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2666 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR4-2,666 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz

Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), VP8 (HW decode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
H.264 (HW decode/encode), VP8 (HW decode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)

No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.11x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W
2.03x higher boost power
This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (130 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
130 W vs 64 W
2.11x higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0

RandomGaminginHD

≈ estimated

25/08/2026

Hands-on review · gaming benchmarks versus a newer six-core CPU

Verdict

Intel Core i7-8086K is a fun collectible with overclocking potential, but a poor choice for serious gaming builds today.

8.0

Gamers Nexus

≈ estimated

13/07/2018

Overclocking stream recap · frequencies, voltages and memory tests

Verdict

Intel Core i7-8086K reaches a strong core overclock of 5.35 GHz, but its memory controller holds back further gains.

3.0

BPS Customs

≈ estimated

18/06/2018

Hands-on review · benchmarks and overclocking tests

Verdict

Intel Core i7-8086K matches the 8700K at stock speeds, its overclock is unstable, and it isn't worth the extra cost.

7.0

Jezy

≈ estimated

08/03/2020

Hands-on review · gaming tests and value comparison

Verdict

Intel Core i7-8086K is a good chip if you can afford it, but the Ryzen 1700X is better value.

Overview video

Overview video

Not graded

Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0

techradar.com

✓ explicit

20/07/2018

Intel Core i7-8086K review

Review · Overclocking CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K performs like the Core i7-8700K out of the box, but its strong overclocking suits enthusiasts who push chips hard.

7.0

hexus.net

≈ estimated

13/06/2018

Review: Intel Core i7-8086K (14nm) - CPU

Benchmark test · Limited edition CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K holds high overclocks well, but its main difference from the Core i7-8700K is a 5.0GHz single-core speed.

8.0

overclockers.com

≈ estimated

27/07/2018

Intel Core i7-8086K 40th Anniversary CPU Review

Lab test · Overclocking and power

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is a limited anniversary chip that runs slightly faster than the 8700K and overclocks well, but it draws more power and runs hotter.

7.0

pcmag.com

✓ explicit

02/10/2018

Intel Core i7-8086K Limited Edition Review

Review · Limited edition chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is slightly faster than the 8700K and overclocks well, but mainly suits enthusiasts who are willing to tune it and have a strong liquid cooler.

8.0

hothardware.com

✓ explicit

11/07/2018

Core i7-8086K 40th Anniversary CPU Review: Intel X86 Hits 5GHz

Review · Anniversary CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K looks just like the Core i7-8700K, and its single-core turbo is the main thing that should make it faster.

6.0

lanoc.org

≈ estimated

24/08/2018

Intel i7-8086K - LanOC Reviews

Benchmark review · Single-core speed

Verdict

The Intel i7-8086K pulls ahead in single-core tasks, while in multi-core and encoding tests it stays within a few points of the 8700K.

6.0

digit.in

≈ estimated

01/08/2023

Intel Core i7-8086K Review : Joining the 50K exclusive club

Review · Overclocking focus

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K suits overclockers and collectors, while the Ryzen 7 2700X remains the better CPU overall.

forbes.com

06/07/2018

Intel Core i7-8086K Limited Edition Review: Should You Buy Its First 5GHz Processor? Would you like to see a comparison table of the benchmark results...

Not graded yet

Read full review →

9.1

hardwareinside.de

✓ explicit

25/12/2018

INTEL CORE i7-8086K – Der Jubiläums Prozessor im Test

Review · Overclocking and power draw

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is a slightly faster Core i7 with overclocking headroom and efficient power draw, suiting enthusiasts who want a collector's piece.

4.0

hardwareluxx.de

≈ estimated

09/08/2018

Intel Core i7-8086K im Test

Lab test · Stock versus overclock

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is essentially a lightly revised 8700K, with gains only in single-thread work and no advantage in games, so it is mainly a collector's piece.

8.8

profesionalreview.com

✓ explicit

11/08/2018

Intel Core i7-8086K Review (Full Analysis)

Review · Benchmarks and overclocking

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is mostly an 8700K with higher clocks, so the gain over it is barely noticeable.

7.6

hardzone.es

✓ explicit

04/09/2018

Análisis: Intel Core i7 8086K

Review · CPU-Z and overclock tests

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is practically an 8700K, but its higher single-core speed and 5.2 GHz overclock make it a chip for enthusiasts and collectors.

8.0

geeknetic.es

✓ explicit

06/08/2018

Review Intel Core i7-8086K [Análisis Completo en Español]

Review · Overclocking and history

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is a strong overclocker that reaches 5.1 GHz and suits enthusiasts, though its six cores still trail AMD's eight-core chips in multi-core work.

6.0

tomshw.it

≈ estimated

28/06/2018

Intel Core i7-8086K Review: The Limited Edition CPU

Review · Limited edition CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K appeals to collectors and gamers who want speed, and it overclocks well, but it is only a small step up from the Core i7-8700K.

8.0

hwready.it

≈ estimated

15/09/2018

Intel Core i7-8086K Limited Edition: The first 5GHz Turbo CPU – Review

Lab test · Overclocking

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is essentially an 8700K with a 5 GHz single-core turbo, so it mainly appeals to collectors and overclockers.

7.0

hardware.info

≈ estimated

13/06/2018

Intel Core i7-8086K review: the best gaming CPU, but not the best value

Benchmark test · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is the best gaming processor tested, but its speed edge over the Core i7-8700K is slim enough that the 8700K makes more sense.

5.0

tweakers.net

≈ estimated

26/06/2018

Intel's Core i7-8086K tested - Review - Tweakers

Lab test · Anniversary chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is a 5GHz anniversary chip that beats the 8700K only in single-threaded work and medium-setting games, with near-identical results in most other tests.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Core i7-8086K

Highest-quality binned Coffee Lake silicon with better stability at high frequencies
First consumer processor to reach 5.0 GHz single-core turbo boost out of the box
Excellent overclocking headroom, often reaching 5.1-5.3 GHz with adequate cooling
Top-tier single-threaded performance for gaming and productivity applications
Limited edition collector's appeal, celebrating the 40th anniversary of the x86 architecture
Strong gaming performance, remaining one of the fastest chips for its generation

What customers don't like about Intel Core i7-8086K

Premium pricing for performance that is nearly identical to the cheaper i7-8700K at stock settings
Does not include a stock cooling fan, requiring a high-end heatsink or liquid cooler
Significant power consumption and high operating temperatures when overclocked
Minimal real-world gains in multi-threaded tasks compared to standard 8th Gen flagships
Strictly limited production run of 50,000 units makes it difficult to find at MSRP
Outperformed in multi-core workloads by contemporary Ryzen competitors with higher core counts

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-8086K is a limited-edition 8th Generation processor released in 2018 to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the x86 architecture. Built on the 14nm++ Coffee Lake architecture, it features 6 cores, 12 threads, and a 12MB Smart Cache, operating with a 95W TDP on the LGA 1151v2 socket. Its main characteristics include being the first mainstream Intel CPU to reach a 5.0 GHz single-core Turbo frequency out of the box, paired with a 4.0 GHz base clock. The primary pros are its status as a highly binned version of the i7-8700K, which offers superior overclocking headroom for enthusiasts and industry-leading single-threaded performance for gaming and Adobe-style applications at its launch. However, its main cons include a significant price premium for marginal performance gains over the standard i7-8700K and the absence of a bundled thermal solution, necessitating high-end aftermarket cooling to manage temperatures during heavy workloads.

Best alternatives

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Processors

Intel Core i7-14700K

Processors

Intel Core i9-14900KF

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Processors

Intel Core i7-14700

Processors

Intel Core i9-12900KS

Processors

Intel Core i7-13700T

Processors

Intel Core i7-13700K

Processors

Intel Core i7-13700

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Intel Core i7-8086K with other processors

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i7-8086K and other processors

No results found